UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff SSaann DDiieeggoo DDiiggiittaall UUSSDD Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2015-5 WWoommeenn EExxppeerriieenncciinngg AAggggrreessssiioonn FFrroomm WWoommeenn:: AA MMiixxeedd MMeetthhooddss SSttuuddyy ooff HHooww WWoommeenn EExxppeerriieennccee AAggggrreessssiioonn,, HHooww iitt IImmppaaccttss LLeeaaddeerr EEffifficcaaccyy,, aanndd HHooww TThheeyy NNaavviiggaattee TThhrroouugghh iitt Karen Kitchen Briggs University of San Diego Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/dissertations DDiiggiittaall UUSSDD CCiittaattiioonn Briggs, Karen Kitchen, "Women Experiencing Aggression From Women: A Mixed Methods Study of How Women Experience Aggression, How it Impacts Leader Efficacy, and How They Navigate Through it" (2015). Dissertations. 9. https://digital.sandiego.edu/dissertations/9 This Dissertation: Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Digital USD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital USD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WOMEN EXPERIENCING AGGRESSION FROM WOMEN: A MIXED METHODS STUDY OF HOW WOMEN EXPERIENCE AGGRESSION, HOW IT IMPACTS LEADER EFFICACY, AND HOW THEY NA VI GATE THROUGH IT by KAREN KITCHEN BRIGGS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May2015 Dissertation Committee Fred J. Galloway, Ed.D., Chair Lea Hubbard, Ph.D., Member Robin McCoy, Ph.D., Member University of San Diego © Copyright by Karen Kitchen Briggs All Rights Reserved 2015 ABSTRACT Despite advancements in education and hiring practices, women are still underrepresented in leadership roles. Contributing to this challenge is the conflict between communal expectations for women and agentic expectations for leaders which can cause some women to doubt their leadership capabilities. While encouragement from women can build leadership confidence, aggression can weaken it. This convergent parallel mixed methods study explored the prevalence of female aggression among women leaders, the effect on leader efficacy, and response strategies. Women deans at doctoral granting universities were invited to complete an online survey that included the Negative Acts Questionnaire to assess aggression prevalence, the Generalized Leader Efficacy Questionnaire to measure leader efficacy, and a survey from the bullying literature to assess participant responses. Flanagan's (1954) Critical Incident Technique allowed participants to elaborate on responses with open-ended questions. Of the 635 women deans invited, 306 (48.2%) participated. Results showed that 68% of respondents experienced aggression from women. Closer analysis revealed law deans were more likely to report aggression experiences while applied science/business deans were less likely. Furthermore, nursing deans and women who identified as LGBTQ reported more frequent aggression than others. Greater levels of aggression were also reported when the aggressor was in a higher position or had the same experience level as the respondent. Findings include the most common forms of aggression and three theoretical constructs for what respondents believed contributed to the behavior. While leader efficacy was negatively affected at the time of the experience, no statistical difference was found in current leader efficacy between women who experienced aggression and women who did not. Many women who experienced aggression, however, felt it ultimately increased their confidence. Additional analysis revealed age had a mitigating effect on leader efficacy and that African American women reported higher leader efficacy scores than women of other races. The most frequent response strategies included internal responses, engaging others, confronting the aggressor, or leaving the position. Results from this study provide insight for how aggression may affect women leaders. Understanding how women experience and navigate through this could help individuals and organizational leaders better respond when impacted by this behavior. DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to women pursuing leadership roles. May the stories shared by the women who participated in this study help you throughout your journey. Challenge yourself to be patient with women who struggle with your leadership, remain committed to your ethics, and take care of yourself along the way. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The process of earning a doctoral degree is a journey of both exciting discoveries and exhausting effort. This journey would have been a lot more difficult-and a lot less fun-if it were not for an extraordinary support system. I am incredibly thankful for the people who have encouraged and supported me over the years. First, I would like to thank my committee who have both challenged and encouraged me throughout the dissertation process. Dr. Fred Galloway has been an advocate from the first day I met him, throughout my coursework, and in conducting this research. I have never had a professor who was so committed to his students' success and I am thankful to have gotten to work with him over the past five years. Dr. Lea Hubbard helped shape me into a qualitative researcher and her persistent encouragement to "synthesize, synthesize, synthesize" truly strengthened this dissertation. Dr. Robin McCoy's support and optimism has kept me going through this process and has meant more than she can possibly know. When thinking about this program in its entirety, I also want to thank the other members of our cohort and all of the SOLES faculty and administration whose support and encouragement have made this process exciting and fun. I especially want to thank Dr. Nicki Schuessler whose friendship has been one of the greatest gifts of this program. This research would not be possible without the participation of 306 women deans throughout the United States. I know their roles require a tremendous amount of time and energy and I appreciate them taking the time to contribute to this important work. I also want to thank the women I have worked with who have supported me throughout my career and who have been wonderful role models for how women can Vll advocate for each other, with special acknowledgement to Cyndy Miles, Denise Pandza, Nenit Wills, Maya Omar, and members of the USD Crew. To the many mentors throughout my career, especially Dr. Sandra Tracey, Ms. Calista Davis, Dr. Gregory Pogue, and Dr. David Blake, I am so thankful that you believed in me even in moments when I questioned myself. On a personal note, I also want to thank my family-my father, David, for being my confidante and compass when facing the challenges of leadership roles; my mother, Wendy, for modeling kindness, sincerity, and strength through her own leadership; and my sisters, Amy and Christine, for showing me how supportive women can truly be toward each other. I want to thank my in-laws, Peter and Marilynn, for encouraging me throughout this academic program as if they were my own parents-I feel so fortunate to be a part of the Briggs family. I also want to thank my son, Cameron, for helping me to keep things in perspective and for making me see what really matters in life. Finally, and most importantly, I want to express my immense gratitude for my husband, Jeremy, for his love, patience, and commitment throughout this journey. We have experienced a lot together over the past five years. To have a husband who has been a true partner and who has supported this process through encouragement, sacrifice of time together, and love has made me adore him even more than I did before my first class. Thank you for believing in me. vm TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION ............................................................................................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................. xviii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. xxii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...................................1 Statement of the Problem ..............................................................................................6 Purpose of the Study .....................................................................................................8 Working Definition ofLeadership ................................................................................9 Research Questions ..................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ............................................. 11 Self-Efficacy, Women and Leadership ....................................................................... 12 Self-Efficacy........................................................................................................ 12 Self-Efficacy and Women ................................................................................... 16 Self-Efficacy and Leadership ..............................................................................21 Leadership and Women .......................................................................................27 Sex role expectations ....................................................................................27 Role expectations for leaders .......................................................................30 Likability versus competence .......................................................................32 Self-Efficacy, Women, and Leadership ...............................................................37 Summary..............................................................................................................41 IX Competition among Women ...................................................................................... .42 Why Women Compete ....................................................................................... .43 Social identity theory .................................................................................. .43 Hostility from the top: Competition theory and Queen Bees ..................... .45 Hostility from below .................................................................................... 50 How Women Compete ........................................................................................ 51 Effects of Indirect Aggression ............................................................................. 57 Summary.............................................................................................................. 59 The Unique Environment of Higher Education .......................................................... 59 The Academic Environment ................................................................................61 Historical development of higher education culture ....................................61 Academic freedom, tenure, and civil discourse ...........................................63 Key structures and processes that support aggression .................................65 Bullying Behavior in Higher Education ..............................................................69 Prevalence in higher education .....................................................................70 Targets and actors .........................................................................................71 Responses.....................................................................................................72 Bullying and Women in Higher Education .........................................................74 Summary..............................................................................................................77 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY ..................................................................78 Purpose of the Study ...................................................................................................78 Research Design - A Mixed Methods Approach .......................................................79 Participant Selection ............................................................................................79 x
Description: