Why I Am Not A Moslem

50 Pages·2002·0.92 MB·English

by  Dr. Peter S. Ruckman

WHY I AM NOT
A MOSLEM
Other Materials Available
By Dr. Peter S. Ruckman:
* Bible Believer’s Commentary Series
* Beginning and Advanced Bible Study Material
* In-Depth Apologetics
* Numerous Pamphlets of Selected Topics
* Variety of Gospel Tracts
* Audio Cassettes
* Video Cassettes
Also Available:
* AV 1611 Bibles
* Study Helps
* Concordances
* Biographies
* Evangelism Material
* Material by Other Authors and Speakers
For FREE Current Catalog write:
BB BOOKSTORE
P.O. Box 7135 Pensacola, FL 32534
W h y
I A m N o t a
M o s l e m
BY
PETER S. RUCKMAN
B.A., B.D., M.A., Th.M., Ph.D.
BB BOOKSTORE
P.O. Box 7135 Pensacola, FL 32534
Dedication
To every American citizen (saved or
lost, male or female, Black, Brown, or
White) who is more interested in finding
the truth (John 14:6,8:43-47) than “making
friends and influencing people” by a
“purpose driven” life based on “possibility
thinking.”
Introduction
The fastest growing religion in the world to­
day is supposed to be “Islam”; that is, if you judge
it by the number of mosques being put up by the
millionaire Arabs in America, Europe, and England
and by the decrease of Protestants and Catholics
due to their rejection the Holy Bible. The Catho­
lics first rejected it back in A.D. 325. Nearly all
the Protestants rejected it after World War II, and
many of them before that about the time of the
Civil War.
The world’s fastest growing religion, due to
Arabic millionaires, buildings, and stupid Ameri­
cans who can’t read (especially College people), is
due to a number of facts that are not often men­
tioned. In the first place, any Mohammedan is al­
lowed four wives, if he wants them, plus slave
girls (we will get into that later). Naturally, no
Mohammedan trying to hide under false cover and
work his way into the American or European sys­
tems is going to be bold enough to practice the
latter (although they do practice polygamy in sev­
eral European countries). These days, they take
over countries about the same way the Catholic
Church took over the Philippines and South and
Central America between 1600 and 1800. You come
in with a pious religion, gradually, and then work
into the government structure until you control the
governments. We call these governments Church-
States.
As the fastest growing religion, Moham­
medanism has tremendous appeal to fornicating
killers like Cain, who killed his brother “because
his own works were evil, and his brother’s righ­
teous” (1 John 3:12).
There are no terrorists in orthodox “Islam.”
They recognize no such word. The press may call
somebody that, but it doesn’t mean anything. Your
modern “Moslem” terrorist is a hero, and if he is
killed, he is a martyr. If you don’t believe it, ask
any genuine “Moslem” in the Middle East. Don’t
ask one over here; they’ll lie like a dog. They have
to lie until they get control, at least that is how it
always has been.
Now, if you like to kill people that disagree
with you (and that is one of the characteristics of
the old Adamic nature), Mohammedanism is an
excellent religion. You can invent any alibi. As a
matter of fact, the history of “Islam” is Moslems
killing each other for centuries because they dis­
agreed in theological or political points, while at
the same time, claiming that their opponents went
to Hell because they were disobeying Allah. Both
sides claimed they were killing the other for the
glory of Allah.
That is what happened in the Crusades (A.D.
1100-1270). You had Roman Catholics killing Mos­
lems for the glory of Mary, and you had Moslems
killing Catholics for the glory of Mohammed and
Allah. Jesus Christ warned His disciples about this
in the New Testament (John 16:1-4) more than
500 years before Mohammed was born.
In a system where you can fornicate with a
number of women at the same time, legally (like
the sex perverts who want to have legal marriages
to fornicate), and at the same time kill anybody
who makes fun of your religion, then you’ve got a
very convenient excuse for any hot-tempered,
fleshy, stupid, demon-possessed killer. It’s a nice
setup. The fact that all Mohammedans are mono­
theists—their continual theme upon which they harp
day and night—doesn't really mean anything when
one considers the people who murdered God’s Son
were monotheists (Deut. 6:4). Sometimes you for­
get that the unsaved Jews, like the Mohammadeans,
were also pork abstainers, that they also prayed a
number of times during the day, and they had strict
rules and regulations about rituals. Monotheists kill
each other in the name of their God (1 Sam. 5:1-
2). At least that is the judgment of history (1 Sam.
17:45-48).
In this little discussion, I am telling you why I
am not a Mohammedan—the real name for all
“Moslems.” Nobody has to agree with it; nobody
has to go along with it. This is my testimony. I am
simply telling you why I am not a “Moslem.”
It certainly isn’t because of ignorance. I’ve
been through that Koran about seventeen times,
and I have five different versions in my house,
with three of them in Arabic. I get my other mate­
rial from Lahore, the official publishing company
for all Islamic material. If I disagree with you and
you disagree with me, it’s not because I haven’t
studied what you studied (and probably more). I
understand that there are different editions of the
Holy Hadith and how they originated and how they
were edited in order to get the best one: Bukhari’s.
I’ve been an ardent student of “Islam” for many,
many years.
I also was taught to read when I was young,
so I don’t have to plead illiteracy, like Moham­
med. He said that he dictated a book that was dic­
tated to him because he couldn’t have read it if it
had been shown to him. At least that is what most
of the Arab Imams say. They say he was illiterate.
One: no Mohammedan could prophesy any­
thing historical because there are no prophecies in
the Koran, except those taken out of the Old Tes­
tament. Mohammed, as a “prophet,” was a ridicu­
lous joke. He was called that by his followers. But
neither Allah nor Mohammed could tell you about
anything, in detail, that took place in history after
Mohammed died (A.D. 632). Everything either of
them said comes from the Old Testament, except
the non-historical passages which deal with the
White Throne Judgment—the Last Day—which
takes place after time is over (notice Rev. 20:11-
15).
Two: after all the hot air about the “Shahadah”
and “Ramadan” and “Mecca” and “doing good”
and “no compulsion in religion,” these poor, igno­
rant Mohammedans do not get any assurance about
salvation from their founder, their “prophet,” their
leaders, their teachers, or their “god.” I have met,
in my time, thousands of people who knew where
they were going when they died and could pro­
duce it in writing and could give you the name of
the Author who wrote the writing. No author’s
name is found anywhere in the Koran. Not one
writer who wrote any part of it dared put his name
on paper, so it doesn’t appear. No Moslem has
assurance of salvation of eternal life when he dies.
He is promised a chance to fornicate with several
dozen virgins if he makes it to Paradise— by works.
But not even Mohammed claimed to know where