©EntomologicaFennica.8December2006 Anote on facultative kleptoparasitism in Prionyx kirbii (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) as a consequence of multi-specific shared nesting site, with description of its prepupa CarloPolidori,JoséTormos,JosepD.Asís,PauMendiola&FrancescoAndrietti Polidori,C.,Tormos,J.,Asís,J.D.,Mendiola,P.&Andrietti,F.2006:Anoteon facultative kleptoparasitism in Prionyx kirbii (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) as a consequenceofmulti-specificsharednestingsite,withdescriptionofitsprepupa. —Entomol.Fennica17:405–413. ObservationsofafemaleofPrionyxkirbiiatanaggregationofStizuscontinuus revealedanalternativenestingbehaviourofthefirstwaspduetothepresenceof thesecond one. Theoverlap ofsomeresources (prey, kind ofsoil) allowed P. kirbiitoactasakleptoparasiteofS.continuus.Theobservedfemaleoftenre-used asnestspre-existingS.continuusemergenceholes,butnoS.continuusnests.The prey wereobtainedsometimesby stealingthegrasshoppersfromS.continuus nestsand/orbyattackingthefemaleswhilecarryingtheprey.Fromareviewof interspecific kleptoparasitism among sphecoid wasps it appears that family Sphecidaeincludesthehighestnumberoffacultativeparasitismcasesandthis finding is discussed. In addition, the description of the prepupa of P. kirbii is givenandisshowntobeinagreementwiththedescriptionofthematurelarvaeof theotherspeciesofthegenus. C.Polidori,DipartimentodiBiologia,SezionediZoologiaeCitologia,Univer- sità degli Studi di Milano – Via Celoria, 26, 20133, Milan, Italy. Tel. +390250314795;E-mail:[email protected] J. Tormos, Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sala- manca–37071,Salamanca,Spain J. D. Asís, Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sala- manca–37071,Salamanca,Spain P.Mendiola,DepartamentdeZoologia,UniversitatdeValència–c/Dr.Moliner, 50,46100,Burjassot(València),Spain F. Andrietti, Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione di Zoologia e Citologia, UniversitàdegliStudidiMilano–ViaCeloria,26,20133,Milan,Italy Received3July2004,accepted13December2005 1.Introduction pactness,soilmoistureandamountofvegetation amongothers),aresimilarinmanycasesfordif- Sphecoidwasps(SphecidaeandCrabronidae)of- ferentspecies,nestingsitesareoftensharedbya tennestinlargeaggregations(e.g.Evans1966& number of species. When this occurs, inter- 1974,Evans&Hook1986,Rosenheim1990).As specific interactions may become frequent and thephysicalnestingrequirements(likesoilcom- lead to nest usurpation (Matthews 1983, Hook 406 Polidorietal. (cid:127) ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 1987),kleptoparasitism(Kurczewski&Spofford soryburrows(falsenests2–3cmlong,seeEvans 1998,Casiraghietal.2003)or,morerarely,nest 1966)aredugclosetothenestentrance(Asìset sharing(McCorquodale&Thomson1988).Fac- al.1988). ultative kleptoparasitism and brood parasitism Our aims are twofold. Firstly, we report ob- (i.e.usebyawaspofanotherwasp’spreytofeed servationsonanunusualstrategy adoptedby P. herownbrood)couldhavebeenanintermediate kirbii to obtain prey and nest; secondly, we de- step in the evolution of the obligate klepto- scribethematurelarvaofP.kirbii,inordertopro- parasitismandbroodparasitismtypicalofgenera videtraitstoseparatethisspeciesfromothersof such as Nysson and Stizoides (Evans 1966, thegenus. Wcislo1987). In this paper we report a few observations takenonasinglefemaleofPrionyxkirbii(Vander 2.Materialandmethods Linden) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae), a common speciesoftheoldworld,nestinginthesamearea ObservationsweremadeonasinglefemaleofP. where a large aggregation of Stizus continuus kirbiibetween24.VI.2003and10.VII.2003,the Klug(Hymenoptera:Crabronidae)hadbeenes- datewhenthewaspwascollectedfordetermina- tablished for many years (Asìs et al. 1988 & tion.P.kirbiiwasobservedonanaggregationof 2006).Thebehaviouralconsequencesoftheco- thesolitary waspStizuscontinuus,inanareaof existenceofthetwowaspsareanalyzed. salt-marsh(ca.9m×15m),characterizedby a Prionyxfemalesusuallyestablishtheirnests bare,compactsoil,covered(30%ofthesurface onbare,compactsoil.Theunicellularor,infew approximately) by Arthrocnemum fruticosum cases, multicellular nests are filled with Ortho- (L.)andJuncusmaritimusLam.andboundedby pthera Acrididae to feed the larvae. One grass- Pinus pinaster Aiton and Phragmites australis hopperisusuallyprovidedtoeachlarva(Evans (Cav.). The female was marked with non-toxic 1958, Benz 1959, Bohart & Menke 1976). De- paintstopermitidentificationonfield.Nestsdug pendingonthespecies,nestsareconstructedbe- andprovisionedbythewaspweremarkedwitha foreorafterhuntingtheprey.Somespeciesclose coloured stick placed in theground closeto the thenesttemporarilybeforehunting(Evans1958, entrances. Genise1980,Grissell1981).P.kirbiibelongsto ObservationsonP.kirbiiweremadeonadis- thegroupofspeciesthatdigthenestbeforehunt- continuousbase,sincetheywereintermixedwith ing and make a temporary closure before the alongtermplannedresearchonS.continuus. provisioning trip (Ferton 1902, Fabre, 1914, p. In the following text, we will use the term 202,Benz1959,Bohart&Menke1976).P.kirbii “kleptoparasitism”toindicatewhenawaspstole females usually hunt one large prey, sometimes thehostprovisionsfrominsidethenestandthen two,iftheyaretoosmall(Benz1959).Thereis carriedthemtoherownnestorwhenshestolethe only one report of Ferton (1902) of a nest with hostprovisionsattackingdirectlythehostoutside twocells,onewithtwo-prey,theotherwithonly thenest;wewillusetheterm“broodparasitism” one,buthisfindingisdubious.Thenestsstruc- ifthewaspenteredthehostnestandovipositson tureconsistsofaverticalburrowfrom3to4cm the host provisions, eventually eating the host deepfollowedbyanhorizontalsectionofabout4 egg. cm(Benz1959). The postdefecated larva (prepupa) was ob- S.continuusfemalesdig(multicellular)nests tainedatSaler,Valencia(6.IX.1992).Themethod before hunting on bare and compact soil, pro- employedtopreparethespecimen,aswellasthe visioning them massively with grasshoppers terminology of larval morphology and format (several for each cell). The nest remains closed usedinthedescriptionfollowfundamentallyEv- duringhuntingflights(Asìsetal.1988).Thenest ans (1987). The following abbreviations have of S. continuus is composed of a main burrow been used in the description: d = diameter; h = (oblique to the soil surface) about 50 cm long height;l=lengthandw=width.Voucherspeci- fromwhich3–8secondarytunnelsdepart,eachof mensaredepositedatthe“Torres-Sala”Entomo- themendinginabroodcell.Generally1–2acces- logicalFoundation(Valencia,Spain). ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 (cid:127) KleptoparasiticstrategyofPrionyxkirbii 407 Table1.NumbersofobservationsmadeonthefemaleofPrionyxkirbiibetween24.VI.and10.VII.2003. Date Patrollingthearea: Patrollingthearea: Attacking Carrying Closing Stealinga stoppingonStizus “touching”S.con- S.continuus apreyto anest preyfrom continuusnests tinuusfemales femaleson anest definitively S.continuus ontheirnests theirnests females 24.VI. 3 1 25.VI. 4 1 1 26.VI. 2 1 1** 1 1** 27.VI. 1*** 28.VI. 4 1 1 29.VI. 2 1**** 30.VI. 2 1*** 1* 01.VII. 1 02.VII. 1 1***** 03.VII. 4 1 1 04.VII. 3 2 05.VII. 5 06.VII. 2 07.VII. 2 08.VII. 3 1 09.VII. 4 10.VII. 1 *=preycarrieddeepinagrassarea;nestnotidentified;**=preystolenfromthewaspafteranattack;***=theS.continuusfemaleflownawayafter the“touch”;****=thisnestdidnotcorrespondtoanemergingholeofS.continuusastheotherones;*****=preystolenfrominsidethenest. 3.Results ofP.kirbiitooktheprey,stungitandtransported it away, stopping sometimes to sting again the 3.1.BehaviourofP.kirbii grasshopper.TheothertwotimesthefemaleofS. continuusdidnotabandontheprey,andP.kirbii Table 1 summarizes the results of the observa- flewaway.Onanotheroccasion,P.kirbiiwaited tions.ThefemaleofP.kirbiiwasobservedforthe on a closed nest the return of the owner with a firsttimeonthe24.VI.2003,whilepatrollingthe preyandfollowedherinsidethenest,comingout nesting site of S. continuus, and she frequented afewsecondslaterwiththegrasshopper.Evenin theareaeverydayoftheobservationperiod.The this case the wasp re-stung the prey during the patrollingbehaviourincludedalwaysanumberof transport. Neither females nor males of S. stops on some nests of S. continuus (open or continuusshowedany aggressivenesstowardP. closed). The stops lasted 5–30 seconds and, on kirbii. average, the wasp stopped on a nest 0.8 times/ Atotalof5nestsofP.kirbiiwerelocatedin minute(range:0–5min–1,SD=1.31,n=19ob- the nesting area of S. continuus, and 4 of them servationsthatlastedmorethan1minute). were identified as re-used emerging holes of S. Onsomeoccasions(6outof42contactswith continuus, but no nest of S. continuus was ob- thewasp)thePrionixfemale,whileoverflyinga servedtobeactivelyusurpedbyP.kirbii.Atotal S.continuusnestwhentheownerwaspresentat of 4 prey-carryings by P. kirbii were observed, the entrance, flew rapidly down and “touched” but no more than one to each nest. Afifth prey theotherwasp,disturbingheractivity(in2cases wascarriedinaperipheralareawithdensevege- outof6,thefemaleofS.continuusflewawayfor tation,butthewaspdisappearedinthegrassand awhileafterthe“touch”).Threetimesthefemale thenestwasnotfound.Consideringthattheob- ofP.kirbiiattackedmoreviolentlyaS.continuus served 5 nests were closed definitively by the femaleasshewasopeninghernesttoenterwitha wasp within one-two days since they were first prey.Onetimeshecausedtheabandonmentofthe recorded,andthatthefemalewasobservedfora preybytheattackedwasp:atthispointthefemale period of 17 days, probably many other unde- 408 Polidorietal. (cid:127) ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 Fig.1.PrepupaofPrionyxkirbii(VanderLinden).–a.Generalaspect(lateralview).–b.Portionofintegument. –c–d.Abdominalspiracle.–e.Cranium(frontalview).–f.Antennalorbit(frontalview).–g.Labrum.–h.Epi- pharynx.–i.Leftmandible.–j.MaxillaandLabium. tected nests belonging to the same individual ments; atria (d = ma) goblet-shaped; walls lined werebeenpresentinthearea. withridgesformingsmallandirregularpolygons; opening into subatria armed with long spines; subatriacomparativelysmall(d=64mm),with6 3.2.DescriptionoftheprepupaofP.kirbii swellings. Cranium (Fig. 1e) (w = 0.9 mm, h [heightmeasuredtoapexofclypeus]=1.1mm) General aspect (Fig. 1a). Body (l = 13.5 mm, higherthanwide,yellowish,withsparsesetae(l= maximumw[3rdabdominalsegment]=4.3mm) 5mm)andsomepunctationsclosetomandibular hymenopteriform, elongate, strongly curved at insertion;vertexdepressedmedially;coronalsu- thelevel ofthethird thoracicsegment, with the tureandparietalbandspresent,brown;antennal thoraxandfirstabdominalsegmentnarrowwith orbits(Fig.1f)(58×43mm)withmembraneofthe respecttotherest,yellowish,weaklysclerotized, orbitconvex,with3sensilla.Fronswithfivede- exceptforspiracles.Anusterminal,atransverse pressions, near epistomal suture and base of slit. Pleural lobes convex. Integument (Fig. 1b) clypeustransverselyfurrowed;frontoclypealsu- with large spinules (l of spinules = 30 mm, w ture unpigmented; clypeolabral suture well de- basal=10mm)arisingfromplate-likebases,with fined.Clypeuswith12setae(l=5mm).Labrum theexceptionofthoseofthethoracicsegments(l (Fig.1g)(maximumw=470mm;maximumh= =5mm)whicharesmallandarrangedinsucha 150mm)bilobate;basesmooth;anteriormargin waythattheyhavetheappearanceoftransverse weaklypigmentedwithsmallsensilla;eachlobe grooves,andwithsparsesetae(l=3–7mm).Spi- surface with sparse setae (l = 5mm) and dense racles (Fig. 1c–d) all in a single line, on meso- conicalsensilla(w=3mm);epipharynx(Fig.1h) thorax, metathorax, and first 8 abdominal seg- denselyspinulose(lofspinules=25mm,basalw ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 (cid:127) KleptoparasiticstrategyofPrionyxkirbii 409 = 3 mm) centrally and laterally, with 8 sensory nesting area of several provisioning females of pores (d = 7 mm) medially distributed en 2 epi- S.continuus(ca.30duringtheperiod).Theover- pharyngealsensoryareas,eachwith4pores. lapoftheresourcesneededbythetwospecies,in Mouthparts.Mandibles(Fig.1i)(l=370mm, particular bare soil and grasshoppers (Evans maximum w = 170 mm) robust, sclerotized, 1958, Benz 1959, Asìs et al. 1988), would ac- brown,teeth3and4darkbrown,2.2×aslongas count for the observed phenomenona. Notwith- wide,withtwopuncturesclosetothebasalexter- standingthelackofacontinuousrecordingofthe nalmargin,with4apicalteeth,3superiorteethon activityofP.kirbii,wehavestatedthat,atleastin aboutthesameplane,thebasaltoothonalower part, the wasp used two resources obtained by plane.Maxillae(Fig.1j)withsparselateralsetae S.continuusfemales:emergenceholes(asnests) (l=11mm),mesallydenselyspinulose,withvery andprey(asfoodforthelarvae).Byaslightshift shortspinules;maxillarypalpilongerthanwide inherbehaviour,thefemaleofP.kirbiimaybe- (75×49mm)with5apicalsensilla;galeae(l=75 comeatruekleptoparasiteofS.continuus,atleast mm,w=30mm)similarlyformed,with2large for what prey is concerned (strictly speaking, apical sensilla. Labium(Fig. 1j) setose (l of the emergenceholesre-useisnotaparasiticaction). setae=12mm);labialpalpilongerthanwide(75 Thisstrategyshouldallowreducedtheexpendi- ×49),with4apicalsensilla(d=7.5mm);salivary tureofenergy indigginganest,butprobably it orifice(l=450mm)transverse. does not reduce the time necessary to find the prey.Infact,weobservednomorethanonenest provisionedandcompletedperday,thecommon- 4.Discussion est value found in many other Prionyx species studied (Evans 1958, Genise 1980, Grissell ThesearethefirstobservationsmadeonP.kirbii 1981). (aswellasonthegenusPrionyx)behavingasa Since re-using a pre-existing burrow (the kleptoparasiteofadifferentspeciesofsphecoid emergencetunnelsofS.continuus)evidentlyre- wasp,andprovidenewdataontheseinterspecific ducesthetimespenttoobtainanest,prey-finding relationships phenomena, which are probably shouldbetheactivitythatmainlydeterminesthe more widespread than previously supposed timenecessarytocompleteanest.Infact,attack- amongfossorialHymenoptera.Theobservations ing a S. continuus female to steal her prey is arebasedonasinglefemale.However,thebehav- greatly more dangerous and time-consuming iourisprobablyrare:innoneofthe14published than re-using an emergence hole, which is no works on the nesting habits of Prionyx spp. moreusedbyanyS.continuusfemalesandonly kleptoparasiticbehaviourwasdetected(mostim- attracts the attention of the males (Asìs et al. portantreferencesquotedinthetext;thecomplete 2006). Moreover, although territorial S. conti- listofworksonPrionyxspp. couldbefoundin nuusmalesattackconspecificmalesandmalesof Pulawski (1999)). For the much more investi- themutillidparasiteNemkaviduata(Pallas),they gated genus Ammophila, only in 4 out of more wereneverobservedtointerferewiththeactivity than50studiessuchbehaviourwasrecorded(Ta- ofP.kirbii.Inconclusion,wemaysupposethat ble 2 and Pulawski 1999). This means that this thefemalesofP.kirbiiprefertogaintimeanden- behaviourisdifficulttoobserverepeatedly.Ac- ergy colonizing an emerging tunnel of S. conti- cordingly,weconsiderthisphenomenonworthof nuus;subsequently,theyfirsttrytofeedtheirlar- reportinginspiteoftherestricteddata. vae at the expense of S. continuus (prey). Any- way,usuallyafterhavinglosttimebypatrolling theS.continuusnestingareainsearchofapreyin 4.1.ThebehaviourofP.kirbii an “easier” way, they resume their “normal” onthenestingsiteofS.continuus huntingactivity.Re-usingS.continuusnestsdoes notseemtoberelatedtosimilarityinnestarchi- Thenestingbehaviourexhibitedbytheobserved tectureofthetwospecies.InfactP.kirbiifemales female of P. kirbii showed characteristics that havebeenobservedtodigtheirnestseveninside seem to be related to the presence in the same already pre-existing nests of bees of the genus 410 Polidorietal. (cid:127) ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 Table2.Observedfacultativeinterspecificparasitismamongdifferentspeciesofsphecoidwasps(Sphecidae andCrabronidae).Thekindofbehaviourofpreystealingisreportedonlyforfacultativekleptoparasitism. Facultativekleptoparasitism Preyof Kindof References thehost parasitic Parasite Host behaviour Ammophila Ammophilaurnaria Lepidoptera Theftof Kurczewskietal. kennedyi*(Murray) Dahlbom[S] larvae provisions 1992 [S] frominside nests Ammophilaurnaria* Ammophilakennedyi Lepidoptera Theftof Kurczewskietal. [S] [S],Podalonia larvae, provisions 1992; robusta(Cresson)[S] Lepidoptera frominside Kurczewski& larvae nests Spofford1998 Microbembex Tachysphex Orthoptera, Preytheft Kurczewski, monodonta**(Say) terminatus(F.Smith) Diptera, outsidethenest personal [B] [C],Lyrodasubita Diptera, communication, Say[C],Bembix Lepidoptera quotedbyEvans pruinosaFox[B], larvae 1966,p.378; Ammophilaharti Evans1966,p. (Fernald)[S] 376,378 Passaloecuscorniger Passaloecus Homoptera Theftof Danks1970 Shuckard[P] singularisDahlbom provisions [P] frominside nests Passaloecuscorniger Passaloecusgracilis Homoptera Theftof Corbet& [P] (Curtis)[P] provisions Backhouse1975 frominside nests Passaloecuscorniger Passaloecusinsignis Homoptera Theftof Corbet& [P] (VanderLinden)[P] provisions Backhouse1975 frominside nests Passaloecuscorniger Psenulusatratus(F.) Homoptera Theftof Chevalier1923, [P] [P] provisions quotedbyEvans frominside &West-Eberhard nests 1970,p.212 Podaloniaaffinis* Ammophilasabulosa Lepidoptera Theftof Field1989,1992; (Kirby)[S] L.[S] larvae provisions Casiraghietal. frominside 2003 nests Ammophilakennedyi Podaloniarobusta Lepidoptera Theftof Kurczewskietal. [S] [S] larvae provisions 1992 frominside nests Prionyxkirbii Stizuscontinuus Orthoptera Theftof Presentstudy VanderLinden[S] (Klug)[B] provisions frominside nests;Prey theftoutside thenest Stictiasignata(L.) Stictiaheros Diptera Preytheft Sheehan1984 [B] (Fabricius)[B] outsidethenest ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 (cid:127) KleptoparasiticstrategyofPrionyxkirbii 411 Table2continued. Facultativebroodparasitism Preyof References thehost Parasite Host Ammophila Ammophilaurnaria Lepidoptera Kurczewskietal. kennedyi*[S] [S] larvae 1992 Ammophilaurnaria* Ammophilakennedyi Lepidoptera Kurczewskietal. [S] [S] larvae 1992 Podaloniaaffinis* Ammophilasabulosa Lepidoptera Field1989,1992 [S] [S] larvae Lirisniger Sphexmaxillosus Orthoptera Fabre1914,p.102 (Fabricius)[C] (Fabricius)[S] S=Sphecidae;Crabronidae:B=Bembicinae,P=Pemphredoninae,C=Crabroninae;*speciesthatappearbothasfacultativekleptoparasitesand broodparasites;**thisspeciesisastrictscavenger,accordingtoEvans1966,p.376. Halictus (Benz 1959). However, burrowing a iour.Thisseemstobetrueinparticularfornest new nest is very time-consuming activity: 22 usurpation(withoututilizationofanyotherhost minutes/cm, according to Benz (1959). Even if resources).However,intherestrictedfieldoffac- some amount of labour should be necessary to ultativekleptoparasitism(andbroodparasitism), adaptaforeignnest,itcouldbeworthdoingit. sharingthesamepreyisnotasufficientcondition andparasitesandhostshavetoberelatedspecies. In fact, there exists a considerable overlapping 4.2.Interspecificfacultativeparasitism between nesting habits and phylogeny in sphe- insphecoidwasps:distribution coidwasps:allthemembersofthesamegenusof- andoccurrence tenusesimilarresources(Evans1966,Bohart& Menke1976).Thingsseemtoworkdifferentlyin Despite of the many studies devoted to thecaseofobligatebroodparasitism,forwhich intraspecific parasitism among solitary wasps onlytherecognitionofthehostnestisrequired. (see Field 1992, for a review on its occurrence Parasitismwillbeperformedlater,intheabsence andperformanceinsolitaryHymenoptera),very ofthehost,whenitsnestwillbereopenedandits little information exists in literature about eggdestroyed(e.g.Stizoidesspp.,Nyssonspp.). interspecificrelationships(seeField1992,fora Onthecontrary,facultativebroodparasitismand briefreview).Table2presentsasummaryofthe facultative kleptoparasitism have probably fol- actualknowledgeontheoccurrenceofthisphe- lowed apathway different fromthat ofobligate nomenon,restrictedtothesphecidwasps(sensu brood parasitism. Supporting this view, faculta- Bohart & Menke 1976; now the family is split tivekleptoparasitismhasbeenobservedmorefre- into Crabronidae, Sphecidae and Ampulicidae) quently in behaviourally related genera like andconsideringonlyfacultativeparasitism.Ac- Ammophila and Podalonia, whose members cordingtoField(1992),onemayclassifythedif- sharesimilarresources(Table2).Inassociations ferentpatternsofinterspecifickleptoparasiticbe- betweenrelatedspecies,parasiticfemalesknow haviour as in the intraspecific case (see Table 2 thecharacteristicsofthehost’snestandmayrec- andField1992).Infact,thetacticdoesnotchange ognizeitmoreeasily. ifthehostisthesameorarelatedspeciesshowing Asecondpointconcernstheoverlapoffood similarnestinghabits.Field(1992)notesthatfac- resources. For example, species of the genus ultativeparasitismmayoccurevenbetweendis- Cerceris often nest in sympatry (Evans 1971, tant species (up to bees vs. wasps), because the Hook1987,Evans&Hook1986),butnorecords parasiteonlyneedsaresourcesimilartothatem- exist of interspecific kleptoparasitism or brood ployed in its normal and non-parasitical behav- parasitism, even if interspecific nest usurpation 412 Polidorietal. (cid:127) ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 was observed in some cases (Evans & Hook Acknowledgements.ThanksareduetothestaffofOficina 1986, Hook 1987). This is probably due to the Técnica, Viveros Municipales, Ayuntamiento de Valencia, forthefieldworkpermit,toJesúsSelfa(UniversitatdeValen- largevarietyofpreyhuntedbythedifferentspe- cia)forthekindattentiontothestudyandtoS.F.Gayubo cies, which rarely overlap. On the other hand, (UniversityofSalamanca)fortheidentificationofP.kirbii. genera that greatly overlap their prey spectrum ThanksareduetoHenryDisney(UniversityofCambridge) andnestingareas,asOxybelusandBembix(Bo- forreadingandcorrectionofthetext.CPandFAwereinpart hart&Menke1976),donotshowanykindofre- supported by a three-years grant FIRB (Fondo per gli Investimenti per la Ricerca di Base) RBAU019H94-001 ciprocal parasitism, probably because of the (2001)and(CP)byaone-yearfellowshipfromtheUniversity muchdifferenthabitsperformedbythesegenera, ofMilan.JTandJDAweresupportedbyagrantfromthe which could prevent any efficient kleptopara- Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (BOS 2001- sitism. 0864). Unfortunately,dataaretooscarcetosubstan- tiateanyhypothesisabouttheevolutionofpara- References siticstrategiesinthesewasps. Asís,J.D.,Tormos,J.&Jiménez,R.1988:Contributiontothe 4.3.TheprepupaofPrionyxkirbii studyofthebiologyofStizuscontinuus(Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).—Entomol.News99:199–206. Asís,J.D.,Tormos,J.&Gayubo,S.F.2006:Territorialdy- ThedescriptionoftheprepupaofP.kirbiiisinrea- namics and contest behaviour in the solitary wasp sonableagreementwiththedescriptionofthema- Stizuscontinuus(Hymenoptera:Apoidea:Crabro- ture larvae of the other species of the genus de- nidae).—Behaviour:143:83–104. Benz, G. 1959: Beobachtungen über das brutbiologische scribed: P. atratus (Lepeletier, 1845), P. thomae VerhaltenvonSphexalbisectus,Lepeletier(Hym.Sphe- (Fabricius, 1775) (Evans & Lin 1956) and P. vi- gidae). — Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden duatus(Christ,1791)(Tsuneki&Iida1969).The GesellschaftinZürich104:307–319. prepupaofP.kirbiisharesthefollowingcharacter Bohart,R.M.&Menke,A.S.1976:SphecidWaspsofthe stateswiththematurelarvaeofthethreepreviously World.Agenericrevision.—UniversityofCalifornia Press,Berkeley,LosAngeles,London.1colorplate,IX describedspecies:(a)spiraclesallinasingleline, +695pp. (b)craniumhigherthanwide,(c)mandibleswithout Casiraghi,M.,Polidori,C.,Ferreri,P.,Preatoni,D.G.,Andri- spinulesontheiruppersurfaceand(d)thoraxwith- etti,F.,Martinoli,A.2003:Doesthedistanceamongnest out welt-like elevations. However, the character clusters affects reproductive success in Ammophila states: (a) mandibles less than 2 times as long as sabulosa (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae)? — Ethol. Ecol. Evol.15:329–341. maximumwide,and(b)galeaeandmaxillarypalpi Corbet,S.A.&Backhouse,M.1975:Aphid-huntingwasps: subequalinlength(usedbyEvansandLin(1956)to afieldstudyofPassaloecus.—Trans.R.Entomol.Soc. characterise the final larval stage of the tribe Lond.127:11–30. Sphecini,andthegenusPrionyxVanderLinden,re- Danks,H.V.1970:Biologyofsomestem-nestingaculeate spectively), are not shown by P. viduatus and Hymenoptera.—Trans.R.Entomol.Soc.Lond.122: 323–399. P. kirbii. Accordingly, they should notbeused to Evans,H.E.1958:Studiesonthenestingbehaviorofdigger characterisetherespectivetaxa.Intheselatterspe- wasps of the tribe Sphecini. Part I: Genus Priononyx cies, the final larval stage has mandibles that are Dahlbom.—Ann.Entomol.Soc.Am.51:177–186. morethan2timeslongthantheyarewide,andthe Evans,H.E.1959:Studiesonthelarvaeofdiggerwasps(Hy- galeae are longer than the maxillary palpi. Addi- menoptera,Sphecidae).PartV:Conclusion.—Trans. Am.Entomol.Soc.85:137–191+XVIII–XXIVplates. tionally,theprepupaofP.kirbiishares,withthema- Evans,H.E.1966:Thecomparativeethologyandevolution turelarvaofP.viduatusthefollowingproperties:(a) ofthesandwasps.—HarvardUniversityPress,Cam- spinulesoflacinialareanotrecurved,(b)anatrium bridge,Massachusetts.xvi+526pp. withridgesformingsmallandirregularpolygons, Evans, H. E. 1971: Observations on nesting behavior of andc)insideoflabiumwithridges,aswellasthe waspsofthetribeCercerini(Hymenoptera:Sphecidae). charactersdescribedbyEvans(1959)tocharacter- —J.Kans.Entomol.Soc.44:500–523. Evans,H.E.1974:Diggerwaspsascolonizersofnewhabitat isetheSphecinae(sensuBohart&Menke1976). (Hymenoptera:Aculeata).—J.N.Y.Entomol.Soc.82: UnliketheotherdescribedspeciesofPrionyx, 259–267. P.kirbiiexhibitsaclypeuswithsetae. Evans,H.E.1987:OrderHymenoptera.—In:Stehr,F.W. ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.17 (cid:127) KleptoparasiticstrategyofPrionyxkirbii 413 (ed.), Immature Insects: pp. 597–710. Kendall/Hunt, Kurczewski, F. E. &Spofford, M. G. 1998:Alternative PublishingCompany,Dubuque,Iowa. nestingstrategiesinAmmophilaurnaria(Hymenopte- Evans,H.E.&Lin,C.S.1956:Studiesonthelarvaeof ra:Sphecidae).—J.Nat.Hist.32:99–106. diggerwasps(Hymenoptera,Sphecidae)PartI:Sphe- Kurczewski,F.E.,O’Brien,M.F.&Spofford,M.G.1992: cinae.—Trans.Am.Entomol.Soc.81:131–153+I– Nesting behavior of Podalonia robusta (Cresson) VIIIplates. (Hymenoptera:Sphecidae).—J.Hym.Res.1:235– Evans,H.E.&West-Eberhard,M.J.1970:TheWasps. 239. Ann.Arbor:UniversityofMichiganPress. Matthews,R.W.1983:BiologyofanewTrypoxylonthat Evans,H.E.&Hook,A.W.1986:Nestingbehaviorof utilizesnestsofMicrostigmusinCostaRica(Hyme- australianCercerisdiggerwasps,withspecialrefer- noptera:Sphecidae).—Pan-Pac.Entomol.59:152– encetonestreutilizationandnestsharing(Hymenop- 162. tera:Sphecidae).—Sociobiology11:275–302. McCorquodale, D. B. & Thomson, C. E. 1988: Anest Fabre,J.H.1914:SouvenirsEntomologiques(Première sharedbythesolitarywasps,CercerisantipodesSmith Série).—Delagrave,Paris.vii+375pp. andC.australisSaussure(Hymenoptera:Sphecidae). Ferton,C.1902:Notesdétachéessurl’instinctdeshymé- —J.Aust.Entomol.Soc.27:9–10. noptèresmellifèresetravisseurs(2eSérie).—Ann. Pulawski,W.J.1999:BibliographyofSphecidae.[www Soc.Ent.France71:499–531. document] URL http://www.calacademy.org/re- Field,J.1989:Intraspecificparasitismandnestingsuccess search/entomology/Entomology_Resources/Hyme- inthesolitarywaspAmmophilasabulosa—Behav- noptera/sphecidae/bibliography.pdf iour110:23–46. Rosenheim,J.A.1990:Density-dependentparasitismand Field,J.1992:Intraspecificparasitismasanalternativere- evolutionofaggregatednestinginthesolitaryHyme- productivetacticinnestbuildingwaspsandbees.— noptera.—Ann.Entomol.Soc.Am.83:277–286. Biol.Rev.67:79–126. Sheehan,W.1984:NestingbiologyofthesandwaspStictia Genise, J. F. 1980: Comportamiento de nidificación de heros (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Nyssoninae) in Prionyxbifoveolatus(Taschb.)(Hymenoptera:Sphe- CostaRica.—J.Kans.Entomol.Soc.57:377–386. cidae).—Physis,SecciónC,39:51–54. Tsuneki,B.&Iida,T.1969:Thebiologyofsomespeciesof Grissell, E. E. 1981: Nesting behavior of Prionyx “tho- theFormosanSphecidaewithdescriptionsoftheirlar- mae” (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). — J. vae(Hymenoptera).—Etizenia37:1–21. Kans.Entomol.Soc.54:16–21. Wcislo, W. T. 1987: The roles of seasonality, host syn- Hook,A.1987:NestingbehaviourofTexasCercerisdigger chrony,andbehaviourintheevolutionsanddistribu- wasps with emphasis on nest reutilization and nest tionsofnestparasitesinHymenoptera(Insecta),with sharing(Hymenoptera:Sphecidae).—Sociobiology special reference to bees (Apoidea). — Biol. Rev. 13:93–118. Camb.Philos.Soc.62:415–443.