Number 1267 Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type Carles Broto Jesper M. Møller Bob Oliver Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Sporadic Simple Groups Bob Oliver November 2019 • Volume 262 • Number 1267 (fourth of 7 numbers) Number 1267 Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type Carles Broto Jesper M. Møller Bob Oliver Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Sporadic Simple Groups Bob Oliver November 2019 • Volume 262 • Number 1267 (fourth of 7 numbers) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cataloging-in-PublicationDatahasbeenappliedforbytheAMS. Seehttp://www.loc.gov/publish/cip/. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1267 Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society Thisjournalisdevotedentirelytoresearchinpureandappliedmathematics. Subscription information. Beginning with the January 2010 issue, Memoirs is accessible from www.ams.org/journals. The 2019 subscription begins with volume 257 and consists of six mailings, each containing one or more numbers. Subscription prices for 2019 are as follows: for paperdelivery,US$1041list,US$832.80institutionalmember;forelectronicdelivery,US$916list, US$732.80institutional member. Uponrequest, subscribers topaper delivery ofthis journalare also entitled to receive electronic delivery. If ordering the paper version, add US$20 for delivery withintheUnitedStates;US$80foroutsidetheUnitedStates. Subscriptionrenewalsaresubject tolatefees. Seewww.ams.org/help-faqformorejournalsubscriptioninformation. Eachnumber maybeorderedseparately;please specifynumber whenorderinganindividualnumber. Back number information. Forbackissuesseewww.ams.org/backvols. Subscriptions and orders should be addressed to the American Mathematical Society, P.O. Box 845904, Boston, MA 02284-5904USA. All orders must be accompanied by payment. Other correspondenceshouldbeaddressedto201CharlesStreet,Providence,RI02904-2213USA. Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for useinteachingorresearch. Permissionisgrantedtoquotebriefpassagesfromthispublicationin reviews,providedthecustomaryacknowledgmentofthesourceisgiven. Republication,systematiccopying,ormultiplereproductionofanymaterialinthispublication ispermittedonlyunderlicensefromtheAmericanMathematicalSociety. Requestsforpermission toreuseportionsofAMSpublicationcontentarehandledbytheCopyrightClearanceCenter. For moreinformation,pleasevisitwww.ams.org/publications/pubpermissions. Sendrequestsfortranslationrightsandlicensedreprintstoreprint-permission@ams.org. Excludedfromtheseprovisionsismaterialforwhichtheauthorholdscopyright. Insuchcases, requestsforpermissiontoreuseorreprintmaterialshouldbeaddresseddirectlytotheauthor(s). Copyrightownershipisindicatedonthecopyrightpage,oronthelowerright-handcornerofthe firstpageofeacharticlewithinproceedingsvolumes. MemoirsoftheAmericanMathematicalSociety (ISSN0065-9266(print);1947-6221(online)) ispublishedbimonthly(eachvolumeconsistingusuallyofmorethanonenumber)bytheAmerican MathematicalSocietyat201CharlesStreet,Providence,RI02904-2213USA.Periodicalspostage paid at Providence, RI.Postmaster: Send address changes to Memoirs, AmericanMathematical Society,201CharlesStreet,Providence,RI02904-2213USA. (cid:2)c 2019bytheAmericanMathematicalSociety. Allrightsreserved. ThispublicationisindexedinMathematicalReviews(cid:2),Zentralblatt MATH,ScienceCitation Index(cid:2),ScienceCitation IndexTM-Expanded,ISI Alerting ServicesSM,SciSearch(cid:2),Research Alert(cid:2),CompuMathCitationIndex(cid:2),CurrentContents(cid:2)/Physical,Chemical&EarthSciences. ThispublicationisarchivedinPortico andCLOCKSS. PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica. (cid:2)∞ Thepaperusedinthisbookisacid-freeandfallswithintheguidelines establishedtoensurepermanenceanddurability. VisittheAMShomepageathttps://www.ams.org/ 10987654321 242322212019 Contents Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type by Carles Broto, Jesper M. Møller, and Bob Oliver 1 Introduction 3 Tables of substitutions for Theorem B 8 Chapter 1. Tame and reduced fusion systems 13 Chapter 2. Background on finite groups of Lie type 23 Chapter 3. Automorphisms of groups of Lie type 31 Chapter 4. The equicharacteristic case 37 Chapter 5. The cross characteristic case: I 51 Chapter 6. The cross characteristic case: II 79 Appendix A. Injectivity of μ by Bob Oliver 93 G A.1. Classical groups of Lie type in odd characteristic 96 A.2. Exceptional groups of Lie type in odd characteristic 98 Bibliography for Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type 115 Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Sporadic Simple Groups by Bob Oliver 119 Introduction 121 Chapter 1. Automorphism groups of fusion systems: Generalities 127 Chapter 2. Automorphisms of 2-fusion systems of sporadic groups 131 Chapter 3. Tameness at odd primes 137 Chapter 4. Tools for comparing automorphisms of fusion and linking systems145 Chapter 5. Injectivity of μ 151 G Bibliography for Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Sporadic Simple Groups161 iii Abstract Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type by Carles Broto, Jesper M. Møller, and Bob Oliver For a finite group G of Lie type and a prime p, we compare the automorphism groupsofthefusionandlinkingsystemsofGatpwiththeautomorphism groupof G itself. When p is the defining characteristic of G, they are all isomorphic, with a very short list of exceptions. When p is different from the defining characteristic, thesituationismuchmorecomplex, butcanalwaysbereducedtoacasewherethe natural map from Out(G) to outer automorphisms of the fusion or linking system is split surjective. This work is motivated in part by questions involving extending thelocalstructureofagroupbyagroupofautomorphisms, andinpartbywanting to describe self homotopy equivalences of BG∧ in terms of Out(G). p ReceivedbytheeditorJanuary18,2016and,inrevisedform,January27,2017andFebruary 1,2017. ArticleelectronicallypublishedonDecember27,2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1267 2010MathematicsSubjectClassification. [AutomorphismsofFusionSystemsofFiniteSimple GroupsofLieType]Primary20D06. Secondary20D20,20D45,20E42,55R35;[Automorphismsof FusionSystemsofSporadicSimple Groups]Primary: 20E25,20D08. Secondary: 20D20,20D05, 20D45. Key words and phrases. [AutomorphismsofFusionSystemsofFinite Simple Groups ofLie Type]GroupsofLietype,fusionsystems,automorphisms,classifyingspaces;[Automorphismsof Fusion Systems of Sporadic Simple Groups] Fusion systems, sporadic groups, Sylow subgroups, finitesimplegroups. C. Broto is partially supported by MICINN grant MTM2010-20692 and MINECO grant MTM2013-42293-P. He is affiliated with the Departament de Matem`atiques, Universitat Aut`onomadeBarcelona,E–08193Bellaterra,Spain. Email: [email protected]. J. Møller is partially supported by the Danish National Research Foundation through the Centre for Symmetry and Deformation (DNRF92) and by Villum Fonden through the project ExperimentalMathematicsinNumberTheory,OperatorAlgebras,andTopology. Heisaffiliated with the Matematisk Institut, Universitetsparken 5, DK–2100 København, Denmark. Email: [email protected]. B.OliverispartiallysupportedbyUMR7539oftheCNRS,andbyprojectANRBLAN08- 2 338236,HGRT.HeisaffiliatedwiththeUniversit´eParis13,SorbonneParisCit´e,LAGA,UMR 7539 du CNRS, 99, Av. J.-B. Cl´ement, 93430 Villetaneuse, France. Email: [email protected] paris13.fr. All three authors wish to thank Københavns Universitet, the Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, and especially the Centre for Symmetry and Deformation in Copenhagen, for their hospitalitywhilemuchofthisworkwascarriedout. (cid:2)c2019 American Mathematical Society v vi ABSTRACT Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Sporadic Simple Groups by Bob Oliver We prove here that with a very small number of exceptions, when G is a sporadic simple group and p is a prime such that the Sylow p-subgroups of G are nonabelian, then Out(G) is isomorphic to the outer automorphism groups of the fusion and linking systems of G. In particular, the p-fusion system of G is tame in ∼ the sense of [AOV1], and is tamely realized by G itself except when G=M and 11 p = 2. From the point of view of homotopy theory, these results also imply that Out(G)∼=Out(BG∧) in many (but not all) cases. p Automorphisms of Fusion Systems of Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type by Carles Broto, Jesper M. Møller, and Bob Oliver Introduction When p is a prime, G is a finite group, and S ∈ Syl (G), the fusion system p of G at S is the category F (G) whose objects are the subgroups of S, and whose S morphisms are those homomorphisms between subgroups induced by conjugation in G. In this paper, we are interested in comparing automorphisms of G, when G is a simple group of Lie type, with those of the fusion system of G at a Sylow p-subgroup of G (for different primes p). Rather than work withautomorphisms ofF (G)itself, it turns out tobe more S naturalinmanysituationstostudythegroupOut(Lc(G))ofouterautomorphisms S ofthecentriclinkingsystem ofG. WerefertoChapter1forthedefinitionofLc(G), S andtoDefinition1.2forprecisedefinitionsofOut(F (G))andOut(Lc(G)). These S S are defined in such a way that there are natural homomorphisms Out(G)−−−κ−G−→Out(LcS(G))−−−μ−G−→Out(FS(G)) and κG =μG◦κG. For example, if S controls fusion in G (i.e., if S has a normal complement), then Out(F (G)) = Out(S), and κ is induced by projection to S. The fusion system S G F (G) is tamely realized by G if κ is split surjective, and is tame if it is tamely S G realizedbysomefinitegroupG∗ whereS ∈Syl (G∗)andF (G)=F (G∗). Tame- p S S ness plays an important role in Aschbacher’s program for shortening parts of the proofoftheclassificationoffinitesimplegroupsbyclassifyingsimplefusionsystems over finite 2-groups. We say more about this later in the introduction, just before the statement of Theorem C. By [BLO1, Theorem B], Out(Lc(G)) ∼= Out(BG∧): the group of homotopy S p classes of self homotopy equivalences of the p-completed classifying space of G. Thus one of the motivations for this paper is to compute Out(BG∧) when G is a p finitesimplegroupofLietype(incharacteristicporincharacteristicdifferentfrom p), and compare it with Out(G). Following the notation used in [GLS3], for each prime p, we let Lie(p) denote theclassoffinitegroupsofLietypeincharacteristicp,andletLiedenotetheunion of the classes Lie(p) for all primes p. (See Definition 2.1 for the precise definition.) We say that G ∈ Lie(p) is of adjoint type if Z(G) = 1, and is of universal type if it has no nontrivial central extensions which are in Lie(p). For example, for n≥2 and q a power of p, PSL (q) is of adjoint type and SL (q) of universal type. n n Our results can be most simply stated in the “equi-characteristic case”: when working with p-fusion of G∈Lie(p). Theorem A. Let p be a prime. Assume that G ∈ Lie(p) and is of universal or adjoint type, and also that (G,p) ∼=(cid:7) (Sz(2),2). Fix S ∈ Syl (G). Then the p composite homomorphism κ : Out(G)−−−κ−G−−→Out(Lc(G))−−−μ−−G−→Out(F (G)) G S S ∼ is an isomorphism, and κ and μ are isomorphisms except when G=PSL (2). G G 3 3