ebook img

PSYCHOLOGICAL SELF-OTHER OVERLAP PDF

153 Pages·2014·0.96 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview PSYCHOLOGICAL SELF-OTHER OVERLAP

PSYCHOLOGICAL SELF-OTHER OVERLAP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS by Mary Y. Liu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Research Professor Sara H. Konrath, Co-Chair Associate Professor Ethan F. Kross, Co-Chair Professor Jane E. Dutton Professor Phoebe C. Ellsworth © Mary Y. Liu 2014 DEDICATION To my family, for their unwavering love, support, and sacrifice ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This body of work would not have been possible without the collective contributions of many. First and foremost, I would like to thank my wonderfully supportive advisors, Sara Konrath and Ethan Kross. Sara, thank you for your insightful wisdom, continual encouragement, and kind friendship. I feel lucky to have had you as a mentor not only for research, but also for life. Ethan, thank you for encouraging me to be an independent thinker, for your continual guidance during my graduate training, and for sharing your research acumen and enthusiasm. For this, I am deeply grateful and indebted. Many thanks to Phoebe Ellsworth and Jane Dutton for being the most supportive and accommodating committee members a candidate could ever hope for. Your collective positivity, humor, and commitment cast a warm and uplifting light to what is normally considered a challenging process. I am also thankful to the many research assistants I have had the privilege of working with over the years for their hard work and dedication. It does not escape me for one moment that this dissertation and the opportunity to pursue graduate training were only possible because of the unwavering love, support and sacrifice from my family. Thank you for providing me with the resources and opportunities that have allowed me to choose my own path in life. Lastly, so much joy in my graduate years has been due to particular individuals who have deeply enriched my experiences beyond graduate school. Although it is impossible to thank each person individually, I would like to acknowledge a few, particularly Tobias Wacker, Diana Betz, Jesse Chandler, Danielle Shapiro, Sasha Kimel, Rich Yau, Jon Yip, and Joseph Tyler. Collectively you have shaped me to be the person I am today, and for that I am eternally grateful. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication.......................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................iii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................v List of Figures...............................................................................................................................vi Abstract........................................................................................................................................vii Chapter I: Introduction...................................................................................................................1 Chapter II: What determines self-other overlap and how may it affect prosocial tendencies?...13 Study 1: Anger versus happiness and control among close friends...................................18 Study 2: Sadness versus contentment and control among close friends............................30 Study 3: Anger versus gratitude and control among best friends......................................39 Study 4: Anger versus gratitude and control among marital partners................................50 Chapter III: Does self-other overlap moderate the consequences of prosocial behavior?..........67 Study 5a: Giving support predicts mortality risk among parents......................................74 Study 5b: Giving support does not predict mortality risk among non-parents..................83 Chapter IV: Conclusion...............................................................................................................95 Endnotes.....................................................................................................................................108 Tables..........................................................................................................................................110 Figures........................................................................................................................................117 Appendix....................................................................................................................................119 References..................................................................................................................................125 iv LIST OF TABLES Table II.1 Summary of appraisals related to the discrete emotions in Chapter II.................................110 II.2 Means, standard errors, and post-hoc comparisons for all dependent variables by condition in Studies 1 to 4....................................................................................................................111 III.1 Zero-Order Correlations of Support Given and Received Variables in Study 5.................112 III.2 Hierarchical Logistic Regression Model Used to Predict Mortality Risk among Participants with Children in Study 5a....................................................................................................113 III.3 Hierarchical Logistic Regression Model Used to Predict Mortality Risk among Childless Participants in Study 5b.......................................................................................................115 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure I.1 Schematic representation of the research questions in Chapter II and III..............................117 II.1Self-other Overlap Mediates the Relationship between Condition and Helping in Study 1..118 vi ABSTRACT The present dissertation uncovers the processes by which self-other overlap influences prosocial behavior and its consequences across different close relationships. Chapter I reviews extant theory and research on self-other overlap and its role in relationships and prosocial behavior. Chapter II explores whether discrete emotions shift perceptions of self-other overlap, and how shifts influence downstream prosocial tendencies across 4 studies. Study 1 found that reflecting on an angry experience with a close friend led to less self-other overlap and subsequent prosocial tendencies toward that friend, relative to reflecting on a happy or more neutral experience. Furthermore, anger undermined helping through the mediating role of self-other overlap, relative to the other conditions. Study 2 ruled out a general negative valence explanation after finding no significant self-other overlap differences from reflecting on emotions similar in valence (i.e., sad, content, or control) involving a close friend. Study 3 tested emotions that directly implicate others (i.e., gratitude, anger, and control) among best friends. Anger undermined self-other overlap, relative to the control. However, there were no self-other overlap differences between gratitude and control, condition effects on helping, or mediation. Study 4 found null effects of anger on self-other overlap, relative to gratitude and control, suggesting that marital relationships may be one boundary condition. Chapter III explores whether relationship type, a proxy for self- other overlap, moderates the long-term health outcomes of providing support to close others. Giving to emotionally close partners predicted mortality risk, when giving to children. This likely occurred because children activate the caregiving system, which is hypothesized to benefit vii stress-regulation. Study 5a found that providing support to adult children predicted reduced mortality risk 17 years later among older adult parents, but providing support to other partners (e.g., parents, siblings, other relatives, friends) did not predict mortality risk among either parents (Study 5a) or non-parents (Study 5b), controlling for a number of plausible confounds. Chapter IV concludes by discussing the implications of the research for a variety of research literatures and future directions. Together, the studies begin to illuminate the intricacies by which self-other overlap influences prosocial behavior and its consequences in different close relationships. viii CHAPTER I Introduction One of the most fundamental distinctions in social psychology is the one between self and other. Theoretical exploration of these two spheres of human existence are supported by an extensive literature (for review, see Wiggins, 1991). For example, Bakan (1966) differentiated agency (the individuated self that strives for mastery, power, and self-protection) from communion (the connected self that strives for intimacy, union, and solidarity). These two modalities can be mapped onto an interpersonal circumplex that organizes interpersonal behavior (Wiggins, 1991). Parallel distinctions occur in Fromm’s (1941) separate entity versus oneness with world, Erikson’s (1950) autonomy versus basic trust, McAdams’s (1985) power vs intimacy motivation, and more recently, Markus and Kitayama’s (1991) independent versus interdependent self. Major areas of psychological research have incorporated distinctions between the self and other into their theorizing, such as research on self and identity (W. B. Swann & Bosson, 2010), close relationships (Clark & Lemay, 2010), prosocial behavior (Penner, Dovidio, Piliavin, & Schroeder, 2005), and aggression (Bushman & Huesmann, 2010). Over the last two decades theoretical interest has focused on how the self may be merged or overlap with others and how this self-other overlap influences different intrapersonal and interpersonal outcomes (Aron & Aron, 1996, 1997; Aron, McLaughlin-Volpe, et al., 2004; Aron, Aron, Tudor, & Nelson, 1991; Batson, 1987, 1991, 1997; Batson et al., 1997; Cialdini, Brown, Lewis, Luce, & Neuberg, 1997; Davis, Conklin, Smith, & Luce, 1996; Goldstein & Cialdini, 2007; Myers & 1

Description:
To my family, for their unwavering love, support, and sacrifice . Study 1: Anger versus happiness and control among close friends. altruism debate, which explored whether self-other overlap mediates the empathy-altruism . Roseman, Wiest, & Swartz, 1994), and a recursive anger-blame loop
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.