Climate Change and Global Warming-Exposed-Andrew johnson

257 Pages·2017·12.27 MB·English

by  Craig Lightfoot

Climate Change
and
Global Warming…

Exposed

Hidden Evidence, Disguised Plans

Andrew Johnson
August 2017

Text Copyright Andrew Johnson © 2017.

Cover by Neil Geddes-Ward

Please analyse, discuss and share.

“I wonder if we could contrive ... some magnificent
myth that would in itself carry conviction to our
whole community.”

Plato

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements .......................................................................... iv
Introduction ....................................................................................... 1
Climate Change? Or is it Global Warming? ...................................... 6
Framing the Issue, Controlling Thought and Debate ..................... 10
A Brief History of “Global Warming” and Attitudes to It ............... 16
What Fundamentalist AGW Beliefs Might Result in … ................... 32
“Don’t talk about Changes in the Solar System!” .......................... 48
Persistent Jet Trails/Chemtrails ...................................................... 68
Studying Contrails/PJT ..................................................................... 98
Are Contrail Patterns Caused by Commercial Airline Flights? .... 107
Perception Management of the PJT/Chemtrail Issue ................. 138
Weather Anomalies ...................................................................... 150
Geoengineering – Civilian and Military ....................................... 176
Wilhelm Reich, Cloud Busting and Orgone Energy ..................... 187
“Don’t Talk about This Weather …” ............................................. 200
What Fundamentalist AGW Beliefs ARE Resulting in …. ............. 216
An Answer to Environmental Pollution And Destruction? ......... 234
Conclusions ................................................................................... 240
References .................................................................................... 247
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

My thanks go out to all these people (in no particular order) for their
support, for sharing their research and for giving me encouragement in
one way or another:

Dr Judy Wood Phil Morris
Richard D Hall Menna Trinder-Widdess
Daniel Elliot Debbee Tapner
Sarah Johnson Neil Geddes-Ward
Chris Johnson Brendan Houlihan
Anthony Beckett Adam Dwyer
Sally Kennedy

Thanks to Mohan Rao and Carl James for proof reading and corrections.
Also, enormous thanks are due to Chris Goj for his thorough proof-
reading and very helpful and practical suggestions for improving this text.

About The Author

Andrew Johnson grew up in Yorkshire, England and graduated from
Lancaster University in 1986 with a degree in Computer Science and
Physics. He spent most of the next 20 years working in Software
Engineering and Software Development and travelled to several different
countries. He has also worked full and part time in lecturing and tutoring
(in Adult Education). Now he works for the Open University (part time)
tutoring students, whilst occasionally working freelance on various small
software development projects. In 2006, he set up the website
www.checktheevidence.com as a repository of information he had been
studying. Andrew is married and has two children.

iv
INTRODUCTION

“You are never dedicated to do something you have complete confidence in.
No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They
know it’s going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to
political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it’s always

because these dogmas or goals are in doubt.”

Robert T. Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Pt. II, Ch. 13
Introduction
Why this Book Exists
In about 2003, I realized I was being lied to – about enormously important
topics. You can read about this on my website if you so wish, though it may
change your view of the validity of what I present here. This book exists to
expose people to new information and challenge them to be honest about it.
By the end, I hope that I have shattered your world view and you will, like me,
see things in a completely different light and begin to understand how multiple
parties seem to have conspired to trick us and make us go along with draconian
plans. My main aim is to expose some of the lies and tactics on which these
plans for humanity are based. Of course, now that I have used language like
this, you may have little or no desire to read any further. You may now
consider that anything I write, from hereon in, must be biased and
unreasonable – “the ramblings of a paranoid delusional crank/conspiracy
theorist…” That’s fine by me – it’s your loss, not mine. I know things that you
don’t. Goodbye …

Still reading? Good – I thank you for your kind attention! The evidence shown
in this book affects our immediate and long-term future in extremely powerful
ways – yet most people are unaware of it. Or, if they are aware of the evidence,
they want to ignore it. I would argue that the ignorance of this evidence has
been carefully engineered – using all manner of psychological tactics and
perception management techniques (which we will also discuss).

Have You Heard …?
I think it is probably fair to say that most of the people that need to read this
book probably won’t ever hear about it. If they did hear about it, I don’t think
it is very likely they would read it. I hope that I am wrong about my opening
statements, but only if I am right about the conclusions I draw at the end of
this book.

The weather is something which affects all of us, every day of our lives. It
dictates our long and short-term plans. In the UK, the weather is the “default
topic” of conversation for strangers and friends alike. Though it has obvious
and far reaching importance, most people don’t know very much about the
weather. These days, they don’t take time to observe it and probably spend
more time looking at a screen than they do looking at the sky. They don’t really
know why the weather seems to be changing. They are told by mainstream
sources that anthropogenic (human) activity is having a negative effect on the
weather. Well, when I say “told,” I really mean that the idea is “rammed down
their throats at almost every opportunity and if they disagree with what they are
being force-fed they must be mad – or stupid.”

2
Introduction
I can be fairly confident in saying that this book collects together, for the first
time anywhere, a range of diverse data which proves that the whole issue of
“climate change” is more complicated and challenging than almost all
researchers are willing to consider, examine, or entertain. For example, this
book contains astronomical data which most climatologists will not discuss in
full. Similarly, the book contains climate and weather data that astronomers will
not discuss. The book contains some data that neither astronomers nor
climatologists will discuss. It contains some data that no scientists will
appropriately discuss.

Certain parts of the evidence in this book are never accurately or appropriately
discussed by mainstream academic or media outlets. However, there are also
important parts of this book that are never discussed by those challenging the
mainstream views either. That is, significant parts of the evidence in this book
is rarely discussed or even mentioned on popular “alternative knowledge” or
“conspiracy” type websites.

If you are a regular web-surfer you can use the evidence I bring forth in this
book to further your own research. Others will likely find many reasons why
you should just ignore what I have written. There are hundreds or thousands
of websites devoted to pointing out errors in thinking of the so-called errant
ways of “global warming sceptics” and “climate change deniers” (whatever that
means).

So, if you are a sincere and honest person, you might want to actually check
that what I present to you is true. I must state that I am neither a climatologist
nor a meteorologist. I do have a degree in Computer Science and Physics and I
do work (part time) for a university, though this book has absolutely no
connection to the work I do for that university.

My formal education included a study of physics and chemistry and some
aspects of weather and climate, when I studied O Level Geography. (For
example, I know what an Occlusion is). Additionally, I have studied
Astronomy for quite a number of years on a casual basis. In any case, some of
the aerial features here documented are so blatantly anomalous (primarily due
to their geometry) that I would strongly argue that only basic observation skills
are needed to see that something real and disturbing (but not officially
acknowledged) is occurring.

I have never had any scientific peer-reviewed papers published in any scientific
journals – but some of my work has been read and reviewed by one or more
scientists. So, if you want to rely on author credentials alone in relation to what
is, after all, a hugely important issue, you can conclude now that I can’t
3
Introduction
possibly have anything relevant to say, can I? So, there’s no point in you
reading much further …

Wait a minute – may I ask you …. “Do you need a meteorologist to tell you
when it is raining?” That is, do you still have basic powers of observation and
reasoning that allow you to evaluate what is happening in the world, without
needing an expert to confirm or refute your own conclusions …? Do you need
permission from an academic, an expert or someone in authority to know
whether something is true or not? Of course, only you can answer these
questions yourself. I answered these questions for myself long ago.

Corrections and Augmentations? Yes, Please!
I take the stance of a witness being cross-examined in a court case, and so I say
to you dear reader, “I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but
the truth, so help me web!” Hence, when you have read through the whole book and
checked all the references, if you find any errors or inappropriate references, please
contact me and tell me what they are, so that I may correct and improve this
work – so that we all benefit. I have attempted to reference this material to a
good standard, but of course, it is not being “peer reviewed” for publication in
a recognized scientific journal or even a magazine. I doubt any journal would
publish the evidence I include and describe here – it would be too damaging to
established interests. Indeed, if there is a knowledgeable reader, who has had
papers published in climatology or meteorology – or any related – types of
journals, I challenge them to take some of what I have presented here, work it
up into a paper suitable for submission, and attempt to get it published. Please
write to me and tell me of your experience.

When I was writing the book, one suggestion I had was to include a blank page
at the end of each chapter for readers to make notes on. I have included a
space for some notes at the start of each chapter.

Beliefs and Knowledge
This book is primarily about knowledge, not belief. It is not about believing
whether climate change has one particular cause or another, it is about showing
you evidence that you probably have never heard about, and it should lead you
to a conclusion. If you believe and have faith in government think-tanks and
academic institutions and you believe they can act without any self-interest and
you believe they always tell the “whole truth” – and you believe they always
admit when they are wrong and then correct their errors, again, there is little
point in you reading any further. Going through this book, you will probably
find the earlier sections less challenging than the later ones, though in the next
chapter, you may find yourself a bit out of your depth and feeling
uncomfortable with what I am saying. You have been warned.
4
Introduction
Global Warming – “Cause and Effect”
I am certainly not convinced that the average global temperatures are indeed
rising and I am also not convinced, even if average temperatures are rising, that
this will lead us to catastrophe. I am convinced that those that claim the cause of
any warming is solely the result of human activity are not being honest. Hence,
they are trying to solve an imaginary problem. They claim to know the cause of
disputed data/observations about global temperatures and therefore they claim
to be able to develop solutions. The truth is, they don’t know what’s happening
and they don’t really know whether they are dealing with a cause or an effect.
An example here is the observation that due to the timing or time period
associated with most of the data, a cogent argument can be made that CO
2
increase in the atmosphere is an effect of global warming, not a cause. Many sites
which promote the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory, such as
“Real Climate Science” 1 claim they have explained this, whilst others say the
CO increase follows warming.2
2

What you will see towards the end of this book is evidence of other climate or
weather effects that all the main researchers and scientists are ignoring.
Decades-long arguments over the temporal relationship between changes in
global temperature and CO levels cause the ignorance of much more easily
2
observable effects. Hence, scientists who are “pro” or “con” AGW theory will
not solve the problem they are setting out to solve – because both “pro” and “con”
groups are wrong! Any action taken, based on a false conclusion, could make the
problem worse – and one has to wonder, is that what someone else wants.

5
CHAPTER ONE
CLIMATE CHANGE? OR IS IT
GLOBAL WARMING?

“All great truths begin as blasphemies.”

George Bernard Shaw

Space for Notes Below