Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2007 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-2007 to 00-00-2007 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Air & Space Power Journal. Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2007 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Air and Space Power Journal,155 N. Twining St,Maxwell REPORT NUMBER AFB,AL,36112-6026 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 131 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 Spring 2007 Volume XXI, No. 1 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspectives Flying and Fighting in Cyberspace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Hon . Michael W . Wynne, Secretary of the Air Force Effects-Based Operations: A Command Philosophy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Lt Gen Robert J . Elder Jr ., USAF Lean Uniforms: Cutting the “Waste” Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Lt Gen Terry L . Gabreski, USAF Maj Gen Loren M . Reno, USAF Brig Gen Robert R . Allardice, USAF Focus Area Dominant Air, Space, and Cyberspace Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Lt Col Paul D . Berg, USAF, Chief, Professional Journals Features Building a Second-Half Team: Securing Cultural Expertise for the Battlespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Capt Scott E . McIntosh, USAF An Untapped Resource for Stabilization and Reconstruction: The United States Air Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Maj William Fischer, USAF Transforming American Airlift: Effects-Based Mobility, the C-17, and Global Maneuver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Maj Ravi I . Chaudhary, USAF Departments Prelaunch Notes Celebrating 60 Years of Excellence as a Professional Journal and Introducing the Latest Chronicles Online Journal Article . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Ricochets and Replies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 The Merge Strategic Imperative: The Necessity for Values Operations as Opposed to Information Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 COL William M . Darley, USA The Long and Winding Road to Operationally Responsive Spacelift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Lt Col Stephen K . Remillard, USAF Potential Air Force Shortfalls in Implementing the Defense Language Transformation Roadmap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Col Stephen Schwalbe, PhD, USAF 2007-1 contents.indd 1 1/26/07 8:36:06 AM PIREPs Cyberspace: The New Air and Space? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Lt Col David A . Umphress, USAFR Joint Close Air Support Transformed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Lt Col Richard Bohn, USAF NOTAMs New USAF Doctrine Publication: Air Force Doctrine Document 2-10, Homeland Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Col John L . Conway III, USAF, Retired Revised USAF Doctrine Publication: Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1.7, Airspace Control in the Combat Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Lt Col Alexander M . Wathen, USAF, Retired Back to the Future: USAF Special Operations School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Col John D . Jogerst, USAF Vignette The Doolittle Raid: A 65-Year Retrospective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Dr . Robert B . Kane, Lieutenant Colonel, USAF, Retired Review Essay Service before Self or Self-Service? Some Fodder for Your Reading on the Professional Ethics of Air Warriors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Dr . David R . Mets Book Reviews Why Great Leaders Don’t Take Yes for an Answer: Managing for Conflict and Consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Michael A . Roberto Reviewer: Brig Gen Duane Deal, USAF, Retired Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Larry Bossidy and Ram Charan Reviewer: Lt Col Mark A . Baird, USAF Doolittle: Aerospace Visionary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 Dik Alan Daso Reviewer: Dr . Robert B . Kane, Lieutenant Colonel, USAF, Retired American Women and Flight since 1940 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Deborah G . Douglas Reviewer: Dr . David R . Mets The Leadership Quotient: 12 Dimensions for Measuring and Improving Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Bill Service and Dave Arnott Reviewer: Dr . Richard I . Lester Hitler’s African Victims: The German Army Massacres of Black French Soldiers in 1940 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 Raffael Scheck Reviewer: Lt Col Robert F . Tate, USAFR Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Michael R . Gordon and Bernard E . Trainor Reviewer: Capt Brian D . Laslie, USAF 2007-1 contents.indd 2 1/26/07 8:36:06 AM The Last Flight of Bomber 31: Harrowing Tales of American and Japanese Pilots Who Fought in World War II’s Arctic Air Campaign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Ralph Wetterhahn Reviewer: Capt Gilles Van Nederveen, USAF, Retired Ensayos sobre las Fuerzas Armadas de America Latina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Russell W . Ramsey Reviewer: Lt Col Paul D . Berg, USAF Y: The Sources of Islamic Revolutionary Conduct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 Stephen P . Lambert Reviewer: Col Mike Davis, USAF Terrorist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 John Updike Reviewer: Maj Roger Burdette, USAF Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Robert A . Pape Reviewer: Capt Jason Belcher, USAF Fighting for Rights: Military Service and the Politics of Citizenship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Ronald R . Krebs Reviewer: Richard Bailey, PhD We Were One: Shoulder to Shoulder with the Marines Who Took Fallujah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 Patrick K . O’Donnell Reviewer: Dr . David A . Anderson, Lieutenant Colonel, USMC, Retired Strikes: 323rd Bomb Group in World War II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 Ross E . Harlan Reviewer: Lt Col Lawrence M . Gatti, USAF Mission Debrief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 2007-1 contents.indd 3 1/26/07 8:36:06 AM Air and Space Power Journal Board of Reviewers Prof. Tami Davis Biddle Dr. Tom Keaney US Army War College School of Advanced International Studies Dr. Kendall K. Brown Johns Hopkins University NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Col Merrick E. Krause Brig Gen Phillip D. Caine, USAF, Retired Director, National Defense University Press Monument, Colorado Editor, Joint Force Quarterly Col Steven D. Carey Col Chris J. Krisinger, USAF USAF College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research The Pentagon and Education Dr. Benjamin S. Lambeth Dr. Clayton K. S. Chun RAND US Army War College Lt Col David MacIsaac, USAF, Retired Dr. Mark Clodfelter Montgomery, Alabama National War College Dr. Karl P. Magyar Dr. Conrad Crane Montgomery, Alabama Director, US Army Military Studies Institute Col Edward Mann, USAF, Retired Dr. Dik A. Daso Colorado Springs, Colorado National Air and Space Museum Mr. Brent Marley Smithsonian Institution USAF Air War College Col Michael D. Davis Col Phillip Meilinger, USAF, Retired USAF College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research Chicago, Illinois and Education Dr. Daniel Mortensen Dr. William L. Dowdy USAF College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research Alabama State University and Education Col Dennis M. Drew, USAF, Retired Dr. Richard R. Muller USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Dr. Stephen Fought Dr. Bruce T. Murphy USAF Air War College Air University Col Richard L. Fullerton Col Robert Owen, USAF, Retired USAF Academy Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Col Thomas E. Griffith Jr., USAF Col Bob Potter, USAF, Retired National War College USAF Public Affairs Center of Excellence Col W. Michael Guillot, USAF US Embassy, Paris, France Col Michael A. Stanley USAF Air War College Dr. John F. Guilmartin Jr. Ohio State University Col Richard Szafranski, USAF, Retired Toffler Associates Dr. Grant T. Hammond Center for Strategy and Technology Lt Col Edward B. Tomme, PhD, USAF, Retired Air University Sci-Ops Consulting Dr. Thomas Hughes Dr. Christopher H. Toner USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies USAF Air Command and Staff College Lt Col J. P. Hunerwadel, USAF, Retired Lt Col David A. Umphress, PhD, USAFR, Retired USAF Doctrine Center Auburn University Col Mark P. Jelonek, USAF Col Mark Wells, USAF The Pentagon USAF Academy Col John Jogerst, USAF Dr. Kenneth P. Werrell Commandant, Air Force Special Operations School Christiansburg, Virginia Mr. Charles Tustin Kamps Dr. Harold R. Winton USAF Air Command and Staff College USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Board of Reviewers.indd 4 1/26/07 8:42:50 AM APJ Flying and Fighting in Cyberspace Hon. MicHael W. Wynne, Secretary of tHe air force Every minute of every day, Airmen in the United States Air Force are flying and fighting in cyberspace . SLP-Wynne.indd 5 1/26/07 8:43:29 AM AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL SPRING 2007 recently, the chief of staff of the Air force and i took steps to focus and accelerate Air force efforts in cyberspace: updating the ser vice’s mission statement, standing up a Cyber space task force, and tasking major com mands to develop potential organizational options up to and including an additional major command. the Air force is particu larly dependent upon cyberspace and well postured for the cyber battle. without domi nance in cyberspace, operations in the air and space domains as well as those on land and at sea remain at risk. the crux of the Air force’s effort calls for combining the dispa rate though effective efforts of thousands of Airmen who already contribute to cyberspace operations into an organization that can de liver global effects, provide stewardship to current cyberspace capability, and develop new systems and approaches to deliver the sovereign options requested. Cyberspace Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne Just as water molecules and principles of Consider the following hydrodynamics define the sea domain and just as air molecules and principles of aerodynamics scenarios: define the air domain, so do the electromagnetic • right now a terrorist lies on his belly in a spectrum (eMs) and associated electronics dusty ditch. he holds a radio transmitter and energy propagation define cyberspace. this that will detonate an improvised explo includes all signals that flow through the sive device and kill Americans as they con eMs—those from cell phones, the internet, voy across a stretch of broken asphalt. Air and remote-detonation devices. if it emits, men in a secure facility just east of the transmits, or reflects, it uses cyberspace. front range of the Colorado rockies input in september 200, the Joint Chiefs of staff commands to global positioning system endorsed a definition of cyberspace as “a do (gPs) satellites to enable an f-1 to en main characterized by the use of electronics gage the terrorist with precision-guided and the electromagnetic spectrum to store, munitions. modify and exchange data via networked sys tems and associated physical infrastructures.”1 • right now a finance technician, sipping the key point in the definition—the idea that coffee in an internet cafe, is moving Us cyberspace includes the totality of the eMs— dollars via a laptop computer to support enables a more holistic approach to the cyber terrorist operations. Airmen in a network space fight. for instance, efforts against an operations center remotely reconfigure enemy’s integrated Air defense system could Air force computer systems worldwide to include offensive and defensive as well as ki mitigate the internet computer attack. netic and nonkinetic effects against the signals Every minute of every day, Airmen in the United (radar and communications), nodes, and net States Air Force are flying and fighting in cyberspace. worked systems of the entire system—not just SLP-Wynne.indd 6 1/26/07 8:43:30 AM FLYING AND FIGHTING IN CYBERSPACE the communications or data-storage aspects. berspace superiority permits effective opera the Air force is the nation’s premier multi tions on land, at sea, and in air and space. we dimensional maneuver force whose strategy must be prepared to defeat our enemies by us and tactics consider agility, reach, speed, ing combined arms—air, ground, sea, space, stealth, payload, precision, and persistence to and cyber weapons systems. our nation de deliver global effects at the speed of sound pends on it. and, with cyberspace capability, at the speed A great deal of our combat capability oper of light. this definition means that cyberspace ates in cyberspace: command and control encompasses but is larger than the internet (C2) systems as well as the intelligence, sur because it also includes capabilities such as di veillance, and reconnaissance platforms that rected energy, which exists in a part of the ensure battlefield awareness stand as just two eMs that lies outside the interconnected, examples of critical systems operating in cyber computer-based, global-information grid. space—and associatively at risk. we cannot al theAirforcecurrentlydominatesthespace low our adversaries, enticed by the low entry domain to the extent that it even monitors cost and high payoff of gaining an advantage and tracks thousands of pieces of space “junk.” in cyberspace, to operate freely there. the Although foreign and commercial payloads pervasive nature of pro-jihad web sites repre exist in space, the Air force unquestionably sents a tangible and highly visible example of gives the United states the ability to project how our adversaries use elements of cyber power through this domain. space against us. furthermore, the Air force provides supe riority in the air domain in the place and du Air Force Efforts ration of its choosing. true, various nations claim sovereignty of airspace in close proximity in Cyberspace to and over their territorial possessions, but these boundaries are likely unenforceable in the Air force has a long history of fighting the face of deliberate Air force actions. our in cyberspace. As operations in the eMs gained service currently has the capability to deny use in importance, a range of cyberspace war fight of even foreign-national airspace for any speci ing emerged, from jamming radio frequencies, fied time and place. to radio electronic combat (a russian deriva Cyberspace demands an effort comparable tive for electronic warfare), to C2 warfare, to to the Air force’s global, strategic omnipres research in directed energy, to information- ence in air and space, but today the service operations capabilities (including computer can offer only limited options in that domain. attack and defense), and so forth. Although Adversaries, be they nation-states or terrorists, all of the services invest substantially in cyber can effectively maneuver within cyberspace space capabilities, the Air force provides the and therefore can find opportunities to ex preponderance of assets for the cyber battle. ploit it. they can communicate globally with Unfortunately, a lack of focus of cyberspace their agents, spread propaganda and solicit forces within the Air force enterprise has hin support worldwide, attack opponents’ cyber dered the service’s presentation of these assets space presence (crashing servers and defacing to the joint war-fighting effort. whereas the web sites), and even conduct tactical opera land and sea services have straightforward tions that have kinetic effects, such as jam command relationships with their cyberspace ming gPs frequencies or detonating impro vised explosive devices via remotely controlled All aspects of air war will have radio frequencies. our nation’s neural network resides in cyber some equivalent role in cyber space. As a highly technologically developed war. nation and group of armed forces, we cannot afford to risk compromise of that network. Cy SLP-Wynne.indd 7 1/26/07 8:43:31 AM