Biomimetics in Architecture: Architecture of Life and Buildings

276 Pages·2010·28.86 MB·English

by  Petra Gruber

BIOMIMETICS IN ARCHITECTURE
ARCHITECTURE OF LIFE AND BUILDINGS
PETRA GRUBER
Petra Gruber
Institute for History of Architecture and Arts, Building Research and Preservation
Vienna Institute of Technology
Vienna, Austria
Printed with financial support of Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung, Vienna, Austria
This work is subject to copyright.
All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation,
reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machines or similar means,
and storage in data banks.
Product Liability: The publisher can give no guarantee for all the information contained in this book. This does
also refer to information about drug dosage and application thereof. In every individual case the respective
user must check its accuracy by consulting other pharmaceutical literature.
The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of
a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and
therefore free for general use.
© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien
Printed in Germany
SpringerWienNewYork is part of
Springer Science+Business Media
springer.at
Cover Illustrations: Petra Gruber
Copy editing: Petra Gruber, Jo Lakeland
Image editing: Roman Bönsch
Typesetting: Petra Gruber
Printing: Strauss GmbH, Mörlenbach, Germany
Printed on acid-free and chlorine-free bleached paper
SPIN: 12594559
With 466 Figures
Library of Congress Control Number: 2010938940
ISBN 978-3-7091-0331-9 SpringerWienNewYork
4

CONTENT
1 Introduction 7
2 Background 9
2.1 Architecture 9
2.2 Bionics [Bionik] Biomimetics 13
2.3 Transfer and methods 41
3 Classical approaches to investigate overlaps
between biology and architecture 50
3.1 Relationship between nature and architecture 51
3.2 "Natural construction" 54
3.3 Nature's design principles 96
3.4 Parallels, differences and synergies between design in nature and in architecture 108
3.5 Biomimetics in construction and architecture 109
4 New approaches and application of
biology's life criteria on architecture 110
4.1 Life, biology 110
4.2 Architectural interpretation of life criteria 124
4.3 Comments and hitherto unexplored fields 191
4.4 A living architecture 194
5 Case studies 196
5.1 Adaptation and evolution of traditional architecture on Nias Island 196
5.2 Transformation Architecture 243
5.3 Lunar Exploration Architecture 247
5.4 Biomimetic Design Proposals 254
6 Discussion 262
6.1 Transfer strategies and methods 262
6.2 Suggestions 263
7 Appendix 264
7.1 Literature 264
7.2 Figures and Photography 270
C |o ntents 5

1 INTRODUCTION
The Russian Juri S. Lebedew in the 1960s wrote
the only comprehensive work done so far on
The aim of the project biomimetics in architecture "Architekturbionik"5. Recent developments in
- architecture of life and buildings - is innovation in biomimetics in Germany and the UK occasionally
architecture. The purpose of investigating the areas touch architecture, but no comprehensive effort is
common to architecture and biology is not to draw being made.
borders or make further distinctions, or even to The new approach carried out here transfers the
declare architecture a living organism, but to clarify biological characteristics of life onto the built
what is currently happening in the overlapping environment and thus architecture.
fields. The accumulation of knowledge of individual In order to make the topic accessible to architects
examples is less important than the investigation of the basics of life sciences are presented, which
the methodology of translating knowledge gained cannot be omitted when dealing with nature and
from nature into technical solutions. The objective natural role models for design. An overview of the
is to employ biomimetics as a tool in architectural present state of research in the relatively young
design. The fields in architecture where this is scientific field of biomimetics shows the potential of
applicable and necessary are diverse. Innovation the approach.
will help to solve current problems in architecture
and environment, and new fields of architecture Methods used for this investigation are diverse.
and design will be explored, e.g. space design. Literature research, conference organisation and
The strategic comparison with biological paradigms participation, and expert interviews were carried
will help identify areas for innovation. Best of all, out.
biomimetics in architecture will help develop a Data for the case study about traditional architecture
culture of active environmental design. in Nias was collected in two field trips, with
extensive architectural documentation and narrative
This book entitled "Biomimetics in Architecture - interviews. The processing of the data was done with
Architecture of Life and Buildings" (Architekturbionik architectural and engineering tools. Students design
- die Architektur von Bauwerken und Lebewesen) projects in different intensities delivered examples
gives a broad overview of overlapping areas in the for the biomimetic approach in architecture. Another
fields of biology and architecture, investigating the case study in space architecture based on literature
field of what is called biomimetics in architecture research and design studies in workshops was also
(Architekturbionik). carried out.
A comprehensive comparative study of these
overlapping areas has not yet been carried The basic assumption of the research is that the
out. Numerous people have already delivered study of the overlapping fields of biology and
contributions to the connections between architecture architecture will show innovative potential for
and biology. Many such approaches have provided architectural solutions.
successful architectural developments. The important questions are: Can the combination
Werner Nachtigall has compiled a vast collection of the biological characteristics of life and the
of examples and made a heroic attempt to order built environment offer new solutions for more
the field of biomimetics as a whole. In his works appropriate, more sustainable architectural designs?
"Baubionik"1 and "Vorbild Natur, Bionik-Design für Can the new approach - searching for life's criteria
funktionelles Gestalten"2 he concentrates on issues in architecture - provide a new view of architectural
around design and building. Frei Otto and his group achievements and make visible innovative potential
have tried to give architects and engineers a view that has not yet been exploited?
on what he called "Natürliche Konstuktionen"3 and
developed an experimental approach to natural
design. Otto Patzelt has compared growing and
building in "Wachsen und Bauen"4.
1 Nachtigall, W.: Bau-Bionik, 2005
2 Nachtigall, W.: Vorbild Natur, 1997
3 Otto, F. et al.: Natürliche Konstruktionen, 1985
4 Patzelt, O.: Wachsen und Bauen, 1974 5 Lebedew, J.S.: Architektur und Bionik, 1983
Introduction | 7
Why is it important to deal with There seems to be a transition in architecture from
architecture and biology? providing unsophisticated shelter to a smart third
skin for humans.
• Growth of cultural landscape • Sick building syndrome - sick environment
At the beginning of 2007, 6.6 billon people are syndrome
living on earth.6 Almost all of them live in cultural The discovery of the "Sick Building Syndrome"
landscapes. We have managed to transform the has led to intensive research and development in
natural environment to fit our needs in many the sector of building automation and technology
respects. About half of the world's population lives integration.8 The "Sick Environment Syndrome"
in densely populated urban areas. Built environment has not yet been defined as a cause of illness, but
has replaced the former natural environment as their own concern will hopefully lead humans to pay
man's "normal" surrounding. more attention to ecology in the future.
Therefore the design of the built environment is • Other future environments
becoming more and more important. Qualities that Both the expansion of civilisation on Earth and space
in former times could be found in nature have to technology have introduced new environments
be introduced into the artificial, cultural, or social, already dealt with by architecture. Until recently only
environment, in order to maintain quality of life and functionality and materials were considered when
biodiversity.7 designing for extremely hostile environments.
Architecture is mainly concerned with the built part Once long duration missions are undertaken human
of our environment, but must also refer to spatial factors have to be considered and these need to
planning on a larger scale. be answered by architectural means The different
• Environmental concern nature of space environments requires innovative
Together with the growth of the world's population, architectural approaches, which will then influence
the rapid development in technology and economy architecture on earth.
creates an enormous impact on the environment • Innovation
as a whole. The building industry's, and thus The only way to solve some of our building-related
architecture's, share in the developments which are problems is through innovative solutions. Role
listed below are considerable: models taken from nature, which have developed
• Natural land loss and irreversible destruction of over many years can enhance innovation.
biodiversity • Criteria of life
• Exploitation of raw material Life has been introduced into architecture discussion,
• Extensive use of energy but life itself evades precise definition. Criteria of life
• Production of waste attempt to provide a definition of life that covers the
• Emissions into soil, water and air whole of contemporary understanding of life in its
Architecture has to adapt to environmental changes. many manifestations. Offering all possible starting
If pollution continues, architecture will in the future points for comparison and transfer, the paradigm of
have to provide shelter from a potentially hazardous life's criteria is perfect for investigation of overlaps
future environment. between biology and architecture.
The investigation of biology and natural processes • Transfer of biological criteria of life to
makes architects aware of the ongoing processes architecture - spin off
and the influence they can achieve. The transfer of biological criteria of life to architecture
• Technology requires discussion of areas, where biology and
Technological progress provides different means architecture actually meet. Instead of staying in the
of planning and building, and has opened up centre of each discipline, the boundaries have to be
opportunities, which allow a more generous explored - in order to find that these fields are not
interpretation of architecture in terms of as distinct as they seem to be.
functionality and mediation between humans and The examination of the overlapping fields will
their environment. Current developments show an hopefully result in further mutual understanding,
increase of life's criteria being implemented into convergence of disciplines and common action.
architectural projects.
6 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human
Wellbeing, 2005, http://www.maweb.org/en/Condition.
aspx#download [03/2007]
7 Turner, W.R. et al.: Global Urbainzation and the Separation of
Humans from Nature, BioScience, 2004 8 Daniels, K.: Technologie des ökologischen Bauens, 1999, p.41
8
2 BACKGROUND
Making architecture is about making projects.
"Project" has a wider meaning than a common
For this interdisciplinary investigation it is necessary intention or plan to do something. In architecture,
to define and describe the fields of both architecture projects are building tasks, which may already
and biology to provide the essential background. have been completed, or are still in "project phase"
existing on paper (or encoded on hard disks), waiting
2.1 ARCHITECTURE for realisation, or having been already abandoned.
The term does not refer to a specific size or scale.
"[Architecture is] the art or practice of designing As innovation is the focus in this discussion, we will
and constructing buildings… also take into account unbuilt projects, if they are
The complex or carefully designed structure of important to illustrate developments in architecture.
something"9 Some unbuilt projects became very famous in
The second definition taken from the New Oxford architecture history as exemplary designs. Being
American Dictionary already characterises the unbuilt, and often described only roughly, these
"nature" of architecture. The discipline that projects on one hand still provide space for vision,
puts material or immaterial things in order is and on the other hand the basic idea is not yet
called architecture in many fields, not only in the spoiled and watered down by the needs of execution.
classic architecture of building. There is a basic Frederic Kiesler's "Endless house", for example, was
architecture in the design of life and organisms, never built, but served as a kind of asymptote for
and even in information technology we use the many other attempts at organic space. Buckminster
word architecture when describing the basic layout Fuller's visualisation of a transparent dome over
of computer programs. Manhattan is tempting for anyone dealing with
lightness in design, but still impossible to realise.
What is architecture? What is The exactitude of expression is difficult to maintain
not architecture? About projects, in the process of application and execution, but this
constructions and structures is also one of the big challenges in architecture.
Most interesting in the context of biological
Architecture is interpreted here as a widespread paradigms for architecture are projects which show
profession engaged in the design of the built a strong interrelation between form, function and
environment. It includes design on all levels of structure or construction, so load bearing is a key
scale, from urban and regional planning to small function and will therefore be focused on.
building projects. It is not exclusively referred to "Construction" and "structure" are commonly used
as "proper" architecture, which is designed by for elements of architectural projects which have
architects, but as a general term standing for the to fulfil tasks of load bearing. The differentiation
material structure that defines space and enables between construction and structure is somehow
interaction.10 Architecture contains life. As Kaas connected to that of structure and material.
Oosterhuis says, "architecture becomes the Following Jim Gordon: "Structures are made from
discipline of building transactions"11: it is about to materials and we shall talk about structures and
move beyond containing activity, taking an active materials; but in fact there is no clear-cut dividing
role, not only influencing but interacting with living line between a material and a structure."12 In
systems. common use, a construction is something which
has to be put together, typically a large element.
The term structure is used in a more abstract
9 New Oxford American Dictionary, program version 1.0.1, 2005 notion, when we are talking about load bearing for
10 Hillier B.: In his essay "Specifically Architectural Theory: a Partial example, but can as well be used for any important
Account of the Ascent from Building as Cultural Transmission to ordering element (which could be abstract), or a
Architecture as Theoretical Concretion" Hillier defines "architecture"
discernable pattern, even surface patterning.13
in contrast to "building" as a design process requiring purposeful
and thoughtful innovative emphasis, other than building by
what he calls "culturally bound competences". Eventually Hillier 12 Gordon, J.E.: Structures, or why Things don't Fall down, 1981,
concedes innovative potential to development of and in traditional p.29
architecture. However, in general this differentiation is difficult to 13 The German terms "Konstruktion" and "Struktur" are not
maintain, as the involvement of people as creative potential in clearly differentiated, either. "Konstruktion" is used for a large-
building processes always brings a chance for innovation, whether scale load bearing system, e.g. the steel construction for the roof
systematic intent or practical understanding is underlying the of a stadium, but speaking in an abstract sense, "Struktur" can
new solution. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/archive/00001027/01/ also be used. In dealing with the works of Jim Gordon and Werner
hillier_1993-specifically_architectural.pdf [11/2007] Nachtigall, there seems to be a better understanding in translating
11 Oosterhuis, K.: Hyperbodies, 2003, p.6 "Konstruktion" with "structure" and "Struktur" with "material".
Background | Architecture 9