ebook img

Disasters and Neoliberalism: Different Expressions of Social Vulnerability PDF

320 Pages·2020·7.522 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Disasters and Neoliberalism: Different Expressions of Social Vulnerability

Gabriela Vera-Cortés Jesús Manuel Macías-Medrano   Editors Disasters and Neoliberalism Different Expressions of Social Vulnerability Disasters and Neoliberalism é Gabriela Vera-Cort s (cid:129) ú í Jes s Manuel Mac as-Medrano Editors Disasters and Neoliberalism Different Expressions of Social Vulnerability 123 Editors Gabriela Vera-Cortés Jesús Manuel Macías-Medrano Departamento deSociedady Cultura Departamento deCambio Sociocultural ElColegio dela FronteraSur(ECOSUR) CentrodeInvestigaciones y Estudios Villahermosa, Tabasco,Mexico SuperioresenAntropologíaSocial (CIESAS) Mexico City,Mexico ISBN978-3-030-54901-5 ISBN978-3-030-54902-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54902-2 ©TheEditor(s)(ifapplicable)andTheAuthor(s),underexclusivelicensetoSpringerNature SwitzerlandAG2020 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsaresolelyandexclusivelylicensedbythePublisher,whether thewholeorpartofthematerialisconcerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseof illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmissionorinformationstorageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilar ordissimilarmethodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfrom therelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained hereinorforanyerrorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.Thepublisherremainsneutralwithregard tojurisdictionalclaimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations. ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Foreword Rediscovering El Dorado: Latin American Contributions to Disaster Studies Iamgratefultotheeditors,theauthors,andthepublisherofthiscollectionofstudies. TheyaddsubstantiallytothegrowingliteratureinEnglishthatfocusesourattention onLatinAmericaasalaboratoryandpioneerofbothforcesthatcreatedisasterrisk and efforts to expose those forces and to institutionalize resistance to them. This collectionalsoadvancesthecauseofdecolonizingresearchintheAmericas(Gaillard 2019). Most of the studies in this volume are based on fieldwork and historical observation in Mexico (with side journeys into Brazil, Italy, and the USA). These detailed studies add to other similar collections such as the free, online volume, ReductionofVulnerabilitytoDisasters:fromknowledgetoaction(Marchezinietal. 2017)thatcombinesofferingsinPortuguese,Spanish,andEnglishthatexploresocial vulnerability to disaster in Brazil and several Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America.AlsoinEnglish,isVirginia1Garcia-Costa’seditedbook,TheAnthropology of Disasters in Latin America (Garcia-Acosta 2020). One can only hope that the richnessofLatinAmerica’slonghistoryofriskandvulnerabilitycreationaswellas resistancetothesemalignforcesaremadeaccessibleinEnglishandotherlanguages, from the hyper-local, such as mutual aid (autogestión) in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria and abandonment by the colonial US federal government (Garriga-López2019)tothenationalscalesuchcontributingtotheoverthrowofthe long-hegemonicrulingpartyinMexicoasaresultofitsmalfeasancefollowingthe earthquakethatdevastatedMexicoCityin1985(Apodaca2017;Riding2017). South and Central America are highly exposed to natural hazards because of their great diversity and range of climates, bioregions and topography, location onthe“rimoffire”(azoneofseismicandvolcanicactivity),andalsobeingaffected bylong-andshort-termcyclesofhighandlowrainfallduetoENSOPacificOcean temperature variation, as well as Caribbean hurricanes. Until recently, however, 1Availableforfreedownloadathttps://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/56269. v vi Foreword studies of the root causes of disaster, that is, their creation or genesis had been hampered by several conditions. Firstly,formanyyearstheviewthatdisasterswere“natural”prevailed(Maskrey 1993). Secondly, with independence from Spain and Portugal and the creation of national government institutions, disasters were generally assigned to the military whosemandatedidnotextendtopreventionbutwaslimitedtoimmediateresponse and (with the church) to relief. Thirdly, attention of the state and the emerging scientificestablishmentwaslimitedtolarge-scaledisastersandnottothenumerous small-scale landslides, floods and other “everyday” events that undermine liveli- hoodsandact with aratcheteffect toreinforce poverty(Lavell andMaskrey2014; Reyes Pondo and Lavell 2012; Wisner et al. 2004). This last-mentioned reflects long-standing racial and class dichotomies in the hemisphere that privileges the lives and concerns of urban, White, and mestizo citizens while rendering invisible rural, indigenous ones. One sees this beginning with the conquista, colonial administration and economies based on the extraction of mineral wealth and bio-based commodities such as rubber and sugar cane. The early distinction between indigenous people andslavesversus theurban elite was reinforced bythe distinctionbetweenlarge-scalelatifundialandholdingandthesmall-scale“peasant” minifundiafarms.Thisisnotmerelyalandtenuresystemthathasbroughtsomuch suffering due to civil wars but also a “model” of society at large (Galeano 1973). Laboratory and Pioneer Inthetwenty-firstcentury,viewsandapproachestodisasterinMexicoandtherest of Latin America have changed. Unrecognized by many in the field of disaster studiesandmorebroadlyinpolicyandpublicadministrationcircles,LatinAmerica has been a laboratory for a deadly driver of disaster risk creation in the form of neoliberalism, particularly focused on the economics of neo-extractivism (Svampa 2019). Although much of Latin America began to develop its own development path in the inter-war years and through the Second World War, these efforts were systematically undermined by a post-WWII global system dominated by the USA (Gunder-Frank 1966). AsthetwoeditorsofDisasterandNeoliberalism(DN)explain(p.7),widespread advancesbyanorganizedworkingclassinthe1960sledtoacounterstrategybythe capitalist class, using legislative and state power reinforced by policies by the post-warBrettonWoodsinstitutions,theWorldBank,regionaldevelopmentbanks and IMF, that had been put in place to stabilize and safeguard return on invested capital.Whattooktheplaceofliberal,democraticgovernmentsandasocialcontract thatprovidedasafetynetworkforworkerswereneoliberalregimeswhosefocuswas to create conditions for overseas investment by minimizing labor standards, envi- ronmental protection, andpublic spending (Harvey2007; Rénique 2005). Foreword vii The result in Latin America has been 50 years violent coups (Chile, Argentina, Brazil)andcivilwars(Colombia,Peru,allofCentralAmerica)aswellasdirectUS intervention (Panama, Grenada). Citing Therborn (2013), the editors of DN sum- marize the human cost of this historical development path (p. 10): “… premature death, fragile health, humiliation, subjugation, discrimination, exclusion from knowledge of the predominant social life, poverty, impotency, stress, lack of safety, anxiety, lack of self-confidence and self-love, and exclusion from opportunities, as well as the necessary resources to act and participate in the world” as well as “a reduction in life expectancy and inter-generational social mobility, along with a generally lower quality of life and capacity for survival.” Thus,LatinAmericawasalaboratoryforthecreationofneoliberalpoliciesthat werelaterimposedonAfricabytheBrettonWoodsinstitutionsandformercolonial governments (Wisner 1988). But Latin America was also a pioneer in developing anunderstandingofdisasteras“faileddevelopment”andpromotingoflocalefforts ofpeoplecollectivelytoprotectthemselvesfromtheriskscreatedbythedominant developmentpathway.TherehadbeenearlyvoicessuchasJosuedeCastro(1952), medical doctor and geographer, who wrote eloquently about how drought in northeast Brazil was turned into hunger and even famine by a long history of elite control over land and water. However, the creation of a new paradigm for under- standing disaster and development accelerated in the late 1980s (Anderson and Woodrow 1989; Cuny 1983; Maskrey 1989) and the early 1990s, especially with the publications of the network known as La Red (Wisner, Brenes and Marchezini 2020). This pioneering is available on La Red’s website, for example, Lavell (1994); Lavell and Franco (1996); Mansilla (1996); Maskrey (1993) and the translation into Spanish of the Routledge volume, At Risk (Blaikie et al. 1996). Fromthelate1990sonward,theimpactofUNframeworkfordisasterreduction (UNISDR2005)anditsprecursorswastobeseen,aswellastheinfluenceofLaRed andothernetworksofcriticalresearchersandplannersinAsia,Africa,Europe,and NorthAmericawidelyintheregion.Forexample,criticalresearcherswhohadarole in shaping new disaster legislation was created in Colombia in 2012. They also influenced the approach of regional organization that began to link disaster with development (Ferris and Petz 2013: 49–62). These intergovernmental disaster agencies include CEPREDENAC in Central America, CDEMA in the insular Caribbean,andCEPRADEintheAndeanregion.2InBrazil,thelesswell-knownand morelooselynetworkedcounterpartofLaRedhadaroleinshapingthatcountry’s disasterlegislationfollowingdeadlylandslidesin2011(Marchezinietal.2017). Latin America, and in microcosm, Mexico as discussed in Neoliberalism and Disaster, have many surprises for the reader and valuable experience of relevance to removing obstacles to public safety such as oligarchy, technocracy, and 2Caribbean Disaster Management Agency (CDEMA) https://www.cdema.org/; Coordination Center for Natural Disaster Prevention in Central America (CEPRENENAC) http://www.un- spider.org/sites/default/files/_CEPREDENAC_S.pdf; Andean Committee for Disaster Prevention and Assistance (CEPRADE) http://cidbimena.desastres.hn/docum/crid/EIRDInforma/ing/No6_ 2002/art16.htm. viii Foreword necropolitical investment strategies in other parts of the world. In the pressure cooker constituted by pandemic, post-pandemic recession, resistance to globaliza- tion, and climate change, what new surprises will emerge? London, England Ben Wisner June 2020 References Anderson,M.&Woodrow,P.(1989).Risingfromtheashes:developmentstrategiesintimesof disaster.Boulder,CO&Paris:WestviewandUNESCO. Apodaca,C.(2017).Staterepressioninpost-disastersocieties.London:Routledge. Blaikie,P.,Cannon,T.,Davis,I.&Wisner,B.(1996).Vulnerabilidad:elentornosocial,politicoy economicodelosdesastres.(TerceroMundoEditores.Lima:LaRed&ITDG).https://www. desenredando.org/public/libros/1996/vesped/. Cuny,F.(1983).Disastersanddevelopment.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress. Castrode,J.(1952).Thegeographyofhunger.Boston:LittleBrown[Geografiadafome.Riode Janeiro:OCruzeiro,1946]. Ferris,E.&Petz,D.(2013).Intheneighborhood:thegrowingroleofregionalorganizationsin disasterriskmanagement.NewYork&London:Brookings&LondonSchoolofEconomics andPoliticalScience. Gaillard,J.C.(2018).Disasterstudiesinsideout.Disasters,43,S1:S7–S17. Galeano,E.(1973).TheopenveinsofLatinAmerica.NewYork:MonthlyReviewPress. Garcia-Acosta, V. (Ed.). (2020). The anthropology of disasters in Latin America. London: Routledge. Garriga-López,A.(2019).PuertoRico:Thefutureinquestion.Shima.https://www.researchgate. net/publication/336692535_Puerto_Rico_The_Future_In_Question. Gunder Frank, A. (2010 [1966]). The development of underdevelopment. In S. Chew & P. Lauderdale (Eds.). The theory and methodology of world development: The writings of AndreGunderFrank.London:Palgrave. Harvey,D.(2007).Abriefhistoryofneoliberalism.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress. Lavell,A.(Ed.).(1996).Viviendoenriesgo.Lima:LaRed.https://www.desenredando.org/public/ libros/1994/ver/. Lavell, A. & Franco, E. (Eds.) (1994). Estado, sociedad y gestión de los desastres en América Latina.Lima:LaRed.https://www.desenredando.org/public/libros/1996/esyg/. Lavell,A.&Maskrey,A.(2014).Thefutureofdisasterriskmanagement.EnvironmentalHazards, 13(4),267–280.https://www.institutomora.edu.mx/ProteccionCivil/Recursos/M%C3%B3dulo% 202.%20Riesgos%20hidrometeorol%C3%B3gicos/The%20future%20of%20disaster%20risk% 20management.pdf. Mansilla,E.(Ed.).(1996).Desastresmodeloparaarmar:coleccióndepiezasdeunrompecabezas social. Lima: La Red. https://www.desenredando.org/public/libros/1996/dma/ DesastresModeloParaArmar-1.0.0.pdf. Marchezini, V., Wisner, B., Londe, L. & Saito, S. (Eds.). (2017). Reduction of vulnerability to disasters:fromknowledgetoaction.SãoCarlos,SP,Brazil:RimaEditora. Maskrey,A.(1989).Disastermitigation:acommunityapproach.Oxford:Oxfam. Maskrey, A. (Ed.). (1993). Los desastres no son naturales. Lima: La Red. https://www. desenredando.org/public/libros/1993/ldnsn/. Rénique, G. (2005). Introduction: Latin America today: the revolt against neo-liberalism. Socialism and Democracy, 19(3), 1–11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/ 08854300500284561. Foreword ix ReyesPondo,L.&Lavell,A.(2012).ExtensiveandeverydayriskintheBolivianChaco:sources ofcrisisanddisaster.RevuedeGéographieAlpine/JournalofAlpineResearch.http://journals. openedition.org/rga/1719. Riding, A. (2017). Mexico’s 1985 earthquake didn’t start a revolution. Zócolo, 29 September. https://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2017/09/29/mexicos-85-earthquake-didnt-start-revolution/ ideas/nexus/. Svampa, M.(2019).Neo-extractivism inLatin America.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. Therborn,G.(2013).Thekillingfieldsofinequality.Cambridge,UK:PolityPress. Wisner,B.(1988).PowerandneedinAfrica.London:Earthscan. Wisner,B.,Brenes,A.&Marchezini, V.(2020) Theroleofnon-governmentalorganizations in naturalhazardsgovernanceinLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean.InB.Gerber(Ed.),Theoxford researchencyclopediaofnaturalhazardsgovernance.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 338954436_Non-Governmental_Organizations_and_Natural_Hazard_Governance_in_Latin_ America_and_the_Caribbean. Contents 1 Disasters and Neoliberalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Gabriela Vera-Cortés and Jesús Manuel Macías-Medrano Part I Social Vulnerability to Disasters in Urban Contexts 2 DisastersasaSocialRelapseinNeoliberalCapitalism.TwoCases Analyzed in Developed Countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Jesús Manuel Macías-Medrano 3 Flood Management Through Financial Cost Transfer Schemes in Mexico City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Jorge Damián Morán-Escamilla 4 Social Vulnerability: Learnings from the September 19, 2017, Earthquake in Mexico City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Patricia Eugenia Olivera 5 “On the Banks of the Rio Bravo…”: Social Construction and Perception of Flood Risk in Irregular Settlements . . . . . . . . . . 97 Xavier Oliveras-González, Teresa Elizabeth Cueva-Luna, and Rosa Isabel Medina-Parra 6 Temporary Shelters and Health Services for Older Adults in Floods in the Metropolis of Monterrey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Rosalía Chávez-Alvarado Part II Social Vulnerability to Disasters in Rural Contexts 7 SpatialReconfigurationandRelocationsAfter Disasters inRural Contexts: The Case of Tacotalpa, Tabasco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Gabriela Vera-Cortés xi

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.