C J HAUCER AND THE EWS THEMULTICULTURALMIDDLEAGES Sheila Delany,Series Editor CHAUCERANDTHEJEWS Sources,Contexts,Meanings edited by Sheila Delany C J HAUCER AND THE EWS S , C , M OURCES ONTEXTS EANINGS EDITED BY SHEILA DELANY ROUTLEDGE NEW YORK AND LONDON Published in 2002 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street New York,NY 10001 Published in Great Britain by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane London EC4P 4EE Copyright ©2002 by Routledge Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented,including photocopying and recording or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. Chaucer and the Jews/edited by Sheila Delany ISBN 0-415-93882-1 Contents Acknowledgments vii Editor’s Introduction SHEILADELANY viii Part I Chaucer Texts 1 CHAPTER1 THE JEWISH MOTHER-IN-LAW:SYNAGOGA AND THE MAN OF LAW’S TALE CHRISTINEM. ROSE 3 CHAPTER2 THE PARDONER’S “HOLY JEW” WILLIAMCHESTERJORDAN 25 CHAPTER3 CHAUCER’S PRIORESS,THE JEWS,AND THE MUSLIMS SHEILADELANY 43 CHAPTER4 “JEWES WERK”IN SIR THOPAS JEROMEMANDEL 59 CHAPTER5 POSTCOLONIAL CHAUCER AND THE VIRTUAL JEW SYLVIATOMASCH 69 Part II Chaucerian Contexts 87 CHAPTER6 CHAUCER AND THE TRANSLATION OF JEWISH SCRIPTURES MARYDOVE 89 v vi Contents CHAPTER7 READING BIBLICAL OUTLAWS:THE “RISE OF DAVID” STORY IN THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY TIMOTHYS. JONES 109 CHAPTER8 ROBERT HOLCOT ON THE JEWS NANCYL. TURNER 133 CHAPTER9 THE PROTEAN JEW IN THE VERNON MANUSCRIPT DENISEL. DESPRES 145 CHAPTER10 THE SIEGE OF JERUSALEMAND AUGUSTINIAN HISTORIANS: WRITING ABOUT JEWS IN FOURTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND ELISANARINVANCOURT 165 CHAPTER11 “HOUSE DEVIL,TOWN SAINT”:ANTI-SEMITISM AND HAGIOGRAPHY IN MEDIEVAL SUFFOLK ANTHONYP. BALE 185 Part III Chaucer,Jews,and Us 211 CHAPTER12 ENGLISHNESS AND MEDIEVAL ANGLO-JEWRY COLINRICHMOND 213 CHAPTER13 TEACHING CHAUCER TO THE “CURSED FOLK OF HEROD” GILLIANSTEINBERG 229 CHAPTER14 POSITIVELY MEDIEVAL:TEACHING AS A MISSIONARY ACTIVITY JUDITHS. NEAMAN 237 Contributors 247 Selected Bibliography 251 Index 257 Acknowledgments First and foremost I want to thank the contributors to this volume,especially the authors of new essays, who rose heroically to the several challenges of early deadlines, editorial exigency, and press requirements. At Routledge, Anne Davidson has been warmly supportive of this project, and before the volume was transferred to Routledge via its parent company’s purchase of Garland,Paul Szarmach,director of the Medieval Institute at Western Michi- gan University, and Chris Zacher, of Ohio State University, welcomed the volume into a Garland series. Preparation of the manuscript could not have proceeded smoothly with- out the invaluable aid of my techie research assistants,Margot Kaminski and Blair Leggett; I fervently thank them for their time,effort,perfectionism,and electronic wizardry. Aeron Carre and Ken Kaminski provided technical sup- port and advice at crucial moments. Also essential were the marvelously helpful staff at Simon Fraser University’s Bennett Library, especially Mark Bodnar and Emily Sheldon. Acknowledgment is due to Mary Hamel at theChaucer Review for per- mission to reprint Elisa Narin van Court’s essay from vol. 29 (1995); to St. Martin’s Press for Sylvia Tomasch’s chapter from The Postcolonial Middle Ages, ed. Jeffrey J. Cohen (2000); to Maud McInerney and Routledge for Christine Rose’s chapter in Hildegard of Bingen...(Garland,1998); to Brill Publishers for my article from Medieval Encounters (vol. 5, 1999); and to Frank Cass Company for Colin Richmond’s chapter in The Jewish Heritage in British History:Englishness and Jewishness,ed. Tony Kushner (1992). vii Editor’s Introduction SHEILA DELANY When Sir Edmund Hillary was asked why he climbed Mount Everest, he replied, “Because it’s there.” My impulse for this project was the opposite: because it isn’t there. Such a book, whether in collection or monograph for- mat,hasn’t existed,but is needed for many reasons. In part,this project grows out of the same realization that inspired a previous one,my guest-edited book- length issue of Exemplaria (12.1, 2000), titled “Turn it again”: Medieval Jewish Studies and Literary Theory. My then-recently developed attention to medieval Jewish culture had indicated little mutual awareness between con- ventionally trained medievalists and their Jewish studies colleagues. The Exemplaria issue was meant to help bridge that gap by publishing the work of a group of theoretically informed Jewish studies medievalists. The present volume does something similar with a canonical English author:to recuperate a side of his work and culture that has usually been occluded. In a real sense it was Chaucer that turned me to Jewish studies—more precisely, teaching Chaucer’s poetry—because of the impatience I increas- ingly felt when, of necessity, ventriloquizing Catholic doctrine in order to render his work accessible and comprehensible to my (mostly Christian sec- ular) students. The problematic that Gillian Steinberg and Judith Neaman address in their discussions of teaching this material to Jewish students is not limited to the Orthodox. A secular,even atheistic Jew might well feel just as troubled by the ethico-theological underpinnings of Chaucer’s or other medieval Catholic poetry as an observant rabbi-to-be. I wonder how many readers bridled at the phrase “Catholic poetry”in the previous sentence:Do we think of Chaucer as exemplifying Catholicpoetry? Do we offer courses in “Renaissance Christian drama” when teaching Shakespeare and others; in “the Anglo-Catholic sonnet sequence”; in “medieval Catholic lyric,” or “European Catholic romance in translation”? That we generally do not— despite an abundance of Jewish or indeed Islamic material in all these gen- viii Editor’s Introduction ix res—is precisely the point. We would probably be asked,or feel compelled, to specify if teaching a course in medieval Jewish literature (an exhilarating experience that I strongly recommend to any medievalist),but the other label is invisible because—as Colin Richmond’s essay documents—it is culturally normative, hence requires no specification. This has been the case even when,as Richmond argues,the Jews,whether present or absent,were crucial to the formation of Anglo-Saxon attitudes and the concept of “Englishness” itself. “Tell it like it is”: a difficult imperative for historians or historicists, especially those working in medieval studies. “Alterity” and “presentism” come to mind as signals of the shoals: do we dare to impose our sense of things on a much earlier period,which may have been irredeemably differ- ent from our own? Yet if there is one thing that hasn’t changed down the ages, surely it is the attempt to manufacture consent (in Noam Chomsky’s phrase). David Aers has reminded us how very manufactured is the consent, the consensus, around religious matters, how demanding of the powers not only of the holy but of the state,its armed forces,its judiciary,its cooperat- ing intellectuals.1 Those are the sorts of powers examined here,as the writers collected in this volume contemplate the paradox of what Gloria Cigman some time ago called “an absent presence.”2 She meant the absence and presence of Jews, expelled from England in 1290 by royal mandate (though no official docu- ment has been found,any more than for the French expulsion of 1394). The English expulsion occurred only about a half century before Chaucer’s birth, so that during his early lifetime there might still have been a few converted Jews in England,3and certainly old folk who,as children,had lived alongside them and who remembered them—much as middle-aged or elderly Hungari- ans today remember the Jews who were taken from their villages during World War II and who never returned. Only late in the seventeenth century, after years of inconclusive national debate,did Jews begin to enter England in significant numbers (although a few had emigrated there earlier, whether after the Spanish expulsion of 1492 or as employees at court).4 Despite their physical absence,the literary,theological,and visual repre- sentation of Jews continued; hence the questions animating this volume are “How?” and “Why?” By what channels were late medieval English writers enabled to represent Jews,and for what motives—personal,political,or cul- tural—did they wish to do so? Timothy Jones and Mary Dove examine the legacy of Hebrew scripture as reinterpreted and retranslated during the fourteenth century. Denise Despres explores the significance of the late- fourteenth-century Vernon manuscript, produced during Chaucer’s lifetime, as a vehicle for ambivalent attitudes toward Jews; a similar approach is taken in Elisa Narin van Court’s contextualized study of the late-fourteenth-century alliterative historical romance The Siege of Jerusalem. The peculiarity of the