ebook img

Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals: Neurocognitive Measurement and Predictors PDF

271 Pages·2012·1.673 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals: Neurocognitive Measurement and Predictors

Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals Donna A. Morere (cid:129) Thomas Allen Editors Assessing Literacy in Deaf Individuals Neurocognitive Measurement and Predictors Editors Donna A. Morere Thomas Allen Department of Psychology Science of Learning Center Gallaudet University Gallaudet University Washington , DC, USA Washington , DC, USA ISBN 978-1-4614-5268-3 ISBN 978-1-4614-5269-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5269-0 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012951414 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci fi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Preface Construction requires tools. Whether we are constructing a house, an educated citi- zen, or a scienti fi c theory, we will be stymied if we do not have the right tools. However rich our raw materials are, they are mere bits and scraps of unrealized potential if we lack the means of assembling them into the products we envision. Imagine a carpenter arriving at Home Depot, her truck already full of lumber, and fi nding an empty tool counter. Her house will go unbuilt. The building that we are seeking to construct is a strong foundation of knowl- edge regarding the cognitive underpinnings of how deaf individuals learn, espe- cially how they acquire literacy. Our truck is indeed full of raw materials: reading researchers have, in recent years, made great strides in describing how literacy is acquired in hearing individuals; neuroscientists have made considerable progress in identifying the neural networks involved in reading and cognition; cognitive scien- tists have greatly increased our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of memory, executive functioning, visuospatial reasoning, and other processes. Yet, we strongly suspect that the applicability of this burgeoning knowledge to the very unique population of deaf individuals has limitations. When an individual’s primary source of information about the world is through vision, the processes through which he navigates the world, learns to read, and acquires knowledge are quite different from those of individuals who hear as well as see their world. How do we understand those differences? How do we come to understand how visual knowledge, in the absence (or near absence) of auditory knowledge, affects the development of cognitive functions and the acquisition of language? How do visual languages contribute to literacy? These questions are important, not only for improving the lives of deaf individu- als but for enriching our understanding of learning for all individuals. But, of course, we need the right tools to answer these questions. Unfortunately, the myriad of assessments that have contributed remarkably to the growing knowledge base for understanding cognitive development for hearing individuals cannot simply be administered to deaf individuals (either in research, clinical, or educational settings) with con fi dence in the validity of the scores. The uniqueness of deaf individuals’ perceptual experiences, their linguistic histories, and their social and cultural backgrounds v vi Preface mandates an intensive effort to reengineer many commonly utilized assessment prac- tices so that they will yield information that can be accepted and interpreted without hesitation. Additionally, a battery of new assessments will also be necessary to mea- sure visual language skills, since these skills play a critical role in the lives of many deaf individuals. The Toolkit project described and presented in this book represents a step in pursuit of effective and valid cognitive, linguistic, and achievement assessments for deaf individuals. This project was undertaken at the Science of Learning Center in Visual Language and Visual Learning (VL2) at Gallaudet University. VL2 is one of six national centers funded by the National Science Foundation to address questions that are of critical concern for the Science of Learning. VL2 was funded (in 2006) to pursue answers to the questions posed above; i.e., to contribute to our knowledge of how visual languages and the unique sensory and perceptual experiences of deaf individuals contribute to their brain development, their cognitive capacities, their language development, and their acquisition of literacy. From the beginning days of VL2, it was evident that we would need to devote our energies to the development of tools for our scienti fi c work. We also knew that there were critical needs for better assessments among practitioners in fi elds of deaf education and clinical practice. As well, we understood that there was considerable overlap between the needs for assessments that would serve the needs of researchers and those that would serve the needs of practitioners. Center scientists representing different disciplines met to discuss the different assessment needs of the Center and to suggest existing instruments, discuss tests that could be modi fi ed or adapted for use for this population, and outline needs for new visual language assessments. The result of these discussions was the VL2 Toolkit Project. In this project, we assembled a variety of assessments into a comprehensive battery and designed a project wherein we would administer the entire battery to the same group of project participants. This design would allow us to evaluate the underlying systems of cor- relations among measures of general cognitive functioning, including executive functioning, visuospatial abilities, short-term and working memory, reading com- prehension, math and writing fl uency and general academic knowledge, and expres- sive and receptive language skill. The data would allow us to speak to the issues of reliability and both concurrent and construct validity, and also give us an opportu- nity to examine the underlying covariance structure of a broad set of measures. This book presents the fi ndings from the VL2 Toolkit project. In these chapters, each Toolkit measure is described, and a statistical analysis is presented that speaks to the psychometric properties of the measure. Thus, the descriptions should be use- ful both for readers interested in a compendium of measures that have been used and studied successfully with this population, and for readers interested in understand- ing some of the technical properties of these tools when administered to this popula- tion. Chapters 1 and 2 present a more detailed discussion of the rationale for the project, describe the procedures used in conducting the project, and display the background characteristics of the individuals who participated in the project. Chapter 3 presents the fi ndings for Toolkit measures of general cognitive function- ing. Chapter 4 discusses the measures selected for assessing visuospatial ability. Preface vii Chapter 5 offers the analyses and descriptions for measures of short-term memory, working memory, and signed verbal learning. Chapter 6 discusses the fi ndings for four separate measures of reading. Chapter 7 presents the results of other areas of academic achievement, including writing and math fl uency and general academic knowledge. Chapter 8 discusses measures of expressive language, while Chapter 9 discusses measures of receptive language. Chapters 1 0 – 12 delve more deeply into a variety of issues having to do with visual languages and visual representations of English: Chapter 10 discusses fi ngerspelling and presents some descriptive data based on an analysis of the error patterns of Toolkit participants on the fi ngerspelling test. Chapter 1 1 presents a discussion of considerations in the development of tests of American Sign Language and provides short descriptions of existing measures that are currently in use and under development. Chapter 12 describes an innovative strategy for using the written responses of participants to the speechreading test as a window on deaf students’ writing strategies. In Chapter 1 3 , we present the results of a factor analysis of the toolkit measures in an effort to identify underlying cognitive structures for this population, and we use the resulting factor scores combined with data from the project background questionnaire to explore the interrelationships among selected background characteristics and performance on the derived neu- rocognitive factors. We acknowledge the support and participation of many in both conducting the Toolkit Project and in producing this manuscript. We especially thank the National Science Foundation for their signi fi cant support in establishing the VL2 Center (under Cooperative Agreement SBE -0541953). We are indebted to the scientists from the Center who contributed to the selection of instruments and the design and execution of the project, especially Dr. Peter Hauser and Dr. Diane Clark. VL2’s data assistant Selina Agyen expertly organized all project recruitment and schedul- ing. We bow deeply to the hard working group who helped prepare the testing mate- rials, particularly former student, Dr. Christen Szymanski, and the team of student and postdoc assessors, which included Assessment Coordinator Leah Murphy, Postdoctoral Fellow Dr. Shilpa Hanumantha, Predoctoral Fellow Wyatte Hall, and graduate assistants Yunjae Hwang, Millicent Musyoka, and Greg Witkin. Finally, we are deeply grateful to the 90 Gallaudet student participants, many of whom endured over 9 h of testing spread out over 3 days. Their contributions to this project are in evidence on every page of this book. Washington, DC, USA Donna A. Morere Washington, DC, USA Thomas Allen About the Editors Donna A. Morere, Ph.D., has been involved in the fi eld of deafness since 1986. She has been a faculty member in the Clinical Psychology Program at Gallaudet since August, 1990. She is the Neuropsychological Assessment Director for the VL2 Psychometric Toolkit Study and Early Education Longitudinal Study (VL2EELS). Dr. Morere also maintains a private practice in Clinical Neuropsychology providing services to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing using ASL, Cued Speech, or Oral communication. Since the early 1990s, the focus of this practice has been chil- dren with complex special needs, primarily those affecting language development. Dr. Morere’s research interests include primary language disorders in deaf children, adaptation of neuropsychological assessment instruments for use with deaf and hard of hearing individuals, cognition and memory, executive functioning and attention disorders, and reading and language development in deaf children. Thomas Allen, Ph.D., is the Founding Director of the VL2 Center and currently serves as its Co-Principal Investigator. He holds a faculty appointment in the Department of Educational Foundations and Research, where he has taught courses in statistics and research design. Dr. Allen formerly served a 9-year term as Dean of the Graduate School at Gallaudet. Prior to becoming Dean, Dr. Allen was the Director of the Gallaudet Research Institute, where he conducted or supervised many large-scale statistical studies of the deaf population in the USA. These included an annual survey of deaf and hard of hearing children and youth and two national efforts to develop norms for standardized achievement tests for the population of deaf and hard of hearing students. He designed and conducted studies of national patterns of classroom com- munication strategies for deaf and hard of hearing students, and a longitudinal study of school-to-work transition for students who are deaf. As the Dean of the Graduate School, Dr. Allen has implemented Ph.D. programs in Linguistics and Audiology, an Au.D. professional doctorate in Audiology, a Master of Arts in Teaching that focuses on preparing teachers to work in bilingual ASL-English environments, a Master of Arts degree in International Development, and a Master of Arts degree in Deaf Studies. He is currently the lead investigator for a several ongoing research projects at the Visual Language and Visual Learning (VL2) Center at Gallaudet University. ix

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.