Comparable Corpora and Computer-assisted Translation

305 Pages·2014·3.361 MB·English

by  Estelle Maryline Delpech

Comparable Corpora and Computer-assisted Translation
To Elia
Series Editor
Narendra Jussien
Comparable Corpora and
Computer-assisted Translation
Estelle Maryline Delpech
Firstpublished2014inGreatBritainandtheUnitedStatesbyISTELtdandJohnWiley&Sons,Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as
permittedundertheCopyright,DesignsandPatentsAct1988,thispublicationmayonlybereproduced,
storedortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withthepriorpermissioninwritingofthepublishers,
or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the
CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the
undermentionedaddress:
ISTELtd JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.
27-37StGeorge’sRoad 111RiverStreet
LondonSW194EU Hoboken,NJ07030
UK USA
www.iste.co.uk www.wiley.com
©ISTELtd2014
TherightsofEstelleMarylineDelpechtobeidentifiedastheauthorofthisworkhavebeenassertedby
herinaccordancewiththeCopyright,DesignsandPatentsAct1988.
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2014936484
BritishLibraryCataloguing-in-PublicationData
ACIPrecordforthisbookisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary
ISBN978-1-84821-689-1
PrintedandboundinGreatBritainbyCPIGroup(UK)Ltd.,Croydon,SurreyCR04YY
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
PART1.APPLICATIVEAND SCIENTIFICCONTEXT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
CHAPTER 1. LEVERAGING COMPARABLE CORPORA FOR COMPUTER-
ASSISTEDTRANSLATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. From the beginnings of machine translation to comparable corpora
processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.1. Thedawnofmachinetranslation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.2. Thedevelopmentofcomputer-assistedtranslation . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2.3. Drawbacksofparallelcorporaandadvantagesofcomparablecorpora 7
1.2.4. Difficultiesoftechnicaltranslation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.2.5. Industrialcontext . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.3. Termalignmentfromcomparablecorpora: astate-of-the-art . . . . . . 15
1.3.1. Distributionalapproachprinciple . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.3.2. Termalignmentevaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.3.3. Improvementandvariantsofthedistributionalapproach . . . . . . 20
1.3.4. Theinfluencedataandparametersonalignmentquality . . . . . . 28
1.3.5. Limitsofthedistributionalapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
1.4. CATsoftwareprototypeforcomparablecorporaprocessing . . . . . . 32
1.4.1. Implementationofatermalignmentmethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.4.2. Terminologicalrecordsextraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
vi ComparableCorporaandComputer-assistedTranslation
1.4.3. Lexiconconsultationinterface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.5. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
CHAPTER2.USER-CENTERED EVALUATIONOF LEXICONS
EXTRACTEDFROMCOMPARABLE CORPORA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.2. Translationqualityevaluationmethodologies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.2.1. Machinetranslationevaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.2.2. Humantranslationevaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
2.2.3. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.3. Designandexperimentationofauser-centeredevaluation . . . . . . . 50
2.3.1. Methodologicalaspects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.3.2. Experimentationprotocol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
2.3.3. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.4. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
CHAPTER3.AUTOMATICGENERATIONOFTERM TRANSLATIONS . . . 67
3.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.2. Compositionalapproaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.2.1. Compositionaltranslationprinciple . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
3.2.2. Polylexicalunitscompositionaltranslation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
3.2.3. Monolexicalunitscompositionaltranslation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
3.2.4. Candidatetranslationfiltering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
3.3. Data-drivenapproaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
3.3.1. Analogy-basedtranslation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
3.3.2. Rewritingruleslearning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
3.3.3. Dealingwithmorphologicalvariation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.4. Evaluationoftermtranslatorgenerationmethods . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
3.5. Researchperspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
PART2.CONTRIBUTIONSTOCOMPOSITIONALTRANSLATION . . . . . 99
CHAPTER4.MORPH-COMPOSITIONALTRANSLATION:
METHODOLOGICALFRAMEWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
4.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
4.2. Morpho-compositionaltranslationmethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
4.2.1. Scientificpositioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
4.2.2. Definitionsandterminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
4.2.3. Underlyingassumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
4.2.4. Advantagesoftheproposedapproachforprocessingcomparable
corpora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
4.3. Addressedissuesandcontributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
4.3.1. Generatingfertiletranslations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
Contents vii
4.3.2. Dealingwithdiversemorphologicalstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
4.3.3. Candidatetranslationsranking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
4.4. Evaluationmethodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
4.4.1. Apriorireference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
4.4.2. Aposteriorireference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
4.5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
CHAPTER5.EXPERIMENTALDATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
5.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
5.2. Comparablecorpora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
5.3. Sourceterms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
5.4. Referencedatafortranslationgenerationevaluation . . . . . . . . . . . 126
5.4.1. Apriorireference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
5.4.2. Aposteriorireference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
5.5. Translationrankingtrainingandevaluationdata . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
5.6. Linguisticresources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
5.6.1. Generallanguagebilingualdictionary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
5.6.2. Thesaurus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
5.6.3. Boundmorphemestranslationtable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
5.6.4. Lexiconforworddecomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
5.6.5. Morphologicalfamilies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
5.6.6. Dictionaryofcognates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
5.7. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
CHAPTER 6. FORMALIZATION AND EVALUATION OF CANDIDATE
TRANSLATIONGENERATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
6.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
6.2. Translationgenerationalgorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
6.2.1. Decomposition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
6.2.2. Translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
6.2.3. Recomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
6.2.4. Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
6.3. Morphologicalsplittingevaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
6.4. Translationgenerationevaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
6.4.1. Referencedataandevaluationmeasures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
6.4.2. Modelgenericityinfluence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
6.4.3. Linguisticresourcesinfluence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
6.4.4. Fallbackstrategyinfluence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
6.4.5. Fertiletranslationsinfluence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
6.4.6. Popularsciencecorpusinfluence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
6.4.7. Qualitativeanalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
6.5. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
6.5.1. Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
6.5.2. Researchperspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
viii ComparableCorporaandComputer-assistedTranslation
CHAPTER 7. FORMALIZATION AND EVALUATION OF CANDIDATE
TRANSLATION RANKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
7.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
7.2. Rankingcriteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
7.2.1. Contextsimilarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
7.2.2. Candidatetranslationfrequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
7.2.3. Parts-of-speechtranslationprobability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
7.2.4. Componentstranslationmode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
7.3. Criteriacombination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
7.3.1. Valuestandardization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
7.3.2. Linearcombination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
7.3.3. Learning-to-rankmodel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
7.4. Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
7.4.1. Referencedataandevaluationmeasures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
7.4.2. Basesofcomparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
7.4.3. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
7.5. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
7.5.1. Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
7.5.2. Researchperspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
CONCLUSIONANDPERSPECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
PART3.APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
APPENDIX1.MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
APPENDIX2.DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
APPENDIX3.COMPARABLE CORPORALEXICONS
CONSULTATIONINTERFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
LISTOFTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
LISTOFFIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
LISTOFALGORITHMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
LISTOFEXTRACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277
INDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
Acknowledgments
IwouldliketogiveBéatriceDailleandEmmanuelMorinmydeepestthanksfor
havingsupervisedandco-supervisedthisdoctoralresearch.Ifeltsohonoredtowork
andlearnbytheirsides.Theybothhaveshownaneffectivecombinationofacademic
rigorousness and pedagogy, which has helped me to progress over the past three
years. Béatrice, thank you for suggesting this thesis to me – it was a very enriching
experience.Manu,thanksagainforbeingtherewheneverIneededyou.
IextendmywarmthankstoNabilHathout,ÉlisabethLavault-Olléon,Emmanuel
Planas and Michel Simard for honoring me by attending my viva and being part of
my committee in spite of their busy schedules. Their constructive comments were
especiallyuseful.Iamgladtohaveprofitedfromsomanycomplementarypointsof
viewonmywork.SpecialthankstoMichelSimardforcomingtoNantesalltheway
fromCanada.
I am particularly thankful to Emmanuel Planas, the former Scientific Director of
Lingua et Machina, for trusting me and hiring me as a research engineer five years
ago.Otherwise,Iwouldprobablynothavehadthechancetocarryoutadissertation
withLINAortoworkonsuchafascinatingresearchsubjectwithinsuchastimulating
industrialenvironment.
Several people contributed to the work presented in this book. I would first like
to thank Claire Lemaire from the University Stendhal in Grenoble, because she was
an amazing colleague and co-doctoral candidate; and also for creating the resources
forprocessingandassessingtheGermanlanguage.Thiswouldnothavebeenpossible
withoutherandIamverythankful.
IwouldalsoliketothankGeoffreyWilliamsandPierreZweigenbaumforagreeing
tobeapartofmydoctoratemonitoringcommittee.Theirshrewdcommentsandadvice
guidedmeintherightdirectionduringthisresearchproject.