Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2009: Vol 32 Index & Table of Contents

2009·1.8 MB·English

Contents Volume 32:1 February 2009
AL2OS EE
Del Giudice, M. Sex, attachment, and the development of
reproductive strategies
AITTEIRIEIIEER! I E Open Peer Commentary Kang, M. J. & Glassman, M. Attachment
Ackerman, J. M. & Kenrick, D. T. Selfishness patterns of homeless youth: Choices of stress
3 and sex or cooperation and family values? and confusion
4 Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & Kerns, K. A. Developmental transformations in
van IJzendoorn, M. H. No reliable gender attachment in middle childhood
differences in attachment across the lifespan 99 Kruger, D. J. Life history as an integrative
PNae e Beckes, L. & Simpson, J. A. Attachment theoretical framework advancing the
reproduction, and life history trade-offs: A broader unde rstanding of the attachment system
view of human mating boW w Lewis, A. J. & Tooley, G. Disorganized
Campbell, A. “Fatal attraction” syndrome: attachment and reproductive strategies
Not a good way to keep your man Li, N., He, J. & Li, T. Gender difference of
bo
Chen, B.-B. & Li, D. Avoidant strategy in insecure attachment: Universal or culture specificr 6
insecure females Maestripieri, D. The contribution of
i
Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A. & comparative research to the development and
:
i Olderbak, S. Attachment and life history testing of life history models of human attachment
26
strategy . and reproductive strategies
i Flinn, M. V., Muehlenbein, M. P. & Ponzi, D.
} Evolution of neuroendocrine mechanisms might not contribute much to the daptiv ness
linking attachment and life history: The social of reproductive strategies
neuroendocrinology of middle Petters, D. & Waters, E. Modeling, simulating
childhood O'7 and simplifying links between stress
Goetz, C. D., Perilloux, C. & Buss, D. M. attachment, and reproduction
Attachment strategies across sex, ontogeny, and Quinlan, R. J. Predicting cross-cultural
MYPRNe gT N relationship type patterns in sex-biased parental investment
Goldstein Ferber, S. Co-regulation of stress and attachment
in uterus and during early infancy mediates early Seltzer, L. J. & Pollak, §. D. Neuroendocrine
programming of gender differences in features of attachment in infants and
attachment styles: Evolutionary, genetic, and nonhuman primates
endocrinal perspectives Symons, D. K. & Szielasko, A. L. Attachment
Harris, J. R. Attachment theory underestimates styles within sexual re lationships are strategic
the child Volpe, L. E. & Barton, R. A. Attachment
Hoénekopp, J. Pre-adjustment of adult attachment and sexual strategies
style to extrinsic risk levels via early attachment Zayas, V. & Ram, D. What love has to do
style is neither specific, nor reliable, nor effective, with it: An attachment perspective on pair
and is thus not an adaptation bonding and sexual behavior
Jackson, J. J. & Ellis, B. J. Synthesizing
life-history theory with sexual selection: Toward Author’s Response
a comprehensive model of alternative Del Giudice, M. Human r produc tive
reproductive strategies strategies: An emerging synthesis?
AAADLLNEEESNEEDELIEEP TPT R E SI TI ECROAH
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. Précis of Bayesian Rationality:
The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning 69
Open Peer Commentary O’Brien, D. P. Human reasoning includes a
Allott, N. & Uchida, H. Classical logic, mental logic 96
conditionals and “nonmonotonic” reasoning Over, D. E. & Hadjichristidis, ( . Uncertain
Brighton, H. & Olsson, H. Identifying premises and Jeffrey's rule 97
the optimal response is not a necessary Pfeifer, N. & Kleiter, G. D. Mental probability
step toward explaining function logic 9S
Danks, D. & Eberhardt, F. Explaining norms Poletick, F. H. Popper's Severity of Test as
an intuitive probabilistic model of hypothesis
and norms € xplain 1e “d
De Neys, W. Be yond re sponse output: More testing
Politzer, G. & Bonnefon, J.-F. Let us not
lo gical tt h in we think
Evans, J. St. B. 1 Does rational analysis put the probabilistic cart before the uncertainty
88
stand up to rational analysis? bull LOO
Griffiths, T. I . The strengths of — and some of Schroyens, W. On is an ought: Levels of analysis
89
the onpepsae for Bayesian models of cognition 90 and the de ‘scriptive versus normative ana alysis of
Hahn, U. Explaining more by drawing on less human reasoning 10]
aaeed. G. S. ( complexity provides a better Stenning, K. & van Lambalgen, M.
explanation than probability for confidence “Nonmonotonic” does not mean “probabilistic” 102
in syllogistic inferences 91 Straubinger, N., Cokely, E. T. & Stevens, J. R.
Khalil, E. I . Are stomachs rational? 9] The dynamics of deve lopme nt: Challenges
Liu, I.-m. Is the second-step conditionalization for Bayesian rationality
unnecessary r 92 Wagenmakers, E.-J. How do individuals reason
McKenzie, C. R. M. Bayes plus environment 93 in the Wason card selection task?
Nelson, J. D. Naive optimality: Subjects’ heuristics
can be better motivated than experimenters’
optimal models 94
Oberauer . K. Oaksford & Chater’s the Ory Authors’ Response
of reasoning: High prior, lower posterior Oaksford, M. & Chater,N . The uncertain
plausibility reasoner: Bayes, logic, and rationality 105
Contents Volume 322 April 2009
Carruthers, P. How we know our own minds: The relationship
between mindreading and metacognition
Open Peer Commentary Langland-Hassan, P. Metacognition without
Anderson, M. L. & Perlis, D. What puts the introspection
“meta” in metacognition? Lewis, C. & Carpendale, J. I. M. Carruthers
Baars, B. J. Is feeling pain just mindreading? marvelous magical mindreading 2p
Our mind-brain constructs realistic knowledge Lombardo, M. V., Chabsohes ti, B. &
of ourselves Baron-Cohen, S. What neuroimaging and
Buckner, C., Shriver, A., Crowley, S. & perceptions of self-other similarity can tell us
Allen, C. How “weak” mindreaders inherited about the mechanism underlying mentalizing
the earth 140 Lurz, R. W. Feigning introspective blindness
Catania, A. C. Cognitive science at fifty 14] for thought
Couchman, J. J., Coutinho, M. V. C., Mills, C. M. & Danovitch, J. H. Getting to
Beran, M. J. & Smith, J. D. Metacognition know yourself .. . and others
is prior 142 Murphy, D. Vasie ‘ties of self-explanation
Evans, J. St. B. T. Introspection, confabulation, pi en D. Global broadcasting and
142
and dual-process. theory self-interpretation
Fernyhough, C. Wh: it can we say about the Petty, R. E. & Brinol, P. Introspec tion and
inner experience of the young child? interpretation: Dichotomy or continuum?
Fiala, B. & Nichols, S$. Confabulation, Proust, J. Overlooking metacognitive
confidence, and introspection experience 158
Frankish,K . How we know our conscious Robbins, P. Guilt by dissociation: Why
minds: lntrospective access to conscious mindreading may not be prior to
thoughts metacognition after all 159
Friedman, O. & Petrashek, A. R. Rochat, P. Social-affective origins of
Non-interpretative metacognition for true beliefs mindreading and metacognition 160
Hernik, M., Fearon, P. & Fonagy, P. Wiffen, B. & David, A. Metacognition
There must be more to development of mindreading, and insight in schizophrenia 16]
mindreading and metacognition than passing Williams, D. M., Lind, S. E. & Happé, I
false belief tasks 147 Metacognition may be more impaired than
Huebner, B. & Dennett, D. C. Banishing “I” mindreading in autism
and “we” from accounts of metacognition 148 Zinck, A., Lodahl, S. & Frith, (€
Hurlburt, R. T. Unsymbolized thinking, sensory Making a case for introspection
awareness, and mindreading 149
Kornell, N., Schwartz, B. L. & Son, L. K. Author’s Response
What monkeys can tell us about metacognition Carruthers, P. Mindreading underlies
and mindreading 150 metacognition 164
Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J. & Lovibond, P. F. The propositional
nature of human associative | sarning
Open Peer Commentary Mandler, G. Propositional encodings are
Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D. & a subset of organization theory
Hermans, D. Associative learning requires Matute, H. & Vadillo, M. A. The Proust effect
associations, not propositions 198 and the evolution ofa dual learning system
Baker, A. G., Baetu, I. & Murphy, R. A. McLaren, I. P. L. Both rules and
Propositional learning is a useful research associations are required to predict
heuristic but it is not a theoretical algorithm 199 human behaviour
Beckers, T. & Vervliet, B. The truth and Miles, J. D., Proctor, R. W. & Capaldi, E. J.
value of theories of associative learning 200 Associative learning without reason or belief
Bliss-Moreau, E. & Barrett, L. F. Morsella, E., Riddle, T. A. & Bargh, J. A.
What’s reason got to do with it? Undermining the foundations: Questioning
Affect as the foundation of learning 201 the basic notions of associationism
218
Boakes, R. A. Learning without thinking 202 and mental representation
Castro, L. & Wasserman, E. A. Rats and Newell, B. R. What is the link between
infants as propositional reasoners: A propositions and memories? 219
plausible possibility r 203 Nolan, R. The new enlightenment hypothesis:
Chater, N. Rational models of conditioning 204 All learners are rational 219
Dawson, M. E. & Schell, A. M. Is propositional Olsson, A. & Ohman, A. Is cultivating
learning necessary for human autonomic “biological blindness” a viable route
classical conditioning? 205 to understanding behavioral phenomena? 220
Dwyer, D. M., Le Pelley, M. E., George, Penn, D. C., Cheng, P. W., Holyoak,
D. N., Haselgrove, M. & Honey, R. C. K. J., Hummel, J. E. & Povinelli, D. J.
Straw-men and selective citation are needed There is more to thinking than propositions
Schmajuk, N. A. & Kutlu, G. M.
to argue that associative-link formation makes
no contribution to human learning 206 The computational nature of associative learning
Gawronski, B. & Bodenhausen, G. V. Operating Schultheis, H. & Lachnit, H. Of mice and
principles versus operating conditions in the men: Revisiting the relation of nonhuman
distinction between associative and human learning
and propositional processes 207 Shanks, D. R. The associative nature of human
Gopnik, A. Rational constructivism: A new associative learning
way to bridge rationalism and empiricism 208 Sternberg, D. A. & McClelland, J. L. How do
Greenwood, J. D. Cognition, consciousness, we get from propositions to behavior?
and the cognitive revolution 209 Uleman, J. S. Automatic (spontaneous)
Hall, G. Learning in simple systems 210 propositional and associative learning of
Lagnado, D. A. A causal framework for first impressions
integrating learning and reasoning Witnauer, J. E., Urcelay, G. P. &
Li, N. Trace conditioning, awareness, and Miller, R. R. A one-system theory that
the propositional nature of associative learning bo bo is not propositional
Livesey, E. J. & Harris, J. A. Is there room
for simple links in a propositional mind? Authors’ Response
bo bo
Lyn, H. & Rumbaugh, D. M. Saliences, Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J. & Lovibond, P. F.
propositions, and amalgams: Emergent Link-based learning theory creates more
learning in nonhumans bo w problems than it solves 23)
Erratum/ Corrigendum
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. No reliable gender differences in attachment
across the lifespan bo NI
Contents Volume 32:(3/4) June/August 2009
Archer, J. Does sexual selection explain human sex differences
in aggression:
Open Peer Commentary Johnson, D. D. P. & van Vugt, M. A history
Bailey, D. H., Oxford, J. K. & Geary, D. C. of war: The role of inter-group conflict in sex
Ultimate and proximate influences on differences in aggression 280
human sex differences 266 Kaighobadi, F. & Shackelford, T. K.
Behme, C. Does sexual selection explain Suspicions of female infidelity predict
why human aggression peaks in early childhood? 267 men’s partner-directed violence IS]
Benenson, J. F. Dominating versus eliminating Kempenaers, B. & Forstmeier, W.
the competition: Sex differences in human \ quantitative genetic approach to understanding
intrasexual aggression 268 aggressive behavior 282
Boden, J. M. Sex differences in the developmental Kenrick, D. T. & Griskevicius, V. More holes
antecedents of aggression 269 in social roles
Browne, K. R. Sex differences in aggression: Pellegrini, A. D. Moderators of sex differences
Origins and implications for sexual integration in sexual selection theory 285
of combat forces Pound, N., Daly, M. & Wilson, M. There’s
Buss, D. M. The multiple adaptive problems no contest: Human sex differences
Csoalmvpedb elbly, h uAm.a nW haatg grkeisnsdi ono f selection? aO9i77 79 are sexually selected 286
Schredl, M. sex differences in dream
Cashdan, E. Sex differences in aggression: aggression
What does evolutionary theory predict?
Sefcek, I A, & Sacco, D. F. Human sexual
Corr, P. J. & Perkins, A. M. Differentiating dimorphism, fitness display, and ovulatory cycle
defensive and predatory aggression: effects 288
Neuropsychological systems and personality Sell, A. Standards of evidence for
in sex differences designed sex differences 289
Dickins, T. E. & Sergeant, M. J. T. Two more Terburg, D., Peper, J. S., Morgan, B. &
things for consideration: Sexual orientation van Honk, J. Sex differences in human
and conduct disorder aggression: The interaction between early
Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. Sexual selection developmental and later activational testosterone 290
does not provide an adequate theory of sex Tremblay, R. E. & Coté, S$. M. Development
differences in aggression 276 of sex differences in physical aggression:
Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P. R. & The maternal link to epigenetic mechanisms 290
Brumbach, B. H. Sex, aggression, van den Berghe, P. L. Sexual selection and
and life history strategy social roles: Two models or one? r¢ JI]
Finkel, E. J. & Slotter, E. B. An I° Theory
analysis of human sex differences in aggression Author’s Response
Gaulin, S. J. C. Biophobia breeds
Archer, i Refining the sexual selection
unparsimonious exceptionalism explanation within an ethological framework
Cohen Kadosh, R. & Walsh, V. Numerical representation in the
parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?
OO
Open Peer Commentary Nunez, R. E. Numbers and numerosities:
Algom, D. Slippery platform: The role of Absence of abstract neural realization doesn’t
automatic and intentional processes in testing mean non-abstraction
the effect of notation 328 Orban, G. A. The discussion of methodological
Ansari, D. Are non-abstract brain limitations in number representation studies is
repre sentations of number developmentally incomplete
plausible? 329 Pease, A., Smaill, A. & Guhe, M.
Campbell, J. I. D. & Metcalfe, A. W. S. Abstract or not abstract? Well, it depends .. .
Numerical abstractness and elementary Pesenti, M. & Andres, M. Common
arithmetic 330 mistakes about numerical representations
Cantlon, J. F., Cordes, S., Libertus, M. E. & Peters, E. & Castel, A. Numerical
Brannon, E. M. Numerical abstraction: representation, math skills, memory,
It ain’t broke 33] and decision-making
Cohen, D. J. Numerical representations are Piazza, M. & Izard, V. What is an (abstract)
neither abstract nor automatic 332 neural representation of quantity?
Dehaene, S. The case for a notation-independent Reynvoet, B. & Notebaert, K. Abstract or not?
representation of number 333 Insights from priming
Falter, C. M., Noreika, V., Kiverstein, J. & Rosenberg-Lee, M., Tsang, J. M. & Menon, V.
Molder, B. Concrete magnitudes: From Symbolic, numeric, and magnitude representations
numbers to time 300 in the parietal cortex
Freeman, W. J. & Kozma, R. Brain neural Santens, S., Fias, W. & Verguts, T. Abstract
activity patterns yielding numbers are operators, representations of number: What interactions
not representations 336 with number form do not prove and priming
Ganor-Stern, D. Automatic numerical effects do Ww Ot
processing is based on an abstract Sziics, D., Soltész, F. & Goswami, U. Beyond
representation oot format-specificity: Is analogue magnitude really
Grabner, R. H. Expertise in symbol-referent the core abstract feature of the cultural
mapping 338 number representation? Ww Olb o
Houdé, O. Abstract after all? Abstraction Tzelgov, J. & Pinhas, M. In search of non-abstract
through inhibition in children and adults 339 representation of numbers: Maybe on the right
Kucian, K. & Kaufmann, L. A developmental! track, but still not there
Ww Uto w
model of number representation 340 Vallar, G. & Girelli, L. Numerical
Lindemann, O., Rueschemeyer, S.-A. & representations: Abstract or supramodal?
Bekkering, H. Symbols in numbers: From Some may be spatial wwu lu N
numerals to magnitude information 34] Wiefel, A., Pauen, S. & Dueck, M. Do infants
Mayo, J. P. Inactivation and adaptation count like scientists? Ww U1O t
of number neurons 342
Myachykov, A., Platenburg, W. P. A. &
Authors’ Response:
Fischer, M. H. Non-abstractness as mental Cohen Kadosh, R. & Walsh, V. Non-abstract
simulation in the representation numerical representations in the IPS: Further
of number 343 support, challenges, and clarifications
Contents Volume 32:5 October 2009
Vigil, J. M. A socio-relational framework of sex differences
in the expression of emotion 375
Open Peer Commentary Lyons, M. Cry baby cry, make your mother
Basso, F. & Oullier, O. When organization buy? Evolution of tears, smiles, and reciprocity
meets emotions, does the socio-relational potential 399
framework fail? 39] Madison, G. Human female exogamy is
Buss, D. M. The role of emotions in supported by cross-species comparisons: Cause to
adaptations for exploitation 391 recognise sex differences in societal policy? 100
Ferber, S. G. Biofeedback mechanisms Provine, R. R. Reciprocity of laughing, humor
between shapeable endogen structures and and tickling, but not tearing and crving, in
contingent social complexes: The nature of the sexual marketplace . 100
determination for developmental paths 392 Swain, J. E. Brain-based sex differences in
Fischer, A. H. Beyond our origin: Adding parenting propagate emotion expression 10]
social context to an explanation of sex Todorov, A. On the richness and limitations
differences in emotion expression 393 of dimensional models of social perception 102
Fugate, J. M. B., Gouzoules, H. & Vazire, S., Naumann, L. P., Rentfrow, P. J. &
Barrett, L. F. Separating production from Gosling, S. D. Smiling reflects different emotions
perception: Perceiver-based explanations for in men and women 103
sex differences in emotion 394 Vermeulen, N. On the systematic social role of
Izard, e. E., Finlon, K. J. & Grossman, S. R. expressed emotions: An ¢ mbodic d perspective 105
Sex differences in emotion expression: Wiefel, A. & Schepker, R. Expressed emotions,
Developmental, epigenetic, and cultural factors 395 early caregiver—child interaction, and disorders 106
Li, N. P. & Balliet, D. Emotional expression Zayas, V., Tabak, J. A., Giinaydyn, G. &
of capacity and trustworthiness in humor and Robertson, J. M. A social-cognitive model
in social dilemmas 396 of human behavior offers a more parsimonious
LoBue, V. & DeLoache, J. S. On the detection account of emotional expressivity 107
of emotional facial expressions: Are girls really
better than boys? 397 Author’s Response
Lozano, G. A. The other side of the coin: Vigil, J. M. The socio-relational framework
Intersexual selection and the expression of of expressive behaviors as an integrative
emotions to signal youth or maturity 398 psychological paradigm 108
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. C. The myth of language universals:
Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science
Open Peer Commentary Nevins, A. On formal universals in phonology
Baker, M. C. Language universals: Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J.
Abstract but not mythological 448 Universal grammar and mental continuity:
Bavin, E. L. Widening the field: Two modern myths 462
449
The process of language acquisition Pesetsky, D. Against taking linguistic
Berent, I. Unveiling phonological universals: diversity at “face value” 464
A linguist who asks “why” is (inter alia) Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. The reality
an experimental psychologist 450 of a universal language faculty 465
Catania, A. C. Language evolution: Pullum, G. K. & Scholz, B. C. For universals
Two tracks are not enough 45] (but not finite-state learning) visit the zoo 466
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, . The myth Rizzi, L. The discovery of language invariance
of language universals and the ae and variation, and its relevance
of universal grammar for the cognitive sciences 467
Croft, W. Syntax is more diverse, and evolutionary Smolensky, P. & Dupoux, E. Universals
linguistics is already here 453 in cognitive theories of language 468
Freidin, R. A note on methodology in linguistics 454 Tallerman, M. If langu: age is a jungle,
Goldberg, A. E . Essentialism gives way why are we all cultivating the same plot? 469
to oo 455 Tomasello, M. Univers: il grammar is dead 470
Harbour, D. The universal basis of local Waterfall, H. & Edelman, S. The neglected
linguistic exceptionality 456 universals: Learnability constraints and
Haspelmath, M. The best-supported language discourse cues 47]
universals refer to scalar patterns deriving
from processing cost 457 Authors’ Response
Margoliash, D. & Nusbaum, H. C. Animal Evans, N. & Levinson, S. C. With diversity
comparative studies should be part of linguistics 458 in mind: Freeing the language sciences from
McMurray, B. & Wasserman, E. Variability Universal Grammar
in languages, variability in learning? 459
Merker, B. Returning language to culture
by way wae 460
Contents Volume 32:6 December 2009
McKay, R. T. & Dennett, D. C. The evolution of misbelief
Open Peer Commentary Langdon, R. Pathological and non-pathological
Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R. & Maner, J. K. factors in delusional misbelief
When is it good to believe bad things? Liddle, J. R. & Shackelford, T. K. Are beliefs the
Ainslie, G. Non-instrumental belief is largely proper targets of adaptationist analyses?
founded on singularity Marcus, G. F. 10,000 Just so stories can’t all be
Bertamini, M. & Casati, R. False beliefs wrong
and naive beliefs: They can be good for you Millikan, R. G. It is likely misbelief
Boyer, P. Extending the range of adaptive never has a function
misbelief: Memory “distortions” as functional Mishara, A. L. & Corlett, P. Are delusions
features biologically adaptive? Salvaging the doxastic
Brown, J. D. Positive illusions and positive shear pin 530
collusions: How social life abets self-enhancing Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F. & Gervais, W. M.
beliefs The evolution of religious misbelief
Bulbulia, J. & Sosis, R. Ideology as Randolf-Seng, B. The (miis)management of
cooperative affordance agency: Conscious belief and nonconscious
Cokely, E. T. & Feltz, A. Adaptive diversity self-control
and misbelief Schloss, J. P. & Murray, M. J. You can’t always
Coltheart, M. Delusions and misbeliefs get what you want: Evolution and true beliefs
UtW w WwW
Dunning, D. Misbelief and the neglect of Sperber, D. Culturally transmitted
environmental context misbeliefs Vt Qo fon
Dweck, C. S$. Why we don’t need built-in Sutton, J. Adaptive misbeliefs and false
misbeliefs memories
JtW w
Flanagan, O. “Can do” attitudes: Some positive Talmont-Kaminski, K. Effective untestability
illusions are not misbeliefs and bounded rationality help in seeing religion
Frankish, K. Adaptive misbelieofr judicious as adaptive misbelief
pragmatic acceptance? Wereha, T. J. & Racine, T. P. Belief in evolved
Gjersoe, N. L. & Hood, B. M. On the adaptive belief systems: Artifact of a limited evolutionary
advantage of always being right (even when model?
Ul
one is not) Wilks, Y. Lamarck, Artificial Intelligence (AI),
Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. Error and belief
management theory and the evolution of misbeliefs Wilson, D. S. & Lynn, S. J. Adaptive misbeliefs
Johnson, D. D. P. God would be a costly accident: are pervasive, but the case for positive illusions
Supernatural beliefs as adaptive is weak
Koneéni, V. J. A positive illusion about Zawidzki, T. W. Adaptive self-directed misbeliefs:
“positive illusions”? More than just a rarefied phenomenon?
Krebs, D. L. & Denton, K. Benign folie
a deux: The social construction of positive illusions Authors’ Response
Kruger, J., Chan, S. & Roese, N. (Not so) McKay, R. T. & Dennett, D. C. Our evolving
positive illusions 526 beliefs about evolved misbelief