AN EVALUATION OP A FORMULA METHOD OP PRICE DETERMINATION A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the School of Commerce The University of Southern California In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Business Administration fcy Benjamin Berry Sherry June 1950 UMI Number: EP43273 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP43273 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 com n3A ' ' This thesis, written by sherry ■ .............. under the guidance of h.%3... Faculty Committee, and approved by all its members, has been presented to and accepted by the Council on Graduate Study and Research in partial fulfill ment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Date............. Faculty Committee W-B. Walt Chairman lton E a ; Rex Has TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. THE PROBLEM AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED . . 1 The problem................... 2 Statement of the problem ......... 2 Importance of the study • • • .......... 2 Definitions of terms used ............ . . • 5 Formula method of price determination . . 3 Full cost m e t h o d ...............• • • • 4 Alternative method . . ................. 4 Profit . . . . . . . . . 4 Required profit......................... 5 Accounting profit ................... 5 Pure profit ........................ 5 Material cost • • • • • . . •• 6 Conversion cost.......... 6 Selling c o s t ......................... 6 Normal capacity ................... 6 Manufacturing overhead .. ........... 7 Price............... 7 Organization of the remainder of the thesis 7 II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE................... 10 Literature on investigations of the princi ple of full c o s t ................... 10 Literature on investigations of an alterna tive formula method of price determination 12 U i CHAPTER PAGE Literature on actual price determination • 14 Literature on marginal concepts of economic analysis and the function of profits • • 15 Limitations of previous studies . . 17 III. FULL COST METHOD OF PRICE DETERMINATION- BY MEANS OF A F OR MULA .............. 19 The constituents of full cost.... 19 The computation of profit based on a per centage of full c o s t * 20 Implied or actual use of capacity as a requirement of price determination • . • 21 General formula for determining price based on the full cost method • • • • • • • • 24 Theoretical considerations underlying the full cost m e t h o d .............. 25 Business enterprise organized for the anticipation of profit earnings • • • . 26 Profit expectations determine the channel ing of resources • • • • • • • • • • • 27 The marginal preferences of consumers . * 28 Sales value of the marginal product as a measure of consumer preferences’. . . . 31 iv CHAPTER PACE Profit considered as the residual of total revenues minus total cost ............. 51 Prevalence of the full cost method of price determination................... 33 In retailing industries • • ........... 33 In manufacturing industries.......... 33 Summary.................................... 35 IV. AN ALTERNATIVE FORMULA FOR PRICE DETERMINATION 37 The constituents of c o s t ................. 37 A general alternative formula for pricing • 38 Basis for Knoeppel*s formula • • • • • • 38 Basis for Churchill!s formula • • • • • • 39 Presentation of Churchill1s formula • • • • 40 Rearrangement of the elements........... 41 Theoretical considerations underlying the alternative formula • • • . • • • • • • • 42 Pragmatic investigations by Churchill • • 42 Basis for selling cost equaling required profit 43 Basis for not calculating a portion of re quired profit on material cost . . . . 44 Basis for the use of normal capacity . . 44 V CHAPTER PAGE Justification for considering realized profit as a requirement of business enterprise • • • • • • • • ......... • 45 Justification in economic theory • . . 45 Justification in prevailing business thought..................... .. 43 Justification in considering selling costs independent of costs of production 49 Justification for not calculating per centage profit on material cost and selling costs ....................... 51 Justification for the use of normal capacity....................... .. 58 Reconciliation of full cost method and alter native method ................... 58 Restatement of the full cost principle and its mathematical computation • • • • • 59 Computation of the addition for profit or m ar k-up .......... 59 Implied acceptance of profit, in part, based on conversion cost under the full cost m e t h o d ............... • • 60 vi chapter page Elimination of material cost and selling cost from the full cost m e t h o d ...... 60 Reconciliation of the X% mark-up and the ratio developed by Churchill • • • • • • 61 Summary • • • • « • • ........................... 63 V. THEORETICAL COMPARISON OP PRICES COMPUTED BY THE PULL COST METHOD AND THE ALTERNATIVE METHOD UNDER ASSUMED CONDITIONS.................. 66 Attributes of price • • • • • • • * • .. ......... 68 Comparative prices computed by the full cost method and the alternative method under the influence of a changing price level • • . ♦ • 71 Limitations of both methods................ 74 Agreement with the criterion............ 74 Disagreement with the criterion • • • • » • • 74 Cause of disagreement due to fixed indirect cost • • • • • • • • • • • • • ............... 76 Suggested modification of the alternative method to correct deficiency ................. 80 Comparative prices computed by the full cost method and the alternative method under the influence of a declining price level and declining demand .............. . . . . 81 Comparative prices with a declining price level, elasticity of supply greater vii CHAPTER - PAGE than one . • 82 Comparative prices with a declining price level, elasticity of supply equal to 1*7 85 Comparative prices with a declining price level, elasticity less than one . • • • 80 Table of summary of results • • • • • • « • 91 Agreement with criterion of price • • . • . 91 Disagreement with criterion of price . . . 95 Causes of disagreement due to fixed indirect costs.......... 94 Price computed by full cost method more in agreement with actual theoretical results 94 Causes of more consistent results . . . . 95 Synthesis of full cost method and alternative method • • • • • « • • ............... • 96 Use of alternative method to compute X% for mark-up of the full cost method . . • • 96 Modification of alternative formula • • . . 97 Limitations of the modified formulas . . . 98 Basic assumptions « • • • • • • • • • • • 99 Criticism of profit ratio.......... . . 100 Criticism of effective selling effort . . 101 Summary .......................... • • • • « 101 viii CHAPTER PAGE VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............ 104 Summary........................... 104 Conclusions............ ......... 112 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................. 118 APPENDIX. EXAMINATION OP THE ALTERNATIVE FORMULA BY MARGINAL CONCEPTS ..................... .121 APPENDIX A. Hypothetical d a t a .......... 123 APPENDIX B. A formula method of pricing applied to pure competition .............. 131 APPENDIX C. A formula method of pricing applied to simple monopoly • • • • » • • • • • 153 APPENDIX D. A formula method of pricing applied to oligopoly and monopolistic competition 166 APPENDIX E. Summary of appendix• • • • • • • • • 173