A COMPARISON OF WHAT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WANT TO LEARN WITH WHAT THEIR PARENTS WANT THEM TO BE TAUGHT A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the School of Education The University of Southern California In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education by Robert P. Durbin June 1950 UMI Number: DP25776 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Fublisterig UMI DP25776 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 E&. D 'i>° D<? 5 ^ This dissertation, written under the direction of the Chairman of the candidate’s Guidance Committee and approved by all members of the Committee, has been presented to and accepted by the Faculty of the School of Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education. & £ & _ ... Dean Guidance Committee Chairman ^ .^1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE PART I THE PROBLEM I. THE PROBLEM AND ITS IMPORTANCE............ . . 1 The problem.......... 1 The importance of the problem............... 3 Importance to the educational philosopher • 3 Importance to the administrator .......... 5 Importance to the school counselor . . • . 6 Importance to the curriculum coordinator . 7 Importance to the psychologist. 8 II. REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIES...................... 9 Interests and needs of y o u t h . . 9 Needs of youth as expressed by adults . . . . 12 Needs stated in terms of problem areas . . . 13 Preferences of high school pupils . . . . . . 24 PART II PROCEDURE' III. THE GENERAL PROCEDURE AND SETTING OF THE STUDY 32 IV. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHECK-LIST........... 35 V. THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE TABULATION OF THE CHECK-LIST . . . . . ....................... 56 Administration of the check-list........... 56 Tabulation of the check-list . 61 iii CHAPTER PAGE VI. THE STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF THE DATA ......... 63 PART III FINDINGS VII. PUPIL CURRICULUM PREFERENCES................. 69 Boy preferences . . . . . ... ................. 70 Curriculum preferences of all the boys . . 70 Curriculum preferences of boys from different grade levels ................. 70 The significance of the difference found between preferences of boys from the different grade levels ................. 81 Preferences for topics within subject areas 83 Girl preferences.......... ................. 106 Curriculum preferences of all the girls • . 106 Curriculum preferences of girls from different grade levels . ............. 115 Preferences for topics within subject areas 117 The difference between boy andg irl preferences 139 Differences within subject areas . . . . . 139 The significance of the difference between boy and girl preferences............... 140 Summary . 142 VIII. PUPILS1 IMPORTANCE RATINGS ........ 144 Importance ratings of the boys . . . . . . . 144 iv CHAPTER : PAGE The importance ratings of all the boys . . 145 The importance ratings of boys from different grade levels • ............. 147 Importance ratings of the girls • ........ 147 The importance ratings of all the girls . ♦ 151 The importance ratings of girls from different grade levels • • • • • • . . . 151 A comparison of the importance ratings of boys and girls....................... .. . . • . 153 A comparison of rank order ratings . . . . 157 The significance of the differences between boys * and girls1 ratings of importance . 157 Summary ................... . . . . . . . . . 158 IX, PARENT CURRICULUM PREFERENCES................. 162 Subject area preferences of fathers and mothers 162 What parents said their sons should be taught l63 The difference between what fathers and mothers said their sons should be taught. 163 What parents said their daughters should be taught • ......................... 166 The difference between what fathers and mothers said their daughters should be taught....................... 169 V CHAPTER PAGE Preferences of parents for individual topics within the subject areas • • • • • • 169 Responses of parents to individual topics that they wanted their sons to be taught 172 Responses of parents to individual topics that they wanted their daughters to be t a u g h t .................................. 180 X. PARENTS1 IMPORTANCE RATINGS.................... 202 The importance ratings that parents gave to topics they wanted their sons to be taught 202 The importance ratings that parents gave to topics they wanted their daughters to be taught . . . ............................. 206 XI. A COMPARISON OF THE CURRICULUM PREFERENCES AND IMPORTANCE RATINGS OF PUPILS WITH THE CURRICULUM PREFERENCES AND IMPORTANCE RATINGS OF PARENTS.................................. 212 A comparison of pupil and parent curriculum preferences................................ 213 The curriculum preferences of boys compared with the curriculum preferences of parents of boys ..................... 213 The curriculum preferences of girls compared with the curriculum preferences of parents CHAPTER PAGE of g i r l s ................................ 215 Differences between parent and pupil preferences for individual topics in the subject areas . . * ......................... 219 A comparison of pupil and parent importance ratings . . . . . .......................... 234 The importance ratings of boys compared with the importance ratings of the parents of the boys.......... 235 The importance ratings of girls compared with the importance ratings of the parents of g i r l s ................... 235 PART IV SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS XII. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................... 241 Summary of the problem.............. 241 Summary of the procedure . . . ........... 242 Summary of the findings 243 Summary of findings In terms of what students wanted to learn in high s c h o o l ........ 244 Summary of findings in terms of the importance ratings that students gave to their curriculum preferences........... 246 vii CHAPTER PAGE Summary of findings in terms of what parents say should be taught to their sons and daughters......................... 247 Summary of the findings in terms of the importance ratings parents gave to their curriculum preferences............ . . . 249 Summary of the comparison of curriculum preferences and the importance ratings of pupils and parents • 250 Recommendations . . . . . 251 Recommendations for curriculum construction 252 Recommendations for further research . . . 257 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................... 258 APPENDIX.................................... . . . . 262 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE I. Curriculum Preferences of High School Boys • • 71 II. Curriculum Preferences of Freshman Boys • . • 73 III. Cur ri cu lum Preferences of Sophomore Boys . . . 7*+ IV. Curriculum Preferenc es of Junior Boys . . . . 76 V. Curriculum Preferences of Senior Boys . . . . 77 VI. Curriculum Preferences of Boys from Different Grade Levels Showing Per Cent of Likes and Dislikes . . . . 78 VII. Curriculum Preferences of Boys from Different Grade Levels Shown in Bank Orders 80 • • • • • VIII* Differences between the Preferences of Freshman and Senior Boys for Subject Areas Expressed in Terms of Critical Ratio . 82 IX. Differences between the Preferences of Freshman and Junior Boys for Subject Areas Expressed in Terms of Critical Ratio . . . . 81+ X. Differences between the Preferences of Freshman and Sophomore Boys for Subject Areas Expressed In Terms of Critical Ratio ♦ 85 XI.-XXI. Responses of Boys to Individual Topics Expressed in Terms of Per Cent Liked . 87-105 • • • XXII. Curriculum Preferences of High School Girls 107 XXIII. Curriculum Preferences of Freshman Girls 108 • • •