You'uns: Toward Appalachian Rhetorical Sovereignty A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Amanda E. Hayes August 2015 © 2015 Amanda E. Hayes. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled You'uns: Toward Appalachian Rhetorical Sovereignty by AMANDA E. HAYES has been approved for the Department of English and the College of Arts and Sciences by Mara Holt Associate Professor of English Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT HAYES, AMANDA E., Ph.D., August 2015, English You'uns: Toward Appalachian Rhetorical Sovereignty Director of Dissertation: Mara Holt “You'uns: Toward Appalachian Rhetorical Sovereignty” began as a consideration of how Scott Richard Lyons's concept of rhetorical sovereignty (put forward in his essay “Rhetorical Sovereignty: What do American Indians Want from Writing?”) might be applied to Appalachia. While the field of rhetoric and composition has advanced a sense of academic and social value for non-standard dialects, my sense is that Appalachian dialects in particular continue to be evaluated as “wrong” rather than different. This evaluation of linguistic error is tied with perceptions of cultural deficit, making some teachers eager to correct both the language and the social values of Appalachian students. What is often unseen in this is the rhetorical writing and communication styles that are attached to that language and those values. Because Appalachian rhetoric as a shared cultural dynamic remains unseen and unconsidered in the classroom, many Appalachian students fail to see themselves as united with others in potentially empowering ways. Thus, where Lyons defines rhetorical sovereignty as the right of a people, united by shared language and cultural history, to create their own definition and have it respected, the people of Appalachia must first learn to perceive themselves, and be recognized by others, as a rhetorically-linked people. To this end, I use historical, cultural, and rhetorical analysis to investigate Appalachian rhetoric as a potentially uniting factor. Specifically, I put forward that elements of Celtic rhetoric and ideology have been 4 inherited by Appalachian peoples throughout the region. These elements are discernible in the ways Appalachians speak and write, although because these elements are unrecognized as rhetorical practices within the academy, many students are simply given the sense that they “don't know how to write.” I advocate bringing Appalachian rhetoric as a concept into regional classrooms, asking students to investigate and record their sense of Appalachian definition and discourse, as a stepping stone toward achieving a critical sense of ourselves as both individual and linked. I also demonstrate my sense of Appalachian rhetorical writing, through the inclusion of personal and family stories and considerations of my process of thinking as illustrative of individualized, non-adversarial argument. 5 DEDICATION For family, place, and all the ways they intertwine. 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS If this work is anything worthwhile, it ain’t cuz a me. It’s because of the many people who make my world and make me care about doing something good in it. Thanks to my parents, grandparents, brother, aunts, uncles, cousins of all degrees, friends and neighbors . . . naming them all would take up more space than the dissertation itself. And to those family members who’ve come before me, and them as yet to come. Special thanks to my teachers, not least of all the ones on my committee: my director, Mara Holt, Sherrie Gradin, Jennie Nelson, and Jaylynne Hutchinson. And thanks to the spirit of Manasseh Cutler, for his dream of a pioneer school that became Ohio University, a research institution in the Appalachian foothills, where my worlds could combine. 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 3 Dedication ........................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1: Introduction to Appalachian Rhetorical Sovereignty ........................................ 9 Chapter 2: Rootsystems of Appalachian Rhetoric ............................................................ 43 Chapter 3: Writing an Appalachian Rhetoric.................................................................... 77 Chapter 4: Removing Appalachia from the Classroom .................................................. 121 Chapter 5: Rhetorical Sovereignty for Appalachia ......................................................... 160 Works Cited .................................................................................................................... 191 8 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Quilt by Alta Carpenter .................................................................................160 9 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO APPALACHIAN RHETORICAL SOVEREIGNTY (OR, PIECIN' A QUILT) Great-grandma Carpenter was a master quilter. She didn't need a sewing machine; she pieced every one of her quilts by hand. Some of them was made for me, which even when little I thought was incredible, as she had so many grandkids and great-grandkids who would have loved to've had one of her quilts. I remember watching her quilt; I was pretty young at the time, but I knew quilting was something I wanted to do, too. Unfortunately, I was too young to have much patience. The stitches had to be so small and so exact...I managed to knot up the thread a few stitches into my one and only solo effort, and gave up the entire enterprise. It's up in my grandparents' attic now, that little piece of batted cotton I was too impatient to quilt when I was five. It's in the cedar chest, just like Grandma Carpenter's quilts are. It's like somebody knew better than I did at the time how much I'd regret giving up. I did learn to crochet eventually, taught by the mother of one of my brother's friends. But it's not the same. Crochet, unlike quilting, ain't part of the family. We don't need any other reason to love Grandma Carpenter's quilts but that they was made by her. Still, it wasn't until within the last few years that I learned to see those quilts in a new light, as something precious not just because of the messages of love and artistry that they'd always conveyed for me. In fact, I've only recently been learning to read them, to read quilting as a whole, as something even more deeply rhetorical than I'd ever realized. 10 The realization tracks directly to my discovery of Fawn Valentine's West Virginia Quilts and Quiltmakers, wherein she explores the cultural roots of the Appalachian quilting traditions. She demonstrates ways of reading the cultural traditions of quilts through their designs and constructions. Scotch-Irish-influenced quilts regularly consist of a traditional pattern, such as a starburst or rings, but within that pattern can lie a chaos of apparently non-related colors and cloth patterns. The whole is over-layered by a pattern of intersecting, wave-like stitching, giving the quilt an equal sense of order and chaos, of circular and interlaced connections. Materials (“piece-goods” Grandma Carpenter called them) are often chosen for sentimental or value-laden reasons; a scrap of a quilter's wedding dress may be entwined with a piece of the blankets that swaddled each of her babies. Thus, what might at first glance appear a disorganized mishmash of clashing colors is actually an ode to the passages of a person's life. It is, as I see it, a system that privileges styles of communication such as descriptive narrative (each piece of the quilt is an opening to an interconnected body of stories) and proposes as an end- goal the drawing of connections between both the similar and seemingly disparate components to create a whole text, a text that speaks of the quilter perhaps more than it speaks to the viewer. The resulting patterns require a sense of cultural literacy for best interpretation, as they require the willingness of the viewer/listener/interpreter to both see the quilt as more than an object, to look at it as a cultural insider might, and to consider meanings beyond the surface materials. A quilt tells a story, but on its own subjective terms.
Description: