UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff TTeennnneesssseeee,, KKnnooxxvviillllee TTRRAACCEE:: TTeennnneesssseeee RReesseeaarrcchh aanndd CCrreeaattiivvee EExxcchhaannggee Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-1995 AAnn AAnnaallyyssiiss ooff SSttuuddyy AAbbrrooaadd AAddmmiinniissttrraattiioonn aatt UU..SS.. CCoolllleeggeess aanndd UUnniivveerrssiittiieess Trevor Nelson University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Higher Education Administration Commons RReeccoommmmeennddeedd CCiittaattiioonn Nelson, Trevor, "An Analysis of Study Abroad Administration at U.S. Colleges and Universities. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1995. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1159 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Trevor Nelson entitled "An Analysis of Study Abroad Administration at U.S. Colleges and Universities." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, with a major in Education. Karl Jost, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Jane Connelly, Kathleen Davis, Malcolm McInnis Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Toth eG raduCaotuen cil: Ia ms ubmithteirnegwa id tihsr steatwiriotnt beynT revoNre lseonnt i"tAnl eAdn alysoifs StudAyb roAaddm inistarta tUiC.ooSnl. l eagneUdsn iverss.iI"h t aiveeex amintehde finaclo poyft his disfsoefrro traamnt dci oonnt aennrdte commtehnaidbet t accepint ed partialfu lfillmoeftn htre e quirefmoetrnh dtees g rDeoec toofEr d uciaotnw,ith a m ajoirn LeaderSstbuidpini Eedsu ciaotn. � KarJlo ,sM tajoPrr ofessor We have trbeidasid s rsteation anrde commietnasdc ceptance: d I 11 Accepftoetrdh Ceo un:c il ,j - AsscoiaVtiecC eh ancellor and DoefTa hne Gr aduaStceh ool AN ANALYSIS OFS TUDY ABROADA DMINISTRATION AT U.SC.O LLEGESA ND UNIVERSITJES A Dissertation Presenftoetrdh e DoctoorfE ducatDieogrene TheU niverosfiT tye nnessKeneo,x ville TrevNoerl son Augus1t99 5 ü Copyri©g hTtr evNoerl s..o 1n99 5 Alrli ghrtess erved •• iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thihsa sb eeanl onjgourneya,n dt hearer mea nyp eoptloew homI a mi ndebted. Theierx pertsiuspep,oa rntde, n couragehmaevnmeta det hisst udpyo ssiblcl aen.n tohta nk theemn ough. la mg ratetfuoDrl . KarJlo smty,m ajoprr ofesasnodsr t udayb roeandt husfioars t, hiisn sigahntdgs e ntrleem indtehrast tarheed eraed litnobe esm etl.w oulalds ol ikteo thanthke o thmeerm berosfm yc ommitftoeetr h egiuri danancde e ncourageDmre.Jn atn:e ConnelDlry.K, a thlDeaevni asn,dD r. MalcMocIlnmn is. Thes taoffft hOef ficoefI nternatSitoundale anntdsS cholaatrl se wSat ate Univerdseisteyr avs ep ectihaaln kssp,e cifictahldeli yr ecDteonrn,iP se terswohnos, a w thvea luoeft hirse searcahn dm adef undasv ailfaobtrlh ewe o rtk ob eu ndertaken. lw ouladl sloi kteot hantkh seaft fi nt hSet udAyb roaCde ntaetrl ewSat ate Univerfsoitrth ye piart iewnhceenl a ppeaprerd eoccuwpiiteohdt hmeart tearnsdt, o S usan .P oscthow homl a md eepilnyd ebftoecrdo ordintahtmeia nigl ianngdres a dintgh routghhe numerovuesr sioofnt sh mea nuscript. Thee xpertoiftsheSe t atistics Laatlb eowrSaat taoUtrneyi verssipteyc,i fically, Dr.S araNhu sseTro,n yG enelDoi,a nAen dersaonnd,S oledad Fernparnodveezd, indispensTahbelywee .r aeb eacdounr ithnegn umerotuism elts h ouglhh ta dl osmty way. Finalllyw ,o ulldi kteot hanmky f ami-lmyy w ifPea me1aan,dc hildEremni ly, TristaanndM, a ckenzTihee.hy a vhea dt ot olermaytu ep sa ndd ownasn dm yc ontinued absencIeh so.p teh ey tfheaeitlth asb eewno rtthh sea crifice. iv ABSTRACT Thep urposoeft his swtaustd ody etenmnteh oer ganizasttirouncatlau nrde s practtihcaeatsp petaorc haractseurciczees sstfuudalyb rooapde ratiinoU n.Ss.c olleges andu niversiTthiere ess.e arwcahsea rl sion teretsokt neodwi ft hedsief fferro tmh e organizationala nsdpt rrauccttoiufclr eeessss su ccesospfuerr atiIonnsst.i tumteimobnearls ofN AFSAA:s sociaotfIni toenrn atiEodnuacla tafofrisl iwaittethdh See ctioonUn . S. StudeSnttusd yiAnbgr oa(dS ECUSSwA)e rseu rveybeymd e anosf a q uestionnAa ire. I totoafl3 4u8s abqluee stion(naa5 i2r.e6ress %p onrsaet wee)r ree turnferdo umn iversities I andf ouyre acro lleges wwehrtiehc ehpn l aciendt foo ugrr oups-Iparrigveas tmeal,l privaltaer,pg ueb laincds mallp ubliisnct itutWiiotnhsit.nh efsoeu grr ouwpesr tew o succelsesv eblass eodnt hpee rcenotfaeg ner olslteudd eanwtasr dsetdu dayb rocarde dit. Significcahnit- sqvuaalrue(pe s< .05we)r feo unbde tween institutional success anda )th el ocatoifto hnse t udayb rooaffidc ew ithaicna demafifcairs atb otlha ragned s mall publiincs titubt)li eonngst,ht i moaefn i nstithuatshi aodin n volveimnes nttu dayb road, specifictahlaelg yeo ft hset udayb rooafdfi caen dw henth efi rsstt udayb ropardo grarns waso fferedc )ua snedo fs ourcoetsh er ctehnatnfur nald sf otrh set udayb rooaffidc es operatbiundgg aettb otlhar gaen ds rnallp ubliincs tituNtois oingsn.i ficchanit- square valuweesr feo unbde tweae)tn h per eseonfca ec entrasltirzuecdft ouirrn et ernational educatrieopno rttioan s ge niaocra demaidcm inistwrhaotspoerr i marrye sponsiibsfi olri ty internateidouncaalt bi)of na,c uslttayt oufts h dei recotfto hrse t udayb roaodf ficaen,dc ) thaec ademqiuca lificaotfthi eod nisr oecrPt.e arsopnr oduct-mocmoerrnetl atwieornaesl so performaendds, i gnifivcaalnute s were fouinnds tbiettuswtueiceocnne aasnlsdn umbeorf studayb ropardo graomfsf eraetld a rpgrei v(art= e. 029a)n dl arpgueb l(ir=c . 578) schooNloss .i gnifivcaalnutwe esr feo unbde tweienns titustuicocneaalsn sdt hdee greoef centraliozfsa ttuidaoybn r oaaddm inistrwaittihotinhn se t udy aobfrfiocaed. v Qualitarteisveeai rsrc ehc ommenadtte hdme o sstu ccesisnfuslt itustiinocnes aggregdaatteeaa siolvye rlouonki qruees pontsheahsta vper ovseunc ces.sB foutlh � qualitaatnidvq eua ntitraetsievarceih sn eedaetdc ommunictoyel ges. vi TABLEO FC ONTENTS CHAPTER I.I NTRODUCTION...............................................1 ................. Backgrouonfd t heP robl.e.m..... ............................. ... ...1. ...... Statemeonft t heP robml.e......... .....................................7.. ... Significaonfc teh eS tuyd.......................1.4. ........................... Definitoifo nT erm.s.............. ..................... .............1..4... .. .. Assumptioannsd L imitati.o.n.s. ............'.,.......1..6.. ................. H. REVIEW 0 F LITERATURE .................................1..7.. ........... ... TheH istoroyfS tudy Abr.o.a.d. .................................. ......1 ..7 The Beginnin.g.s. ........................... ...1.7. ....................... The MedievaUln ivers.i.t.y... .... ................ ...... .....2.0. ........ The1 7tthh routgoht he 20Ctenht u.r.y. ............2.8. ............... The TwentieCtehn tur.y. ................... ..3.4. ........................ OrganizatIinovnosl viendS tudy Abr.o.a.d. ..................4..1.. ....... U.S.G ovenrment 41 PrivatAeg ecnies. .............................................4..6.. ....... Impacotf StudyA broa.d. ......................4.8. .......................... Demogarphic.s. ................................................4..8.. ... .. ImpactS tudie.s.. .... ....... ........................ ...... ........... 5.6. .. StudiUetsi lizEixnigs tSitnagn dardIinzsetdr um.e.n.t.s. ..6.0. .. StudiUetsi lizSipencgi ficDaelsliyg nIends trum.e.n.t..s.. . .6.6. OrganizaotfiS otnu dAyb roaAdd ministr.a.t.i.o.n. .......7.6. ............ Study Abriont ahdeA dministraHtiievrea rc...h. y. .............7..6 . . vii Roleo f theA dviso.r. .................... ...8.1. .......................... Summary. .............................. ...8.9. ................................. II!M.E THODOLOGY ............................ ...9.2. .............................. Population 92 Instrument 92 PreliminReavriys ioannsdt heP iloStt ud.y. ........... ..9.4. .......... Mailings 96 ResponsRea te. ......................... ...9.9. ............................ ProcedufroerA nalysiosf D ata. ........................ ...1..0..0. . .......... IV.F INDINGS 102 ResearcQhu estio1n .. ......� .... 5 ................._ "" .. , ...... ..�.. .." ........... " ...... ".. ....... " • ..".. ........ " .. 108 ResearcQhu estio2n .. .......... ,... ................................................... �.. ................................ " ........ 111 ResaerchQ uestio3n . ....................................................... ... 115 ResearcQhue stion4 ....................... ,. ........................ .................. 117 ResearcQhue stio5n 118 ............... ...................... ..................... 'O •• ,..- ResearcQhu estio6n . .............................................................. 121 ResearcQhu estio7n .. ............................................................... 124 Numbeorf Y earTsh erHea sB eena S tudAyb roaOdffi ce. .... ..1.2.5 FirsStt udyA broaPdr gor am. ................... .1.2.7. ................... ResearcQhu estio8n . ...................... .1.3.0. .............................. SourcoefsI ncomoet hetrh aCne ntrFauln d.s. ............... ....1 .3.5. Summary.. ...................... .......................... ........... ....... . 139 V. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSIOCNO,N CLUSIONS,A ND RECOMMENDATIONS .. .............. .... ............ .... ........... ....1 41 Summarya ndD iscussi...o...n.. ........................................... 141
Description: