Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1999 Apparatus for dynamic interface testing between reinforcing inclusions and sand William M. Bergeson Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at:http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Recommended Citation Bergeson, William M., "Apparatus for dynamic interface testing between reinforcing inclusions and sand" (1999).Theses and Dissertations.Paper 611. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please [email protected]. Bergeson, ·William M. Apparatus· for [)ynamic Interface Testing between R.einforcing Inclu·sionsand· Sand. January 2000 .. Apparatus for DynamicInterfaceTesting between Reinforcing Inclusions and Sand by WilliamM. Bergeson AThesis Presentedto the Graduate and Research Committee ofLehighUniversity in Candidacy for theDegree of Master ofScience III Department ofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineering LehighUniversity -' ------------------,08=20~9 -_ .._~----- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS T.he author ofthis thesis,would like to thank the following people: GraceE.'Bergeson , Albert o. Bergeson Kimber!yA. Bergeson TimothyM. Bergeson . Bradly A. Bergeson .Andrew D. Bergeson John A. Bergeson SueBergeson ~- LisaBergeson & son Stuart Dr. ScottRaschke III TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ;.· . ,--" CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL..,............................................. ·11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...... 11l TABLE OF CONTENTS...;......................................................... IV LIST OF FIGURES... viii ABSTRACT ·............................................. 1 CHAPTERl............................................................................. . 3 1 IN"TRODUCTION : '" . 3 ·1.1 CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS............................. 4 1.2 IN"TERACTION..................................................... 5 1.3 STATIC LOADIN"G VERSUS DYNAMIC LOADIN"G...... 6 1.4 FACTORS IN"FLUENCIN"GLABORATORY TEST RESULTS............................................................ 7 1.5' BOUNDARY CONDITIONS..................................... 8 1.6 THREE CATAGORIES OFLABORATORYMETHODS... 9 1.6.1 EQUIVALENT HOMOGENIZATION METHODS... 10 1.6.2 EXPLICIT MODELIN"GME'FHODS..................... 10 1.6;-3 LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM METHQDS ;- ,. 11. --_.~"~~--_.~-_.].6:-4-~PULLOUTDIRECt"SHEA:KTESTS~:-:-~:~~~~1.-1 --~ 1.7 PULLOUT SHEARBOX TEST........................ 11 1.8 THESIS OBJECTIVE... 12 iv 1.9 CHAPTER SUMMARy............................................. 13 CHAPTER 2....... 18 2 LITERATUREREVIEW..................... . . 18 , 2.1 SHEARLAG ANALYSIS OFPLANARREINFORCMENTS. 18 2.2 PULLOUTTESTS TO INVESTIGATE LOAD TRANSFER... 21 2.3 DYNAMIC INTERFACESHEARSTRENGTH OF GEOSYNTHETICS... 24 2.4 SUMMARY OFLITERATURE REVIEW....."................... 26 CHAPTER3............................................................................... 32 3. EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE........................................... 32 3.1 GENERALREQUIREMENTS....................................... 33 3.2 MATERIALS 35 3.2.1 ALUMINUM.................................................... 36 3.2.2 BUTYLRUBBER............................................. 37 3.2.3 CLEAR POLYCARBON...................................... 38 J. 3.2.4 ACRYLIC ~.............. 38 3.2.5 UNTREATED GLASS........................................ 39 3.2.6 POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE...................... 39 ------ -----------3.2.]~-BOLY_YIN.YLCHLORlDE................................. ;)9,---~- 3.3 FABRICATED EQUIPMENT :....... 40 3.3.1 PULLOUT SHEARBOX.........;........................ 40 v 3.3.2 REINFORCING INCLUSIONS........................... 42 3.3.3 SHAKETABLE MOUNTING BASEFRAME · 43 3.3.4 PRESSUREBAGS............... 44 3.3.5 COMPOSITWINDOW :;.......... 46 3.3.6 PULLOUT SHEARBOXSPACER...................... 46~ 3.3.7 FRICTION LINERS :...................... 47 3.4 PURCHASED AND ACQUIRED EQUIPMENT.................. 47 3.4.1 AIR PRESSURESySTEM.................................... 47 3.4.2 PULLOUT ASSEMBLY AND MOTOR................. 48 3.4.3 DATAACQUISITION...................................... 48 3.4.4 SHAKINGTABLE.......................................... 48 3.5 ELECTRICALREQUIREMENTS.................................. 49 3.6 PROCEDURE........................................................... 49 3.7 SUMMARY OFEQUIPMENT AND TEST PROCEDURES... 51 CHAPTER4... .. . 59 4 EQUIPMENT ASSEMBLY AND RESULTS FROM ALL OFTHE TESTS.............................................................................. 59 4.1 TEST EQUIPMENT FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLy 59 4.1.1 TOLERANCES................. 60 ---------~. fLL2_CONSTRU_CTIQ~ROCESS................................ 61 4.2 PERFORMANCETESTRESULTS .:.:.:..;.d........ 63 4.3 FULL-SCALEINTERFACE TEST RESULTS......... 65 VI 4.4 SUMMARY OFEQUIPMENT FABRICATION AND TEST ..:J RESULTS "...................... 66 ( CHAPTERS ".;: , 70 5 RESEARCH SUMMARIES AND fINALREMARKS.................... 70 5.1 EQUIPMENT SUMMARIES......................................... 70 5.2 TEST SUMMARIES ,........ 71 5.3 RESEARCH SUMMARy.... 72 5.4 RESEARCH CONCLUSIONS............... 73 5.5 FUTURERECOMMENDATIONS.................................... 75 REFERENCES..... 76 VITA" · ·......................... 79 vii LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTERl . . . 1-1 HIGHWAYENGINEERING APPLICATIONS . 14 1-2 REINFORCED SOILFAILUREZONE : . 14 1-3 TYPICALLANDFILLLINER SySTEM . 15 1-4 SOLID WASTE ACTING ON LINER SySTEM ": . 15 1-5 SAND-INCLUSION INTERFACE · 16 1-6 DYNAMIC INTERFACETEST APPARATUS .. 17 CHAPTER 2 2-1· AUTOMATED PLANE-STRAIN REINFORCEMENT CELL....... 28 2-2 LARGE SCALEPULLOUTBOXAND REACTION FRAME...... 29 2-3 SHAKINGTABLEFACILITy............ 30 2-4 GEOSYNTHETICTO GEOMEMBRANEFORCE DIAGRAM.... 30 2-5 GEOTEXTILE TO GEOMEMBRANE FORCESLIP MODEL...... 31 2-6 STIFFNESS AND DAMPINGPARAMETERS - 31 CHAPTER 3 3-1 DYNAMIC INTERFACETESTAPPARATUS;.-, , ;., ·_52 ~~---"---~~3~~C()NVENTIONALPULLOUT BOXES-&-THbPtH:I::;()tJT-S-H"tA:R~~--~-- BOX :~ , ~................................... 53 3-3 INTERNALCOMPONENTS.OFTHEPULLOUT-SHEARBOX... 54 viii
Description: