Research in Criminology Series &litors Alfred Blumstein David P. Farrington Research in Criminology Understanding and Controlling Crime: Toward A New Research Strategy David P. Farrington, Lloyd E. Ohlin and James Q. Wilson The Social Ecology of Crime J.M. Byrne and RJ. Sampson (Eds.) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending Derek B. Cornish and Ronald V. Clarke (Eds.) The Social Contexts of Criminal Sentencing Martha A. Myers and Susette M. Talarico Predicting Recidivism Using Survival Models Peter Schmidt and Ann Dryden Witte Coping, Behavior, and Adaptation in Prison Inmates Edward Zamble and Frank J. Porporino Prison Crowding: A Psychological Perspective Paul B. Paulus Off School, In Court: An Experimental and Psychiatric Investigation of Severe School Attendance Problems I. Berg, I. Brown and R. Hollin Policing and Punishing the Drinking Driver: A Study of General and Specific Deterrence Ross Homel Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance Austin Lovegrove Criminal Behavior and the Justice System: Psychological Perspectives Hermann Wegener, Friedrich LOsel and Jochen Haisch (Eds.) Male Criminal Activity from Childhood Through Youth: Multilevel and Developmental Perspectives Marc Le Blanc and Marcel Frechette continued after index Anne L. Schneider Deterrence and Juvenile Crime Results from a National Policy Experiment With 12 Illustrations Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Anne L. Schneider College of Public Programs, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA Senior Research Analyst Laurie H. Ervin Department of Political Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074, USA Series Editors Alfred Blumstein School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA David P. Farrington Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9DT, England, UK Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schneider, Anne L. Deterrence and juvenile crime : results from a national policy experiment / Anne L. Schneider. p. cm. - (Research in criminology) Includes index. Bibliography: p. ISBN-13:978-1-4613-8927-9 (alk. paper) J. Juvenile corrections-United States-Evaluation. 2. Juvenile delinquency-United States-restitution. I.Schneider, Anne L. II. Title. III. Series. HV9014.S323 1989 364.3'6'0973-dc20 89-11600 Printed on acid-free paper. © 1990 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1990 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, com puter software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc. in this publication, even if the former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks Act, may accordingly be used freely by anyone. Typeset by David E. Seham Associates, Inc., Metuchen, New Jersey. 987 6 5 4 3 2 ISBN-13:978-1-4613-8927-9 e-ISBN-13:978-1-4613-8925-5 DOl: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8925-5 Contents List of Figures ..................................................................... VIII List of Tables....................................................................... IX Chapter 1 The Punishment Perspective ................................. . Introduction................................................................ 1 Purpose ...................................................................... 3 An Overview............................................................... 4 Organization of the Book .............................................. 5 Chapter 2 Policy, Perceptions, and Criminal Behavior .............. 6 General Deterrence Research ......................................... 6 Aggregate Data Studies .............................................. 6 The Methodological Critique ....................................... 9 Macro-level Evaluation Research................................. 9 Recidivism and Specific Deterrence ................................ 10 Deterrence and Labeling ............................................ 10 Restitution Programs .......... ........................ ...... ......... 12 Methodological Issues................................................ 13 Perceptions of Legal Sanctions ........................ ............... 14 One-Wave Perceptual Research ................................... 14 Second Generation Perceptual Research ....................... 15 Sanctions and Perceptions .......................................... 16 Unresolved Issues..... ..... ..... ............................ .......... 17 Chapter 3 Rational Choice and Decision Heuristics .................. 19 Deterrence and Subjective Expected Utility Theory. .......... 19 A Critique ............................................................... 20 Modifying Rational Choice Theory............................... 22 A Decision Heuristics Approach..................................... 22 Decision Heuristics ................................................... 23 The Decision Model .................................................. 27 Chapter 4 Juvenile Offenders: Methods and Measures .............. 29 Introduction................................................................ 29 Sources of Data........................................................... 30 vi Contents Characteristics of the Interviewed Sample..................... 30 The Juvenile Offender Interviews ................................ 34 The Official Records Check ........................................ 35 Management Information System Data ......................... 36 Offenders and Offense Rates.......................................... 36 Measures of Offense Rates ......................................... 36 Comparing Alternative Measures of Recidivism................. 39 Measuring Prior Offenses .............................................. 46 Perceptions and Values ................................................. 46 Intentions ................................................................ 46 Certainty ................................................................. 50 Severity .................................................................. 50 Good Citizen Self-Image ............................................ 51 Remorse .................................................................. 52 Fairness .................................................................. 52 Experiences in the Juvenile Justice System ...................... 53 Random Assignment.................................................. 53 Restitution and Probation ........................................... 54 Boise, Idaho ............................................................ 55 Washington, D.C. .... ........ ..... ... .......... ..... ...... ....... ..... 55 Clayton County, Georgia............................................ 56 Oklahoma County ..................................................... 56 Ventura, California .................................................... 56 Dane County, Wisconsin............................................ 57 Program Success....................................................... 58 Chapter 5 The Perceptual Basis of Juvenile Crime ................... 59 Intentions to Reoffend .................................................. 60 Correlates of Intentions.............................................. 60 Multivariate Models of Intentions to Reoffend ............... 62 Post-Release Recidivism ................................................ 64 Correlates of Recidivism ............................................ 64 Multivariate Models of Perceptions and Recidivism ........ 64 Decision Making and Recidivism .................................... 68 Methodological Issues................................................ 68 Threshold Effects...................................................... 68 Good Citizen, Deterrence, Interactions......................... 70 Decay Effects........................................................... 71 The "Macho" Explanation ......................................... 72 Curvilinear Effects .................................................... 73 Deterrence and Experienced Offenders ......................... 74 Deterrence and Type of Crime .................................... 75 Discussion .................................................................. 76 Chapter 6 Direct Effects of Programs on Recidivism ................ 77 Suppression Effects...................................................... 78 Program Effects ........................................................ 78 Discussion of Suppression Effects................................ 82 Post-Program Comparisons ............................................ 83 Discussion of Direct Effects........................................... 86 Contents vii Chapter 7 Experiences, Perceptions, and Recidivism ................ 90 Programs and Perceptions ............................................. 90 Restitution vs. Incarceration....................................... 90 Discussion ............................................................... 92 Linking Program Experiences with Recidivism.................. 93 A Methodological Note.............................................. 93 Restitution vs. Incarceration....................................... 95 Restitution vs. Probation............................................ 96 Programmatic Restitution vs. Ad Hoc Restitution ........... 99 The Pooled Data....................................................... 101 Discussion .................................................................. 103 Chapter 8 Conclusions. .... . ....................... ..... .... .. .... ............ 105 Program Effects on Recidivism....................................... 106 Effect of Perceptions on Recidivism ................................ 108 Program Interventions, Perceptions, and Results ............... 110 References ..................................................................................... 112 Author Index ................................................................................. 119 Subject Index ............ ..... ....... ...... .................... ........ .... ................ ... 123 List of Figures Figure 3.1. The Decision Model ......................................... . 28 Figure 4.1. Summary of Offense Indicators .......................... . 37 Figure 4.2. Weighting System for Measures of Crime Seriousness ..................................................... . 38 Figure 5.1. Annual Offense Rate and Certainty of Punishment .. 66 Figure 5.2. Annual Offense Rate and Severity of Punishment ... 66 Figure 6.1a. Incarceration and Restitution: Effect on Recidivism 80 Figure 6.1b. Probation and Restitution: Effect on Recidivism .... . 80 Figure 6.1c. Ad Hoc and Restitution: Effects on Recidivism ..... . 81 Figure 6.1d. Restitution and All Controls: Effects on Recidivism 81 Figure 6.2. Annual Offense Rates of Randomly Assigned Cases 85 Figure 6.3. Percent Reoffending Among Randomly Assigned Cases ............................................................. . 85 Figure 7.1. Linkage Model: Restitution vs. Incarceration ........ . 95 Figure 7.2. Linkage Model: Restitution vs. Probation ............ . 99 Figure 7.3. Linkage Model: Restitution vs. Ad Hoc Restitution 101 Figure 7.4. Linkage Model: All Cases ................................. . 103 List of Tables Table 4.1. Characteristics of the Interviewed Sample ............. . 31 Table 4.2. Correlation Matrix of Recidivism Variables ........... . 40 Table 4.3. Operationalizing "Lambda": Alternative Variables .. 43 Table 4.4. Demographics and Alternative Measures of Subsequents ..................................................... . 44 Table 4.5. Deterrence Variables and Alternative Measures of Subsequents ..................................................... . 45 Table 4.6. Alternative Measures of Prior Offenses ................. . 46 Table 4.7. Intercorrelation of Alternative Measures of Priors and Subsequents ..................................................... . 47 Table 4.8. An Overview of Perceptions in the Six Sites .......... . 48 Table 5.1. Zero Order Correlates of Intentions ..................... . 61 Table 5.2. Models of Intentions to Commit Crimes ................ . 63 Table 5.3. Zero Order Correlates of Subsequent Court Contacts 65 Table 5.4. Models of Subsequent Court Contacts .................. . 67 Table 5.5. Threshold Effects: Controlling Severity ................ . 69 Table 5.6. Threshold Effects: Controlling Certainty ............... . 69 Table 5.7. Threshold Effects: Controlling Self-Image ............. . 70 Table 5.8. Immediacy Effects of Certainty and Severity ......... . 71 Table 5.9. "Macho" Explanations ...................................... . 72 Table 5.10. Curvilinear Effects ............................................ . 73 Table 5.11. Naive and Experienced Offenders ........................ . 74 Table 5.12. Deterrence Models for Types of Offenders ............ . 75 Table 6.1. Suppression Effects ........................................... . 79 Table 6.2. Offense Rates and Prevalence Rates for Post-Program Comparisons .................................................... . 83 Table 6.3. Direct Program Effects on Recidivism, Controlling for Possible Confounding Variables ........................... . 87 Table 7.1. Program Effects on Perceptions, School, and Jobs (Zero Order Correlations) .................................. .. 91 Table 7.2. Restitution vs. Incarceration in Boise Idaho: Multivariate Model ............................................ . 94 x List of Tables Table 7.3. Restitution vs. Probation: Multivariate Model ......... 98 Table 7.4. Restitution vs. Ad Hoc Restitution: Multivariate Model .............................................................. 100 Table 7.S. Program Type, Perceptions, and Recidivism: Multivariate Model for Pooled Sample ................... 102
Description: