00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page i Does SOCRATES Have a Method? 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page ii 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page iii edited by G A R Y A L A N S C O T T SOCRATES Does Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page iv Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Does Socrates have a method? : rethinking the elenchus / edited by Gary Alan Scott. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn0-271-02173-x(alk. paper) 1. Socrates. 2. Methodology—History. I. Scott, Gary Alan, 1952– b318.m48 d64 2002 183(cid:2).2—dc21 2001035790 Copyright © 2002 The Pennsylvania State University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Published by The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 16802-1003 It is the policy of The Pennsylvania State University Press to use acid-free paper for the first printing of all clothbound books. Publications on uncoated stock satisfy the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48–1992. 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page v C O N T E N T S Abbreviations for Plato’s Dialogues ix Preface xi Gary Alan Scott Introduction 1 Gary Alan Scott Part One: Historical Origins of Socratic Method 1 Parmenidean Elenchos 19 James H. Lesher 2 Forensic Characteristics of Socratic Argumentation 36 Hayden W. Ausland 3 Elenchosand Exetasis:Capturing the Purpose of Socratic Interrogation 61 Harold Tarrant 4 Comments on Lesher, Ausland, and Tarrant 78 Charles M. Young Part Two: Reexamining Vlastos’s Analysis of “the Elenchus” 5 Variety of Socratic Elenchi 89 Michelle Carpenter and Ronald M. Polansky v 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page vi vi Contents 6 Problems with Socratic Method 101 Hugh H. Benson 7 Elenctic Interpretation and the Delphic Oracle 114 Mark McPherran 8 The Socratic Elenchos? 145 Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith Part Three: Socratic Argumentation and Interrogation in Specific Dialogues A. Clitophon, Euthydemus, Lysis, Philebus 9 The Socratic Elenchus as Constructive Protreptic 161 Francisco J. Gonzalez 10 Humbling as Upbringing: The Ethical Dimension of the Elenchus in the Lysis 183 François Renaud 11 The (De)construction of Irrefutable Argument in Plato’s Philebus 199 P. Christopher Smith 12 Elenchos,Protreptic, and Platonic Philosophizing 217 Lloyd P. Gerson B. Four Interpretations of Elenchus in the Charmides 13 Socratic Dialectic in the Charmides 235 W. Thomas Schmid 14 The Elenchosin the Charmides,162–175 252 Gerald A. Press 15 Certainty and Consistency in the Socratic Elenchus 266 John M. Carvalho 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page vii Contents vii 16 Questioning the Self: A Reaction to Carvalho, Press, and Schmid 281 Joanne B. Waugh About the Contributors 299 Works Cited 303 Index 319 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page viii 00-P2035-FM 1/28/2002 12:11 PM Page ix A B B R E V I AT I O N S F O R P L AT O ’ S D I A L O G U E S Alc. i Alcibiades i(or Major) Lov. Lovers (or Rival Lovers) Alc. ii Alcibiades ii(or Minor) Lys. Lysis Ap. Apology of Socrates Men. Menexenus Charm. Charmides Min. Minos Cl. Clitophon Parm. Parmenides Crat. Cratylus Phd. Phaedo Crit. Critias Phdr. Phaedrus Cri. Crito Phil. Philebus Epi. Epinomis Pol. Statesman (or Politicus) Euthyd. Euthydemus Prot. Protagoras Euthyp. Euthyphro Rep. Republic Grg. Gorgias Soph. Sophist Hipp. Hipparchus Symp. Symposium Hi. Ma. Hippias Major Thg. Theages Hi. Mi. Hippias Minor Tht. Theaetetus La. Laches Tim. Timaeus ix
Description: