“Big data pragmatics!” or “Putting the ACL in computational social science” or If you think these title alternatives could turn people on, turn people off, or otherwise have an effect, this talk might be for you. Lillian Lee, Cornell University http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/llee The one equation in this talk Lots of on-line conversations (Facebook, Twitter, ...;YouTube comments...; Yelp reviews...;...) = Many systems with humans and language as key components = Fantastic opportunities for NLP + the social sciences to build better systems and learn more about people A sampling Lexical diffusion: Jacob Eisenstein, Brendan O’Connor, Noah Smith, Eric P. Xing, 2014. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113114 L ic e n se Power relationships from language: d fro m Vinod Prabhakaran, Owen Rambow. T h e C Best short paper hon. mention, ACL 2014 a r to o n B a n k L ic e n s Language matching and ed fro m community engagement: T h e Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C a r to o Bob West, Dan Jurafsky, n B a n Jure Leskovec, Chris Potts. k Best paper, WWW 2013. “Lillian” What about the effect of language choice? One aspect of phrasing: framing The framing of an arguments emphasizes certain principles or perspectives. “One of the most important concepts in the study of public opinion” [James h t t p Druckman, 2001] :/ / w w w .o u r Hedging and framing in GMO debates: Eunsol Choi, Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee, Cristian br e a t h Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Jennifer Spindel 2012 in g p la n e t .c o m / "green revolution" "Frankenfood" co n t r o l-t h e -w o r ld -t h r o u g h -g e n e t ic a lly -m o d Other “*ACL” framing work includes: Viet-An Nguyen, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Philip Resnik 2013; ifie d Eric Baumer, Elisha Elovic, Ying Qin, Francesca Polletta, Geri Gay, 2015. -fo o d / Past research: phrasing may not matter Daniel Hopkins, SSRN 2013: “...there is no evidence that groups targeted by specific frames [such as ‘death panels’ in the health care debates] respond accordingly.” Justin Grimmer, Solomon Messing, Sean Westwood, The Impression of Influence, 2014: total number of messages mattered more than amount of money the messages described. ! Either Sasa Petrovic, Miles Osborne, or Victor Lavrenko, slashdot 2014: “...a famous person can write anything and it will be retweeted. An unknown person can write the same tweet and it will be ignored.” Purely hypothetical NAACL Board meeting I knew I should have said “arf”. lic e n s e d fr o m th e C a r to o n B “Joel” “Mike” a n k “Hal” “CCB” “me” Still, can wording alone be influential? Non-options: Have better ideas. (Instantaneously) become alpha dog. Be a dog at all. “Parallel universe” experimental paradigm Exploit situations with many instances of: h t ...the same speaker pt /: / w w w mi. ...in the same situation, or d b c. o m / m e conveying the same info... d ai / r m 2 9 6 3 ...varying their wording (beyond a fixed set 81 8 7 3 6 of lexical choices) t/ t 0 1 0 7 0 4 8 / and see the effects. Relates to work on style (e.g., Annie Louis and Ani Nenkova, 2013 ) and paraphrasing (e.g., Wei Xu, Alan Ritter, Chris Callison-Burch, Bill Dolan, Yangfeng Ji, 2014 ) Outline h ttp s :/ / w Memorability and cultural penetration: w w .f Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Justin Cheng, Jon Kleinberg, lic k r.c Lillian Lee, ACL 2012 om / p h o http tos/ :/ h /pix yku/ a 3 b 6 a 1 y.c 42 o 6 m 1 2 /en/tw Information sharing and spread: 99/in/ itter-tweet-tw Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee, Bo Pang, ACL 2014 photostream itter-b emphttphttp / ird ath://:// -312464 ie-326x2www.bebwww.jam / Claim strength and its effects: 35.pneksayaicao • Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee, ACL (short) 2014 g fasi.cobserve • Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee, work in progress m/wr.com p-conten/assets/ t/uploads/11552774/ 201view 3/11/s.jpg Other *ACL work includes: Marco Guerini, Gödze Ötzbal, Carlo Strapparava, 2015 Tim Althoff, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Dan Jurafsky 2014. Aside on presentation style Paraphrasing Stuart Shieber: Your goal is not to convince people that you are brilliant, but that your solution is trivial. ! It takes a certain strength of character to take that as one's goal. ! ! Purely hypothetical reviewing situation “There is very little substance to this paper. ! There are no new applications or techniques.” “me” & “my coauthors” “WSDM” submission reviewer
Description: