BOOK ABRIDGMENT IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND by Jordan Howell A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in English Summer 2017 © 2017 Jordan Howell All Rights Reserved BOOK ABRIDGMENT IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND by Jordan Howell Approved: ____________________________________________________________ John Ernest, Ph.D. Chairperson of the Department of English Approved: ____________________________________________________________ George Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: ____________________________________________________________ Ann L. Ardis, Ph.D. Senior Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ___________________________________________________________ Matthew J. Kinservik, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ___________________________________________________________ David A. Brewer, Ph.D. Member of the dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ___________________________________________________________ Siobhan M. Carroll, Ph.D. Member of the dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ___________________________________________________________ Edward J. Larkin, Ph.D. Member of the dissertation committee ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Matthew J. Kinservik, for all of his guidance and unwavering support throughout the duration of this project. Furthermore, a big thanks to my committee, Siobhan Carroll, Edward Larkin, and David Brewer, for all of their instructive feedback over many, many drafts. Thank you all for helping to bring order to the chaos of my chapters, and for helping to complicate my thinking. I explored the ideas in this dissertation at a number of academic conferences, travel for which was generously funded by the Department of English. I would like to thank the Department of English for funding my research through multiple, generous research fellowships, which not only helped to fund travel but also provided me the time to finish this dissertation and publish the research in scholarly journals. I would also like to thank the American Society of Eighteenth-Century Studies for awarding me the Aubrey Williams Travel Grant, which funded numerous research trips, as well as the Lewis Walpole Library and the Beineicke Rare Book and Manuscript Library for awarding me a joint research fellowship that allowed me to spend eight weeks in the archives. I would like to thank my friends for their endless moral support, and Scratch Magoos for always having an open table for me to write. Lastly, I thank my wife, Rebecca, and son, Leo, who never failed to pull me away from the dissertation to enjoy the finer things in life. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 Defining Abridgment ...............................................................................................3 Why Abridgments Matter ........................................................................................8 Chapter Outline ......................................................................................................14 Chapter 1. WHAT IS ABRIDGMENT?.................................................................................. 18 1.1 Designing Abridgments .............................................................................20 1.2 Practices of Abridgment ............................................................................28 1.2.1 Editorial Abridgment......................................................................32 1.2.2 Summary Abridgment ....................................................................40 1.2.3 Transformative Abridgment ...........................................................47 1.3 Abridgments in the Print Marketplace .......................................................63 1.4 Legality of Abridgments ............................................................................72 2. ABRIDGMENT AND THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING ....................... 86 2.1 Abridgment and Early Modern Learning ...................................................86 2.2 Abridgment and the Empirical Sciences ....................................................95 2.3 Wynne’s Abridgement of Mr. Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding..........................................................................................107 2.3.1 Origins of Wynne’s Abridgment ..................................................108 2.3.2 Structure of Wynne’s Abridgment ...............................................117 2.3.3 Style and Rhetoric in Wynne’s Abridgment ................................124 2.3.4 Legacy of Wynne’s Abridgment ..................................................134 v 3. ABRIDGMENTS AND THE ORIGINS OF THE ENGLISH NOVEL ............. 138 3.1 A Hypothesis for Generic Conformity .....................................................141 3.2 Prose Fiction Abridgments before the Novel...........................................144 3.3 Old Narratives for New Readers ..............................................................153 3.4 The Novel Form in Abridgments of Robinson Crusoe ............................160 3.5 Abridgment and the Idea of the Novel .....................................................170 3.6 Novel Abridgments after Crusoe .............................................................178 4. REFORMING THE LONDON STAGE ............................................................. 187 4.1 Toward a Definition of Theatrical Abridgment .......................................187 4.1.1 Quantifying Theatrical Abridgment .............................................188 4.1.2 Defining Theatrical Abridgment ..................................................192 4.2 Dramatic Abridgment in the Restoration: The Case of Hamlet ...............199 4.2.1 Hamlet in Print and Performance: A Brief Textual History.........199 4.2.2 Abridging Hamlet and the Ephemerality of Performance ............205 4.3 Reforming the London Stage ...................................................................213 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 227 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 235 Primary Sources ...................................................................................................235 Secondary Sources ...............................................................................................242 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Abridgments in the English Short Title Catalogue ........................................... 85 Figure 2: Abridgments in the English Short Title Catalogue ........................................... 85 Figure 3: Comparison of Wynne's abridgment to Locke. ............................................... 119 Figure 4: Theatrical Adaptation in Langhans’ Promptbooks .......................................... 192 Figure 5: Comparison of Excisions. Reproduced from Spencer, “A Note on Cutting and Slashing” (1936): 394 ...................................................................................... 210 vii ABSTRACT In the following dissertation, I examine the commercialization of abridgment and posit that the ubiquity of abridged literature challenges long-held assumptions regarding literary history, the history of reading, and the formation of the English literary canon. It is unfortunate that so much modern scholarship tends to characterize book abridgment as subordinate to “original” authorship, dismissing it as a parasitic literary practice that feeds off legitimate literature. But the historical reality is that many of the literary texts that we write about and teach to our students are not the texts average English readers are likely to have encountered. Following the lapse of the Print Licensing Act in 1695, commercial print production surged and people across England’s urban centers were confronted with a deluge of print, much of which was relatively affordable, such as broadsides, pamphlets, and daily gazettes. Books, however, remained expensive. Abridgments performed a valuable socio-cultural function by expanding access to once- expensive literature while also reducing the time investment to consume literature. Abridgments expanded access geographically, as well, because provincial and colonial American printers found a ready market for abridged texts. By 1800, roughly three times as many abridgments of Robinson Crusoe had been printed than had editions of the original, mostly by Scottish publishers operating out of Edinburgh and Glasgow. In North America, the first unabridged edition of Robinson Crusoe was not printed until 1819, viii whereas abridgments had been printed regularly since the 1780s. Abridgments expanded access intellectually by adapting style, form, and rhetoric for diverse audiences with varying levels of reading proficiency. The Methodist luminary John Wesley found Paradise Lost too esoteric for the average English reader, so he altered, abridged, and annotated it without breaking Milton’s blank verse. Moreover, it was John Wynne’s abridgment of Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding that was widely read by students at the universities, not Locke’s original. This story is repeated time and time again, not only for novels but for historically significant works across all genres of literature. “Book Abridgment in Eighteenth-Century England” contributes new knowledge regarding the popularity of abridgment, but it also underscores the plasticity of literature, the instability of textual history, and the artificiality of the literary canon. In the first chapter, I identify methods of book abridgment that were prevalent prior to 1800. Whereas some books were basically cut and pasted into smaller, shorter books (effectively retaining the text from the original), others were paraphrased, excerpted into compendiums, or abridged during the process of translation. Following an examination of the methods of abridgment, I turn to printing records to assess the rise in book abridgment from a relatively obscure practice during the sixteenth century to a ubiquitous practice by the conclusion of the eighteenth century. The chapter concludes with an overview of British copyright law pertaining to book abridgment so as to establish the legality of book abridgment throughout the long eighteenth century. The following three chapters will examine the ways in which book abridgment evolved in print and literary culture. Contrary to modern scholarship that regards book ix abridgment as parasitic, the great intellectuals of the Scientific Revolution recognized that abridgments played a significant role in the dissemination of knowledge, which was integral to the advancement of learning. I examine John Wynne’s Abridgment of Mr. Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1696), which was published in 33 editions (and 5 languages) prior to 1801. Wynne’s abridgment, though interesting in and of itself, is representative of the broader debates concerning prose style and rhetorical brevity following the founding of the Royal Society. Abridgers were well-situated to condense ideas, cut superfluous or long-winded expressions and descriptions, and establish a model of brevity that adapted old works brought closer to a model of perfection that was judged not by flourishes and elegance of language, but by the ease of learning and retention of knowledge. Just as abridgment was flourishing within scientific circles, the practice emerged in prose fiction. In this chapter, my aim is to answer a single question: to what extent do abridgments figure into the origins of the English novel? I suggest that some abridgments constitute a reaction to the models of narration, characterization, and storytelling found in early novels, particularly those by Defoe and Swift. Abridgers had a tendency to curtail in-depth representations of the human psyche, such as is found in the first-person narrations of Robinson Crusoe (1719) and Moll Flanders (1722). Unlike nonfiction abridgments, which sought to simplify and expedite instruction and the retention of knowledge, abridgments of novels sought to expedite reading itself, condensing action so as to increase the rate of action and thereby align the generic attributes of the emergent novel tradition with run-of-the-mill formula fiction. x
Description: