ebook img

Why Do We Feel Sick When Infected—Can Altruism Play a Role? PDF

15 Pages·2015·1.81 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Why Do We Feel Sick When Infected—Can Altruism Play a Role?

UNSOLVEDMYSTERY Why Do We Feel Sick When Infected—Can Altruism Play a Role? KerenShakhar1,GuyShakhar2* 1 DepartmentofPsychology,CollegeofManagementAcademicStudies,RishonLeZion,Israel, 2 DepartmentofImmunology,WeizmannInstituteofScience,Rehovot,Israel *[email protected] Abstract Whenwecontractaninfection,wetypicallyfeelsickandbehaveaccordingly.Symptomsof sicknessbehavior(SB)includeanorexia,hypersomnia,depression,andreducedsocial interactions.SBaffectsspeciesspanningfromarthropodstovertebrates,istriggerednon- specificallybyviruses,bacteria,andparasites,andisorchestratedbyacomplexnetworkof cytokinesandneuroendocrinepathways;clearly,ithasbeennaturallyselected.Nonethe- less,SBseemsevolutionarilycostly:itpromotesstarvationandpredationandreduces reproductiveopportunities.HowcouldSBpersist?Formerexplanationsfocusedonindivid- ualfitness,invokingimprovedresistancetopathogens.Couldpreventionofdiseasetrans- mission,propagatinginpopulationsthroughkinselection,alsocontributetoSB? OPENACCESS SicknessSyndromeandSicknessBehavior Citation:ShakharK,ShakharG(2015)WhyDoWe FeelSickWhenInfected—CanAltruismPlayaRole? Sicknesssyndromeisthegeneralizedresponseofthehosttoinfections.Itsclassicalphysiologi- PLoSBiol13(10):e1002276.doi:10.1371/journal. calsignsincludefeverandanemia,butitalsoincludespsychologicalsymptoms—collectively pbio.1002276 termed“sicknessbehavior”(SB)[1–3].Thesesymptoms,familiartoanyonewhohasbeensick, Published:October16,2015 includefatigue,depression,irritability,discomfort,pain,nausea,andlossofinterestinfood, Copyright:©2015Shakhar,Shakhar.Thisisan drink,socialinteractions,andsex.Inanimals,suchchangescanbequantifiedbasedonbehav- openaccessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe iorandreflectreprioritizationofmotivationsduringdisease[2]. CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermits Acommonmisconceptionisthatpathogensdirectlyproducethesebehavioralsymptoms, unrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninany butinfactSBisorchestratedbythehost’simmuneandneuroendocrinesystems;mammals medium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourceare haveevolvedseveralparallelpathwaystoalertthebrainofinflammationandtriggersymptom- credited. aticbehaviors(Fig1)[4,5]. Funding:Theauthorsreceivednospecificfunding Althoughthespecificitiesmayvary,SBiswidespreadwithrespecttobothpathogensand forthiswork. hosts:diversepathogens,includingviruses,bacteria,andprotozoa[1],cantriggerit,andequiv- CompetingInterests:Theauthorshavedeclared alentbehavioralresponsescharacterizeseveralvertebrateclasses[1,2,7]aswellasarthropods thatnocompetinginterestsexist. [8,9].However,whencloselyexamined,somegeneraexhibitsignificantvariationintheextent Abbreviations:CCD,collapsedcolonydisease; ofSB[10],whichtodateremainsunexplained. COX,cyclooxygenase;DC,dendriticcell;ESS, evolutionarilystablestrategy;IL,interleukin;LPS, lipopolysaccharide;NLR,NOD-likereceptor;NTS, TheMystery—WhyDoWeFeelSick? nucleusofthesolitarytract;SARS,severeacute SinceSBisaconservedphenomenonthatismediatedbycompleximmunologicalandneuro- respiratorysyndrome;SB,sicknessbehavior;TLR, toll-likereceptor;TNF-α,tumornecrosisfactoralpha. endocrinepathways,itclearlymusthaveevolutionarybenefits.Still,inthelast25years,much PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 1/15 Fig1.Informationregardinginflammationiscommunicatedtothebrainthroughparallelneuraland circulatoryroutes[4,5].Leukocytes,suchasdendriticcells(DCs)andmacrophages,sensemicrobes throughpathogen-recognitionreceptorssuchastoll-likereceptors(TLRs)andNOD-likereceptors(NLRs) andthenreleaseinflammatorycytokinessuchasinterleukin–1beta(IL–1β),IL–6,andtumornecrosisfactor alpha(TNF-α).Intheneuralroute,cytokinestriggeractivityinvagalafferentsthatinnervatenucleiinthebrain stemsuchatthenucleusofthesolitarytract(NTS).Theseinturnrelaythesignaltovariousnucleiinthe hypothalamus,thalamus,andamygdala[4].Inthecirculatoryroute,microbialligandsandcytokinestravel throughthebloodtoreachthemeninges,choroidplexus,andcircumventricularorgans(pink)wheretheycan enterthebrain.Morerecentdataindicatethatsuchligandscanalsoactivatetheepitheliuminareaswithan intactblood–brainbarrier,causingittosynthetizevariousprostaglandinsandreleasethemintonuclei involvedinspecificbehaviors[6]. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276.g001 PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 2/15 efforthasbeendirectedatunderstandingtheproximatereasonsforSB[3],butitsultimatecau- sation—thereasonsSBhasevolvedinthefirstplace—attractedrelativelylittleattention. Unlikephysiologicalsymptomsofsickness,suchasfeverandhypoferremia,whichlikely boostresistancetopathogens(Box1),behavioralsymptomsremainpoorlyexplained.Clearly, allofthesesymptomsimposesignificantcoststohostfitness(Fig2)[11,12].Anorexiaand adipsiaincreasetheriskofstarvation,lossofessentialnutrients,anddehydration,particularly inthecontextoffever.Lethargycanleadtopredationbyslowingdownpreyandsinglingitout forpredators[13,14].Socialdisinterestdecreasesparentalcare[15,16],limitsmatingopportu- nities[17],and,togetherwithfatigue,canleadtolossofterritoryandsocialstatus[7,18].For SBtoevolve,thesecostsmustbeoffsetbybenefits—whatcanthesebenefitsbe? Box1.FeverandHypoferremia:PhysiologicalManifestationsof SicknessSyndrome Physiologicalresponsestosicknessareinitiatedbytheimmunesystemandpropagated mainlybythebrainandliver.Manyofthesearebelievedtobenefithostresistancetoinfec- tions,andtwo,feverandanemia,havebeenlinkedtoSB[1]. Feveriswidelybelievedtoimprovesurvivalfollowinginfection[19,20]bydirectly inhibitingthegrowthofvariouspathogensandbyenhancingimmunefunction(e.g.,bac- terialclearance,Tcellproliferation,andneutrophilactivation)[21].Thebenefitsofhyper- thermiahasbeenmostconvincinglydemonstratedinectodermssuchasreptilesandfish, inwhichdeliberateexposuretohigherenvironmentaltemperaturesimprovedsurvival [19].Correspondingly,inrabbits,mice,andchicks,antipyreticdrugsrepeatedlyincreased mortalityratesfrombacterial[22]andviral[23]infections.Theevidenceinhumansisless conclusive,aslarge-scaleblindedtrialshavenotbeenperformed[24,25].Nonetheless,sev- eralsmallrandomizedtrialshavereportedthatantipyrogenicagentsdelayedrecovery frominfectionssuchasmalaria[26–28]andchickenpox[29].Consequently,ithasbeen estimatedthatroutinelytreatinginfluenzapatientswithantipyreticscausesatleast700 extradeathsannuallyintheUnitedStatesalone[20]. Anotherphysiologicalcomponentofsicknesssyndromeisanemia,whichisabyproduct of“hypoferremiaofinfection.”Hypoferremiaisawell-regulatedprocessintendedto deprivepathogensoftheironessentialfortheirgrowth[30,31].Itaffectsseveralclassesof pathogens,includingmanybacteria,someviruses,andseveralprotozoa.Freelyavailable ironcandiminishnormalresistancetobacteriainseveraldiseases,andironoverload increasedinfectionratesofpathogenssuchastuberculosis,malaria,andbrucellosis[31,32] Infectionelicitshypoferremiaaspartofthehepaticacutephaseresponse[31].Inflamma- torycytokinessuchasIL–6,IL–22,andtype-Iinterferonstriggertheproductionofthepep- tidehormonehepcidinintheliver.Hepcidinthenbindsandinternalizestheironexporter proteinferroportin.Asaresult,macrophagestraptheironrecycledfromerythrocytes,and enterocytesstoptransferringdietaryirontothecirculation,rapidlyreducingplasmairon. CanSBImproveHostResistance? TheconceptthatSBisacoordinatedandadaptiveresponsetoinfectionshasbeenestablished sincethemid-1980s.Severalcomprehensivereviewshavecoveredthehistoricaldevelopment ofthisconceptandconsideredvarioushypothesesregardingtheadaptiveroleofSB[2– 4,14,33]. EarlyfindingssuggestingthatSBdirectlybenefitsthehostexaminedanorexia.Inawell- controlledstudyfrom1979,MurrayandMurrayinfectedmicewithListeriamonocytogensand PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 3/15 Fig2.ThecostsofSBtodirectfitness.Behavioral(pink)andphysiological(green)symptomsofSBcan,eitherdirectlyorindirectly,leadtomaladaptive consequences(orange)thatreduceindividualfitness. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276.g002 PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 4/15 force-fedthemtocompensatefortheresultantanorexia[34].Thetreatedmicesuccumbedto theinfectionathighrates.Unliketheadaptiveeffectsoffever,thisremainedalargelyisolated study,andcontestingtheoriesstilldebatewhetheranorexiaboostsresistancetopathogensand howitmightdoso[35].Suggestionsincludeddeliberaterestrictionofnutritionalelements, avoidingpotentiallycontaminatedfood,andadecreaseinriskyforagingwhileweak[35]. Newlyestablishedrouteslinkingnutrition,intestinalmicrobiota,andimmunity[36]cannow alsobeconsidered. In1988,aseminalpaperbyBenjaminL.HartwasthefirsttosuggestthatSBinitsentirety isacoordinatedresponsebenefittingthehost[1].Realizingthatfeverandhypoferremia directlypromotehostdefense(Box1),HartsuggestedthatSBisprimarilyintendedtoserve thesephysiologicaladaptations.Specifically,heproposedthatSBevolvedtoconserveenergy neededtosustainmetabolicallydemandingfever.Thus,immobility,lethargy,andreduced motivationtoobtainfoodanddrinkcouldhavedevelopedtominimizemuscleworkandexpo- suretothecold.Anorexia,ontheotherhand,wouldpromotehypoferremiabyreducingiron intake.Otherbehaviorswereviewedassubordinatetotheprimaryonesthatconserveenergy andreduceiron.Reducedgrooming,forexample,couldpreservefluidsinthecontextofadip- sia,whereasdecreasedforagingwouldprotectaweakanimalfrompredators. Hart’shypothesisremainedthedominanttheoryinthefield[2,37–40],asitparsimoniously explainsalargerangeofsymptoms.Sinceitwasproposed,though,accumulatedevidencehas exposedsomegapsinthehypothesis;itisnowtimetoreassessit. ConservingenergytomaintainfeveriscentraltoHart’shypothesis.SBisdefinitelyassoci- atedwithreducedmotivationforaction—andthereforewithlessenergyexpenditure.However, inmanycases,feverandSBaredecoupled,theonearisingwithouttheother[10].Inhumans, forinstance,malaiseandfatigueoftencharacterizemildinfectionsthatdonotelicitfever. Moreimportantly,severalaspectsofSBcanactuallytiptheenergybalanceinthewrongdirec- tion.Confinementtonestsanddensdoesnotalwaysconserveheat.Inwarmerclimates,dens arecoolerthantheoutsideenvironmentandmobilityincreasesbodytemperature,yetdesert animalsstillremaininside[10].Anothercounterproductivesymptomisreducedgrooming. Whenmammalsandbirdsstopgrooming,theirfurandplumagegraduallylosetheirinsulating efficiency,requiringmoreenergytomaintainfever[41,42]. Themostcounterintuitivesymptomisanorexia,which,asHartacknowledged,deprives sickanimalsofcaloriesneededtofuelfever(especiallyinmigratoryanimalsthatcannotreduce energyexpenditurebyretiringtoprotectedenvironments).Recognizingthiscaveat,Hartsug- gestedinsteadthatanorexiaevolvedtoreduceironconsumption,consequentlyassisting anotherimportantantimicrobialresponse—hypoferremia.Itseemsunlikely,though,thatevo- lutionwouldfavoranindiscriminatereductioninfoodintakejusttodecreaseironconsump- tion.Herbivores,forinstance,canvarytheirdiettosuitnutritionalneeds[43],sotheycould insteadavoidonlyiron-richfoodsoringestclayeysoiltointerferewithironabsorption[44]. Moreimportantly,physiologistshavesincegainedmuchmechanisticinsightintohypofer- remia,renderingthisnotionlesslikely.Dietaryironabsorptionisdwarfedbythetotaliron reservesinthehumanbodyandtheamountrecycledthrougherythropoiesis[45].Anorexia, therefore,canonlymediateslow-actingchangesinplasmairon[46].Incontrast,inflammatory agentssuchaslipopolysaccharide(LPS)canhalveplasmaironwithinafewhours[47].The directmechanismthroughwhichinfectionelicitshypoferremia(Box1)wasonlydiscovered15 yearsago[31]andinvolvestherapidproductionofhepcidinintheliver.Thisefficientmecha- nismobviatesanorexiawheninfectionrequiresthehosttorapidlyreduceplasmairon. SensingthatHart’sexplanationcannotaccountforallthesymptomsofSB,severalcomple- mentarytheorieshavesincebeenproposed.WatkinsandMaier[48]stressedtheimportance ofallodyniaandhyperalgesia(reducedthresholdandincreasedintensityofpain)inSB.They PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 5/15 proposedthatthesesymptoms,togetherwiththereducedactivitySBintroduces,areintended toprotectsensitiveorgansandtissuesfromfurtherdamage.Medzitovetal.[49]maintained thatSBchieflypromotestolerancetowardsparasites,ratherthantheirclearance,althoughthe detailsofthisinteractionremainedunclear.Allthesetheoriesfocusondirectbenefitsthat infectedindividualsmayderivefromSB;theydisregardtheindirecteffectsSBmayhaveatthe grouplevel. Overall,theevidencethatallthesymptomsofSBdirectlyimprovehostresistancetoinfec- tionremainsincomplete,andafterseveraldecadesofresearchinthisfield,writersstilldebate whetherandhowsymptomsofSBbenefithosts[3,14,33,35,50].What,then,couldacomple- mentaryevolutionaryexplanationbe? CouldKinSelectionDrivetheEvolutionofSB? IfgainstodirectfitnesscannotfullyexplainSB,perhapsinclusivefitnesscouldcomeintoplay. Weproposethatreducedtransmissionofinfectiousdiseaseamongrelatedindividualscontrib- utedtotheevolutionofSB.AlthoughtheideathatSBreducestransmissionhasbeenalludedto before[3,20,51,52],itwasneverrecognizedasamajororganizingprincipleforSBinverte- brates.Wenamethistheory“theEyamhypothesis”aftertheEnglishminingcommunitythat isolateditselftocontainanoutbreakofbubonicplaguein1666.Three-quartersofthevillagers reportedlydied,butthesurroundingcommunitiesweresaved[53]. TheEyamhypothesisreliesonthreepremises: Premise1:SBReducesDirectandIndirectContactsbetween InfectedIndividualsandTheirConspecifics Strikingly,mostofthesymptomsthatconstituteSBshareacommondenominator:theyrestrict contactsbetweensickindividualsandtheirsocialgroups(Fig3).Symptomsofsicknessachieve thisfeatusingthreecontainmentstrategies: ContainmentStrategy#1:RestrictingPhysicalContacts Itisself-evidentthatsalientsymptomsofSB,suchassocialdisinterest,depression,hyperalge- sia,fatigue,andhypersomnia,reducethemobilityandsocialactivityofinfectedindividuals, limitingtheircontactwithconspecifics.Likewise,sexualdisinterestsuppressescourtshipand matingbehaviors,whereasreducedparentalcareentailsbydefinitionlessinteractionwithoff- spring.Thecontributionofanorexiaandadipsiamaybelessapparent;bysuppressingthe motivationtoeatanddrink,theyreducetheurgetotravelinsearchoffoodandwater,share mealswithgroupmembers,andgatheratwatersources. Self-imposedisolationmayaccountforthefolkobservationthatterminallyilldogsleave theirownerstodiealone.Similarbehaviorhasbeenrecordedinthewildamongbadgers, which,wheninfectedwithbovinetuberculosis,separatedfromtheirclanandsettledinindivid- ualsetts,wheretheydied[54]. Tellingly,theoppositeeffectisobservedwhenpathogensmanipulatehostbehaviortotheir benefit.Insuchdiseases,infectedhostsbecomehyperactiveandinteractmorewithpotential hosts:forexample,rabiddogsbecomefearlessandbite,androdentsinfectedwithToxoplasma gondiilosetheirfearofcats(thedefinitivehosts)[55]. ContainmentStrategy#2:LimitingEnvironmentalContamination Ontopofrestrictingdirectcontacts,SBcanalsolimitindirectcontactsbetweenconspecificsby reducingmicrobialcontaminationofsharedresources:ground,foodandwater(Fig3). PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 6/15 Fig3.ThebenefitsofSBtoindirectfitness.SymptomsofSB(pink)cansuppress(redconnectors)or promote(greenarrows)severalmediatingbehaviors(yellow),consequentlyreducingpathogentransmission throughseveralroutes(blue). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276.g003 Symptomssuchashypersomnia,fatigue,anddepressionrestricttheanimal’sradiusofactiv- ity,limitingenvironmentalcontaminationtoitsimmediatesurroundings.Socialandsexual disinterest,aswellasanorexiaandadipsia,furtherreducethedriveofanimalstotravelfarther afield. Anorexiaandadipsiaseemparamountinthatrespectastheypreventsickanimalsfrom contaminatingsharedfoodandwaterresources.Contaminationofpastures(forherbivores)or carcasses(forcarnivores)andcontaminationofwaterholesareundoubtedlymajorroutesfor oralandfecal-to-oraltransmissioninthewild.Finally,anorexiaandadipsiaalsoreducedefeca- tion,diarrhea,andvomiting,whicharethemajormeansofspreadingforentericpathogens. PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 7/15 ContainmentStrategy#3:AdvertisingInfectiontoConspecifics Whereasstrategies#1and#2involveself-imposedrestrictions,SBcanalsoactbyprovoking responsesfromconspecifics.Inmanyspecies,groupmemberscandetectinfectedindividuals throughvisual,olfactory,andchemicalcues[56–59],distancethemselves,andstopinteracting withthem[60].Suchsignalinghasbeendemonstratedmostconvincinglyineusocialinsectsin whichchemicalcommunicationisusedtocoordinatesocialimmunity(Box2). Box2.TheCaseforSocialImmunityinEusocialInsects Eusocialinsects—socialbeesandwasps,ants,andtermites—formcoloniesdubbed“super- organisms.”Thesecontainfewbreedingindividualsandmanycloselyrelatedsterilework- ers.Workersaredispensable,carecollectivelyforbrood,andaregeneticallyinvestingin theirsiblingsandparents.Thissituationencouragescooperationandaltruism.Coloniesof eusocialinsectsareidealsettingsforthespreadofpathogens,astheirinhabitantsliveat highdensity,constantlytouchoneanother,andexchangefoodorally.Lowgeneticdiver- sitymayposeanadditionalrisk,asmoreindividualsaresusceptibletothesamepathogens. Theoretically,thesefactorsmakeeusocialinsectsoptimalcandidatestodevelopSB. Empirically,ithaslongbeenrecognizedthateusocialinsectsexhibitsocialimmunity, collectivebehaviorsthatpromoteparasiteresistance[61]andlimitcontagiousinteractions amonggroupmembers[62].ManyofthesebehaviorsresembleSBinvertebrates,whereas someareidiosyncraticadaptationstothesituationininsectcolonies. Specifically,amongseveralspeciesofants,individualsthathadbeenexperimentally treatedwithlivepathogensorpathogen-associatedmolecules(suchasLPS)arelesssocia- ble[8],avoidcontactingbrood[8,63],stoptransferringfoodtonestmates(trophallaxis) [9],becomelessmotile[9],decreaseallogroomingofnestmates[64],andspendmostof theirtimeoutsidethenest,wheretheyeventuallydie[8,65].Similarly,amonghoneybees, individualswhosehealthiscompromisedeatless,transferlessnectartothehive[66], spendlesstimeinthehive[67],andleaveittodieinisolation[66].Thiscompulsionto leavethehivemayexplainsuddenmassdesertionsobservedintherecentepidemicofcol- lapsedcolonydisease(CCD),regardlessoftheelusivepathogenthatinducesit[68].The behaviorofparasitizedtermiteshasbeenlessstudied,butinfectedindividualsseemto migratetobottomstrataofmoundsanddiethere[69]. Communicatinghealthstatusisanimportantaspectofsocialimmunity.Thebulkof ourknowledgeconcerns“hygienicbehavior”inhoneybees.Inthisprocess,infectedlarvae andpupaearedetectedandremovedfromthehivebyworkers,limitingthespreadof infections[70,71].Evidently,thebroodcommunicatesitshealthstatuschemicallyatthe earliestsignofinfection.Recently,itwasshownthatadultbeescanalsobeexpelledfrom thehivebasedonsimilarsignals[71].Thebehavioralcomponentofsuchsignalingis clearerindampwoodtermitesinwhichadultsthathavecontactedfungalsporessignal throughvibrationtorepelcolonymembers[60]. Studiesinrodentsimplicatedthevomeronasalorganinsensinginfection[72]anddiscour- agingsocialandsexualinteractions[59];importantly,immuneactivationwithLPSwasenough tomarkanimalsassick.Eveninhumans,mammalswithanill-reputedsenseofsmell,the clothesofLPS-treatedsubjectscanbesniffedout[73]. Itiseasytoacceptthatthedetectionofinfectedconspecificshasevolvedasaprotective avoidancemechanism,butthetransmissionofsuchsignalscouldalsohavebeenselectedfor. PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 8/15 SeveralsymptomsofSBmayactasinfectioncues:reducedself-groomingvisiblydistinguishes infectedindividualsasscruffy[1]andprobablyaccentuatestheolfactorysignalstheyemit. Similarchangesmayaffectvocalcommunication.Insparrows,forinstance,thefrequencyand patternofbirdsongchangeduringaninflammatoryresponse[74].Lastly,thestereotypicpos- tureandmotionthatinfectedanimalsadoptbecauseoffatigueandhyperalgesiacanactas additionalcues.Thus,LPS-treatedsubjectscanbedetectedbyobserversbasedontheirgait [75].Thesignalingaspectsofsuchbehavioralchangesareexposedbytheresponseofsickani- malstopredators.Underthegazeofcarnivores,sickmembersofaherdwouldattempttodis- guisetheirvulnerabilityandsuppressSB[14].Thisobservationsuggeststhatanimalscanalert theirkinofinfectionbutsuppresssuchsignalingtopredators. Premise2:ReducedContactsLimittheSpreadofInfections Medicinehaslongacknowledgedtheimportanceofisolationforcontaininginfectiousdisease inhumans.Behavioralinterventionssuchasquarantine,schoolclosures,andbansontravel andpublicgatheringhavecurtailedthespreadofcontagiousdiseasessuchasEbola[76],vec- tor-mediateddiseasessuchasbubonicplague[77],andairborneonessuchassevereacute respiratorysyndrome(SARS)[78].Thesesuccessesdemonstratethat,regardlessoftheroute, socialisolationcanreducetransmission. AquestionmorerelevanttotheevolutionofSBiswhetherself-imposedsocialisolationis effectiveinthewild.Severalsuchexamplesexist:inthelastdecade,batpopulationsofmany speciesinNorthAmericacollapsedbecauseofthe“whitenose”fungaldisease.Although almostallofthecoloniesobservedweredecimated,somebatpopulationssurvivedbyadopting asolitaryroostingpattern[79].Conversely,astudyinwilddeermicehasshownthathighly activeindividuals,whichencounteredmoremice,exhibitedhigherviralinfectionrates[80]. Isolationofinfectedpeoplebasedonclinicalsymptomscanbeeffectiveonlywhenthey overlapwiththeinfectiousperiod[81].Empiricaldatasuggestthat,inthefewinfectiousdis- easesstudied(barringHIV),thisisindeedthecase.Thus,inSARS,smallpox,andfoot-and- mouthdisease,thisoverlapexceeds80%[81,82],andestimatesforinfluenzarangebetween 50%and90%[81,83].Sincebehavioralsymptomstypicallyprecedespecificclinicalsigns,these figureslikelyunderestimatetheoverlapbetweenSBandinfectivityandthepotentialreduction intransmission. Premise3:BehaviorsThatReducePathogenTransmissionCan PersistthroughKinSelection IfindeedSBfavorsthefitnessofothergroupmembersattheexpenseoftheindividuals,thenit canbeconsideredaninstanceofbiologicalaltruism.Ithaslongbeendebatedhowaltruismcan becomeanevolutionarilystablestrategy(ESS).Alikelymechanismiskinselection,thepositive selectionoftraitsthatincreasethefitnessoftheindividual’srelatives.Thisinitiallycontrover- sialtheory,putforwardbyW.D.Hamilton[84],hasbeenmathematicallyvalidatedandwidely acceptedsince[85]. Kinselectioniseasytoacceptwhenaltruismisactivelydirectedatrelatives(e.g.,birdsfeign- inginjurytoleadpredatorsawayfromtheirchicks),buthowcanitpromoteSB,aresponse thatindiscriminatelyfavorsrelatedandunrelatedgroupmembers?Thiscanonlyhappenwhen theaveragerelatednesswithinthesocialgroupishigherthanwithintheentirepopulation. Indeed,inmany(althoughcertainlynotall)species,geneticallyrelatedindividualsaredispro- portionallyrepresentedintheimmediatesocialgroupsinwhichmostphysicalinteractions occur[86–89].Suchbiasdevelopsbecauseofhighpopulationviscosity,i.e.,slowandspatially restricteddispersalofprogeny. PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 9/15 Animalspeciesvaryinthedegreeofintergrouprelatednessbasedontheirlifehistory.At oneendofthespectrumarer-strategistswhoseoffspringareneonatallyindependentanddis- persewidely.Undersuchconditions,socialconsiderationsareunlikelytodriveSB.Atthe oppositeendofthespectrumlieeusocialanimals.Amongthese,eusocialhymnopterahave beenstudiedmost(Box2).Theseinsectsindeeddisplayavarietyofcollectivediseasedefense behaviors,inpartresemblingSB,whicharecollectivelytermed“socialimmunity”[61]. Humans,classicalK-strategistswhocohabitmostoftheirliveswithfirst-degreerelatives,seem tolieclosertothispole. Intriguingly,someexperimentalevidencesuggeststhatSBisactuallynotasuniversalascom- monlyassumed.Somebirdscanbecomeinfected,mountanimmuneresponseanddevelopfever withoutshowingconspicuoussignsofillness[90],leadingtoanapparentlysuddendeathfrom infection[14].Infish,administrationofLPStriggersnoobservablebehavioralchanges[91]. StudiesinwildmousepopulationsshowedthattheintensityofSBvariesconsiderablyamong relatedspecies[10].Howthisdiversityrelatestosocialstructureisyettobeexamined. WhereDoWeGofromHere? TheEyamhypothesishasneverbeendirectlytested,sotheempiricalevidencesupportingitis stilllimited;nonetheless,itproducestestablepredictions.Asstatedabove,anESSforSBwould counterbalanceitscosttotheinfectedindividualswiththebenefitofreducingtransmissionto theirkin.Thisbenefitshouldbeproportionaltopathogenvirulence,thechancesoftransmis- sionbetweenindividuals(infectivity),andtheaveragerelatednessofsusceptiblehosts.Conse- quently,severalpredictionscanbeexaminedeithercorrelatively(1-3),experimentally(4,5),or mathematically(6,7). 1. Virulence:DifferentpathogensinvokeSBofvaryingintensities.Ourtheorypredictsthat, throughanevolutionaryprocess,morevirulentpathogenswouldcometoprovokestronger behavioralresponses.Whenapathogenisdeadly,theindividualloseslittle(asitwoulddie anyway)andgainsmuch(asitsavesitsrelativesfromdeath)fromadebilitatingbehavioral response.Whenapathogenisavirulent,theoptimalbehavioralresponsewouldbeasub- clinicalone,invokingnoSBevenifanimmuneresponseisactivated. 2. Diseasetransmission:IncreasedoddsfortransmissionwouldalsofavoravigorousSB. Thus,moreintenseSBisexpectedamongspeciesthatliveindensecoloniesandengagein closephysicalcontact(especiallyingregariousseasons).Likewise,highlycontagiouspatho- gensareexpectedtotriggeramorepronouncedSB. 3. Geneticrelatedness:HigherrelatednesswithinsocialgroupsshouldalsopromoteSB(asit wouldotheraltruisticbehaviors).Thus,SBwouldintensifywithpopulationviscosityand thelengthofcareforoffspring.Thiscouldbetestedbycomparingphylogeneticallyclose species(e.g.,socialversussolitarywasps).Comparisonscanalsobemadeamongindividuals withincommunities:forexample,mothersversusfathersinpolygamousspeciesandrepro- ductiveversusnonreproductivemembersofeusocialcommunities. 4. Anti-inflammatorydrugs:PharmacologicallysuppressingSBinexperimentallyinfected individualsshouldacceleratethespreadofinfectionsevenwhenthecourseofdiseaseis unaltered.Suchexperiments,though,wouldrequirehabitatsthatallowefficientself- isolation. 5. Tracers:Toruleoutimmunologicaleffectsonpathogenclearance,thedispersalofinnocu- oustagssuchaspigmentsorradioisotopescanbetraced. PLOSBiology|DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002276 October16,2015 10/15

Description:
mortality rates from bacterial [22] and viral [23] infections. The evidence Unlike the adaptive effects of fever, this remained a largely isolated study, and . Eusocial insects—social bees and wasps, ants, and termites—form colonies dubbed “super- organisms. Shattuck EC, Muehlenbein MP. Huma
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.