THEI^LATIONSHIPBETWEENRACIALIDENTITYDEVELOPMENTAND MULTICULTURALCOUNSELINGCOMPETENCY: ALONGITUDINALANALYSIS By TERAESAVINSON ADISSERTATIONPRESENTEDTOTHEGRADUATESCHOOL OFTHEUNIVERSITYOFFLORIDAINPARTIALFULFILLMENT OFTHEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEDEGREEOF DOCTOROFPHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITYOFFLORIDA 2000 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . FirstandforemostIwouldliketothankmychair,GregNeimeyer,forhis continuoussupportandassistanceinthisproject. Iwouldalsoliketoacknowledgemy committeemembersfortheirhelpfulinputandguidance;LisaBrown,MonteBein,David Suchman,andMichaelHerkov. IwouldalsoliketothankCeciliaBibby,thecounseling psychologysecretary,forallofherhelp. Finally,Iwouldliketothankmyother classmatesfortheirsupportduringthistime. TABLEOFCONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS u LISTOFTABLES v ABSTRACT vi INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATUREREVIEW 9 MulticulturalCounselingCompetency 9 RacialIdentityDevelopment 15 METHOD 27 Sampling 27 Instrumentation 28 RESULTS 33 DescriptiveAnalysis 33 LongitudinalStabilityofRacialIdentityandMulticulturalCounseling CompetencyMeasures 35 LongitudinalChangesinRacialIdentityDevelopmentandMulticultural CounselingCompetency 36 ComparisonofWhiteandNon-WhiteTrainees 38 ComparisonoftheRelationshipBetweenRacialIdentityDevelopment andMulticulturalCounselingCompetency 40 OtherVariables 44 iii DISCUSSION 46 REFERENCES 55 APPENDIXAPARTICIPANTLETTER 61 APPENDIXBINFORMEDCONSENT 62 APPENDIXCDEMOGRAPHICQUESTIONNAIRE 63 APPENDIXDSOCIALCONTACTQUESTIONNAIRE 64 BIOGRAPHICALSKETCH 65 iv LISTOFTABLES 1.Helms'ModelsofRacialIdentityDevelopment 22 2.DescriptiveInformationforWhiteandNon-WhiteTrainees 33 3.MeanScoresforWhiteandNon-WhiteTrainees 34 4.PearsonCorrelationsBetweenTime1andTime2 36 5.T-TestComparisonofOriginalandFollow-UpGroupsofWhite Trainees(N=31) 37 6.T-TestComparisonofOriginalandFollow-UpGroupsof Non-WhiteTrainees(N=13) 38 7.RepeatedMeasuresANOVAResultsforAwarenessandKnowledge 40 8.PearsonCorrelationsforWhiteTrainees(N=31) 41 9.PearsonCorrelationsforNon-WhiteTrainees(N=13) 42 V AbstractofDissertationPresentedtotheGraduateSchool oftheUniversityofFloridainPartialFulfillmentofthe RequirementsfortheDegreeofDoctorofPhilosophy THERELATIONSHIPBETWEENRACIALIDENTITYDEVELOPMENTAND MULTICULTURALCOUNSELINGCOMPETENCY: ALONGITUDINALANALYSIS By TeraesaVinson August2000 Chair:GregJ.Neimeyer MajorDepartment:Psychology Previously,VinsonandNeimeyerdocumentedasignificantrelationshipbetween racialidentitydevelopmentandmulticulturalcounselingcompetency. Thisstudy examinedthestatusofthatrelationshipaftertwoyears. Participantsweresolicitedfi-om thesampleofcounselingpsychologygraduatestudentsfi-omseveraluniversitieswho completedthepreviousstudy. Eachtraineecompletedaracialidentitymeasure(White RacialIdentityAttitudesScaleorPeopleofColorRacialIdentityAttitudesScale),a multiculturalcounselingcompetencymeasure(MulticulturalCounselingAwareness Scale),asocialdesirabilitymeasure(MotivationtoControlPrejudicedReactionsScale),a socialnetworkquestionnaireanddemographicquestionnaire. Resuhsindicatedthat studentsoverallincreasedtheirmulticulturalcounselingcompetency,andmovedtoward vi moresophisticatedlevelsofracialidentitydevelopment. AlthoughWhitetrainees continuedtoexhibitasimilarrelationshippatterntheoreticallyconsistentwiththe literature,Non-Whitetraineesresuhs'wereincongruent. Finally,analyseswereconducted onthestabilityofracialidentitydevelopmentandmulticulturalcounselingcompetency overtime. Resultsindicatedthatthemulticulturalcounselingcompetencymeasure demonstratedsignificantreliabilityoverthetwo-yeartimeperiod,whilebothracial identitydevelopmentmeasuresdidnot. Possibleexplanationsfortheseresuhs,limitations tothestudy,andfuturedirectionsforresearchwerediscussed. vii INTRODUCTION Therelationshipbetweenracialidentitydevelopmentandmulticukuralcounseling competencyhasreceivedincreasedattentioninrecentyears. Studieshaveshownthat moreadvancedlevelsofracialidentitydevelopmentarepositivelycorrelatedwithhigher degreesofmuhiculturalknowledge,awareness,andskills(Ottavietal.,1994;Nevilleet al.,1996;Vinson&Neimeyer,Inpress). However,questionsstillremainaboutthe stabilityofthisrelationshipovertime. Theprimarypurposeofthispaperistoprovidethe firstlongitudinalinvestigationoftherelationshipbetweenmulticulturalcounseling competencyandracialidentitydevelopment. Multiculturalcounselingcompetencyandracialidentitydevelopmenthavebeen thoughttoberelatedsincethestirringsofthemulticulturalcounseUngmovementinthe 1950sand1960s. Jackson(1995)surveyedarticlesincounselingjournalsfi-omthe1950s thatemphasizedtheimportanceoftherecognitionofone'sovmcultureincounseling. Beforethe1950s,thecounselingprofessionwaslargelyethnocentric,withthe White/Anglo-Americancuhurebeingthenormandotherculturesbeingviewedasdeviant. AtleastsincethetimeofWrenn(1962),however, counselorshavebeenaskedto recognizetheir"culturalencapsulation"andworktoovercomeit. Withthisemphasis cametherecognitionofcultureasanintegralpartofone'sperson-nodoubthelpedalong 1 2 bytheCivilRightsMovement. Multiculturalcounselingdevelopedinrelationtothis recognition,quicklyevolvingtooccupyapositionofprominenceandcentralitywithinthe fieldofcounselingandcounselingpsychology(Heath,Neimeyer,&Pedersen,1988; Neimeyer&Norcross,1997;Vinson&Neimeyer,Inpress). Consequently,withthis camethedesiretoquantifymulticulturalcounselingcompetency. Sueetal.(1982)were amongthefirsttooutlinethecomponentsofmuUiculturalcounselingcompetency, includingcuhuralawareness,knowledge,andskills. Culturalawarenessinvolvesa therapist'smovetowardcognizanceofhis/herownculturalbackgroundandsensitivity towardothers'differences. Knowledgeinvolvesanunderstandingofthebackgroundof his/herclients,andtherelevantinformationthatcouldaffectthetherapeuticrelationship. Finally,skillsconsistsoftheabilitytousestrategiestoworkwithincUents'cultures eflFectively.Thus,thedirectionformulticulturalcounselingassessmentwasestablished, eventuallyleadingtothedevelopmentofinstrumentssuchastheMulticulturalCounseling Inventory(MCI;Sodowsky,TafFe,Gutkin&Wise,1994),theMuUiculturalAwareness- Knowledge-and-SkillsSurvey(MAKSS;D'Andrea,Daniels&Heck,1991),andthe MulticulturalAwarenessScale(MCAS,Ponterotto,Sanchez&Magids,1991),among others. Jackson(1995)definesmulticulturalcounselingas"counselingthattakesplace betweenoramongindividualsfromdifferentculturalbackgrounds"(p.3). Giventhis definition,multiculturalcounselingcompetencyiscommonplacesince,asSueetal.(1982) noted,"everycounseling/therapyinteractionisslightlycross-cultural"(p.47). Jackson (1995)alsostatesthatmulticulturalcompetencyisimperativetothecollaborative '5 3 relationshipbetweentherapistandclientbecauseitenhancestherapeuticunderstanding andempathy. Inessence,onecanmoreeffectivelyunderstandanotherifheorshe possessesknowledgeoftheirbackgroundandsubsequentexperiences. Anotherfactorleadingtotheimportanceofmulticulturalcounselingistherapid changeinthiscountry'sdemographics,withthepopulationofethnicminoritiesgreatly increasing(Fox,Kovacs,&.Graham,1985). Sueetal.(1982)predictedthatmorethan onethirdoftheUnitedStatespopulationwouldberacialorethnicminoritiesbytheyear 2000.Additionally,theUSBureauofCensus(1992)hasreportedthatracialminorities willbecomeanumericalmajoritybytheyear2050. Thesedrasticchangesinthe demographiccompositionofthissocietyindicatethatworkwithminoritieswillbecome increasinglymorecommon. Inadditiontoitspresumedrelationshiptothetherapeuticalliance,multicultural counselingcompetencyisalsoassociatedwithotherpositivevariables. Althoughtherole ofcross-culturalfactorsintherapeuticoutcomeisnotyetclear(Neimeyer&Gonzales, 1983),greatercross-culturalcompetencehasbeenrelatedtohigherlevelsofclient diversity(Sodowsky,Taflfe,&Gutkin,1991),greaterculturalsensitivity(Pomales, Claibom,&LaFromboise,1986),andmoreadvancedlevelsofracialidentity development,or,culturalself-knowledge(Vinson&Neimeyer,Inpress;Neville,Heppner, Louie,Thompson,Brooks&Baker,1996;Ottavi,Pope-Davis,&Dings,1994)-whichis thefocusofthepresentstudy. IntheSueetal.(1982)paperoutliningmulticulturalcounselingcompetency,the firstcharacteristicofthecuhurallyskilledcounselorwas"onewhohasmovedfrombeing