COGNITION, SEMANTICS AND PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES SERIES Founded by Wilfrid S. Sellars and Keith Lehrer Editor: KEITH LEHRER, University ofA rizona Managing Editor: LOIS DAY, University ofA rizona Board of Consulting Editors: JONATHAN BENNETT, Syracuse University ALLAN GIBBARD, University of Michigan ROBERT STALNAKER, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ROBERT G. TURNBULL, Ohio State University VOLUME 52 COGNITION, SEMANTICS AND PHILOSOPHY Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on Cognitive Science Editedby JESUS EZQUERRO and JESUS M. LARRAZABAL University ofthe Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V. ISBN 978-94-010-5153-8 ISBN 978-94-011-2610-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2610-6 Printed on acid-free paper AlI Rights Reserved © 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally pubIished by Kluwer Academic PubIishers in 1992 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1s t edition 1992 No pact of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanicaI, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix INTRODUCTION xi CHAPTER 1: ANIMAL COGNITION AND HUMAN COGNITION: A NECESSARY DIALOGUE Luis Aguado Aguilar 1 I. Introduction 1 II. Characterization of Comparative Cognition 2 III. Cognitive Modules and Evolution 3 IV. Two Goals of Comparative Research: General Processes and Evolutionary Sequences 6 V. Consciousness and Cognition 10 VI. Conclusions 16 CHAPTER 2: USER MODELLING IN KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS M. Felisa Verdejo 23 I. Introduction 23 II. Situations of Interactive Communications 24 III. The Content of the User Model 29 IV. Characteristic Dimensions of a User's Model 31 V. Domain-Knowledge: Shallow Versus Deep Modelling 32 VI. Modelling Intentions 36 VII. Building a User's Model 39 VIII. Learner's Model 40 IX. Conclusion 43 CHAPTER 3: CHANGING BELIEFS RATIONALLY: SOME PUZZLES Dorothy Edgington 47 I. Background 47 II. A Justification of Generalized Conditionalisation 52 III. The Judy Benjamin Problem 55 IV. An Apparent Counterexample to Simple Conditionalisation 60 V. The Three Prisoners 63 vi VI. Judy Benjamin Again: The Strong Strategy 65 VII. Independence 67 CHAPTER 4: ON THE REPRESENTATION OF LINGUISTIC INFORMATION M. Teresa Espinal 75 I. Introduction 75 II. The Modularity Hypothesis 77 III. Grammar, Pragmatics and Modularity 80 IV. Interdisciplinarity in the Analysis of Linguistic Information 84 V. Disjunct Adverbials Pragmatically Oriented Towards the Speaker or Hearer 85 VI. On The Representation of Disjunct Constituents: A Multidimentional Approach 96 VII. Conclusions 101 CHAPTER 5: MODELLING MEMORY FOR MODELS Keith Stenning 107 I. Introduction 108 II. Two Senses of "Model" 111 III. Models in Working Memory 113 IV. Representations for Syllogistic Reasoning 119 V. Distributed Bindings and Syllogistic Reasoning 124 CHAPTER 6: ON THE STUDY OF LINGUISTIC PERFORMANCE Victor Sanchez de Zavala 129 I. A Proposal for "Cognitive Science" and A Specification of it 132 II. Current Situation in Linguistic Performance Theory 134 III. Some Issues Regarding Research Programs on Linguistic Performance 146 IV. Appendix 151 CHAPTER 7: PARTIALITY AND COHERENCE IN CONCEPT COMBINATION Nick Braisby, Bradley Franks and Terry Myers 179 I. Introduction 179 II. Flexibility and Specificity 180 vii III. Sense Selection 181 IV. Sense Generation 187 V. Partiality, Coherence and Concept Combination 193 VI. Conclusions 205 CHAPTER 8: THE LABYRINTH OF ATTITUDE REPORTS Daniel Quesada 209 I. Mental States 210 II. Semantic Contents 212 III. Attitude Reports as Explanations 213 IV. The Crimmins-Perry Theory 215 V. Reports and Reporting 219 VI. Two Kinds of Attitude Reports 221 VII. Reporting and Explaining 226 CHAPTER 9: AUNTY'S OWN ARGUMENT FOR THE LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT Martin Davies 235 I. Introduction: Aunty and the Language of Thought 235 II. The Threat of Regress 236 III. First Stage: Systematic Cognitive Processes 241 IV. First Stage: From System to Syntax 246 V. Second Stage: The Structure of Thought 249 VI. Second Stage: Concepts and Inference 254 VII. Two Objections to the Second Stage 256 VIII. Conceptualised Thought and the Connectionist Programme 260 IX. An Invitation to Eliminativism? 265 CHAPTER 10: COGNITIVE SCIENCE AND SEMANTIC REPRESENTATIONS Jean-Francois Le Ny 273 I. Cognitive and Other Sciences as Using Representations 274 II. Natural and Rational Representations 276 III. Sources of Variability in Representations 278 IV. Use of Prescriptive Rules 281 V. Description of Natural Representations 282 VI. Token Representations, Long Term Memory Representations, and the Notion of Activation 285 viii VII. Cross-Compatibility with Neurobiology and Artificial Intelligence 287 VIII. Conclusion 289 CHAPTER 11: ANCHORING CONCEPTUAL CONTENT: SCENARIOS AND PERCEPTION Christopher Peacocke 293 I. Scenarios Introduced 293 II. Scenarios: Consequences and Comparisons 299 III. A Further Level of Content: An Application 306 IV. Spatial Reasoning and Action 314 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Kluwer Academic Publishers for their patience in helping to put this volume together. We also would like to thank our colleagues in the Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science of the University of the Basque Country for helping to organize the Colloquium. Financial support came form the Ministerio de Educaci6n y Ciencia (Madrid), Departamento de Educaci6n (Gobiemo Vasco), Diputaci6n foral (Guipuzkoa), Kutxa Guipuzkoa-Donostia and the University of the Basque Country. Many thanks. Finally, thanks also to our friend Paul Horwich. He helped to contain our linguistic bugs. ix INTRODUCTION THE PLACE OF PHILOSOPHY IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE During the last few years, many books have been published and many meetings have been held on Cognitive Science. A cursory review of their contents shows such a diversity of topics and approaches that one might well infer that there are no genuine criteria for classifying a paper or a lecture as a contribution to Cognitive Science. It is as though the only criterion is to have appeared in a book or in the programme of a meeting in whose name or title we can find the expression " ... Cognitive Science" or something like that. Perhaps this situation is due to the (relative) youth of the field, which is seeking its own identity, still involved in a process of formation and consolidation within the scientific community; but there are actually deep disagreements about how a science of the mind should be worked out, including how to understand its own subject, that is, "the mind. "While for some the term makes reference to a set of phenomena impossible to grasp by any scientific approach, for others "the mind" would be a sort of myth, and the mental terms await elimination by other more handy and empirically tractable terms. Still, some progress has been made and nowadays there seems to be some tacit agreement concerning what a suitable cognitive science ought to do, that is, to study "the mind" without confining itself to being a science of the brain, but also to do this job in a tangible, manageable and as exact as possible way. No doubt, philosophy has had a lot to do with this state of the art, both in the good and in the bad features. Frequently it is claimed that philosophy does not bring forth results, at least in the way that one of the empirical sciences does. However, what philosophy actually has done, and should do, is to frame topics, problems and questions, to offer views, to analyze approaches, to point out what can be important, telling why. 1 And in doing all these things, philosophy has sometimes made mistakes, but has had successes as well. The mistakes have come out mainly, in our view, when philosophy has neglected its role of metadiscourse, trying to supplant and, in some cases, to exclude, the substantive research relevant to accounting for the cognitive phenomena worked out by scientific xi
Description: