THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document6 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that NATIONAL SECURITY helps improve policy and decisionmaking through POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY research and analysis. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER DNA as Part of Identity Management for the Department of Defense 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Rand Corporation,1776 Main Street,PO Box 2138,Santa REPORT NUMBER Monica,CA,90407-2138 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF ABSTRACT OF PAGES RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE Same as 30 unclassified unclassified unclassified Report (SAR) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18 This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity. DNA as Part of Identity Management for the Department of Defense Douglas Shontz NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE This paper results from the RAND Corporation’s continuing program of self-initiated research. Support for such research is provided, in part, by donors and by the independent research and development provisions of RAND’s contracts for the operation of its U.S. Department of Defense federally funded research and development centers. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R ® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2010 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2010 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002 Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface DNA has characteristics that some believe make it a good candidate as a biometric for either identification of individuals or verification of their identities. This paper examines this issue from several perspectives, including the technical requirements for and the policy and legal ramifications of using DNA as a biometric. This study is not exhaustive but rather is an explor- atory effort designed to highlight the significant issues and potential useful applications of DNA as a biometric to assist the Department of Defense in making an informed decision about how and whether to pursue this application. This paper results from the RAND Corporation’s continuing program of self-initiated research. Support for such research is provided, in part, by donors and by the independent research and development provisions of RAND’s contracts for the operation of its U.S. Depart- ment of Defense federally funded research and development centers. This research was conducted within the Intelligence Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. For more information on RAND’s Intelligence Policy Center, contact the Director, John Parachini. He can be reached by email at [email protected], by phone at 703-413-1100, exten- sion 5579; or by mail at the RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050. More information about RAND is available at www.rand.org. iii Contents Preface ........................................................................................................... iii Summary ........................................................................................................vii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ ix Abbreviations ................................................................................................... xi DNA as Part of Identity Management for the Department of Defense ............................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Definition of Biometrics ......................................................................................... 2 Verification Versus Identification ............................................................................... 3 DNA Technology Summary .................................................................................... 3 Issues with and Potential Applications of DNA as a Biometric ............................................ 6 Legal and Policy Issues of Overseas DNA Collection for Identification ................................ 6 Technical Issues of Overseas DNA Collection for Identification ........................................ 8 Potential Applications for DNA Collection for Identification ............................................ 9 Legal and Policy Issues of Domestic DNA Collection for Verification ................................10 Technical Issues of Domestic DNA Collection for Verification .........................................11 Issues Beyond Privacy ........................................................................................12 Conclusions ......................................................................................................13 References .......................................................................................................15 v Summary The Department of Defense (DoD) must keep track of a large and ever-growing number of people, both known and unknown, as it executes its mission. The field associated with this responsibility is called identity management. One tool for identity management is bio- metrics, and, increasingly, some view DNA as a strong candidate for the expansion in biomet- rics because of its unique and unalterable character. However, serious questions remain about whether DNA is a viable biometric option, and it presents especially challenging questions. This exploratory study is intended to illuminate significant issues and potential applica- tions to assist DoD in making informed decisions about research in identity management. This paper assesses some of the issues presented by DNA data collection, storage, and use, and discusses the potential applications and implications. This analysis led to the following key findings: • Investment in DNA for some identification applications appears worthwhile. • Investment in DNA for verification does not appear worthwhile. • No studies demonstrating the value of DNA as a biometric appear to exist. • Risk management needs can likely be satisfied with less intrusive measures than DNA. • Collection of DNA and storage of DNA information within DoD requires a systematic approach that includes identifying priorities and risks. • Little or no reliable cost data exist. DoD should therefore begin a systematic effort to evaluate the viability of DNA in iden- tity management. The DoD needs to systematically • evaluate and state its priorities for identity management • evaluate and state the risks identity management is intended to address • explain how using biometrics reduces those risks • identify risks or priorities that can only be addressed by DNA • analyze the costs and benefits of expanding the use of DNA in identity management • develop policies regarding collection, analysis, use, and storage of DNA information. At this time, DNA as a biometric appears a worthwhile investment for narrow, targeted applications. Less complicated and more robust technologies, such as fingerprint and iris scans, should be favored for broad-based biometric applications. vii