CReSIS UAV Preliminary Design Review: The Meridian William Donovan University of Kansas 2335 Irving Hill Road Lawrence, KS 66045-7612 http://cresis.ku.edu Technical Report CReSIS TR 125 June 25, 2007 This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (#ANT-0424589). Executive Summary This report describes the requirements development and preliminary design of three candidate aircraft for use in the research of ice sheets. Preliminary sizing, performance matching, configuration selection, Class I weight and balance, Class I stability and control, and Class I drag analyses are included in this report for all three designs. The design mission for this aircraft is to takeoff from a snow or ice runway, fly to a designated area, then use low frequency radar to perform measurements of ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica. Three designs were developed: • A Monoplane with Structurally Integrated Antennas • A Monoplane with Antennas Hanging from the Wing • A Biplane with Antennas Structurally Integrated Into the Lower Wing i Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-0424589. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ii Table of Contents Executive Summary.....................................................................................................i Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................ii Table of Contents.......................................................................................................iii List of Figures..............................................................................................................v List of Tables..............................................................................................................vi Nomenclature...........................................................................................................viii Abbreviations.............................................................................................................ix 1 Science Rationale................................................................................................1 2 Requirements Definition and Development......................................................2 2.1 Stall Speed and Climb Performance.............................................................3 2.2 Aircraft Range...............................................................................................3 2.3 Takeoff and Landing Distances....................................................................8 2.4 Cruise Speed.................................................................................................9 2.5 Payload Requirements................................................................................10 2.6 Size Requirements......................................................................................12 2.7 Logistical Requirements.............................................................................13 2.7.1 Maintenance Requirements.................................................................13 2.7.2 Communications.................................................................................14 2.7.3 Regulations.........................................................................................14 2.7.4 Environmental Issues..........................................................................15 2.7.5 Special Operations Requirements.......................................................15 2.8 Requirements Summary..............................................................................16 3 Aircraft Survey..................................................................................................17 3.1 Aircraft Currently Used in Cold-Weather Research...................................17 3.1.1 Lockheed C130...................................................................................18 3.1.2 Lockheed P-3 Orion............................................................................19 3.1.3 DeHavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter.........................................................20 3.2 Uninhabited Air Vehicles...........................................................................21 3.2.1 Similar Uninhabited Air Vehicles.......................................................24 3.3 Optionally Piloted Vehicle Concepts..........................................................29 4 Preliminary UAV Designs................................................................................32 4.1 Red Design..................................................................................................34 4.1.1 Preliminary Aircraft Sizing.................................................................34 4.1.2 Sensitivity Analysis............................................................................38 4.1.3 Performance Matching........................................................................38 4.1.4 Configuration Selection......................................................................40 4.1.5 Class I Weight and Balance................................................................64 4.1.6 Class I Stability and Control...............................................................70 4.1.7 Class I Drag Analysis..........................................................................73 4.1.8 Red Design Summary.........................................................................75 4.2 White Design..............................................................................................77 iii 4.2.1 Preliminary Aircraft Sizing.................................................................77 4.2.2 Sensitivity Analysis............................................................................80 4.2.3 Performance Matching........................................................................80 4.2.4 Class I Drag Analysis..........................................................................81 4.2.5 White Design Summary......................................................................84 4.3 Blue Design.................................................................................................86 4.3.1 Similar Aircraft...................................................................................86 4.3.2 Preliminary Aircraft Sizing.................................................................89 4.3.3 Sensitivity Analysis............................................................................92 4.3.4 Performance Matching........................................................................92 4.3.5 Configuration Selection......................................................................96 4.3.6 Class I Weight and Balance..............................................................108 4.3.7 Class I Stability and Control.............................................................113 4.3.8 Class I Drag Analysis........................................................................115 4.3.9 Blue Design Summary......................................................................118 5 Summary of Preliminary Designs..................................................................120 6 Conclusions and Recommendations..............................................................122 6.1 Ongoing Design........................................................................................122 6.1.1 Detailed Landing Gear Design..........................................................122 6.1.2 Engine Selection – Turboprop Variant.............................................123 7 References........................................................................................................125 iv List of Figures Figure 2.1: Map of Antarctica.......................................................................................4 Figure 2.2: Design Mission Profile.............................................................................17 Figure 3.1: Lockheed C130 Operating from Snow Runway [19]...............................18 Figure 3.2: Lockheed P-3 Orion on Ice Runway in Antarctica [20]...........................19 Figure 3.3: De Havilland Twin Otter Operating from Snow Runway [33]................21 Figure 3.4: Current Commercially Available UAVs [3, 12, 13]................................23 Figure 3.5: General Atomics Predator B [4]...............................................................25 Figure 3.6: General Atomic Predator [4]....................................................................25 Figure 3.7: Northrop Grumman E-Hunter [2].............................................................26 Figure 3.8 General Atomics I-Gnat [4].......................................................................26 Figure 3.9: AAI Shadow 200 [21]..............................................................................27 Figure 3.10: AAI Shadow 600 [21]............................................................................28 Figure 3.11: Geneva Aerospace Dakota UAV [22]....................................................28 Figure 4.1: Takeoff Weight Regression Plot for Similar Aircraft..............................35 Figure 4.2: Performance Matching Plot for Red Design............................................39 Figure 4.3: Preliminary Fuselage Layout for Red Design..........................................41 Figure 4.4: Engine Power...........................................................................................44 Figure 4.5: Engine Weight..........................................................................................45 Figure 4.6: Engine Power-to-Weight Ratio................................................................46 Figure 4.7: Red Design Wing Planform.....................................................................49 Figure 4.8: Lift-Curve-Slop for Clark Y Airfoil [8]...................................................51 Figure 4.9: Wing Lift Distribution for the Red Design..............................................55 Figure 4.10: Definition of V-Tail Planform Area [7].................................................57 Figure 4.11: V-Tail Planform Drawing for the Red Design.......................................58 Figure 4.12: Landing Gear Placement for Lateral Tip-Over Requirements...............62 Figure 4.13: Landing Gear Layout and Retraction Scheme for Red Design..............63 Figure 4.14: Three-View of Red Design.....................................................................68 Figure 4.15: Center of Gravity Excursion for the Red Design...................................69 Figure 4.16: Longitudinal X-Plot for the Red Design................................................71 Figure 4.17: Directional X-Plot for the Red Design...................................................72 Figure 4.18: Drag Polars for the Red Design..............................................................74 Figure 4.19: Lift-to-Drag Ratio for the Red Design...................................................74 Figure 4.20: Final Three-View of the Red Design.....................................................76 Figure 4.21: Takeoff Weight Regression for the White Design.................................78 Figure 4.22: Drag Polars for the White Design..........................................................83 Figure 4.23: Lift-to-Drag Ratios for the White Design..............................................83 Figure 4.24: Summary of the White Design...............................................................85 Figure 4.25: Aviat Pitts S-2C [17]..............................................................................87 Figure 4.26: Aviat Christen Eagle II [17]...................................................................88 Figure 4.27: Beech Model 17 (Staggerwing) [18]......................................................89 Figure 4.28: Takeoff Weight Regression Plot for Blue..............................................90 v Figure 4.29: Performance Matching Plot for Red Design..........................................95 Figure 4.30: Fuselage Layout for Blue Design...........................................................97 Figure 4.31: Wing Planform for Blue.......................................................................101 Figure 4.32: Span-wise Lift Distribution for the Blue Design..................................104 Figure 4.33: Empennage Planform for Blue.............................................................105 Figure 4.34: Landing Gear Layout for Blue.............................................................106 Figure 4.35: Lateral Tipover Criteria for Blue..........................................................107 Figure 4.36: Longitudinal Tipover and Ground Clearance Criteria for Blue...........107 Figure 4.37: Preliminary Arrangement of Blue Design............................................111 Figure 4.38: Center of Gravity Excursion for Blue..................................................112 Figure 4.39: Longitudinal X-Plot for the Blue Design.............................................114 Figure 4.40: Directional X-Plot for the Blue Design................................................115 Figure 4.41: Biplane Interference Factor [28]..........................................................116 Figure 4.42: Drag Polars for the Blue Design...........................................................117 Figure 4.43: Lift-to-Drag Ratios for the Blue Design...............................................118 Figure 5.1: Comparison of Fuel Usage for 3 Fine Scale Missions...........................121 Figure 5.2: Combined Takeoff Weight Regression Chart........................................121 Figure 6.1: CAD Model of Innodyn 165TE..............................................................124 List of Tables Table 2.1: Mission Information for Fine, Local, and Regional Surveys......................6 Table 2.2: Aircraft Range Trade Study Based on Number of Flights Required...........6 Table 2.3: Summary of Airports in Antarctica [1]........................................................8 Table 2.4: Runways in Greenland [5]...........................................................................9 Table 2.5: Dimensions of Standard Shipping Containers [9].....................................13 Table 2.6: Summary of Design Requirements............................................................16 Table 3.1: Lockheed C130H Summary [14]...............................................................19 Table 3.2: Lockheed P-3C Orion Summary [14]........................................................20 Table 3.3: De Havilland Twin Otter-300 Summary [13]............................................21 Table 3.4: Summary of Similar Aircraft [3, 12, 13]...................................................24 Table 3.5: Optionally Piloted Vehicle Performance Summary [14]...........................30 Table 3.6: Additional Range Estimates for Crewed Aircraft......................................30 Table 4.1: Mission Fuel Fractions for Red Design.....................................................37 Table 4.2: Takeoff Weight Sensitivity Summary for the Red Design........................38 Table 4.3: List of Viable Engines [13]........................................................................42 Table 4.4: Wing Planform Summary for Red Design.................................................50 Table 4.5: Volume Coefficient Values for Existing Aircraft [7]................................57 Table 4.6: V-Tail Geometry Summary.......................................................................59 Table 4.7: Landing Gear Disposition Comparison.....................................................60 Table 4.8: Landing Gear Summary for the Red Design.............................................64 Table 4.9: Group Weight Data for Single Engine Propeller Driven Aircraft [6].......66 Table 4.10: Component Weight Breakdown for the Red Design...............................66 vi Table 4.11: Class I Weight and Balance for Red Design...........................................67 Table 4.12: Weight and Balance Summary................................................................70 Table 4.13: Mission Fuel Fractions for the White Design..........................................79 Table 4.14: Takeoff Weight Sensitivity Summary for the White Design...................80 Table 4.15: Mission Fuel Fractions for Blue Design..................................................91 Table 4.16: Takeoff Weight Sensitivity Summary for the Blue Design.....................92 Table 4.17: Summary of Flap Trade Study for the Blue Design................................94 Table 4.18: Summary of Preliminary Sizing and Performance Matching for Blue....95 Table 4.19: Wing Planform Summary for Blue........................................................102 Table 4.20: Fuel Storage Comparison......................................................................103 Table 4.21: Empennage Summary for Blue..............................................................106 Table 4.22: Landing Gear Summary for Blue..........................................................108 Table 4.23: Weight Breakdown for the Blue Design................................................109 Table 4.24: Class I Weight and Balance for the Blue Design..................................110 Table 4.25: Class I Weight and Balance Summary for Blue....................................113 Table 5.1: Summary of Preliminary Design Concepts.............................................120 vii Nomenclature Symbol Description Units AR Aspect Ratio ~ b Wing Span ft, in c Wing chord ft, in C Drag Coefficient ~ D C Zero-Lift Drag Coefficient ~ D0 C Lift Coefficient ~ L C Lift-Curve Slope Rad-1 Lα c Specific Fuel Consumption Lbs/hp-hr p D Drag Lbs D Propeller Diameter Ft p e Oswald’s Efficiency ~ f Equivalent Parasite Area Ft2 L Lift Lbs M Munk’s Span Factor ~ n Number of Propeller Blades ~ p P Engine Power hp P Blade Power Loading hp/ft2 bl R Range Nm S Wing Area Ft2 S Wetted Area Ft2 Wet W Empty Weight Lbs E W Fuel Weight Lbs F W Payload Weight Lbs pay W Takeoff Weight Lbs TO Γ Dihedral Angle Deg α Angle of Attack Deg ε Wing Twist Deg η Wing Station ~ η Propeller Efficiency ~ p σ Biplane Interference Factor ~ viii Abbreviations Abbreviation Description CReSIS Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets FAR Federal Aviation Regulations NSF National Science Foundation UAV Uninhabited Air Vehicle ix
Description: