WITTGENSTEIN ON PHILOSOPHY, OBJECTIVITY, AND MEANING Thisvolumeofnewessayspresentsgroundbreakinginterpretationsof some of the most central themes of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. A distinguished group of contributors demonstrates how Wittgenstein’s thought can fruitfully be applied to contemporary debates in epistemology, metaphilosophy, and philosophy of lan- guage. The volume combines historical and systematic approaches to Wittgensteinianmethods and perspectives,with essays providing detailed analysis that will be accessible to students as well as specia- lists. The result is a rich and illuminating picture of a key figure in twentieth-centuryphilosophyandhiscontinuingimportancetophi- losophicalstudy. james conant is Chester D. Tripp Professor of Humanities and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, as well as Humboldt Professor at the University of Leipzig. He has published widely on topics including philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, aesthetics, German idealism, and history of analytic philosophy. sebastian sunday is Lecturerin Philosophy at the University of Oxford. His research covers a range of philosophical areas, with afocusonlogicandepistemology. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:44:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:44:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 WITTGENSTEIN ON PHILOSOPHY, OBJECTIVITY, AND MEANING edited by JAMES CONANT UniversityofChicago SEBASTIAN SUNDAY UniversityofOxford Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:44:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 UniversityPrintingHouse,Cambridgecb28bs,UnitedKingdom OneLibertyPlaza,20thFloor,NewYork,ny10006,USA 477WilliamstownRoad,PortMelbourne,vic3207,Australia 314–321,3rdFloor,Plot3,SplendorForum,JasolaDistrictCentre, NewDelhi–110025,India 79AnsonRoad,#06–04/06,Singapore079906 CambridgeUniversityPressispartoftheUniversityofCambridge. ItfurtherstheUniversity’smissionbydisseminatingknowledgeinthepursuitof education,learning,andresearchatthehighestinternationallevelsofexcellence. www.cambridge.org Informationonthistitle:www.cambridge.org/9781107194151 doi:10.1017/9781108151764 ©CambridgeUniversityPress2019 Thispublicationisincopyright.Subjecttostatutoryexception andtotheprovisionsofrelevantcollectivelicensingagreements, noreproductionofanypartmaytakeplacewithoutthewritten permissionofCambridgeUniversityPress. Firstpublished2019 PrintedintheUnitedKingdombyTJInternationalLtd,PadstowCornwall AcataloguerecordforthispublicationisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary. LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData names:Conant,James,editor. title:Wittgensteinonphilosophy,objectivity,andmeaning/editedbyJamesConant, UniversityofChicago,SebastianSunday,UniversityofOxford. description:NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress,2019.|Includesbibliographical referencesandindex. identifiers:lccn2019008053|isbn9781107194151(alk.paper) subjects:lcsh:Wittgenstein,Ludwig,1889–1951. classification:lccb3376.w564w57952019|ddc192–dc23 LCrecordavailableathttps://lccn.loc.gov/2019008053 isbn978-1-107-19415-1Hardback CambridgeUniversityPresshasnoresponsibilityforthepersistenceoraccuracyof URLsforexternalorthird-partyinternetwebsitesreferredtointhispublication anddoesnotguaranteethatanycontentonsuchwebsitesis,orwillremain, accurateorappropriate. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:44:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 Contents ListofContributors pagevii Preface ix Acknowledgments xii 1 AnatomyofaMuddle:WittgensteinandPhilosophy 1 AlexanderGeorge 2 ExplainingWhatWeMean 28 JuliaTanney 3 Objectivity 47 AliceCrary 4 TheMethodologicalSignificanceofIntuitionsinPhilosophy 62 OskariKuusela 5 Wittgensteinon‘SeeingMeanings’ 84 KatherineJ.Morris 6 BringingthePhenomenalWorldintoView 100 AvnerBaz 7 FirstStepsandConceptualCreativity 119 MichaelBeaney 8 WittgensteinandAnalyticRevisionism 143 MartinGustafsson 9 DemystifyingMeaninginHorwichandWittgenstein 164 SilverBronzo 10 WhatIsMeaning?AWittgensteinianAnswertoan Un-WittgensteinianQuestion 185 Hans-JohannGlock v Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:46:54, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 vi Contents 11 Meaning,Use,andSupervenience 211 WilliamChild 12 SomeSocraticAspectsofWittgenstein’s ConceptionofPhilosophy 231 JamesConant References 265 Index 280 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:46:54, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 Contributors avner baz,TuftsUniversity michael beaney,HumboldtUniversityandKing’sCollegeLondon silverbronzo,NationalResearchUniversityHigherSchoolofEconomics william child,UniversityofOxford james conant,UniversityofChicagoandLeipzigUniversity alice crary,UniversityofOxford alexander george,AmherstCollege hans-johann glock,UniversityofZurich martin gustafsson,ÅboAkademiUniversity oskari kuusela,UniversityofEastAnglia katherine j. morris,UniversityofOxford sebastian sunday,UniversityofOxford julia tanney,independentscholar vii Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:47:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:47:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764 Preface Wittgenstein’s famous example, in the opening section of the Investigations,ofthetransactionbetweenashopkeeperandsomeone who has been sent shopping with a slip of paper marked “five red apples” is followedbythisequallywell-knowndialogue: —Itisinthisandsimilarwaysthatoneoperateswithwords.–“Buthow doeshe[theshopkeeper] knowwhere and how heisto look up the word ‘red’andwhatheistodowiththeword‘five’?”–Well,Iassumethatheacts asIhavedescribed.Explanationscometoanendsomewhere.–Butwhatis themeaningoftheword“five”?–Nosuchthingwasinquestionhere,only howtheword“five”isused.(PI§1) Thus ends the opening section. This dialogue will be as intelligible, or unintelligible,toanotherwiseintelligentreaderastheshopkeeperexample itself and the discussion of a quotation from Augustine which precede it. Mostreadersarelikelytohavemanyquestionsatthispoint.Isittruethat one operates with words in the same way (or similar ways) as the shop- keeper? Why does Wittgenstein say “explanations come to an end some- where,”beforehehasevenbeguntogiveanyexplanationatall? On the other hand, if a reader knows the later philosophy of Wittgenstein well, they might recognize in this brief passage several key elementsofit,includingWittgenstein’sconceptionsofmeaningasuse;of rule-followingasapractice;ofaphilosophicalproblemasbeingoftheform “Idon’tknowmywayabout”;hisnotionofalanguage-gameasanobject of comparison; and his emphasis on description over explanation in philosophy. It is noteworthy that Wittgenstein’s description of the shopkeeper exampledoesindeedgivenothingbutdescriptionsasopposedtoexplana- tions.Inthesubsequentdialogue,quotedabove,Wittgensteinunderlines this feature of the example: first, by adding the qualification that “it is in this and similar ways that one operates with words”; and, second, by ix Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Oxford Union Society, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:48:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764.001 x Preface refusing to give explanations in his responses to the interlocutor’s questions (“Well, I assume that he acts as I have described”), and even adding—somewhat preposterously—that “explanations come to an end somewhere.” This latter statement (“Explanations come to an end somewhere”) is perhaps the clearest indication, in this short dialogue, of the kind of interest that Wittgenstein takes in the interlocutor’s two questions (“But howdoesheknowwhereandhowheistolookuptheword‘red’andwhat he is to do with the word ‘five’?”; “But what is the meaning of the word ‘five’?”). Wittgenstein responds to these questions, which are apparently innocent,asiftheyembodiedsomekindofobjectionablephilosophy.This isafeaturethatthesequestionsandWittgenstein’sresponsestothemhave incommonwiththeearlierquotationfromAugustineandWittgenstein’s response to it. In both cases, Wittgenstein appears to think that there is importantphilosophicalworktobedone,although(or,perhaps,because) therelevanttypeofproblemislesswelldefinedthanaparticularphiloso- phicalviewortheory;thetypeofproblemthatWittgensteinisinterestedin appearstolieatasomehowdeeperormoregenerallevel. TheopeningsectionoftheInvestigationsisanutshell,inmanyways.It presentsvariouselementsofWittgenstein’sphilosophyinanutshell.And, like Wittgenstein’s philosophy as a whole, it too is a hard nut to crack. Given this relative inaccessibility of Wittgenstein’s philosophy, it is per- hapsnotsurprisingthat,nowadays,Wittgensteinscholarship—thatis,the historical study of the philosopher and his philosophy—continues to thrive, while Wittgensteinian philosophy—that is, both Wittgenstein’s philosophy itself and philosophy practiced in the same manner—is increasingly perceived by many philosophers as being, at best, at the periphery of current concerns and debates. Wittgenstein’s influence on theanalytictraditionwasparticularlystrong,butanalyticphilosophersare evidently finding it increasingly difficult to see the relevance of much of Wittgenstein’s work for contemporary analytic philosophy. This volume strivestorepairthisrecentdisconnectionoftheanalytictraditionfromone ofitsfoundingfiguresbyanalyzingWittgensteinianmethodsandpointsof view both from an exegetical perspective and with a view to the contem- porary significance of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. For this purpose, we decided that it would be best to give our contributors the freedom to treat their subjects with varying degrees of exegetical detail. Since the volume seeks to both interpret and apply Wittgenstein’s philosophy, it seemedtousthatmorefree-spiritedvariationsonitshouldbepermitted, orindeedencouraged. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Oxford Union Society, on 09 Jun 2020 at 08:48:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764.001