Women, Violence, and the “Arab Question” in Early Zionist Literature Andrea Siegel Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 Andrea Siegel All rights reserved ABSTRACT Women, Violence, and the “Arab Question” in Early Zionist Literature Andrea Siegel This dissertation examines the themes of rape and domestic violence in Zionist literature on the “Arab Question” published in Hebrew from the last years of Ottoman rule in Palestine through to the 1929 riots that erupted during the British Mandate. By bringing to light the import of rape and domestic violence in works by authors such as L.A. Arieli, Yehuda Burla, Aharon Reuveni, Yitzhak Shami, and Shoshana Shababo, I demonstrate that Zionist motions of race and gender developed in an intertwined manner as writers imagined the future of Jewish- Arab relations in Palestine. Moreover, while scholarly treatments of gender in the yishuv have thus far largely concentrated on questions of masculinity, I show how reading for masculinity and femininity together reveals Zionismʼs horror- stricken sexual underbelly; as authors do away with early fantasies of Jewish- Arab interweaving in an increasingly volatile political climate, they translate pogrom-associated fears of bodily violation from Russian and Eastern European settings into the Palestine arena. In novels, short stories, poetry, medical literature, and propaganda pamphlets Zionist intellectuals also urge reform of Jewish family life, sexual partnering, and hygiene education̶this, all the while that they mount a case against turning to the Arabs as a viable folk source and partner for the New Jew. Table of Contents Page List of Illustrations.................................................................................................. ii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................iii Introduction............................................................................................................1 PART ONE: ON RAPE: PUSHING PAST THE WOMAN Anti-Semitism, Vitalism, Nationalism...................................................................26 L.A. Arieliʼs Allah Karim! and Aharon Reuveniʼs Devastation..............................61 PART TWO: VIOLENT DOMESTICITY: WHAT DOES THE WAYWARD WOMAN WANT? Jews, Arabs, and Aggression as Internal Critique.............................................103 The Hebrew Heroine.........................................................................................157 PART THREE: FURTHER DIRECTIONS Order, Chaos, and the Sexualized “Spatiality of Fear” After 1929....................221 Works Cited.......................................................................................................280 ! "! List of Illustrations Page 1. Abel Pann, “Terror”..........................................................................................26 2. Abel Pann, “You are not going to die . . .: (Gen. 3:4)”.....................................61 3. Arnöld Bocklin, “The Isle of the Dead”...........................................................120 4. Meʼir Gur-Arie, “Poster for the Levant Fair”...................................................157 5. Avraham Melnikoff, “Jerusalem Effendi” .......................................................157 6. Zeʼev Raban, logo for Ha-sneh ....................................................................221 7. Na(cid:2779)um Gu(cid:2851)man,1 from A Journey to Health Land.........................................267 8. Na(cid:2779)um Gu(cid:2851)man, To Ishmaelʼs Grave, cover.................................................267 9. Na(cid:2779)um Gu(cid:2851)man, from Book of Strewn Light..................................................272 10. Na(cid:2779)um Gu(cid:2851)man, “Disarm!”..........................................................................274 11. Na(cid:2779)um Gu(cid:2851)man, “Our Fortresses”...............................................................274 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 Copyright for all illustrations by N. Gutman are owned by the Gutman family and used with permission through the Gutman Museum of Art in Tel Aviv. ! ""! Acknowledgements My graduate training, including the research for this dissertation, would not have been completed without the support of the Wexner Foundation, the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies at Columbia University, the Department of Middle East, South Asian, and African Cultures at Columbia University, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and the American-Jewish Joint Distribution Committee. I thank my advisor, Dan Miron, for inspiring me with his erudition ever since I was a young undergraduate student in his Introduction to Hebrew Culture class over fifteen years ago. I greatly appreciate his guidance and unflagging insistence on excellence. I could not ask for a better mentor in Nili Gold. Her brave conviction that the study of literature begins both with the text and with self-reflection will be with me always. I wish to thank, as well, the other members of my dissertation committee̶Hannan Hever, Wael Hallaq, and Uri Cohen̶for their thoughtful comments and generosity. David Fishelov of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has been both a professional sounding board and a personal friend ever since he lectured at Columbia University as a visiting scholar. Rachel Hallote, Director of the Jewish Studies Program at Purchase College SUNY, has welcomed me into the professorate and encouraged me as I have moved into the final phases of bringing the dissertation to completion. ! """! Phillip Hollander, who took me under his wing back in his doctoral candidacy days, provided a listening ear over many long hours in libraries both in the United States and in Israel. Among the cherished friends who have put up with my laments and musings over the past few years, I wish to single out for a hearty thanks Sara Zatz, Jai Kasturi, Wendy Amsellem, Faye Lederman, Avital Eliason, and Rachel Alexander. Lucette Benezra and Deni Koenhemsi have been my “home away from home” in Istanbul for the past two years; they opened their apartment and their hearts to me as I edited dissertation chapters in local coffee shops of Ulus. I am so fortunate to have them in my life. Finally, I thank my family. If only my mother, Karen Siegel z”l, could have lived to see me finish my Ph.D.! I dedicate this dissertation to her. My fatherʼs support for my doctoral studies, including the long nights of comprehensive exam preparation, has been crucial to the completion of this dissertation. He has modeled for me the goodness of the “life of the mind,” and I take his passion for teaching with me whenever I enter the classroom. Harriet Siegel, Joanna and Dan Seiden, Debbie Schechter (who read an earlier version of this manuscript) and Ellie Sigelman mean the world to me. I look forward to continuing to build our family together in years to come. ! "#! 1 Introduction Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Jewish anxieties about male-female partnerships, familial domesticity, and sexual vitality contour early Zionistsʼ writings on Jewish-Arab relations in Palestine. Key Hebrew authors in the years preceding and following the watershed Arab riots of 1929 soberly assessed regnant hopes for Jewish-Arab coexistence through stories that explore the often uncontrollable urge to use force̶upon oneʼs family member, neighbor, or oneself. In particular, the motif of violence against women (and those put in the position of ʻwomanʼ)1 perpetrated by both Jews and Arabs surfaces repeatedly in stories by writers such as L.A. Arieli, Aharon Reuveni, and Yehuda Burla. Zionist intellectuals probed, and intensified, their concerns about interethnic tensions in Palestine through tropes of rape and domestic violence. Joan Wallace Scott in her seminal essay “Gender: A Useful Category for Historical Analysis” makes the case that scholars of history must grapple with the ways that people create systems of social relations based upon their assumptions about differences between the sexes. Gender is at the heart of 1 The phrase is from Lynn Higgins and Brenda Silverʼs Rape and Representation (New York, 1991), 2. 2 how people inherit and rework symbols, choose frameworks via which to interpret those symbols, and develop political, familial, and literary spheres that supply those interpretive frameworks and dynamically evolve through them (1069). A fundamental inquiry of the present study, then, is how can gender (and, specifically, violence against women) be a useful category for historical analysis of Arab-Jewish conflicts at the dawn of Zionism? Moreover, do modern Hebrew writers supply gendered interpretive frameworks and rework specific tropes of womenʼs experiences in ways that consolidate or challenge visions for Arab-Jewish cooperation in Palestine? Such inquiries have not received sufficient attention in existing scholarship on the Arab Question in Zionism. The Arab Question in Zionism One of the central moral and social issues for Zionists, dating as far back as Ahad Ha-amʼs essay “Truth from the Land of Israel” (1891) and continuing to this very day, is what has become known as the “Arab Question” (ha-sheʼela ha- ʻaravit): the recognition that at the dawn of Zionist settlement efforts in Palestine the majority of the local population was not Jewish and had no desire for the 3 Jews to take control of the contested homeland.2 As the initial Jewish immigration waves (ʻaliyah, pl. ʻaliyot) to Palestine got underway (each of the first five major successive waves with its own character, 1881-1903, 1904-1914, 1918-1923, 1924-1926, 1932-1936), Zionists debated about Arab-Jewish relations on various fronts--including economics, labor, natural resources, demographics, immigration and the associated impacts on government structure, language, urban and rural planning, and security. Since its first appearance in Ahad Ha-amʼs essay and in ensuing milestones like Yitshak Epsteinʼs “A Hidden Question” (1905), the “Arab Question,” as its name indicates, is as much a matter for philosophers and observers of the human passions as it is a matter for social scientists, workersʼ rights activists, and urban planners. The notion of “accursed questions” (proklyatye voprosy) from nineteenth-century Russian intellectual history as explained so beautifully by Isaiah Berlin in his well known essay on Tolstoy, “The Hedgehog and the Fox,” applies as well to the prominence of “Questions” in Zionism: “those central moral and social issues of which every honest man, in 2 Zionist writers during the pre-state period differed in how they referred to Palestinian Arabs (“Arabs,” “Ishmaelites,” “non-Jews,” etc.). On the formation of Palestinian Arab identities, see Khalidi (New York,1997); on the earliest Arab and Turkish reactions to Zionism, see Mandel (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London,1980).
Description: