WORDS VISION & UCFV Faculty & Staff Association Newsletter Vol. 5 No.4 January 1998 and apparently there's already a interactive electronic virtuality can In this issue disturbing shortage of French be a seductive distraction . . . and champagne for that once-in-a worse. Nightmare scenario # 1: my lifetime midnight toast. students sit there, semi-listening as I From the Editor . . . . . . . . . 1 blather on about some sort of But my own sense is that the language stuff; meanwhile, they're Reports millennium has already passed. The scanning their e-mail, checking out -President . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 most significant thing about 1997 select chat rooms, playing a quick -Faculty Grievance Report 3 was the surging growth of the hand of Solitaire, and/or perusing -Staff Grievance Report . . 6 World Wide Web. The Internet has some extreme XXX pix, if I'm being, -OH&S Chair Report 8 now definitively taken over from TV like, so boring today. And once as the instant gratification inter you've turned the machines on, there Articles continental mega-info-beast; the is no going back, of course. -Identity Crisis Revisited 8 implications of that perceptual leap -A Tale of Two Restaurants 10 are just starting to sink in. What worries me, I guess, is the -A Poem ... ......... 13 sinking feeling that the currently vaporous barriers between Education and Entertainment are about to Notes and Notices . . . . . . . 13 vanish. What next, 3-D headsets? From the Editor Then, I suppose, I could lecture more 'interactively' against a backdrop of ever--changing imagery programmed Shift Happens for various thematic purposes: e.g., boiling lava rivers in Hawaii for You know, the punchline to the As far as teaching goes, I'm not discussions of returned mid-terms, old joke: "what did one paradigm say quite sure, yet, how I feel about this Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoons for to the other?" brave New Age. Right now, my making fine semantic points, students can be plugged 1998 may be a bit of a problem in in class, transmogrifying in that regard. I mean, the big news illtlt,IIIJ.11ta111 our beloved shared teaching seems to be that the magic year 2000 environment into a kind of, well, is just twenty four brief months multimedia yard sale. away. Everywhere the millennium is anticipated - in a TV series named In some ways it's great; after all, for it, not to mention the ominous every kind of data is just a click computer bug, plus regular away. You can get help on any topic newspaper columns on the topic, and ::: :!; J!lt=ll'l'J!;,~,i.id : as you go, not to mention connect so on. All the hot spots for 1999 in-class discussion 'directly and ::: 1111111~1•1~~-, :: : New Year's Eve parties are booked meaningfully' to the wide world. i - leaving only places like the Odd !J~1tM#i##[email protected]~rM?i Fellows' (Persons'?) Hall free - ?t##lf~JQ f~lt:tfP $#Q, : ' On the other hand, this 2 January 1998 the menacingly blank beach balls President's Report significant vehicle for members to from The Prisoner series for rabid have input into the way that UCFV, speculations about the real agenda of formerly FVC, has been run. The Microsoft Inc, and so on. When I do As a New Year's resolution, our evidence for this is in the number of my geezerology unit on the seething editor (Richard) and his able times .the FSA is asked to provide legacy of the 60s, I could feature assistant (Fenelia) have vowed to representatives to committees and important cultural heros like Twiggy, enforce copy deadlines, a move that task forces that are working on the Tiny Tim, and Freddie and the I heartily endorse even though it will development of policy. As I speak to Dreamers. Groovy. sometimes force me to write before my counterparts at the various the pen is truly ready. Our deadline colleges and university colleges That's not exactly the point, for this issue - absolutely firm - around the province, I see that this though, to make learning more and is January 16th, which means that kind of participation by the local more like a fun computer game: is not very much has happened in FSA union is quite unusual, and I'm it? But maybe we're all being business since our last Words & certain that it is this involvement of 'bought off' by this slick info Vision issue. So, I'm going to use the employees that has made the technology - to the detriment of our the President's column this month to labour climate at UCFV well known capacity to think critically - do some thinking out loud - or for its congeniality. overwhelmed by the sheer behemoth thinking in print. bulk, brazenness, and potential Some of our members have beauty ofit David Morosan's Faculty criticized the FSA for concentrating Grievance Chair report last month more on its professional association Does easy access to unlimited on the dual roles of activities to the neglect of its labour information, presented in an program/department heads pointed union responsibilities, and have been entertaining way, necessarily make out a number of issues that arise out encouraging the FSA to act like a you smarter? No, but it sure keeps of our members having traditional trade union. It might be you busy ... and pretty soon you may responsibilities that may, at times, easy to assume that it's faculty in even believe you are understanding conflict. This caused me to think general who prefer the professional the time of your life about the dual role that the FSA association model, whereas staff are plays within UCFV. We call more supportive of a strong union. Meanwhile, In Another Part of the ourselves an association, and many However, many of our staff members Forest. .. of us see the FSA as our own support the activities of our professional association, expecting professional assoc1at1on, have All this millennial expectancy may that it will do those things that parti~ipated on various committees, make the here-and-now seem a trifle professional assoc1at1ons do: and find that this makes their jobs anti-climactic, but I'm sure we're in develop policy, set and police interesting and fulfilling and makes for another exciting period at UCFV, standards of competence, etc. them feel a vital part of the with more institutional dilemmas and However, the FSA is also certified institution (something not reported by new directions than you can shake a as a labour union, and so it has the their counterparts around the post new president at - i.e., the same responsibility to represent its secondary system). And on the other old round of change and uncertainty. members in collective bargaining side, faculty are often heard to ask So brace yourself, gentle reader; and and in enforcing the collective "why don't you guys (the FSA) DO congratulations for surviving yet agreement with the employer. something about __ (name an another year without going postal. Occasionally these roles seem to issue)? Grow up and be a real come into direct conflict, and there union!" We start anew with a bevy of is an increasing tension between bolstering reports from the front them as our members express their Frequently, this dual role places lines, more cogent cogitations on opinions that the FSA should be the FSA in awkward positions. As identity, a provocative poem - and more of one and less of the other. we had often done in the past, the the usual much much more. FSA Executive appointed an official It's as a professional association representative to the committee that -Richard Dubanski that the FSA has provided the most was struck to create a Harassment • 3 January 1998 Policy. After a great deal of work problems directly with the second easy; it's clear that the FSA must and several drafts, all of which were party, to avoid taking advantage of respond as a union. But a recent vetted through the FSA Executive, power relationships, could only issue again illustrated the dilemma: the new Policy was approved by benefit the institution and each of us Peter Jones becoming a member of UCC and the· Board. The FSA who works within it. Right? Well, faculty. A labour union response officially supported the policy what happens to the FSA member would · have been quick and through mention in a clause of the who is found to be in contravention unequivocal: over our collectively Collective Agreement. The Policy is of the ethics code and is subjected to dead bodies. Other colleges have essentially a good one, requiring a bit discipline, and what if, in defending grieved similar situations, and even of tweaking here and there, but the member, the FSA finds that the taken them to arbitration. But as nothing beyond what might be application/enforcement of the code colleagues, as faculty and staff who expected in a comprehensive policy was somehow unfair? If the FSA have worked alongside Peter for 11 on a sensitive issue. And thus the part1c1pates actively in the years, the correct response was less FSA fulfilled its professional development of the code, something obvious. In the end, I believe that we association role. that a professional association reached a compromise that allows us would certainly do, would this to wear both our union and our However... what happens now to weaken our member's defense later professional association hats with our members who find themselves on? Again, I'm not sure of the some pride. facing discipline as a result of being outcome. on the responding end of a But what do )'.QY think? What role harassment complaint? What would This duality of FSA roles is at do you believe the FSA should play happen if the FSA, in representing the base of many of the conflicting in our institution? Should we the member, determined that either roles that our members find continue to attempt to walk the there were problems in the policy themselves in. As professionals, w.e tightrope between two extremes? itself, or (more likely), problems in are more than capable of guiding Should we leave the professional its implementation? Could the and directing our programs and association activities to a body like FSA's official involvement in the departments. But as union the UCC? Do you think that the development oft his policy jeopardize members, this role often finds us in FSA should be more of a labour the chance of success should a opposition to other members of the union, or less so? subsequent disciplinary action lead to FSA As people who are committed a grievance and arbitration? I'm not to our students, to our departments, Your responses, either to me sure that I know the answer, }?ut and to the mission of UCFV, we personally or, better yet, to this certainly the outcome would depend want to sit on SACs, to ensure that newsletter, will be read with interest. on the details of the individual case. the right person is chosen for a position. But where does this leave -Kim Isaac UCC will soon be looking at the FSA member - an internal developing a code of ethics for applicant - when her union Faculty Grievance UCFV. In discussing this with the brothers and sisters on the SAC Executive, I think I can say that we choose an outsider for the position? Chair Report all see value in having such a code. The outcome of a grievance in this Certainly those of us who deal with kind of situation again would Issues prominent in the business the day-to-day issues of the FSA depend on the facts of the individual of the Faculty Grievance Chair this know that some of the most difficult case but the FSA reps on the SAC month: and painful problems our members would certainly be questioned as to encounter are not problems with whether they were in agreement Overloads management; rather, they are with the decision. problems with other members. A This ongoing issue has become a document that would remind each of As your President, I spend a fair perennial prominent concern of part us to treat everyone we encounter amount of time worrying about the time and sessional instructors. with respect and courtesy, to refrain appropriate role for the FSA. Some Department and program heads also from malicious gossip, to discuss issues that come to my attention are 4 January 1998 complain that they receive pressure other cases, we have been asked by ordinarily be granted an interview from faculty members who want to management to waive the SAC unless there is consensus among do overloads and are inquiring about process on an emergency basis. SAC members that the candidate the upcoming spring session. In spite Diversions from the SAC process does not meet the criteria deemed to of FSA protests of overload are at risk of becoming epidemic, be central to the position. Criteria assignments last year, complaints and 'emergencies' seem to result must be set, and should be persist. This month I will grieve the from management's absence of prioritized, before the applications assignment of two overload sections forethought, which in tum results are viewed. this academic year (August '97 to from a disregard of the collective June '98) to a full-time employee. agreement. Protests and threat of In a related matter, a This will be followed later this month grievances to individual question arose regarding by an open letter to management and administrators has proved futile (see how SAC members FSA members advising management Kim's letter to Acting President should treat that the FSA will automatically Bate), resulting in the open letter information grieve the assignment to any full-time from Kim, Bev and me, appearing gathered about employee of a second overload below. Please read this letter. It internal candidates section in a single academic year. has the effect of warning FSA from sources outside The FSA will gneve these members (and non-members) who the SAC process. assignments as individual cases, are approached to accept a position My answer is that asking as restitution that a sum of which could potentially last more SAC members money equivalent to the salary paid than four months. If you accept should take great for the overload be distributed to such a position without undergoing care to prevent this regular part-time and sessional an SAC, the FSA will publicly information from employees in the area, as grieve your appointment, and will biasing their comparison compensation for work lost by them seek to control the SAC process for of the candidates during the SAC or other employees. a subsequent re-hiring of the process. SAC members who feel position. they are unable to do this should The FSA will also pursue contract dismiss themselves from the SAC. and/or policy language to require Access to Minutes of FSA This is particularly important in regular part-time (RPT) and Meetings situations where a griever might sessional instructors to declare establish that the SAC was tainted in outside work, and for this additional A member has asked where the favour of a candidate, or against a work to be taken into account when FSA minutes are stored and where candidate's favour, because an SAC assigning work to RPTs and they can be accessed easily by member brought a conflict of interest sessionals. I will be available to members. The answer is that they to the SAC. For the same reason, receive input and to answer questions have been kept in several locations. biasing statements in favour of a about this issue in Abbotsford in See the list of these locations posted candidate or against a candidate, room A225 (Boardroom) February 2 at the end of this issue. which are based on personally from 11:30 to 1:00 pm, and in acquired information must not be Chilliwack in Room D 131 on Conduct of Members of SA Cs shared in the SAC discussions since February 2 from 3:30 to 4:30 pm. they serve to bias the discussion of Comments or questions can be sent I have been asked to clarify the candidates and prevent the equal to me by mail or phone as well. nature of grievances that I anticipate consideration of the candidates' could result from SACs where performances in the search process. Appointed Positions internal candidates are involved. I It is important to reinember that a am happy to discuss this with grievance citing the use of personal In the past few months the FSA members anytime. One question likes or dislikes to taint an SAC can has been approached with concerned the obligation of the SAC be brought by unsuccessful information that new positions have to grant interviews to internal candidates, by SACs members who had employees appointed to them, on applicants. Internal applicants will participated in the process, or by any an interim or permanent basis. In other FSA member who feels.t hat the 5 January 1998 successful candidates for a job in was successful in requesting these this UCC decision is that proposals their workplace was not chosen notes be removed. Department and strongly linked to existing programs fairly. Program Heads were instructed to should be granted priority over new exclude this information from programs applying through PPP. Dismissal of Sessional departmental files. Another instructor was successful in having It is not yet clear to me what A sessional instructor who had all documents pertaining to a might be the implications of a letters of appointment to teach two dismissed case of alleged potentially inconsistent application of courses in January was dismissed harassment removed from all UCFV this precedent, or its adoption as from work late in December, due to administrative files. UCC policy, for the FSA's grievance poor evaluations. Our collective of future layoffs. agreement ·provides very little for Unhealthy Work Environment sessionals in this circumstance, since Committee on Changes in UCFV is bound by the contract, not Several FSA members Faculty Workload the letters of appointment. Program complaining of unhealthy air in their and department heads are reminded workplace were removed from their A very preliminary scan of the to be very clear with sessionals that work location. Members are questionnaires reveals a list of topics the faculty evaluations are reminded that it is their right to that respondents have identified as paramount in determining whether refuse to work in an environment deserving public discussion. Here is their employment will continue, even they have reason to believe is an unsorted list. Note that other if they are in possession ofletters of unhealthy or unsafe. The FSA topics will be identified when the appointment. would certainly support you in any committee reviews the questionnaires such case, and UCFV would be in detail (beyond the first page), and Conversion of Long-serving very unlikely to challenge a sincere other opportunities for discussions RPTs claim of this type. will be announced. Two instructors who had been UCC Reviews and Changes The following two topics of long-serving members of a PPPs Initial Decision interest will become the focus of department beginning prior to the public discussion early in February. implementation of a degree program A recent decision was made by They will be widely publicized prior in their area were granted regularized University College Council (UCC) to their occurrence, but in the part-time contracts. Their to regard program proposals by meantime, you are asked to prepare qualifications had been sufficient to Chemistry and Physics as yourself for the following secure a position prior to the exceptions to the normal Program discussions: beginning oft he degree program, but Planning and Priorities (PPP) they were judged to be not procedures, in part because they • Course release At this point in competitive with candidates who had constitute continued support of the evolution of our degree more updated qualifications. Since developing programs, and in part programs, are we ready to identify their regulariz.ation should have taken because they were argued to be cost a new or additional way of place prior to the change in neutral. allocating courses release, besides programs, they were awarded 'B' automatic section releases for contracts conditional upon an The parameters of these each upper division course? That upgrading of their qualifications. exceptions have not been set, is, should class size, revision of leaving open the possibility that courses, lab components, travel Documentation in Personnel other programs fearing lay-offs or time, marking load, etc., be a Files Clarified elimination of their programs in the factor in deciding the matter? near future might gain approval for Should we be advocating a simple An instructor who found their proposals by appealing by the seven course work load, with unflattering notes about his teaching same criteria. This possibility relatively few additional releases performance in a departmental file exists because the implication of for specific circumstances? 6 January 1998 • Qualifying duties related to to which areas of the collective definitely increased and become a instruction Can we find ways to agreement need these types ~f serious problem." And there we left quantify the . workload attention are welcome. Send e-mail it. UCFV didn't really hire any more implications of corruruttee work, or Aspen. people to lighten the load and the independent studies courses, -David Morosan Union really didn't push it. Money, practicum supervision, student of course, or lack of it, was the adv i.s m. g, e t c .?. reason for no new hires. Same story for evaluations. Most of us agree The raw list of suggested topics our evaluation process is inadequate for public forums: Staff Grievance but we don't seem to be doing much about it. In this case our excuse for _ increases in class size Chair Report being unable to revamp the process is - student advising in applied lack of time due to over work (don't programs these two tie in nicely?). We accept Greetings and Happy New Year. _ field work in applied programs the situation with a 'it'll never So far 1998 is shaping up to be an _ provincial and national meetings change' attitude, but complain extremely interesting year for for applied programs, allowances nonetheless. And it is probably true, UCFV. With both local and for professional development . these situations will never change provincial negotiations starting up inconsistent workload (c lass size, unless we decide they must and take soon, and a new President and upper level release) some action. Within a few weeks Library Director about to be hired, _ credit for scholarly activity members will be asked what they we could be in for some big changes _ supervision of directed studies, would like to see negotiated. I hope in the way we do things around individual projects beyond regular staff work load and evaluations will here. And I'm happy about that teaching load be a top priority. because for the most part I think _ inequities between small and change is a good thing. When life larger departments ( course release The Dilemma goes on in the same way day after for upper leve~ new courses, more day we become complacent and than five preps per year) I just love those unexpected at bored _ not to mention boring. _ course release for revised courses home bonus days - you know, when Change keeps us on our toes, it fires (rather than upper level courses) UCFV, the schools and a lot of local people up and gets them involved _ balanced distribution of course businesses are closed after a heavy and interested in their world. How releases, not upper level release_ snow· because the road conditions are does that old saying go - _ lab instructor workload m hazardous. Usually I would stay something like, "If you want to be sciences interesting, be interested." indoo~s , tucked up snug and wa. nn, , _ inconsistent workload in sciences and revel in the fact that there 1sn t (upper level release, class sizes, any thing I ~ to do, so I ~ do The Situation contact time) whatever I want, which is most likely _ travel time as workload a whole lot of nothing. Actually, we need a lot more Unfortunately that was not the case Clarification of Collective changes at UCFV. For starters we this time as my son had an important need to do something positive about Agreement early morning appointment in the issues we have been complaining Chilliwack. We didn't want to about for so long. Staff work load I have been given a course release cancel and take the chance he would and evaluations are two that come this semester to identify past not be rescheduled for months, so off to mind. Staff have been griping practices regarding areas of ~e we went to town. The Cultus Lake about heavy work loads ever since collective agreement that reqmre roads weren't too bad, but once out we became a University College. A considerable interpre~tion, and to oft he park conditions were awful - few years ago UCFV and Union set write more user-friendly versions of slushy and slippery - we slid all up a task force, to look into staff some of the most cloudy areas of the over the road. We made it there and workload, and what we came up collective agreement. Suggestions as back safely, but it was a rather with was "Yup, staff workload has unpleasant trip. 7 January 1998 The next morning UCFV, the to decide whether I should stay advantage of a situation. They do not schools, and I would guess home and risk being thought lazy, or want to be seen as disloyal or Chilliwack's businesses, were open. attempt the trip and risk an untrustworthy. So, how do we According to the local radio station, accident. In the end I usually go to convince our members they will not the storm was over and road clean-up work, as I did that day. I guess I'd be viewed that way, by the Union or well on the way. I was a little rather take the chance of crashing UCFV? How do we convince them disappointed because those my car than be thought a lazy wuss. that the very few unkind judgmental unexpected at home bonus days are Maybe I should be in therapy! people who do make them feel such a - well, nice bonus - and uncomfortable about their decision to one is never enough. I was also The really ridiculous part of this stay home, are not worth worrying somewhat surprised to hear that whole thing is that when other about? I don't know the answer, but every thing was pretty well back to people decide to exercise their right this question is on the agenda of our normal because the Lake roads were on not traveling in severe weather first Shop Steward meeting next ten times worse. My own street was conditions, and stay home, I think, week. Maybe the group of us will be a skating rink. Just getting from the 'now isn't that sensible'. I would able to sort it out. For my own part back door to the car, a whole 25 feet, never consider them lazy or taking I will say this, the next time I am was an exercise in terror (not to advantage of the system. Why can't intimidated by bad weather or bad mention grace and agility, that triple I apply the same logic to myself? I air. .. I stay home. (Yea, sure.) Lutz I did upon stepping off the last do take comfort, though, in the fact stair was definitely Olympic that numerous other UCFV The Shop Steward Story material). Actually I didn't even employees react the same way as I make it to the car; half way there I do in this situation. They too drive As of this writing we have thirteen decided it was crazy to drive, and to work in weather conditions that Shop Stewards representing crawled back into the house. any reasonable person would t:hin,k Chilliwack and Abbotsford - eight dangerous. Unfortunately we don't staff, five faculty - some of whom Standing at the kitchen window, act reasonably if we think others are have done Steward work before and watching my neighbour make several going to ridicule us for it. many who are new to it. Not only unsuccessful attempts at getting his were David and I really pleased with car on to the street, I was beginning This 'I don't want to look the tum out to the December 12 Shop to get that 'Oh God, what do I do deficient' thinking really became Steward workshop, but also very now' feeling. apparent during the bad air grateful to these people for problems we had in Abbotsford volunteering. As a group we I mean, it was obvious that the Campus at the beginning of decided to go with an 'At Large' highway and main city streets were December. Both UCFV and the Steward system rather than an area okay or UCFV and schools would Union told people to go home if rep one. Part of the reason for that not have been open. I did not want to feeling ill or concerned about the decision is the fact that we do not risk an accident, to my car or person, situation. But most didn't go; they have a reps from Mission, Hope, or but I also did not want to call into the complained but didn't go. UCFV the Marshall Road Success Centre. office saying I wouldn't be in. I made arrangements to move people We could use a few more Faculty convinced myself that no one would from affected areas to non affected Stewards too, but, feel we're off to a believe the Cultus Lake roads were ones, but some didn't want to move. good start. as bad as they really were, and that A few had to be forced out. people would just think I was making The Stewards will be our front an excuse for another little holiday. As stupid as it seems for liners. We're hoping that members employees to insist on staying in an with complaints or concerns, who This conversation I was having area where others are getting sick, otherwise might be reluctant to come with myself was a repeat of one I or traveling to work on treacherous to the Union Executive directly, will have had many times over the years. roads when the employer does not feel more comfortable contacting one Whenever the road conditions are expect nor want them to, I do of the Stewards. The most important bad, but UCFV is not closed, I go understand their thinking. They do aspect of a Shop Stewards role is to through it. I absolutely hate having not want to be seen as taking support members by: listening, 8 January 1998 identifying the issues, referring Occupational Health solving our ongoing air quality complainants to the appropriate problems. people, and keeping conversations & Safety Committee confidential. Our Stewards will be Aside from the air quality handling disputes between members, Chair problems, if anyone has any and disputes or controversy between workplace concerns, please do not UCFV and FSA, at the informal hesitate to contact me or anyone else It was nice to have such a long stage (Articles 7.0 and 7.1 Grievance who represents you on the OH&S break over Christmas; I think we Procedure of the Collective Committee. all needed it. Agreement). Anything stepped up to a formal stage will be turned over to -Colleen Olund This is going to be a very short the Grievance Chairs. This does not report. I am sure everyone has mean that a Steward is expected to heard about the air quality problems handle a grievance at the informal we had in Abbotsford in early Identity Crisis stage if she/he is uncomfortable with December. So, attached you will it. At any time a Grievance Chair Revisited find the results of the air quality may be called in by the complainant, testing and report that was or by the Shop Steward. Also, if a grievance does go formal the Steward completed. This was posted in three The thoughtful pieces by Eric may still be involved by request of areas in B Building on the Davis, Moira Gutteridge and David either the complainant, as a support Abbotsford Campus, but Kim and I Morosan in the November issue of person, or the Grievance Chair, as a did promise to publish it in this Words & Vision have been on my reference. issue. Just bear in mind when you mind ever since I read them, and even read this report, the testing was not though there has been an intervening Your Shop Stewards are: done until a minimum of 24 hours issue of this newsletter with a after the initial incident and all the response from Gloria Wolfson, I Staff venting to the area was closed off. would like to submit my own thoughts. I would like to remind anyone Doug Rasmussen .... 447 7 Lynn Best .......... 4244 who was ill the first week of I was struck by the different Colleen Olund . . ..... 4524 December who has not already perspectives brought to the issues Mary Grace Grant .... 4272 reported it, to please do so. You under discussion. It's exciting and, I Lynda Town ........ 4477 can either call me at local 4524, e believe, a sign of a maturing Ellen Dixon ......... 4264 mail me, or just drop by the university college when an historian, Business Office. Gloria Borrows ...... 4282 a philosopher, a psychologist, and a Lenora Gaib ........ 4735 social worker can engage in an The issues surrounding the air animated discussion about where Faculty quality problem have not been we've come from and where we may 'swept under the carpet' and we will be headed as an educational Val McDonald ....... 4316 not allow them to be. There are institution. ongoing discussions to see what Robin Anderson ...... 4282 actually happened and how to Vicki Grieve ...... . . 2439 I'm a librarian by profession, and prevent it occurring in the future. I Wendy Burton ....... 2413 following my profession's will keep you updated on what Leslie Wood ........ 4284 commitment to (some might say transpires. fixation with) classifying knowledge Steward recruitment will be and making it accessible, I would like ongoing. If you are interested but As a point of interest, WCB has to address what I see as the two main new guidelines regarding air quality unable to volunteer at this time, keep points raised by Eric in his initial that come into effect on April 1, it in mind for the future. piece: a) the need for a change in 1998. Hopefully these will set culture leading to a system that some sort of standard to help us in -Bev Lowen emphasizes due process, and b) the 9 January 1998 definition of a university college, and response. The problem is that as we Where I agree that we have some more particularly, UCFV. grow and as new people come on way to go in the implementation of board, this system of personal due process is in the area of labour A) Due Process contact becomes unworkable, partly relations my area of because of the sheer volume of responsibility. When I was first With apologies for over- issues, partly because many people elected FSA President, I was struck simplifying subtle arguments on just do not feel comfortable by the number of times I was complex issues, I understood the operating in this kind of hallway approached by both management and major concern in Eric's initial piece chat manner, and mostly because members, and asked to make binding to be that despite the growth and this kind of informal and decisions on issues that I really knew change that have taken place in this undocumented system does not little about. Whereas I realize that institution · over the past years, stand up to any kind of objective at times it's absolutely appropriate business is conducted in an outdated test of fairness. for the union president to make a manner, with deals taking place decision or speak on behalf of the behind the scenes between the major In the 10 years that I've been membership as a whole without players, rather than out in the open, employed at UCFV, we've come a taking a vote., my feeling after being according to democratically agreed long way toward implementing in this position for 7 months is that upon and preferably written transparent procedures that anyone there is too much of an expectation procedures. can access. Whereas formerly the that problems can be solved with a instructional deans were the major quick conversation between a dean I've heard different colleagues players in determining which and the FSA President. Many of complain that they simply cannot programs received approval within these problems are ones that recur on understand how decisions are the institution and were then sent on a fairly regular basis, and the reached at UCFV. They feel as to Victoria for funding, we now absence of documentation means that though they are cut out of the loop, have bodies such as the University we are doomed to repeat both the and wonder how it is that some College Council and the Program problems, and the search for people who work here seem to have Planning and Priorities Committee solutions as well. their problems addressed quickly and that make those decisions, with their ideas actualized promptly, input from a broad cross-section of Recognizing this, Employee whereas their's just seem to be employees. Whereas it used to be Relations and the FSA will be unnoticed by their dean or the FSA. left largely to the discrimination of working this winter to try to Other colleagues express puzzlem~nt the dean as to how to react when document some of the practices that when anyone indicates that UCFV is there was a complaint against an have become, in fact, informal, anything but a wonderful place to employee, we now have policies in unwritten policies regarding a wide work, with terrific labour relations place such as the Harassment Policy variety of activities: RPT hirings, and a receptive management. These and the Student Complaint Policy SAC procedures, etc. David people sometimes bristle at the idea which allow both the complainant Morosan, Bev Lowen, Moira that there needs to be more of a and the respondent some assurance Gutteridge and Barry Bompas will be paper-oriented, bureaucratic that there is a process to be meeting to try to produce approach to doing business. followed. We still have work ahead documentation that may become part of us; policies and processes will oft he Collective Agreement or some In some ways I feel that I have continue to need time and creative other procedures manual. one foot in each of these camps. I energy from all os us. And it's know that our rather informal way of members of the FSA such as It's interesting that one of the dealing with problems has served at Virginia Cooke, Ian McAskill, great strengths of this institution - least some ofus well for many years, Elizabeth Asner and Linda our ability to work with management and that this is probably one of the Matwichuk, among many others, to create quick and effective major reasons why UCFV has who are largely to thank for the solutions to problems, rather than enjoyed a pleasant labour climate; we development of these more getting tied up in legalistic, can approach our deans or even our transparent processes. confrontational situations - is also president, and expect some kind of one of the weaknesses of the