publications series Monographs 2 Women’s Rights? W This volume explores the concept of Japanese reproductive rights o and liberties in light of recent developments in disability studies. m Masae Kato asks important questions about what constitutes per- e The Politics of Eugenic n sonhood and how, in the twenty-first century, we come to under- ’s stand eugenic abortion and other bioethical arguments. Tracing the R Abortion in Modern Japan origin and influence of the concept of a ‘right’, the author places the i g h term in local social and historical contexts in order to determine t s that it still carries overtones of Anglo-American philosophy, rather ? than universal truth. Digging deeply into Japanese debates on se- M a sa e K ato › lective abortion, Women’s Rights? The Politics of Eugenic Abortion M in Modern Japan discusses how this charged term can be both de- a Westernized and de-masculinized, especially in its appropriations by s a the Japanese women’s movement and disability scholars. In the heat e of bioethical argument, the significance of the concept of ‘right’ is K a gaining its weight. In the situation that accurate analysis of the con- t o cept is needed both by academic scholars, medical professionals and bioethicists, this book sheds a light on possible development of the notion of ‘right’. Masae Kato is research fellow in the Socio-Genetic Marginalisa- tion in Asia Programme (SMAP) at the International Institute for Asian Studies. She conducts research on socio-cultural factors that play a role in the reproductive decision-making process in Japan, which are compared to those from China and India in the context of SMAP. She is an assistant professor in gender studies at Leiden University, the Netherlands. isbn 978 90 5356 793 7 amsterdam university press www.aup.nl 9 789053 567937 amsterdam university press Kato_DEF.indd 1 11-2-2009 19:59:30 Women’s Rights? Publications Series SeriesEditors MaxSparreboomandPaulvanderVelde EditorialBoard Prasenjit Duara (University of Chicago) / Carol Gluck (Columbia University) / Christophe Jaffrelot (Centre d’E´tudes et de Recherches Internationales-Sciences- po) / Victor T. King (University of Hull) / Yuri Sadoi (Meijo University) / A.B. Shamsul (Institute of Occidental Studies / Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia) / HenkSchulteNordholt(RoyalNetherlands InstituteofSoutheastAsianandCar- ibbeanStudies)/WimBoot(LeidenUniversity) The IIAS Publications Series consists of Monographs and Edited Volumes. The aim of the Series is to promote Asia-Europe Studies. The Series includes com- parative researchon Europe andAsia andresults fromcooperationbetweenEur- opean and Asian scholars. The International Institute for Asian Studies stimu- lates scholarship on Asia and is instrumental in forging research networks amongAsiascholarsworldwide. TheInternationalInstituteforAsianStudies(IIAS)isapostdoctoralresearchcentre basedinLeidenandAmsterdam,theNetherlands.Itsmainobjectiveistoencou- rage theinterdisciplinary and comparativestudy ofAsiaand topromotenational andinternationalcooperationinthefield.Theinstitutefocusesonthehumanities andsocialsciencesand,whererelevant,ontheirinteractionwithothersciences. IIASactsasaninternationalmediator,bringingvariouspartiestogether,working as a clearinghouse of knowledge and information. This entails activities such as providinginformationservices,hostingacademicorganisationsdealingwithAsia constructing international networks, and setting up international cooperative projects and research programmes. In this way, IIAS functions as a window on Europefornon-Europeanscholarsandcontributestotheculturalrapprochement betweenAsiaandEurope. Forfurtherinformation,pleasevisitwww.iias.nl Women’s Rights? The Politics of Eugenic Abortion in Modern Japan Masae Kato Publications Series Monographs 2 Cover illustration:Eva Gjaltema Cover design:Maedium, Utrecht Layout: The DocWorkers,Almere ISBN 978 90 5356793 7 e-ISBN 978 90 4850143 4 NUR 741 /745 © IIAS /Amsterdam University Press, 2009 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright re- served above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or in- troduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owners and the authorof the book. To my Sensei To my Parents To my Sisters Contents Acknowledgments 11 Introduction 13 Problems ofrights:Theissue ofrights in an international context 15 The aims ofthisbook with regard to theconcept of‘rights’ 20 Relatedresearch 22 On target groups:Socialmovement organisations ofwomen, disabledpeople, and anti-abortion activists 28 On thestructure 32 1 Historical Background 35 Laws onabortion betweenthe Meiji periodand theend of theSecondWorld War 35 The Iehousehold systemand women’sposition during the Meiji period 36 Towards thegrowing militarism of the1930s 38 After theSecondWorld War 42 2 AbortionDebates in the1970s 59 The attempt to revise theEugenicProtection Law: The draft proposaland those behind it 59 Reactionof women to theproposed revisions to the Eugenic Protection Law 65 The encounter between themovements of women and disabledpeople 66 Disabledpeople’sarguments againsttheproposal 68 Insearch of movementrhetoric 70 Philosophicalcontribution of theWomen’sLiberation Movement 77 DebateinsidetheWomen’sLiberationMovement about theconcept ofan individual political ‘right’ 78 8 CONTENTS 3 On women’sselfishness and the right to abortion 85 Genealogyof theconcept ofrights 85 Politicalphilosophy in Japan before theconceptof‘rights’ was introduced 96 A rights analysis of theJapanese abortion debate during the1970s 106 Towards the1980s:The 1975 UN Women’sConference and thesolidarity of Japanesewomen 114 4 AbortionDebates in the1980s 117 The 1982 attemptto repealtheeconomicreasons clause and theanti-abortion argument 117 The reaction of the disabled people’smovement 131 Rights in the 1980s 138 5 Analysisof theDiscourse onthe ConceptofIndividual, Political Rights in the 1980s 141 On thefrequent useof theterm ‘right’in the 1980s 142 On adebateabout the Mizukobusinessand the usage of theterm ‘right’ in Japan 155 The 1980s in comparison with the1970s 158 Fromthe 1980sinto the1990s 159 6 The Debate on the Notion ofIndividual, Political Rights after theRepealof the Eugenic Protection Law 167 The main problem after theEugenicProtection Law: Reproductive technologies 167 Individual doctors and their perspectives onwomen’sright to self-determination 175 Reproductive technologies use women’sbodies 187 Whatcan be learnedfrom these debates? 192 7 Liberated Individuals? 195 The meaning ofthe ‘self’ with ‘women’srightto self-determination’ 195 Liberalism 198 On themeaningof ‘women’sright to self-determination’ as used by the women’smovement 201 ‘Who isthe self’ in women’srightto self-determination 215 CONTENTS 9 Conclusion Summary of theAnalysis andthe Future of theConcept of‘Rights’ 219 1970s:‘Women’srightto abortion’ is women’segoism 219 The 1980s: International arguments, new rhetoric,and anew phasein movements’ activities 231 The possibility ofenriching theconcept of‘rights’ 235 Appendix 1 Crimes of abortion (Chapter 29 ofthe Japanese PenalCode) 241 Appendix 2 The Eugenic Protection Law 243 Appendix 3 The Law to Protectthe Mother’sBody 257 Appendix 4 Ademand letter from Osaka Aoi shiba nokai to the Hyôgo Prefecture 261 Appendix 5 Aleaflet written and distributed by TANAKA Mitsu, on behalf ofthe Women’s Liberation Movement (Tokyo,1973) 263 Notes 269 Bibliography 313 Index 337
Description: