AR TARGET SHEET The following document was too large to scan as one unit, therefore, it has

250 Pages·2007·12.64 MB·English

217 217
GLOSSARY
ADDITIONAL CURRENTS CONCERNING
GENERAL RECOMMENDATION NUMBER 2
Otis Draft Environmental Impact Statement
We have no objection to the 5 to 7 year period of research DOE U.S. Department of Energy
into methods of safe disposal of the waste that remains in the
3.3.1.1 149 single-well tanks, but we believe the focus should be on a EIS 'Environmental impact Statement -
safe system of retrieval,. rectification, encapsulation in stain-
lesa steel containers and buried in a deep repository instead of EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
into on-site shallow burial at Hanford.
HLW High-Level Radioactive (or Nuclear) Waste
RWVP Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant
/5/ (Be. Appendix C in V.I. 2 of the DEIS
for a description of the Plant.)
U. Richard Nokes
LLW Low-Level Radioactive (or Nuclear) Waste -
MEN Monitored Retrievable Storage
Leonards Palmer w(aAs trea dtioo aBcet icvleo swealsyt em osntiotroargeed faancdi leiatsyi lwyh irceht raielvleodw sa tt hae
future date.) -
MTHM Metric Ten of Heavy Metal (e•q•^ uranium!
i
Senate_ cl i££ Dailey HERA National £nviromaental Policy Act
06/06/x NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PUREE Plutonium and Uranium Recovery through Extraction
(A process used to recover plutonium and uranium for
iIl the national defense program.)
(TI
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
TAU Tressuranic waste
(Waste which contains radioactive elements heavier than
uranium and which generally era long-lived.)
WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot plant
(A disposal facility designed to accommodate defense
treasurable wastes, located is New Mexico.)
WRAP Waste Receiving and Processing (Facility)
(Be. Appendix E in Volume 2 of the DEIS for a
description of the Facility.)
Exhibit T {YiL '.Y= -." _ . .
06/06/.
AW 0 1965
EXHIBIT s .._..^JJ 3 19?6 61,
1.
.^ I:
5
j
ag
Rich Holten/Pan
August 8. 1986
WA6C0-6HERMAN Pa¢2
PUBLIC HEALTH DEPA RTM ENT:::.-.-- r. r^ 7 £ b86
AUe 12 1986 1.

•x AUg:vs[ 8, 3986 aoea _.. mTe asc"hg. roAmltdh opuieghs se:tnaecsh, ,Misat et raonudn d£ lpardegsul acbMelyi tbi ce :9ela fsosri ftiheode tshaerd gsw oafd hwaateter
could still be contaminated rathac easily.
URi.cSh. LFblpltaernb/rEeInSt of IDe ry TsiTte aw aalste lroncaatitveed mino cualrde a olstohe rp rpeasertn to cfa tshkes dwiriinnto a ,tr.a Nnsopxaetvaacri,M tranisfp tohretation
Ric hland aerations Office - abacvcai daednetqsu awtuei dc lgeaarnc-runpl,l yw hbeer eaas hthoret d-itsapzmo saaclu tsei te "ittrsateilof., tihfa tr octa upll,aml
PP..OO.. Becdl, 5W50ash g o 99352 - mannat h"eehllaI tmp rnotreecdt Wb ea rdeiaf,fi ccualltl tove ^lai1n1. cause chronic long-term
Since Wviford is for only one Putpeu, td prrdiix Ploth isI and s
Dent W. Fblten: Uthsei fcoorwd tirti ews eslodp tphlaYn iase :eraanr em tahsaonm sbulfef itcoi ecnatn: taos Tsthaet aflo lblayu isnegp lwoyr ecsloss aiotn:
These tomcats are in regards to the draft San for disposal of Uenfm, 1) Begin stones to find a settafectory lwg-tem gseletito repository.- 3.3.1.1
Patches Nigh-Level Tram,¢ anic and ThNC Wastes, March 1986.
2.3.2.7 ITa £axsca wroiWry ooff tihse wEerISe oafn sit laatte r[ Thiaasff tteerrp wreant t dodate,d n noetat 2) Tler aini s ao tleosntga ctyM at, ha_ngsepnnacty tr'e ins raot thae' federal, state a.d lxal 3.4.2.24
,(Pn Wdtttxiiiae enmr gpaee a g raahatCvo:vr.eet ua d Tane iln tPbcaa Y bale etleMa ce. es.a diaolelnonll cds s att ctaahhee srrd nmee teee,eh ,ina.tEsft u ppsinlaasttwl rri cf c ne d mId ioefthfnhufhht ieea fecPft uePalrll1obeti.bo al ldltiscdoctme clatoiaunbau ndliarddl d a br.dya.ei .tt .iWt toHinonetoPoha omcrls oioeh9 tuussoc0lono rd hottdhny aasypsa.r[ otSCthrefM are en'EfosffuffpOeae acclrrrttt ,d[ v saa d f [oi1 orroM nff iipnont ratdWl laaaa e:ssd suu .ini[taaattbiitoo l nen3s tss, r, nopfT opohsiiissto mlryoo uwllldi t hatr fll ownn 1clyo1 nn1stnfeeersnct Ttre aztm n 2. 5. 6
Tha altetnatiul of in-place stabilization iss an obvious choice wMa
considering tw 3 £attars S ly,
1) Transportation of mclesr Waste to other parts of the co mty. at C^
2) Tre cot ued uae o£ Ha ford add therefore continued waste production. ^,^ L _/ j ( L
N1,o0m00v,e0r0 00 cc corsa ooff rraafd.ino apcetsisvaitbryvl tleesf tw finth S thaanmk asp ptehaart tot oM ttoooo ogreenrt SDRo^m-tisvi Csi.n I9 lSlsinnigtarztihan UR..S.
to ]uhf fill with gavel and boxy with nexkers.
- We would take exceptim to the calculations of only 32 health effects ICI/cat
3.5.1.98 owvaerr 1th0e, BItncoh eyde atmrs ki£s. allA celln tirta vl oiusi lldo stta oken wsiteel da nMd foenxem evxac9ep ttwiokn ptola tdh¢e -
theca, that people wild not dig through tha ripciP ad accidently break
.pen a tank.
It mould appear that the ¢.logic alterertivl evup, be test suited it the
site was located other than it tM Coluebia Plateau. nraha Dater roeditions
aN frartuaed basal: will allow the gouMUSter to eventually flood out any
d P retpeository a d t n ot1Y Ho cottavmrs case es l p eing
2. 1. 1 tefhotret a r:fsmtsxee s tah£tar naH na3n 0tfM0o-r5 d0 0t haeta rtsM.a ngtr neTu dr1wst f tpmaesrs. wc:earanunnsot atip nhlga rKceeoenp Mtta ilo nueehtr wso mft o tth hrweoi utrghesphtository
7 0 8 6
219
August 8, 1986
in its DEIS are potions at best. Leaving the waste in the ground i 3.3.1.1
Comamte nSthse oHna ntfhoer dD ERIeeSsse rfvaartDieofne nse Waste AUG 12 1986 66 ajdu sBtm endoitu ma cfcoerp tdaubmlpei.n gT hceo nDtEaImSi nraetceodm mweansdtaetsi oins ttoo tcaolnltyi nuunea cucseipntga bsloei.l
'his practice is being halted at Savannah River. Why would Hanford
submitted by: end to .1 want to continue dumping waste in the soil? Check with 2.2.10
the people at Savannah River for an alternative method.
Betty MCArdle
Nuclear Disarmament Coordinator The DEIS says thatastes that are difficult and/or hazardous
Oregon Chapter Sierra Club to retrieve will be left in place." Difficult retrieval does not
3740 S.W. Comes St. justify leaving it in .place. Extra effort land expense) must be made 3.3.2.5
Portland, Oregon 97219 to find a way to retrieve it. It is much easier to control the
)503) 245-4889, [phone] safety risks to worker health and the enviro n maetnt this time in
removing all the waste from the ground for processing than it is to
control what happens to that waste if it is left in the ground.
I would like to speak to yaou in the first person as well as for
tbheec a6u,s5e0 0I ,S iaesr raan Cilnubd imveimdbuearls, a vaenrdy tch e esrthaetde aobfo uOtr ewghoant. hIa pdpoe ntsh iast OptionT hneo tO raecg ocne pCthaabpltee.r. oTfh itsh eo pStiieornr aw oCulludb hfaivned st hte hmeo anto -ddainSgpeors atlo the 3.3.4.1
Hanford. I war born in' Portland in July c of 1946, That meaanns that I environment. We realize that law requires this option beincluded,
was in the womb and a child during the time when clouds of and hope that the DOE would never consider this option under any
radioactive iodine were released from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation cumatances.
without any notice to the public or follow. up health studies. That
was just the beginning Of a series of releases and leaks, intentional No actions should be taken (aside from permanent geologic 3.3.4.1
or a Cidel al from Hanford. 1. think that we the public have to keep disposal) that cannot be undone when better disposal technology is
sharp eye on activities at Hanford and make Sure that the safest discovered. In place stabilization should not be considered.
possible m s are used i n all operations. That might be expensive,
even $11 billion or more, but it is very small price compared to Of Deduct importance is finding a safe repository or safe
the cost of producing nuclear weapons. solution. A key problem is DOS's dropping the search for a second 2.1.3
.p deep geologic depository site, and it has repercussions for Hanford's
The number 1 priority and methodfor "getting rid o£^ defense defense waste.With only one civilian repository there will be very
2"5.6 wthaisntge taot 'Hdaon ftoor dp roitse ctto tqhuei te emyaikniinmg ti ta n-d- rPiugbhlti co wh!e aIltt hinso wth ea nfdi risst clhiototslee aS p1a ce fdoerss i drreaafbbellnees ed iwsapsotsea.l Tohpitsi omni gthhta ti nwfoluuledn cneo tt hien cDlOuEd et odeep 3.3.5.7
the future. It is ludicrous to be talking about how to clean up the geologic disposal of defense wastes. The Oregon Chapter of the
wastes when they are still being produced.. Sierra Club calla on the DOE to resume the process for siting a
second repository.
The best practice is to-quit producing defense wastes at
2.5.6 Hanford. But, if the Department of Energy )DOE) insists upon DOE uses language that would cause readers to not be in favor of
producing more waste the DEIS needs to address methods of disposing the geologic disposal alternative. Leading language would make
of future defense waste, as well as that already existing. readers believe that Congress. would not be forthcoming with enough 3.3.1.2
money for the geologic option. Congress may in fact be willing to
The issue of disposing of defense wastes at Hanford cannot be allocate the funds if the public shows their favor for that option.
addressed in isolation from other Hanford issues, operation or The Oregon Chapter of the Sierra Club is in favor of deep geologic
2.3.1.3 not of the N-Reactot and PERRY plant, low level r adioactive waste, disposal. -
mon-radiosective waste and a Possible deep geologic nuclear waste
2.3.1.14 wrietphoosuitt otrayl kaitn gt haeb oHuatn fcoorndt isniuteed. pYreond uccatninoont ftoar lPko na-bporuotd udcetfieonns)e owfaste trackD OrV oSr dc riend itbeillliitnyg itsh ei np uqbuleisct itohne. tTrhuet hD OaEn dd ofeosr nlooto khianvge oau tg ofoodr 2.5.5
nuclear waste, without talking about the deep geologic depository, the welfare of the .general public. We the public muse take a very
etc active role in looking out for the public good. We insist that this
very toxic waste be cleaned up and cleaned up the best possible way.
It is of paramount importance that the short and long term risks
to the environment from defense wastes temporarily stored at Hanford In s veral places, the DEIS states that more ronmental
2.2.11 be eliminated. Extraordinary efforts must be made to clean up all protection will be considered if needed. What more environmental 4.1.19
the 'wastes So that they cannot and will not escape into the protection? Yes, wwe sure it will be needed. Use the most
environment. This clean up must happen as soon as possible with an .protection from the beginning. It is cheaper to prevent problems
upper limit of five years to complete the clean up. than it is to clean them up afterwards.
The options for clean up of defense wastes presented bythe DOE
Balq
AUG 12 1986
4}

"I f%
0^ ^
RECENED Z'OEBL
.J
DEFENSE vs. COMMERCIAL WASTE ENGINEERP.H BARRIERS AND pARKHR$ AUG 12 1986 ^
j'7
DOE defense facilities have safety standards different from The proposed "engineered boniest have never been tteesstteedd to ee e
2.2.7 others in the nuclear industry. The DOE claims to Comply with if they would in fact isolate the wast"e from wind erosion, a
NUC lean Regulatory Commission (NBC) regulations even though they aree infiltration, and plants animal, and human intrusion. Ther aarree some
pnaortt irceiqpuaitree di nt ot hdios spor.o jIefc tt htios aitst etsrtu et,o tDhoee 'NsB Cc osmhpoluiladn cbee. iTnhveited enr k. Amqounegs tithones. abou-t twhhee t.h,e,rC rt hseur ff.accae ooff itth heeb baarrrriiieeerrr . iiss abbeeoeevnefact 3.5.1.7
ssttarnidnagrednst faosr tdhies psotsainndga rdosf mfoirl idtiasrpyo swiansgt eos fs hCoiuvlidl ibaen awta slteeass.t Tahe gevroaulunadt eevde. 1T.o WtWhiiindndke t hiaot Tnh eirse ains obviwoouusl df anoctt ocr Hthhannaggte m uisst 100,,000
waste is highly toxic whether it is generated by a defense reactor or years is not realistic. is lliiikkkeelyly be more than b event 3.5.1.32
by a commercial reactor. happening within 10,000 years affecting thhee barrier. The combined
2.4,1.6 effects might Cause a break in the barrier alloying surface water to
The option that would allow the baste in the single .11 tanks get to the wastes
to be left in the tanks and "stabilized" is unacceptable. This
2.2.7 conflicts with requirements In the commercial industry (Nuclear waste animaThl.e engineered barrier is designed to keep roots and burrowing
Policy Act) which say they must dispose of high level wastes in a away from the waste. But, the soil may be ideal. habitat for 3.5.1.84
deep geologic repository.' such a mall. Burrows could make vertical movemeenntt of water through
the barrier soils m likely. Stabilizing the surface with plants
2.4.1.1 defensCeo mwmaesrtcei ails wdaesftien eids idne ftihnee dD EiInS tienr mtse romfs "ocfo nccoennsttriattuieonntss, "of the Smoimgeh tp lhaenltps. wBiultl, dtihei sd urrainisge osr other quAess ttihoen s rooovtesr dleocnagy ,t itmhee ysp alnesa.ve
waste. The DEIS claims that defense waste is less radioactive than open vertical passageways for water to percolate through when
commercial spent fuel. There is important consideration - the precipitation increases.
defense waste is more solubile and dizpersable (particularly those in
tuhnel essisn gDlOeE suhseelsl rtualnekss )a.n dT hmee twhaosdtse a tw illela snto ta sb es tsraofnegl ya sd itshpoossee dt hoaft part Pofr oevaecnh toepcthinoonl.o gAine sO patrieo nn owth iacvha idloaebsl en o£to r.bianrcrliuedre sb,a rwrhiiecrhs are a 3.5.1.8
2.4.1.9 apply to the commercial industry. should have been offered.. Stabilizing waste in tanks must not be
done until the "engineered barrier- has been tested and found
3.3.27 Another federal law that DOE should be required to comply with foolproof.
at Hanford is the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
00 One rule under RHEA is the requirement for theu sue of a liner. If stabilization in place. should be eh.raa (although the Sierra
Liners are not included in the description of any of the options. Club opposed that method) the 'engineered barriers" (after the e.
testing mentioned in the above paragraph) should not be the only
WHAT TO DD WITS THE WASTES means of protecting the environment. There should be other barrier
systems that will assure that waste does not leak into the ground 3.5.1.8
The wastes in tanks should be retrieved, glassified, and water system (including the aforementioned RCRA required liner(.
deposited in a deep geologic repository. If liquid wastes are left Water Can intrude into the tanks from below. the surface via the
3.3.1.1 is tanks they will eventually leak. This includes retrieving sad groundwater system, not just from the surface. The already leaking
processing the pre-1970 wastes. These Wastes cannot be left where tanks pose a serious hazard.
they are. It may be somewhat more "dangerous" for the workers today
who work on the retrieval, but what might happen to those wastes in The proposed markers might in fact attract diggingand drilling 3.5.1.31
the future is too uncertain to take a chance on leaving them leaking 10,000 years in the future rather than discourage it. "Fatal doses
in the ground. to intruders might event result from the unlikely even of drilling
into encapsulated waste in a geologic repository." (from the DEIS)
The post-1970 plutonium contaminated wastes (contaminated Imagine yourself an archeologist a few thousand years in the future.
3.1.3.25 equipment and laboratory wastes), which have been held with retrieval Very few people in 1986 could read languages from 3,000 years
in mind, should be retrieved and disposed of in the New Mexico we have a great difficoity with Beowulf written in the Old English of
repository. Their current storage containers were not meant for only about six hundred years ago. A sign showing digging (even with 2.5.1
long-term storage. slash through. it) might ay to that future archeologist for
treasure hunter) -DIG HERB."
If process changes or additions are needed to handle single
shell wastes, such must be in the analysis. To not do so says to the GEOLOGIC QUESTIONS
public that there is no real option to remove and process these
3.1.7.6 wastes. In place stabilization would encourage the disposal of all Numerous geologic problems with the Hanford Reservation have
defense waste in the Northwest. 'The Hanford Reservation already has been pointed out to DOE by a variety, of qualified groups and
defense waste permanently stored there, why not send it all]" might individuals. Of particular interest is the location of the site near
be the reasoning. This is obviously unacceptable. the middle of the Pasco Basin, withia'10 miles. of the Columbia River 2.3.2.1
(into which numerous springs flow from the basalts) and in one of the
AD' 121986 6
219 219
b
2.3.2.1 gsetprsuccfteunrtailsltys ,m otshte sceom fpalcetxo rpsa rwtosu lodf itmhpel yC obleuvmyb icao mPpllaetxe ague.o hTyod rmoolsotgy reducDianmgs tohne tlihkee lCiohlouombdi oa fRifvleoro dusp sltirkree atmh oosfe H ainnf otrhde: paaxset .c.r eTdhiotseed wdiatmhs
ahnydd rloilkoegliyc tgersotuidnwga tiers arbeosuutr g3e5ncheo. lein.,d eDeOdE, satfitlelr Cdarninlolti ndge fainnde the wsiplaln ncootm plaarsetd ftoor etvheer .t-o xtihce yl iwfiel lo fi nt hfea cwta, sltaes.t Wa itvheoruyt sthhoertd amtisme
geohydrology of the site to anyone's satisfaction. natural river forces could alter the river bed. The altered river
could eventually encroach upon. the disposal area anywhere on the
What is the general nature of fracture systems below the Hanford Hanford Reservation.
R ... re.tical the character of the interbeds of sandstone between the
various flows?. In regard to the last point, the Ellensburg 'The sediments and landscape features of the Pasco Basin .
PGrmation, which occurs as layers of very permeable sandstone between demonstrate at least four episodes of flooding only a few tens of
3.2.1.9 any of the flaws, is not given any discussion in this regard and is thousands of years ago in which almost the entire area of the
described, in general, in very benign and misleading terms Reservation was inundated. Thus. floods resulted from damming by
(according to a geologist consultant). The descriptions of the glacial ice of huge lakes in western Montana, followed by sudden
stratigraphy are just too general. The collection of technical and release of the lake water when the ice dams failed. It is not
inadequate information must appear impressive to the non-geological impossible, and according to some Climatologists it is probable,
Bader. In reality, the section i not at all impressive (again, that the next few thousand years will see a return of glacial
according to a geologist consultant), conditions to the northern hemisphere, and that ice dammed lakes may
If the Hanford site should be chosen as the national repository aagtatiani nfeodr ma ti nH atnhfeo rvda lwel esy aabboouvte 2H5a0n fmoertde.r.s. .a bTohvee htihgeh epsrte sweantte rr ilveevresl....
(which the Sierra Club opposes(, the drilling and driving of miles of Aflood of the extreme magnitude described might have drastic
tunnels and holes present the risk of altering the groundwater paths consequences for very long lived radioactive wastes stored near the
in ways that would seem most serious. The problem of reversing the present land surface. Sell. and sediments containing-low level
2.1.9 effects of these Constructions is not m rely one of backfilling. and rites would certainly be eroded, and the present storage tanks for
grouting the tunnel sections. Each hole driven will permit some high level wastes might be breached and their contents scattered
expansion of existing fractures in the basalt that will be difficult Widely in the flood debris...." (source: Radioactive Wastes at
to Correct. Hanford: A Technical Review, National Academy of Sciences, 19]8)
A
There isnvidence of current earthquake activity in the It might not be highly likely that there wouid be a flood, but
immediate area of the Danford rese rvatio n. The whole question of when we are dealing with radioactive waste that will be active for at
° 3.2.2.2 sitnrtuecgtruirtey aonfd ssh allowC iwtays toen dthies pHosaanlf osrdit Reess.e rTvhaitsi oqnu eisst ivoint ail tnoo tthe :elveeanstts 1.0 ,T0h0e0r ey eaarres, w awyes maunsdt plloaocke sa t( otrh ew iplols sbieb(i ltiot yd iosfp ousnel iokfe ltyhis 3.5.6.8
fully addressed in the draft EIS . Seismic activity Might open up new rite without inviting the possibility of waste being scattered in a
acks or other means ofconducting groundwater (particularly new flood.
vertical conduits) which would allow waste to contaminate groundwater
and move into the Columbia River.
CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
Tbroughout the discussion of the hydrology, little mention is
made of the potential for change in the hydrologic system in the 'The discussion of future. climate is. based on sketchy data. In
projected 10,000 year period. The sole reference to this reality patterns of climate Change for the last 20,000 years for the
4.1.25 CaIrddeidseictkiu)osanspi,p otanhrse eroneft hlf yl orodesl aotne dbte heetn o C aocclluoimmmbipaatr eiRhcie vnecsriir vcaeun mds tsfutldaayns choe-sff lotofhoe d tsho ydodanry o.Cl oolIgdny yPreaeaslrcisoa Bbbalasesei dnT oahare e gf onionoatdl . aeEtvIi Sda elsnlhc oecu lleodaf r e tvahaenl du papatrseet d tiwhcoetu iloedn fsnf eootc tfsn te eOhcfee spnsoeasxrstii lb1yl0 ,eb0e0 0 3.2.1.3
in thin in. just four miles from the Columbia River. global climatic changes, and the HIS should consider the effects of
long-term unforeseen environmental Changes such as those. similar to
COLOMBIA RIVER, DAMS, FLOODS the rising of the Great Salt Lake.
The DEIS seems to presume that wastes that reach the Columbia
.Rdiisvceurs snioo nl oofn gceorn cae notfr actoionncsern n breacdaiuosaec tOifv ed imlautteiroina.l Trheearchei nisg ntohe GROUNDWATER
3.2.4.2 brnri,noiaaoausvd nvsIeipudrkaorm arsoaoicp.bofrt tlfM uiieoeoovsmcnrfi t .e"pt d aystsirI ehtltmefeuusmi dtt gbsyihoh i oftirnit s d sotn s f iho.nabse,tee c e twrtbhdotiieehelvr dads ed ctl riaw ii lnthfscuheeeo t ent uea hilddinitd.its d l sb Wuefaheetironc iseuontohalemen .dere w s dih-b h nit eith c goshech o llk rpeyngoia orvprrweelua aMrydiltLa. if tso tetalTh acahathttyteiee evdrtse.she. e TroThefh e iiassnd gTTrriarhhandoeedtu rieionsreoadtTm awuhicciadsenttiti gi veemlnveoersoe ss t t u ol wneenvidna utegotklhrruean og gettuihehrhnn aede ihb w tnaHlaHhfsaetaeo nen rtafrfgmrso oraaprsrotvedyduiec s nolgttsdner ei. doomt t fuseIov n n itdu(dtah naea ednwpk uedaeeenr tn nd aedavHedreciarj)nhrngo toafria nnoonnsmcruidtedenn un dgtdtho hi ancgeeIv hr s.elCoa eounhwjalnnaauvudetvsmi ^eetbnfwr igra £ba to- e aem gaRnr_tuniy thndvwbe. eh4trih.caht 3. 5.3.6
.AJJ8 1 ° 1986 03 1 no 1986 6
L, :,
J^0 9561 ;,i GOH
£ • 9' Z • £ ^PpV1.Fa1oog.X?pvey-eo] ? 1 apezgyl,gaowT yx nSOIailil.a.onl?snxgpll n q T- nIi.-H1- eg1 - uM1a-pI9(1 o y?dLeT]3buo l ooowd-epm]n ilNxe l a pPae-J1qau.a 1TY p0I O )olld•ada pe ; TwTmI5aJp;sneO ga II.1pVsTa .1aH0o.bn. 6^ NIdd o _ o dw] -i H9s e?dI0ie , y4p iqs634?n eTVA oFg:m?p Ow3p2 a.l,1 enn ql,ouaF;I i p.0easpo,bml s?AJ sn pp -Xj iIp.4 aao1qT"1aYq3? I3 v T . 3e?VILpI4eHT1O{a.o n6 T',iOp -14Je 1 {0ee awgn)oaSeb - .y p'uOMIT zixxH aSypae en _ n6e? 'us?a HT(uoHz .Vm. 'axH o e-N1TpawTI 3aV)g I T w aozazna.nlna eTs?dqoIO"lH,a}lyJ -;snyIoovgneeg[aql Jy?T [ u nOP ogSiT. bg. -41e T- -4gPp3 s;ua s npnse2. ogie6. Ta a .IiaphT.auuieI 60emdP e a OTia 4sT enlFleTl sz-0uPeaoOTamnio-6. - daz1.snIb-e1TgHIpT4 LaInPau [ spX%laTaauT;oPy 3g3soy gep O1m.a 4.p 1 u q.u Taesp Slo3aT d3lwds a noetes?lnq2oeyu m osayT qTgpeTyq na(e ,liF£a bdn'p Ew-;s -a-oa-4sgT l -aTo„se1Tl e3 e3pm.szou .{j. TOa. is5Tn ;aue3T4Ti JP V-asaz3l?a6;lal{1uT;ue{weaa0Sn.zO? {l}aupaoa4QeTyuwl.1uyr G£T T' p9• I' T' £'£'Z
NoIllplpD N a" HSTTUI y ays¢M .HHHW. 61 ' £ * I *C
^^ •^ •^•.£ -uT.F;Tl;3aee3izea]ed •anlaod.X doai. da-sszpa umb3oa unpz?Mo zya'i nne pax-a ;Ty6o u;di3? dol6aw -TpFxo aoIO[odaesyldus -se uTu.aglTX0 1pv'laqssfe ei-a.ap.i2g . } I u-aee yo1 eo3vf l ia4 .g36pT1,vNuTTaImjp3O dssas laga4eolj}Tan.sa.yo a i}ae •e ysboa}adn ?i?r Vlse[,vo nTaaoIombga z;qoba , .wTp•a,?s .oaz.nw-oep;n 06 0p01u 1p- Tasqtaeg4 e?a uxaaeq. .OI sTdi-oe-d Toy- ye.6 "TP wol eFe as. gppXip- T,aOH6. e-Tza Zo3.s1s.zse. .ne.9 a uaiFan u?l0.la0wab0ie 'OapO?duTp p ea Ixopa ez16;o;uz;e?n4 uaevi Hoi Tpe43IaeeUuz . ;aOyvl oo?seospad ozuuoqdg
Z ' Z '(J`£7 s-s-aTP;PuISen n1a03o ib6mTP l. aT.q3g)dlsT' e 3p.pnIze3Tl o Tu.;o n4pd1I 4e e pHaua il?sO-g;e;1e 4 -idaN4ea yIl3143 ai. z-.]p0d-dsg3 es3 smlu aT e 3s .Fs,Wpe T ;An4a l iq;,Voueladn3 snsu.5 snatea e m -. J'Oqybpi.J vz u'T}o6T(4xu;P o-Pu.PdTieosx.aH;ddsa eens ; iaea.lpHya. 3 m.p pa dO6qiI. uF .uTpluijbaeeboxay. o.]q a d. P4s p"a1uX[.n aen,eTuzo.y3?ym pau.pIa .sm•.asa .Tpas 14zvsTlTo[ qpp3. pe ;.iaoe.l 3X.u I.6faIa iadn1uunasTo3 li qoa?p? p4 iP,g;aa,eIld3. . o0..a a'uqi1i. e a?paaap{uPen p•I onpa; nooOi Tl o alns;ae ea ( id{i[.pdeO.w?oPel TsuOI.asoD 3lpn1.o ve.d ..04a Tl61xp u aFapysm[.3aa V l vV.O o.s. eO..?.] ..; s(q. 3 ;n ;psn eumq. p.).aa .. T.Ipg.omee qosavFZ;a-Iaxl{aoad ygwX3aeTepemis ^ ' b ' •£
T ' I y _ F. lis dal J.6oI 6 chap e -'-I alsem pio,.,, ay] TIe buTl;nd HSId 'aa I4a4IM 'Samiq
• b^'^ 9661.0 L iH xuo sN¢sy
Llsed a41 uI sasea[ax ayeiaq?Iap aql ;0 saauan6asuoa aqq Opel aney
Z' • 4% -y4uupaea6w3uuuoopo1;?plo- liTd1lPeunw0ubda2- aaaw aew uFtaua a .eolnsaqpxlo3n]aT?gu yneaoymad fws aa a s- Xy.asIFs3 TTaqT an .]Zyqfa6t imayeso vi?an}so mq pe is. lFPzpa-p[Oaa3IlaPsasoen een iuF n-lppza Taaoaia2atpns0;Oo a;';4a Iy aZ ayF . ,?d{.[{- .nseI lsuoaPTeeu.ppPsja azT o l;4olTdeau46Odsap?p ?ln .Ipo [s;.Fd e? .T pv b.dpu-l. wipiTno.p pqoTI6 ue.lF.gn.--aTs; lyn s3apZma,uoa Pae -a• ogo]ee.a ao?a.a.Sa.l; dd.ssawa eyedwemym 4saept4dMai wleeuasaLuS0n 3OS s o;Opaa 4;IaiI.anJgd. i4zg .gaOpop.Opaiaj T- -4q4g0s.pg.m,; j/. a ua.1P0uao1 aa?au1a qa4e?p p q2a.6xp4'nT nip z.3aa.V aqz G ipso IFdgO(uidose.sn aa zjss?yFau es4qp.0pe 3Hn1?n 0Py [ a iPaa3du 1onnxTa1uu. o 1ao dS)p?zdP ?penPn1 esTaiesz IOd a;JIwz0nuoq;e-neOle; 0H q s2 0iwsTP1N oi Pe s. lZa;.s4 y-.a?;6ze.sOOn8ged "6.sa s T1 Tal S"aBauT-jzi2TSS .3 .Ilga P3ia aaapes.q lTdleyaae plapql ?l,]eaw{I gqTo.4l,S-T. K ' £ *T '£ 0tcot
lpiaoNads-d 1.1e Tpl.a,Iy3. s. .a.T 6epueyT ueo op uI"e .T I.laa,ueso 6p4a Tla4gqln--ooap]s aaS49;T]1o V;gP3e?e,m .Md d TaLdudpoP ap6" uFda2wqpIn aal{ ; Ipe?imp 4 ;Flea]qynnM; dud opaoump PTziaOlemn -ap[p4eua1 nu ;ToOuT1i a63 gan u yoyzyT asF gn.ImwL{.OT ses aaalaTpge. uT ,Te sTPpa2.OdIao,T sen p ;auIain.q. .o,,p.i u6.psnXlpToaanxzeno 6qepVX st3(eo uypss qya, sg 0"O?36}IIT6 TmP-p -aaola.zTn.d.e1q.de .^ w-F.loT.bonw.o- e.l 4pI]ouu saOppnb oO wx '- .p -aaoIuls-Tgece-emaa-;ps ilueagan 3uaaoTsqTzneya TT'£' S'£
01 luen aM -pasodsTp ad ol,O Ta3;esnezna saOVUl pI3l0e 3;VoP Hl iaie?d} uuap apq ]g FdZoo sdaepa la.q -T aslil aVn2a lP a.v.OITq1.dIapwe. sp2uannoa.i6 Xu0oepqe [apqeqx ppau4n0oai;b;XeJ eaqn eqa qsla so1e apliaexb alai eudl 'SIHU
bI ' I '£ 'Z "pI.w.ogzs; Ap.apqnX p-xap aap.IT. u Ts aulspppqn 6Gu?Aveol pTTSSniow4ws. ea.ps. 4pyo p-s uupo?T;yeduo? wpe;avso0odaoaad all sasva ZSVd da sdoaada,;
Apple
9 • L O '41d.4-.,-. MwT6.4e 4s-ueoTnldao s u2aXap- y I3Ts. -dx-o3 TenX I.-eTF1 ,{1 ; IoP6.' vdpL?[az penxsxpno do.eza. ?d. PTe aSaqzSa i?]owa;1a e .pau.u' .z.i o .]gb -i oea2yolue[ lo epapav qqaal lqai. . ua.d..1od., 4.sa1sp .aI 0-.I'I.1Tsi SMpa om1g .ls1ae1w uwonTs?TSae9an1nu ; To p u1appX I pwsAnnPiTo u 4-unQqOlJx Ihasz i a; wop Opn1xO Ju4 RMvq ODT l'ueaP qusaa4T-yw yes1 jT4; uoO.1..O-. q 2l S1oe lpIv eTa-sQwuTOu- woT -zlIeTTi, ApaIUL-m aso S l-AI I l.[ilaleT. nl4qu VuMTFaa .w;Sp4Oac OdlpaIn.gTlsgI 4d.;.edoO.o 6 •Z•^ • £ ' £
do pouealo aq lanes s{Tos pajpuTwpyuw asayy -aigeldaaie lour ST STVj
{,•p • T • £ - .-;o pose4)d ..T.pI Tuea aaqs aaynye yO To ]a ]Ps-eiM-. P'TSa'uZo'aE -VTo T(1-aa49T -V TI TlOu4 .P.a.3 egue?;wse a3yvyo0-aao v¢ p;oau vu?eewggqee}x paa ljS eegaz pa.iaanllOsVoaS;n zpVaoa1 nn.ww.n v 6 ug1?eg a-31a13p n ?,y•a 3;eoaFaxg zaw nQy[43 o iJF O4a3 qllqg b6on0;. VaIl1 [T?aSsma -npaiOa1aoTT4;alnu_za4anidox;
(t
f1 $^ GT
1,
I..,, ^.
u
219
2 1. 9
ID
.1 .find a method of removing and processing these wastes. All the waste 2.2.10
3.2.4.1 Project, DOE studies)? The Columbia Gorge is a unique area - a must be processed and safely disposed.
national treasure. All effort must be taken to protect. it..
/ CHANGED STANDARDS 4^11 AljO 12 1886 ddtiioss ppbooesTs aheale otmafi e mctteehh loeled irscma uitWrter doeorunnet ld lws yhte eiadneri dcf tho£a i abcbneued tg'Iti tend re t tvoahe nelrd oe rptsemratefinreetirv e eov naww laab yseazttnoetdse .rdr ierTstehprteoirrseieave levn aeoalefn d datsnhde 3.1.4.30
The DEIS state. that 95% of TRU waste was reclassified based awl... i. dpliafcfei ciusl tu ntaoc creepttraibelvee. wastes Isay 2 - 5 years). Stabilization in
"engineering judgment and historical records•" It also reflects a
change from lonCi/g to 100/9 to qualify as high level waste. What th
2.4.1.8 htahpep ejnuesdt iwfhiecna ttihoen sftoarn dtahrids wchaasn cghea?n gTehde fDrEoImS 1d0o/egs tnoo t1 0j0u/s9t7i fWyh atth iiss ssttaabbiillAiitz ziSena gvt aawnnanksa thwe a.Rsitveesr., T.hDeO ED EuIsSe ds hmoeutlhdo dhs aovteh edre scrainb evdi tortihfeirc amteiaonns toof
change. Now much of the transuranic waste will fit the low-level
aste category because of this change? net will be the disposal There is a need for studies done by independent, impartial 2.2.13
method for low-level waste? biganirations such as the U.S.G.S.y National Academy of Science.,
The EIS should state that no waste form will be diluted so that E.P.A., National Institute of Health, Project Search.
2.4.1.15 riutl emsa yw iflall lb eu ncdhearn gleeds sa gsatirni n(gAesn ti nd itshpeo staol/ gr etqou i1re0m0e/ngt)., or that the tempoWrhairlye sftuorrtahgeer mreestheoardcsh a raen dn odte vaeclceopptmaebnlte ,i ss iunc hp raosc:e.s sc rsiobm.,e french 2.2.10
drains, reverse wells:, ditches and trenches, cardboard boxes, single
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT wsatlolp tfuarntkhse.r Opfr ocdouucrtsieo,n tohfe wmaosstte dwehsiilree arbelsee asricthu aatnido nd ewvoeulolpdm ebnet tios 2.5.6
The DEIS does not include a complete inventory of all .wastes at being completed (and afterward).
2.2.13 Hsahnofuolrdd bien ccloundsiindge rtehdo sbey ntohte bEeIiSn.g Scuocnhs iadne riendv ebnyt otrhyi si sD EnIeSe.d eAdl lt owaste If after doing more testing and research and development on 2.3.2.3
fully evaluate this DEIS. Also, an ongoing independent audit o£ DOE better technology there are changes in the DEIS then the DOE must
4{ waste management Work should be done. ctohmepsley rweivtihs itohnes .N aItriroenvaelr s.iEbnlvei raocntmieonntsa lm uPsotl incoy tA cbte ItNaEkPeAn( utnot irle vmioerwe
2.3.1.7 assessWmoernstts .c a-s eW ea cnceiedde ntot alnoaolky saets wworesrte ncoats ei nsccleundaerdi oisn ftohre earcihs koption testing has been completed successfully.
anvdi rf o.r. .t.h ea tp obsesfiobriel ithtye .r atdhiaota catlilv itthye hwaads teex pwoleuladd b.e I nex ptohsee dc atsoe tohfe FUNDING
non-radioactive toxic waste its toxicity does Cut go away. Weapons program funding should include research and development 2.2.9
2.32..22..91 rrdteoies sfebpiaeonrT sechiamhinle sd n aettDnpe.Eedc In hTSdndh eoeeinlv stoel gelpsyvort epeuslmmdh eyoon auftotl .undf ruAtebnhe.dle liT indhengiefc srflnpeeueo cdcsnteaeesdlse sdoita fnetr cyodth enhtbfoeeoel n ofmsdgieeino evarwseela l sssoEtutIpugeS gd . eio sesnTtso he,utehd nr dmee.on reneeeded. wwdcfiooeasnrassp ptttooerrsnsueas cals ttt.aimo foeS enniar.tg.c a noManinnfdcodi e ercdrxeaitp nsesatpind ogs fsnieuaiofnlfnfd i osmcor eaftstn hhtstooo audff lsuerd n e fddsbosieera s sprdchowioshvuaa ellasrd ntt adeebr ,d deea e ainvdsmei dmlvf oeeofpdrru it nhaeddotdeswe f lfeftyonoo rsr.ef ramwocaamtksu etanelesw.
environment. There is word that the U.S.G.S. has agreed to undertake.
Rane sienrdveapteinodne,ndtu rsitnugd yt hoef stuhmem eCro lluomw-bfilao wRi vpeerr iboedlso.w Mtohree Hsatnufdoireds such as of fuFnudnidnig nfgo ri st hae sperroidouucst iporno bolfe mn.u cTlheearre wheaasp obnese.n- abnu t ennootrm foousr atmheount 2.2.9
2.3.2.9 this need to be undertaken. Additional references on ecological SAFE production of nuclear weapons. The problem is the lack of
airmep anctost asvhoauilladb hleav ree sbeeaenrc hin cnleueddesd toif b teh edyo naer ein a tvhaiisl aabrleea .- and if they fPurnoddiuncgt iofonr otfh en uscalfeea rl ownega-ptoenrsm. d(iTshpoesrael aorfe -owtahsetre sp rgoebnleermats. eid nfcrloumd itnhge a
lack of .safe working conditions) Congress requires the commercial
2.3.2.3 di spoRseasle awrocrhk acnadn dbeev edloonpmee. nTt hwei lfli nbael nEeIeSd esdh obuefldo rper osvoimdee opfe rtfhoermance - nraudciloeaacrt iivned uwsatsrtye st oa sC otnhcue ryr eanrtel yg esnete raastiedde. fDuonEd ss hfoourl dt hbee dsiusbpjoescatl toof
criteria for the work on which the R&D must be done. Any changes in thi s requirement. Nuclear weapons production should not be allowed
criteria to complete the Work that come out of the research and without concurrently providing funding to dispose of generated
development must be made open to the public for comment. wastes.
The easily retrieved wastes should be permanently disposed of
immediately. The pre-1970 wastes and plutonium contaminated waste
-posethe same hazard as the post-1970 wastes. If the pre-1970 wastes ,P.r1t12N^`- u"^'- Aue 1 ^ ^sas da ^9
are very difficult to re .v., than the DOE must go to extra effort to
8
~^{ „*

e
221
m
S tZc.^...at By
12 DPA b
f G, t3^, SSO
A116 12 195 6
/'L'.. CF .".a^Ld, Lll.9 9`idJ a- 1Y^=6P.ui^ii August 5.1986
2. 1.1 C^ 2/P s ffP . ^/'cr —(f^L CtJCW/^.^ (^-y Jyl FDFeeapdtd .= .a.olI af 8l3uMldreivyg.
2. ^. lyO ^U-[2.a C=^L!t!!!^iL GNcrIG£'^ G^ l,C(7-DEE ?GU<a:"^6 Y/-C—T'CLGCc^ LC'1-^' ^' Hichlerd, Mash. 9935`2
2^J'i-, r.w.t3LZ^vy .^ 2^-G.1-+i52L p' Pay Nuclepr Pmts Pepositniy
.p 2.2.14 z Tn,a Haar dSrira.b.tne, been a lot of controversy lately about Hmford's Asia,
N 2.5.6 / arc c/ u u^ .v c. «, a = E / K y "i—/ ; t0i. m. reAsntsA tpeo ethseib pieu bBlaicnt rae rcoeprdo toffy sits, arcs I mold like to Add A,
\_ 4 the 111-CitiW Ma 1 ad Audi died by Um M. of Com,rass aM
/Jl ^^t .^ycc,b ^.^ iGi z/vse-t^ ^]^f+r"5' t'"' thhea nNgoe,. as iAnsc eth eth xeu neafBrloyd R19.4.01 8. Uan.d.ob viousUllyl ftehdaetr aisl Pv=ato pgeoirtnyg I tsoe
no nto consult vitY Any tat local goverment An to what
the Federal Goverment does on their own peoperty.
^ 1 51 u_A'LCJ.c^L `_ 71 /I f offdcIal bucoyns nsuelvte rt hhee aFerdde orfa l Gheo vernmne tnhte w shteant et hoery Adnec idloe ctaol gbouivledr mBeonnet-
thing tha some of us Aould consider dap, m..,
« rte .propeIr twyo, addo nB'utt lleott Aannyyoonen.e tteellll w yeo uw hwhaatt I cyoouuamlrd . ddoo wxiithth m yyo upre rlsoeMn.al 2.3.2.12
^^--nc^-uz-a^ e.iA y^i 03-0 .. ainaeralr
cgaebP x. PGSCN
648 P Books= xd:.
bnbnGNB Othello, Nash. 99344
:a

222 x+23:,
v :R ll r :3ses
AUG 12 19860_,aa ,tall a,:' Y lCW
1)a. m NUCLLE k wAS - JAkn -
COME Ablmdnnt lentwe
ARifcth:l aRn.dA . OCpoelrsaotinons 1I(2i0fLeP z .Ygohsteha iAten tS. p4okesperson Allen' z. 1986
PReitc Bhela. n5d5,7 : mhi n_ ten raGrande, OR 978,0
9935
Deer °rl ends,
3thout s ballet having been Tired, c ::O.t a micsiia hsving been
le'.:nohe C, „ t s bomb *_av`.et, base, droned it can be said tact the
.caciear dilece,,, ta. necks, a,9 race in arose, KILLING us.
Ceentci'"a:_stnere- ja..on vldet rel:zn -cS:_ee ntlt e aRe ErlM o1hctaaa tnti.oo nbn cooirfs, e ' hCainnBgdth h-aClrel vlt e.ltn heTe a PcrHtydisci soc-ln asat tit lsheoa mtte a hss-tiIet.se. .Ri inbl olt_hae's RMLlrIc.,Sh lh DaenectlpI a1'r:.t: mL e= le ,I1 roafce e,E, nMergCymer 0O
mend or. Inc-ud_n..-, T. t:^e Colu=bLa Rife r, eglicultural _nreduct.on Cp. Bin 950
ienu ets tFi-o.rnt ht tc oT aannidc aecrrti.v Ie, cer -tl st wb ons^ a ctltade l •rfeeo oTcoit.oo—^cc . e ctld -cc aicws^ .be Fichlane. WA 98352 Cl
a. atiy -uost4rins _- -Hwo. ..an: "and race, aaumt Hart anw
.P 2.1.1 t zr oxti::ane-e P '_ - 'ens ?east iss.-<6: 111 16C c1e]^i i oe nlE crre laptredic el.a teerrr nb y: :ttheaes ,,,e",ar e W ,ngion Salt Neckar Pen Board end Coonell imparments on the B
M .a of ti .-I.rd, s any : asibl. note tial to be .,efl nnr'fo menlal' amt, 9temill "Dispuml of Hnnfore Defcnso H-ph told. C
W n ^o err :' :ailtierr. 'e fut.:uoorrnteC_ C Yrofe anereti JPs. rinctleniinc a: Tank Write; The Board and Cou nil uneudmalld or .cv .se,, ,mien
e alro-o-^ ve al ,-n on ctea, ast. _ rod in i-edo.. a e_l..^cce .( the monsu nl Bich included a series of put,: all-iill.
2.5.6 etanco_a c eilcat.en: Ci:s1 1o1e1 :-Cn ra nra]ogs-a`^ ' -o roY.- i.,e-- res^ep_c -baiI ICtlo.ar;c. s'b iaieirne t s htesiirl t,lirssa1 . n..o:P '..s.r t:ceoD,nuo:en,ra. tceb v_te'r. 1 wd l. p.E lt.bh,me .Bp om'amrcwdn .tx seaa ldl ide.ad,. .dcaemM n.fi oWe1d1eu n bei sntp5hi a olB mra i Lnfii nmCaao,lu E 19 tiosnt nsasi2 n w i atrgaeRp f Da'fmrd . fco'mhl med gnu rND
,. e - cs, c c u IT ucta .t' ? this cap.sn Commenrs wotn a ,H, cl cd fl. -1 gmemrne.¢a .., C+
n c: _1 or c in e hard tine :rlinb t ' deralandied h the, they a"II aver t men tonmerel to to
_—noI t'.ti-l _e-Y:.s ec .SLO0 r .- c _ 1oe: - 0.c s , s r.el_cc -. . i.rf uolrl _ll_ 1 -GP rfh,ecae,^ s;c ^,ti igPo-'n c7a0o D adma aNsaptsi pornoo cfe stsmh iwpse g tceooere nuaTptae edt%h wwei iNlthla esdahecalrh,e \o 1tf h steh eer eAasfutfl.et c, toefd )'t hC))d enoio adru onnc iul iatn d. pT1a1h1f1l iemu (JaD-
,ra of.._ --...._\c v _.a. t c cm e e:- - i ^bref thco it's ll n India. N aloe, rnev indicated cnm.ran, will' the issue raised n
.is :""ner, paduQC.
ere C tae - ClOei:li' G ^l tie :lati'nts cinchona, de,
2.5.6 rSc sane:vt: :sTvpCl_de ^ rc- l a;- ie l .n foi fn— ct:a1 1trah.:e':i ,ma. _-.-'s `_ _ ana- o bteeco .at. =h-s: eosId nneal faeefi-_ssar _ctnhtd.,.v -"h^.t.`-an c :- , :oanft tcu_- c_tpl e.r aatr ree Dw cfaomoarncma.l Thi_ - mindpbL tloupai annc keAanug,reea -liOmn,c. oelCoumudt,eri sreCe .ntothmse' m:faelleotw:i ng', -
P.mia Illiane &asemrnu
rely In a '.b11:.1nnt Future, CTeitcrhoneinc aCl oµm6.rrie6m« sP Creopmarpeidl ebd, b Cl RHS aCll .&. .A. sIso. ciiant,es
W
Rifler Yosemite
nab IB>1oVaa1 s,+ooen..O c 3 %1ON3d..
avawmoJ su>nuJ -- O XJON3d..
ZIO u 1 N ymd >nnpmasveay p.J
H-J R801oa3 bwa>+10 tl3alma RneaB na,PUtl £-J
5-J p,evg aisxM ieal>nN'++e4J .o4s1H vaueM LO
T-3 auP+e9 41008 ,ouun.a^ i-J
zlvammwS 8auxaH mlVnd -- J"XiON3ddtl
9-9 S....J yae1J Fg
f-H veeoOS 1. al, E-8
Z'8' a,aDUOJ 1e4o^8aa >nd., puxlnl Z-0
' I'0 :vawa8eu¢(y 6au>8um3 Rton.J volvag 1-H
sl..mm....... .o0 Ie3.J . H XJON3d..
8'YPnnoJ 6,ovnPW M eaWnti
9i-YS 4q H-PU61¢laoS p,e g' g etllany tD
5z osaa In,n1eN L'Y u>goH- V W
LZ-Yua4v3 9-tl v sOPU3
61-tl apJO R8,a63 S'V
:IYdUigtlM
ti-V (8.10-3 6-Y' / 4J e'4i1H 'V vaueM
Vtl, JJO 1 J, I:V Z., q^y^y is YJj^j/f^N/
E V n vd o151N Pue n8ao eVa+Y .;'Y , 0 (/'^( (/a% I J\ ^
I.d a,on.,P8Y I-v 7
DUa OJ R 8y ,S tl %IUN3ddtl -
VI sa ss of 4osP,ptl mseq tealSnry - ffan6 -ec4 n0 J H - t asxald
EI uogevoesue,t 8m^a so l U e 1 uo insuac m e a,q¢soe
3ap 341 - e 1 1 a4 PI 3 41 's . i 1 + a 1 .Im ,nI c,l•
6 .n.¢i _a e:S p6¢ 1¢,aPa3 Valm aauel1 .woJ u1P..e0 e4 ssP.vn,tl a 41 V -g{ <4 4 a,nP.am. J 1 aweolan u18p lql
G lem.4v1 3 81'^ 3O X, m. J -1e151x5e alevoaPe 4i,m'P,xag ...eN 1 U 41 +auunw ..1
51 1 Rla w1em P ,. uo rsv p sua D am. u on n
fI uonanRpovqloudl s,dudxwos u^eoso ,1l . P'Paau.u aa.l emdlpxm nv lPdmmoµaa .lse auI 4o1ls xSvU FJoP lUsO TjIucs4n!u JooNla D41,Jj , zqdi LIlwe o5.s14 Y0z1 J IJ Bse ,n4 a-a r+,Hi4fePx (D
M31Aa3AO 1N3 31V15 W, su,• q maw aop IDevO., Isom aryl so mmw03 01 Amnuoade agl aleua+ede a,N C
M3
S1N31NOJ 3O 318Y1 As, (D
'^c 8 ... nu m99¢'6I1 "'8I 11a1ee4831n1yy 0-
Q.11(LG Q.Y
.£3 d 3 E[' Qom`
^ B ^ ^ J