Development of good quality of yogurt in terms of texture, appearance, color, taste and determination of fat percentage in milk and yogurt A DISSERTATON SUBMITTED TO THE BRAC UNIVERSITY FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (B.Sc) IN MICROBIOLOGY SUBMITTED BY ANILA LABONNYA MODHU STUDENT ID: 12126012 AUGUST, 2016 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES MICROBIOLOGY PROGRAM BRAC UNIVERSITY MOHAKHALI, DHAKA DECLARATION This is to declare that the research work embodying the results in this thesis entitled “Development of good quality of yogurt in terms of texture, flavor, food value and low cost and determining the fat percentage of milk and yogurt.” submitted by Anila Labonnya Modhu, has been carried out by under the joint supervision and guidance of Professor Dr. M Mahboob Hossain, Coordinator, Biotechnology and Microbiology Program, BRAC University in partial fulfillment of B.Sc in Microbiology, at BRAC University, Dhaka. It is further declared that the research work presented hereis original, has not been submitted anywhere else for any degree or diploma. Candidate Anila Labonnya Modhu Certified: Prof. Dr. Mahboob Hossain Associate Professor, Microbiology program Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences BRAC University 66, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212 Bangladesh 2 | P age ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Professor A. A. Ziauddin Ahmad, Chairperson, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University for allowing me and encouraging me to complete my under graduate thesis. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Mahboob Hossain, my major professor for his guidance and mentorship during this research project. I also thank him for his constant support all throughout my student life and guiding me during the research work which has enhanced my capability enormously. In addition, Iwould like to thank Ms. Shamima Akhtar and Ms. Asma Afzal for guidance and encouragement in the lab. I would like to express my eternal gratitude to my loving parents, for allthe love, patience, help and support. I thank my brother, Vincent for his support. I would like to thank specially, Ms. Mumu who was always there beside me in all of my thesis works. Also for her support, critical comments and suggestions.My hearty gratitude to all my thesis mates, for their friendship and support. Special thanks to my family, for their support and prayers during this time. I willalways be grateful for the constant love and encouragement they gave me along the way. Most of all, I thank God for everything. 3 | P age ABSTRACT In the present study efforts were made to develop improved quality of yogurt in terms of texture, flavor, colour, taste and low fat content. To achieve this objective, better strains of Lactobacillus were isolated from locally available well known branded yogurts of Dhaka city. It was done to optimize the yogurt production with an improved quality yogurt. Total 40 samples were analyzed by recombining many other samples. Of the forty yogurt samples, eight samples found to be of better quality. Later on, from these eight samples two highest scored samples were selected. . Observation of the quality assessment was done by hedonic scaling. Therefore, chemical, physical, microbial and organoleptic analyses for samples were conducted at predetermined days. Yeast and Lactobacillus spp was found from better samples. Also the fat content of milk and yogurt showed that yogurt had higher fat content than milk which is healthier to eat. Starter culture found from yogurt isolates may have potential to be used in dairy industries in terms of their high technological and organoleptic characteristics. 4 | P age Table of Contents Chapter Page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………….……………. 4 CONTENT……………………………………………………………………. ……… 5-6 LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………... 7 LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………….. 8-9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………….…………………………………….. 10-12 1.0 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………… 13 1.1 Yogurt……………………………………………………………………... 14 1.2 Biochemistry of yogurt……………………………………………………. 16 1.3 History of yogurt…………………………………………………………… 18 1.4 Different names of yogurt………………………………………………….. 19 1.5 Different types of yogurt…………………………………………………… 20 1.6 Health benefits of yogurt…………………………………………………… 23 1.7 Probiotics of yogurt…………………………………………………………. 25 1.8 Nutritional profile of yogurt………………………………………………… 26 1.9 Yogurt’s starter culture……………………………………………………… 29 1.10 Packaging materials of yogurt……………………………………………. 30 1.11 Aims and Objective………………………………………………………. 31 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………….. 32 3.0 MATERIALS AND METHOD…………………………………………………….. 39 3.1 Collection of market samples………………………………………………... 40 3.1.1 Milk……………………………………………………………………. 40 3.1.2 Starter yogurt…………………………………………………………… 41 3.1.3 Combination and labeling of different starter culture………………..… 41 3.2 Place of experiment…………………………………………………………. 41 3.3 Fermentation of yogurt………………………………………………………. 41 3.3.1 Ingredients for yogurt manufacture……………………………….. 42 3.3.2 Milk Standardization……………………………………………… 43 3.3.3 Homogenization…………………………………………………… 44 3.3.4 Heat treatment……………………………………………………... 44 5 | P age 3.3.5 Inoculation and Fermentation……………………………………… 46 3.3.6 Cooling…………………………………………………………….. 46 3.4 Quality Assessment by Sensory & Organoleptic Evaluation or Physical Test(Hedonic Scale)………………………………………………………. 47 3.5 Microbiological Test 3.5.1 Determination of the Bacterial Load 3.6.1a) Media Used………………………………………………….. 48 3.5.1 b) Techniques Employed………………………………………. 52 3.5.1 c) Enumeration of Bacterial Load……………………………… 52 3.5.1 d) Purification of the Isolates…………………………………... 53 3.5.2 Morphological and Cultural Studies of Selected Isolates…………… 53 3.5.3 Microscopic Observation or Characterization of the Isolates……….. 54 3.5.4 Maintenance & Preservation of the Isolates………………………… 55 3.6 Roese Gotlieb method……………………………………………………. 55-57 4. RESULTS……………………………………………………………………………. 58 4.1 Organoleptic Quality Assessment………………………………………………….... 59 a) First set of recombination:……………………………………………………... 59 b) Second set of recombination………………………………………………...… 64 4.1.1 A) Texture Acceptability……………………………………………………..…. 66 4.1.1 B) Appearance Acceptability………………………………………………...….. 67 4.1.1 C) Color Acceptability………………………………………………………….. 68 4.1.1 D) Taste Acceptability…………………………………………………………… 69 4.2 MICROBIAL ASSESMENT 4.2.1 Culture and Subculture……………………………………………...…….. 71 4.2.2 Gram Staining…………………………………………………………………….. 73 4.3 Final yogurt: Inoculated sample…………………………………………………… 73 4.4 Preservation of isolates…………………………………………………………….. 75 4.5 Chemical Analysis: percentage of fat of milk and yogurt…………………………. 76 5. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………...... 78-81 6. CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………… 82-84 7. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………… 85-87 APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………………. 88-91 6 | P age List of Tables Contents Page No. Table 1.1: Yogurt and yogurt-like products originated in different regions of the world 19 Table 1.2: The composition of regular-, low-fat- and non-fat yogurt 21 Table1.3: Nutritional composition of different varieties of yogurt (per 100 g) 27 Table 3.1: Time-temperature combinations for milk pasteurization 45 Table3.2: Hedonic Scale 47 Table 4.1 : Name of recombined 32 samples of first screening 60 Table 4.2: Hedonic data of first set of yogurts 61 Table 4.3 Name of recombined 8 samples of screening 64 Table 4.4 Hedonic data of second set of yogurts 65 Table4.5: Microscopic observation from sample B and sample E isolates 74 Table4.6: Nutritional value of milk (full fat) 76 Table4.7: Nutritional value of yogurt 76 7 | P age List of Figures Contents Page No. Fig: 1.1: Lactose catabolism into glucose and galactose 16 Fig: 1.2: Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway 17 Figure 3.1: Manufacturing process of set- and stirred-yogurt (Adapted from Lee 42 and Lucey, 2010) Fig4.1: Sample-1 62 Fig4.2: Sample-2 62 Fig4.3:Sample-3 62 Fig4.4:Sample-4 62 Fig4.5: Sample-5 62 Fig4.6: Sample-6 62 Fig4.7: Sample-7 62 Fig4.8: Sample-8 62 Fig4.9: Sample-9 62 Fig4.10: Sample-10 62 Fig4.11: Sample-11 62 Fig4.12: Sample-12 62 Fig4.13: Sample-13 63 Fig4.14: Sample-14 63 Fig4.15: Sample-15 63 Fig4.16: Sample-16 63 Fig4.17: Sample-17 63 Fig4.18: Sample-18 63 Fig4.19: Sample-19 63 Fig4.20: Sample-20 63 Fig4.21: Sample-21 63 Fig4.22: Sample-22 63 Fig4.23: Sample-23 63 Fig4.24: Sample-24 63 Fig4.25: Sample-25 63 Fig4.26: Sample-26 63 Fig4.27: Sample-27 63 Fig4.28: Sample-28 63 Fig4.29: Sample-29 64 Fig4.30: Sample-30 64 Fig4.31: Sample-31 64 Fig4.32: Sample-32 64 Fig4.33: Sample A 65 8 | P age Contents Page No. Fig4.34: Sample B 65 Fig4.35: Sample C 65 Fig4.36: Sample D 65 Fig4.37: Sample E 66 Fig4.38: Sample F 66 Fig4.39: Sample G 66 Fig4.40: Sample H 66 Fig 4.41: Mean of texture of second sets yogurts combination chart 67 Fig 4.42: Mean of appearance of second sets yogurts combination chart 68 Fig 4.43: Mean of color of second sets yogurts combination chart 69 Fig 4.44: Mean of taste of second sets yogurts combination chart 69 Fig 4.45: Average mean of quality of second sets yogurts combination chart 70 Fig 4.46 :Comparing Best two yogurts samples comparison in terms of texture, 71 appearance, color and taste chart Fig4.47: Sample B on MRS media 72 Fig4.48: Sample B on NA 72 Fig4.49: Sample E on MRS media 72 Fig4.50: Sample E on NA 72 Fig4.51: Gram staining of Sample B 73 Fig4.52: Gram staining of Sample E 74 Fig4.53: yogurt from experimental LAB 75 9 | P age (LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS) % percent αalpha βbeta <less than >more than ≤ less or equal to ≥more or equal to ºCdegree celsius ºFdegree fahrenheit S/sec second N normality L/l litre V volume µg micro gram µm micro meter µl micro litre cfu colony forming unit cm centimeter Conc.Concentration Min/mins minute e.g.as example et.aland others etcetcetra Fig.figure 10 | P age
Description: