ebook img

Anova for Parameter Dependent Nonlinear PDES and Numerical Methods for the Stochastic ... PDF

90 Pages·2015·1.15 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Anova for Parameter Dependent Nonlinear PDES and Numerical Methods for the Stochastic ...

Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Anova for Parameter Dependent Nonlinear PDEs and Numerical Methods for the Stochastic Stokes Equations Zheng Chen Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ANOVA FOR PARAMETER DEPENDENT NONLINEAR PDES AND NUMERICAL METHODS FOR THE STOCHASTIC STOKES EQUATIONS By ZHENG CHEN A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Zheng Chen defended on July 2, 2007. Max Gunzburger Professor Directing Dissertation Fred Huffer Outside Committee Member Janet Peterson Committee Member Xiaoqiang Wang Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To my parents, my wife and my daughter. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My greatest thanks are due to my advisor, Dr. Gunzburger. Over the years of my study with him, he gave me advice, encouragement and support. His lectures, talks and courses provided to us were important to me, but I also was privileged to have chats and individual time with him. I will always admire his skills and extensive knowledge in mathematics, physics and statistics, and his insight into scientific problems. Only with his help, was I able to do this work. I hope that I have learned enough from him to be a productive researcher myself. I would also like to thank Dr. Yanzhao Cao for giving me great help in preparing my dissertation including choosing topics and cooperative research throughout these years. I would also like to thank Dr. Huffer, Dr. Peterson and Dr. Wang for their willingness to be on my committee. Dr. Huffer allowed me to sit in his class to study stochastic processes; he is so kind and compassionate and gave me any help I needed. Dr. Peterson is one of my favorite professors. I learned Finite Element Methods from her in Iowa. I will never forget her tutoring my spoken English. Dr. Xiaoming Wang provided the most wonderful advanced PDE courses, from which I benefited a lot. I also thank him for his concern about my research and my life in these years. I also want to take this chance to thank Dr. John Burkardt and Dr. Mark Sussman: they are always there when I need help in programming. Dr. John Burkardt showed me the tricks and technology in programming and Unix. He is always passionate and patient. With him in our group, I do not panic when I have trouble in my work. He also saves me much time by sharing his codes with me. I want to thank Dr. Steve Hou and Dr. Scott Hansen at Iowa State University for their help and concern for my study. During the pursuit of my PhD, I worked as a teaching assistant for the Department of iv Mathematics and as a research assistant for School of Computational Science. The faculty and staff of these two departments gave me all kinds of help when I needed, I appreciate it. Lastly, I am grateful to my wife Min Chen; without her love and continuous support, it is unimaginable that I could have persisted in my study over these years. My daughter Rebecca Chen brings me happiness which makes me feel at ease in working hard; for this, I thank her. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x 1. General Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. The ANOVA expansion and efficient sampling methods for parameter depen- dent nonlinear PDEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 ANOVA expansions of multivariate functions and effective dimensions . . 8 2.3 The model problem and the approximation property of ANOVA expan- sions for small perturbations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 TheANOVAexpansionsofandtheireffectivedimensionsforcostfunctionals 16 2.5 Sampling parameter space for building surrogate functionals . . . . . . . 18 2.6 Methods for uniform sampling in hypercubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3. Review of Results for Stochastic PDEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1 Introduction to Numerical Stochastic PDEs . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.2 Introduction to homogeneous Gaussian noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.3 Green’s functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.4 Two concepts in the SPDEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4. Stochastic Stokes Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2 Discretization of the white noise and error estimates . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.3 Finite element approximations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.4 Numerical Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.5 Stochastic Stokes equations driven by homogeneous Gaussian noise . . . 58 5. Conclusions and future research topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.2 Future research topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 vi BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 vii LIST OF TABLES 2.1 The ANOVA expansion terms and values of the effecitve dimensions. . . . . 19 2.2 Absolute error, averaged over 10 realizations, in the location of the minimizing parameter point for each of the point sampling methods used in the surrogate construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.3 Absolute error, averaged over 10 realizations, in the minimum value of the functionals for each of the point sampling methods used in the surrogate construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 viii LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 The data configuration for the model problem used in the computational examples. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1 approx integral of mean vs. log(n) (n, partition number in x axis and y axis) 57 4.2 approx integral of variance vs. log(n) (n, partition number in x axis and y axis) 57 4.3 approx mean of 1 norm of pressure vs. log(n) (n, partition number in x axis − and y axis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.4 Approx mean of u(x,y) after 5000 realizations in nx = ny = 32 . . . . . . . 59 4.5 Approx mean of u(x,y) after 5000 realizations in nx = ny = 16 . . . . . . . . 59 4.6 Approx variance of v(x,y) after 5000 simulations in nx = ny = 16 . . . . . . 60 4.7 Approx variance of v(x,y) after 5000 simulations in nx = ny = 32 . . . . . . 60 4.8 discretized white noise in nx = ny = 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.9 discretized colored noise with alpha = 1.2 and nx = ny = 8 . . . . . . . . . 67 ix

Description:
The ANOVA expansion and efficient sampling methods for parameter .. Determine if lower order ANOVA effects dominate the values of the cost
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.