ALIGNING INNOVATION TO BUSINESS STRATEGY COMBINING CROSS-INDUSTRY AND LONGITUDINAL PERSPECTIVES ON STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT IN LEADING TECHNOLOGY-BASED COMPANIES Promotoren: Prof.dr H. Dons Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr drs F.H.A. Janszen Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Prof. dr L.A. Lefebvre Ecole Polytechnique Montreal Promotiecommissie: Prof. dr ir A.J. Oskam (Wageningen Universiteit) Prof. dr ir J.M.L. van Engelen (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) Prof. dr W. van Rossum (Universiteit Twente) Prof. dr W. Vanhaverbeke (Erasmus Universiteit) Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences 2 Aligning Innovation to Business Strategy Combining Cross-Industry and Longitudinal Perspectives on Strategic Alignment in Leading Technology-based Companies Frances T.J.M. Fortuin Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de Rector Magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. dr M.J. Kropff In het openbaar te verdedigen op 7 november 2006 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula 3 Fortuin, F.T.J.M. (2006), Aligning Innovation to Business Strategy. Combining cross-industry and longitudinal perspectives on strategic alignment in leading technology-based companies PhD thesis Wageningen University – with references – with summary in Dutch ISBN: 90-8504-518-5 Thesis, Wageningen University and Research Center, the Netherlands 4 Dedicated to my husband Onno and to my children Anne Willem and Ilonka 5 6 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For the several employments and offices of our fellows, we have twelve that sail into foreign countries under the names of other nations (for our own conceal), who bring us the books and abstracts, and patterns of experiments of all other parts. These we call Merchants of Light. We have three that collect the experiments which are in all books. These we call Depredators. We have three that collect the experiments of all mechanical arts, and also of liberal sciences, and also of practices which are not brought into arts. These we call Mysterymen. We have three that try new experiments, such as themselves think good. These we call Pioneers or Miners. We have three that draw the experiments of the former four into titles and tables, to give the better light for the drawing of observations and axioms cut of them. These we call Compilers. We have three that bend themselves, looking into the experiments of their fellows, and cast about how to draw out of them things of use and practice for man's life and knowledge, as well for works as for plain demonstration of causes, means of natural divinations and the easy and clear discovery of the virtues and parts of the bodies. These we call Dowrymen or Benefactors. Then after divers meetings and consults of our whole number to consider of the former labors and collections, we have three that take care out of them to direct new experiments, of a higher light, more penetrating into Nature than the former. These we call Lamps. We have three others that do execute the experiments so directed and report them. These we call Inoculators. Lastly, we have three that raise the former discoveries by experiments into greater observations, axioms, and aphorisms. These we call Interpretators of Nature. We have also, as you must think, novices and apprentices, that the succession of the former employed men do not fail; beside a great number of servants and attendants, men and women. And this we do also: We have consultations, which of the inventions and experiences which we have discovered shall be published, and which not: and take all an oath of secrecy for the concealing of those which we think fit to keep secret: though, some of those we do reveal sometimes to the State, and some not. Nova Atlantis (Sir Francis Bacon [1625] in Omta, 1995). About 1625, Sir Francis Bacon magnificently described an organization that was totally innovation oriented in the ideal world of Nova Atlantis. Today, R&D (Research and Development) organizations can be found in the everyday world. This book will bring you into this world. It describes the day-to-day activities of innovation management and the constant struggle to align innovation to business strategy. It aims to answer such questions as: • What causes the (lack of) strategic alignment between innovation and business? • How can strategic alignment be achieved and maintained? 7 This book presents the findings of a cross-industry study into the management and organization of innovation in ten technology-based companies in different industries typified by the length of their product generation life cycles (PGLCs) and a six-year longitudinal study in one of these companies to research the dynamics of strategic alignment. It aims to provide a sound empirical basis for a number of ideas and statements about innovation management in general. Parts of the book have been presented at scientific congresses and workshops, and the findings have served as a platform for discussion with managers in R&D. The study was undertaken at the Department of Business Administration at Wageningen University. I would first like to thank the CTOs and R&D Directors of the companies that participated in the cross-industry study, who gave up precious time for interviews about innovation management, and whose insights greatly enhanced my understanding of the subject of this thesis. In addition, my thanks go to the R&D department heads and R&D program managers of these companies for their willingness to fill out the self-assessment questionnaires. I am very grateful to the company that provided me with a unique opportunity to conduct a longitudinal study. Without the participation of the R&D staff and higher management of the strategic business units and corporate headquarters in completing the research questionnaires up to four times, this study would not have been possible. My special thanks go to Felix Janszen, Louis and Elisabeth Lefebvre and Hans Dons for their support. Felix, your enthusiasm for innovation management always stimulated me. Louis and Elisabeth, I have very good memories of our in-depth dis- cussions on innovation management in the Netherlands, as well as in Canada. Hans, thank you for your willingness to participate at a late stage of the process of completing and defending this manuscript. I also want to thank the members of the PhD committee for their valuable comments and suggestions. In carrying out the research, I received great help from Elsa Liefferink in the data collection phase and from Carl St. Pierre, Ron Kemp and Erno Kuiper in different phases of the statistical analyses. Ann Reeves improved my English and Sietze Bras took care of the cover design of the book. This thesis was made possible by the special department for study and professional work at DEDICON, the Federation of Dutch Libraries for the Blind that transposed numerous inaccessible books, papers and articles into accessible reading format for me. Finally, I would like to thank the scientific and administrative staff and my PhD colleagues of the Department of Business Administration at Wageningen University for their friendship and support, especially for their willingness to lend me their eyes every time the task to be performed exceeded the capabilities of my screen-reading software. And last but not least, I would like to thank Onno Omta, my husband and colleague, who gave me the room to find my own way in the field of management science but at the same time was there to support me when needed. He patiently read the draft versions of this manuscript, traveled with me to congresses and cared for me at difficult moments. Frances Fortuin, September 2006 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgements.........................................................................7 Table of Contents................................................................................................9 Chapter 1............................................................................................................15 Introduction.......................................................................................................15 Chapter 2............................................................................................................21 Theoretical Perspectives on Strategy.................................................................21 2.1 Strategic management..............................................................................................21 2.2 The history of strategic management thought.....................................................23 2.3 Static versus dynamic strategy models..................................................................24 2.4 The two main theoretical perspectives on strategy.............................................25 2.5 The industrial organization perspective................................................................26 2.6 Competence perspective.........................................................................................28 2.6.1 Resource-based view......................................................................................30 2.6.2 Dynamic capabilities framework..................................................................31 2.7 The concept of strategic alignment..................................................................32 2.8 Concluding remarks................................................................................................35 Chapter 3...........................................................................................................37 Study Domain: Innovation................................................................................37 3.1 The phenomenon of innovation.......................................................................37 3.2 Innovation typologies..............................................................................................38 3.3 The R&D process....................................................................................................40 3.3.1 The R&D funnel............................................................................................41 3.3.2 First through fifth generation R&D............................................................42 3.4 Barriers to innovation..............................................................................................43 3.5 Drivers of innovation..............................................................................................44 3.5.1 Innovation culture..........................................................................................44 3.5.2 Innovation strategy........................................................................................44 3.5.3 Open innovation............................................................................................47 9 3.6 Best practices in innovation....................................................................................47 3.6.1 Clear product definition and portfolio planning.......................................48 3.6.2 A structured R&D process...........................................................................48 3.6.3 Use of (international) cross-functional project teams..............................49 3.6.4 Use of integrated virtual development tools..............................................50 3.7 Innovation strategy and the two perspectives on strategy.................................50 3.8 Analyzing strategic alignment in the case of innovation....................................53 3.9 Concluding remarks................................................................................................54 Chapter 4...........................................................................................................55 Research Design...............................................................................................55 4.1 The general conceptual framework.......................................................................55 4.2 Overall research design............................................................................................56 4.3 The cross-industry study.........................................................................................59 4.3.1 The product generation life cycle................................................................59 4.3.2 Conceptual framework..................................................................................61 4.3.3 Operationalization of the research variables..............................................63 4.3.4 Propositions....................................................................................................64 4.3.5 Data collection................................................................................................69 4.3.6 Development of survey questionnaires and methods of data analysis..70 4.4 The longitudinal study.............................................................................................71 4.4.1 Conceptual framework..................................................................................71 4.4.2 Propositions....................................................................................................72 4.4.3 Operationalization of the research variables..............................................75 4.4.4 Methods of data collection and data analysis.............................................76 4.5 Concluding remarks................................................................................................79 Chapter 5............................................................................................................81 Cross-Industry Study Results.............................................................................81 5.1 Data collection and baseline description of the cross-industry companies81 5.2 R&D Performance...................................................................................................84 5.2.1 Revenue contribution of new products......................................................84 5.2.2 Number of patents.........................................................................................85 10
Description: