Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 2002-01-15: Vol 89 Iss 3

37 Pages·14 MB·English

Volume 89, No. 03 http://www.usda.gov/oce/waob/jawf/wwcb.html January 15, 2002
he < fi ' LLETIN
Abs ints M4, E i
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
( (K MsiT WAhi
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration cha i}I . | adeF ,— fae Sy National Agricultural Statistics Service
SHES
National Weather Service and World Agricultural Outlook Board
x
Percent Of Normal Precipitation
JAN - DEC 2001
[1971-2000 |
| Normals |
__Utilized |
10
CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER, NOAA
Computer generated contours
Based on preliminary data
HIGHLIGHTS
Contents
January 6 - 12, 2002
Highlights provided by USDA/WAOB Water Supply Forecast
for the Western United States
Total Precipitation & Temperature Departure Maps
C old air stubbornly clung across the Southeast, Extreme Maximum & Minimum Temperature Maps
resulting in another minor freeze on January 9 as far Weather Data for the Delta and Bootheel &
U.S. Crop Production Highlights
south as Florida’s northern citrus areas. Weekly
Florida Freeze and Duration Maps
temperatures averaged as much as 10°F below normal in for January 9
Florida. In addition, widespread rain and snow fell across National Weather Data for Selected Cities
National Agricultural Summary & Snow Cover Map
the East early in the week and again at week’s end, aiding 2001 Weather Review
pastures and winter grains in the southern Atlantic 2001 Weather Data for Selected Cities
2001 Crop Production Highlights
region, and providing some relief from long-term drought.
January 9 ENSO Update
Meanwhile, record warmth overspread the Plains and International Weather and Crop Summary &
Midwest, boosting temperatures 6 to 26°F above normal. December Temperature/Precipitation Maps
Subscription Information &
On January 8, several locations noted monthly record-high January 8 Drought Monitor
temperatures. Although the warm weather permitted off-
(Continued on page 5)
Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin January 15, 2002
Water Supply Forecast for the Western United States
Snowpack and
Precipitation SNOTEL — River Basin Snow Water Content
Mid-January snowpacks show a Basin Average Snow Water Content, € % of Average.)
wide contrast, ranging from Figure 1
above average in Oregon,
California, and Nevada, to
below normal in_ central
Montana, Wyoming, Colorado,
New Mexico, and Arizona (fig.
1). Pacific Northwest snow-
packs are running two to three
times the values observed in
January 2001. However, snow-
packs diminished (compared
with normal) during the first 2
weeks of January, due to a Report Date:
cw |
reduced frequency of storms in JANUARY 14 , 286862 \ \
the West.
?
28 ‘
Snowpacks diminish rapidly Provisional Data 2
Based on Mountain Data from NRCS SNOTEL Sites “~~
moving eastward into western
Data provided by Western Regional Climate Center
Montana, eastern Idaho, Hater and Climate Center Desert Research Institute
National Resource Conservation Service Reno, Nevada
Wyoming, Colorado, New Portland, Oregon
Mexico, and Arizona.
Significant areas are in the 50
to 70 percent of average range.
SNOTEL -— River Basin Precipitation
Seasonal precipitation (October
1 through January 14) reflects
Basin Average Precipitation, € % of Average.)
above-average precipitation for
Figure 2 OCTOBER 1 , 2001 thru JANUARY 14 , 2002
the Pacific Northwest, northern 1 0
California, and Nevada, but 7 106 117 us aa ECS[ 11s P; i 64
below-average precipitation in
southern California, Arizona,
Arizona, New Mexico,
Colorado, Wyoming, and
central Montana (fig. 2).
Spring and Summer
Streamflow Forecasts
The Pacific Northwest seasonal
Report Date:
streamflow volume is forecast Se
to improve significantly from JANUARY 14 , 2662 \ y\
\,
last water year, based on f
information through January 1, \ es 4
Provisional Data
2002. Most forecasts in Based on Mountain Data from NRCS SNOTEL Sites "—~
Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Data provided by Western Regional Climate Center
Water and Climate Center Desert Research Institute
Nevada, and California indicate National Resource Conservation Service Reno, Nevada
Portland, Oregon
near- or slightly above-average
January 15, 2002 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin
streamflow. However, central Montana, Spring and Summer Streamflow Forecasts as of January 1, 2002
central Wyoming, Colorado, southern Legend
y
Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico forecasts > 130% of Average
indicate either below- or much-below A "\0-1 30% of Average
average spring and summer streamflow
(fig. 3). . r R $93 90 - 110% ooff AA verage
WY 70 - 90% of Average
< 70% of Average
Figure 3
naciiiets tat |N ot Forecast
All major western storage reservoirs are
below seasonal averages, except in
Montana, where holdings are near average
(fig. 4). The low levels reflect carryover
from last year's drought that affected much
of the West. RaW
Ss
i NN
For More Information
The National Water and Climate Center
WS
Homepage provides the latest available
snowpack and water supply information. Y y <
\ S
Please visit: ; ,
N NN
http://www.wcec.nrcs.usda.gov
SX 3 MX
RWNS
WRN Y \
Prepared by
USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Nationa! Water and Climate Center
Portiand, Oregon
ito // www Woe nres usd2. gov
Reservoir Storage as of January 1, 2002
Figure 4 gm Above Average ame AY CTAGE mum Seclow Average |
Capacity of Reservoirs Reported (1000 Ac. Ft.)
i 4,620 37,766 5,059 6,631 18,181 1,448 6,708 3,538 2,576 1,089
; ; ; :a e ee )
UCoPfose nrectaeebnnltte s
AZ CA CO iD MT NY NM OR
| 8/8 156/156 70/70 16/16 45/46 7i7 13/13 25/31
Number of Reservoirs Reported
Prepared by: USDA, Natura! Resources Conservation Service, National Water and Climate Center, Portland, OR
AIUA DWA AC. ICS. USda. gov
Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin January 15, 2002
Total Precipitation (Inches)
JAN 6 - 12, 2002
SSS Seen SER a j "Ty
,L ae
CAD ; t
>4
i 2 to 4
Yn to 2
>.5 tol
tee 0.5
Ht) 204,
CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER, NOAA
Computer generated contours
Based on preliminary data
( 01/
Lfx aa
y a. aes,
Departure of Average Temperature from Normal (°F)
JAN 6 - 12, 2002
EPS ae PEs 77 7 P ~ J — ait a
A8°/A5 Mas
CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER, NOAA
Computer generated contours
Based on preliminary data
'1971-2000|
Normals |
Utilized|
January 15, 2002 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin
(Continued from front cover)
season fieldwork to continue and maintained low Extreme Maximum Temperature (°F)
levels of livestock stress, many fields from Montana JAN 6 - 12, 2002
to Texas remained free of snow cover that would ——
protect winter wheat from wind erosion and potential |
temperature extremes. Elsewhere, heavy precipitation
was confined to the northern Rockies and areas from
the Cascades westward, as a 2-month, drought- |
easing wet spell gradually subsided across the
Northwest. Farther south, mostly dry weather
persisted into a seventh month in the Four Corners |
region, where concerns about spring snow-melt runoff |
and summer water supplies continued to grow.
Early in the week, windy, dramatically milder
conditions overspread the northern Plains, fueled by | CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER, NOAA
chinook (downslope) winds. Six days after New |
Year’s Day, low temperatures in Montana fell to -5°F |
in Cut Bank, -7°F in Great Falls, and -14°F in |
Havre, high temperatures on January 7 soared to 58,
60, and 62°F, respectively. From January 6-12, winds |( 0.4.
averaged 19.8 mph in Great Falls and 24.0 mph in | \_
Cut Bank. Peak wind gusts reached 61 mphinGreat ~—__— —
Falls on January 12, and topped 60 mph on 3 different
days (January 7, 8, and 12) in Cut Bank, including a JAN 6 - 12, 2002
gust to 72 mph on January 8.
Meanwhile, record warmth developed across the West
early in the week, expanding across the Plains and |
Midwest on January 8 and 9. For the week, more |
than 200 daily-record highs were established, nearly
half of them on Tuesday. All-time monthly records
were established on January 8 in locations such as
East Rapid City, SD (73°F), Bismarck, ND (63°F),
and Oelwein, IA (57°F). Elsewhere on Tuesday,
Wichita, KS (75°F), tied their monthly record,
previously attained on January 22, 1967, while
Glasgow, MT (61°F), and Des Moines, IA (64°F), CUMATE PREDICTION CENTER, NOAA
Computer generated contours
missed their respective January-record highs by just Based on preliminary data
1°F. Although the passage of a cold front brought
slightly cooler air to the Plains and Midwest after
midweek, temperatures remained at near- to above-
normal levels. Farther west, very warm conditions | \ sawaan ss
also developed across southern California, where | ™ LF,
daily-record highs included 85°F on January 8 in San
Bernardino and 84°F on January 11 in Riverside. provided limited relief from previously dry conditions. Athens, GA,
recently completed their driest October-December period on record,
In contrast, a strong high-pressure system settled across the central with 2.55 inches (23 percent of normal), but netted 1.10 inches (59
Gulf Coast region on January 8, reaching Florida a day later. percent) during the first 13 days of January. Elsewhere in Georgia,
Readings remained mostly at or above 30°F across central Florida on Atlanta received 4.02 inches (36 percent of normal) from October to
January 8, when steady winds at 10 mph or higher helped to maintain December, their second-driest such period in the last 70 years, but
a fairly uniform temperature pattern, but generally ranged from 24 to recorded 1.06 inches (54 percent) from January 1-13. Even less relief
34°F the following morning, when winds were calm. Selected low from dryness was noted on the Plains, where Dodge City, KS,
temperatures in Florida on January 9 included 24°F in Hastings, 25°F received only a trace of precipitation from January 1-13, following
(a daily-record low) in Orlando, 28°F in Daytona Beach, and 32°F at their second-driest June-December period on record (5.85 inches, or
both Belle Glade and Immokalee. Temperatures were not low enough 43 percent of normal), behind only 1952.
to harm citrus fruits, which are typically damaged by a hard freeze
(temperatures at or below 28°F for 4 hours or more), although some Cold conditions lingered in western Alaska, but unusually mild
winter ground crops required freeze-protection measures. In addition, weather lifted weekly temperatures at least 10 to 20°F above normal
blowing sand resulted in some possible reductions in quality (scarring) across most of the Alaskan interior. Warmth peaked on January 9 in
of some vegetables in southern Florida. Not surprisingly, the warm Fairbanks, AK, where the high of 40°F tied their record for the date.
weather on the northern Plains and cold conditions in Florida Significant precipitation was largely confined to southern Alaska,
resulted in some interesting comparisons. On January 8, the high of where Kodiak received 7.98 inches during the first 12 days of January.
61°F in Miami, FL, was lower than the maximum temperatures in Meanwhile in Hawaii, an unusually quiet weather pattern prevailed
Jordan, MT (66°F), and Bismarck, ND (63°F). through a fourth consecutive week, bringing renewed drought
concerns. Some oft he highest 24-hour totals were observed in Kauai
The week opened and closed with fast-moving storm systems across on January 9-10, when rainfall included 1.60 inches in Kokee and 0.88
the East. Both produced beneficial showers in the Southeast and inch in Wainiha. Despite beneficial autumn rainfall nearly statewide,
heavy snow in parts of the Northeast. On January 6-7, 17.4 inches of only scattered Hawaiian locations reported above-normal precipitation
snow blanketed Albany, NY, their fifth-highest January storm-total for 2001. Honolulu, Oahu, measured less than 15 inches of rain for
snowfall. The early-week storm delivered a trace of snow to the fourth consecutive year (4.52 inchesi n 1998, 12.01 inches in 1999,
Philadelphia, PA, and Washington, DC, the latest first snowfall on 7.09 inches in 2000, and 9.16 inches in 2001) for the first time since
record in both cities (previously December 27, 1990, in Philadelphia, 1959-62, leaving their 50-month precipitation at 34.06 inches (36
and December 25, 1894, in Washington). Farther south, showers percent of normal), or 60.82 inches below normal.
Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin January 15, 2002
Weather Data for Selected Locations in the Delta and the Bootheel
Weather Data for the Week Ending January 12, 2002
Data provided by the Mississippi State Delta Research and Extension Center (DREC),
the Southern Regional Climate Center (SRCC), and the University of Missouri.
SEITTERAE
4-INCH NUMBER OF DAYS
TEMPERATURE °F PRECIPITATION ieee esa TEMP. °F PPAREPCIIP Or,
STATES
AND
STATIONS IANT EST
AVMEARXAIGMAEUV MMEI RNAIGMEEUX MHT IRGEH MEEX TREMEA VERAGDEE PARTURWEETI ENO KTALLY, DEPARTURGER2i I4 N- HOUR, TINO.SD,T1 eAIcLN ,C E NPCOTSD1R .eIM cN ACLE TINO.SJ,T1 aIAnLN ,C E PNCOSTJ1R a.InM N ACEL AVMEARXAIGMEAU VMME IRNAIGMEAUA90 MBN D O VE BA32NE DL OWI.0 N1C H I.5N0MOC ROH RE
BATESVILLE* BLOW '
CLARKSDALE * 6= NF&®§OR ROMMA L
CLEVELAND* WW2wO a ro NNYo Nn S=Ona v eyCo oO N
GREENVILLE * w >
GREENWOOD * FN&NOOmH RO NOR MM AL DNNNyDO No—| -n s
INDIANOLA1 S iseasaci kak NRwB@> rO2OyH N O
INVERNESS5 E oooaOoaonn ens 1.61 ocoocoo8iSc°i)e i i
LYON WWf En NnNN1 1 wWF
MOORHEAD* 0.72
ONWARD 1.62
ROLLING FORK * 0.46
SCOTT 1.67
SIDON oooo°o 1.24
TUNICA * Oo !S ChkOONDN 0.96
TUNICA 1W o WOOWNNN 0.94 !e cacWWcNENoN cNe oo=- p m0 00
VANCE
VICKSBURG * -0.05 1.25 1.42
YAZOO CiTy * 1.66 0.19 1.37 9.15 104 1.66
STONEVILLE* 1.87 0.61 1.65 10.96 144 1.87
CARDWELL 0.31 -0.47 0.26 9.40 152 0.49
CHARLESTON ¢ ‘ 0.27 -0.25 0.27 8.39 151 0.40
CLARKTON 50 9 9 0.37 -0.21 0.34 10.33 186 0.49
DELTA 0.17 -0.40 0.16 7.04 115 0.38
GLENNONVILLE 0.25 -0.33 0.24 9.01 162 0.44
PORTAGEVILLE #1 0.38 -0.48 0.37 9.23 146 0.44
PORTAGEVILLE #2 0.35 -0.51 0.35 8.81 140 0.41
STEELE 0.45 -0.39 0.33 8.67 132 0.54 ie oooOVwY oAowFAeNWr1= n cNAweNawNcAc-=n WoNodNcoNH eoN ocFo AoNoNoNe=N.!
Compiled by USDA/OCE/WAOB’s Stoneville Field Office. * Based on 1964-93 normals. * Based on 1961-90 normals.
Delta and Bootheel Weather and Crop Summary: A low-pressure system that moved along the Gulf Coast brought varying amounts
of precipitation to all reporting stations. High pressure dominated the region thereafter, allowing temperatures to rise above normal.
A dry cold front crossed the region late in the week. Recent warmth and abundant sunshine combined to aid winter wheat
development.
U.S. Crop Production Highlights
The following information was released by USDA’s Agricultural Statistics Board on January 11, 2002. Forecasts refer to January 1.
The all orange forecast for the 2001-02 crop is 12.5 million tons, the previous forecast and 200,000 boxes below the final 2000-01
virtually unchanged from the December | forecast, but up 1 percent utilization. If realized, it will be Arizona’s fifth consecutive season
(%) from last season’s final utilization. Florida’s all orange of declining utilization.
forecast remains at 231 million ‘boxes (10.4 million tons), 3%
higher than the previous season. Weather conditions until the end Winter wheat seeded area for 2002 is expected to total 41.0
of December were warm and mostly dry. Early and midseason million acres, down fractionally from 2001. This is the smallest
varieties in Florida are forecast at 131 million boxes (5.9 million area since 1971. Approximate class breakdowns are: Hard Red
tons), the same as the December forecast. If realized, this pro- Winter (HRW), 29.3 million acres; Soft Red Winter (SRW), 8.3
duction will be 2% higher than last season. Fruit sizes are the third- million; and White Winter, 3.4 million.
smallest of the 10-season series. Losses from droppage are slightly
above average. Florida’s Valencia forecast is 100 million boxes The HRW seeded area is up 1% from 2001. Significant acreage
(4.5 million tons), unchanged from the previous forecast, but 5% increases in Texas, Oklahoma, and Montana more than offset a
higher than last season’s final utilization. Fruit sizes are slightly large acreage decline in Kansas, where wheat seedings last
below average, while losses from droppage are below average. increased in 1996 and fell to the lowest level since 1957.
Oklahoma (first wheat acreage increase since 1990) and Texas are
The all orange forecast for California, at 54.0 million boxes (2.03 rebounding from last year, when dry conditions reduced seedings.
million tons), is the same as the October 1 forecast, but down 8% The SRW area is down 4% from last year, and is 13% below 2
from the previous season. California’s Navel orange harvest is years ago. Acreage declined significantly across the Cor Belt, in
20% complete, and fruit sizes are larger than last season. The Arkansas, and throughout much of the Southeast. Seeded acres
Texas all orange forecast is 1.9 million boxes (81,000 tons), down increased sharply in Georgia, where growers planted additional
300,000 boxes from the initial forecast in October, and 335,000 wheat in place of rye as a cover crop. The White Winter seeded
boxes below last season. Arizona’s all orange utilization is forecast area is down 1% from 2001. Growers in Idaho planted the smallest
at 700,000 boxes (26,000 tons), a decrease of 50,000 boxes from acreage since 1962.
January 15, 2002 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin
24 Hour Minimum Temperatures (degrees F) at
6 Feet Above Ground Level
Ending: 12Z January 9, 2002
- NWS CO-OP Station
¢ FAWN Station
Oranges:
Minor Area
EE Major Area
Temperature data provided by NVVS CO-OP and
Fiorida Automated VVeather Network (FAVVN) stations
Hours of Temperatures at or below 28F at
6 feet above ground level on the morning
of January 9, 2002
Temperature data provided by Florida Automated Weather Network (FAVVN) stations
During the first 10 days of the new year, cold air settled deep into the South on several occasions. On January 3, a freeze was noted
as far south as the lower Rio Grande Valley in southernmost Texas, where low temperatures generally ranged from 26 to 30°F.
Brownsville, TX, recorded 30°F, their lowest temperature since an identical reading on January 13, 1997. Due to the short duration
of the Texas freeze, agricultural impacts on citrus, unharvested sugarcane, and winter ground crops were relatively minor. A day later,
the harshest of several freezes struck southern Louisiana, where Baton Rouge (18°F) experienced their coldest weather since a low
of 15°F on February 5, 1996. Since the harvest of Louisiana’s sugarcane crop was virtually complete, the primary agricultural concern
involved the possible effect of cold weather on young sugarcane stands (mostly under 3 feet tall).
Southern Florida escaped the cold spell with only scattered frost, but central Florida (the State’s northern citrus areas) experienced
several light freezes, primarily on January 4-5 and 8-9. The January 8-9 event resulted in more widespread freezes, although gusty
winds on the 8" tended to keep temperatures in a narrow range near or just above the freezing mark, while calm conditions on the
9" allowed for easier implementation of freeze-protection measures and resulted in larger local variations in temperatures (generally
24 to 34°F; see top chart above). As shown by the freeze duration chart (bottom chart), all of Florida’s citrus region escaped freeze
damage (temperatures did not fall below 28°F for 4 hours or more), although some winter ground crops required freeze protection and
may have sustained localized damage due to cold weather and blowing sand.
Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin January 15, 2002
National Weather Data for Selected Cities
Weather Data for the Week Ending January 12, 2002
Data Provided by Climate Prediction Center (301-763-8000, Ext. 7503)
TEMPERATURE °F PRECIPITATION fPEoRoCtEyN,T TEM—P. _°F |— PR ECIP
STATES
AND URE
STATIONS EJiC .a n
AVMEARXAIGMAEUV MMEI RNAIGMEEUX MT REMREEXE TLM OEW AVERAGDEENF PORARORMMTA L DENFPORARORMMTA ULR E 2IN4. -HOUR, NPCOTSDR.eI McNA1C LE NPCOTSR.I MN AL MAXIMAUVMME IRNAIGMEAUA9 0BMN DO VE BA32EN DL OWI0 1N CH
BIRMINGHAM Ww > §IGoN R EATEST @ w w aS a o
HMOUBNITLSEV ILLE nGo iS) —) @1 oN oS AocVfo foE) RAGE¢m~ >a
MONTGOMERY mHM= N ann=n
ABNACRHROORWA GE ooiOO on YONU NW N OoOOnNOn e
FAIRBANKS
JUNEAU a= ©o 4O1on wnmomo
KODIAK wwWNwa
NOME on
FLAGSTAFF 0OO0f R M0OR0E 000000
PHOENIX NOO SN nN
TUCSON
YUMA
FORT SMITH oo--
LITTLE ROCK w
BAKERSFIELD
FRESNO
LOS ANGELES
REDDING
SACRAMENTO
SAN DIEGO
SAN FRANC
STOCKTON
ALAMOSA
CO SPRINGS
DENVER INTL
GRAND JUNCTION
PUEBLO
BRIDGEPORT
HARTFORD
WASHINGTON
WILMINGTON
DAYTONA BEACH
JACKSONVILLE
KEY WEST
MIAMI
ORLANDO
PENSAC
TALLAHASSEE
TAMPA
WEST PALI
ATHENS
ATLANTA
AUGUSTA
COLUMBUS
MACON
SAVANNAH
HILO
KAHULUI
LIHUE
SPRINGFIELD
EVANSVILLE
FORT WAYNE
INDIANAPOLIS
SOUTH BEND
BURLINGTON
CEDAR RAPIDS
DES MOINES
DUBUQUE
SIOUX CITY
WATERLOO
CONCORDIA
DODGE CITY
GOODLAND 5
TOPEKA 53
Based 0n1971-2000 normals *** Not Available
January 15, 2002 Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin 9
Weather Data for the Week Ending January 12, 2002
. PMNUMOBF DEARYS ]
TEMPERATURE °F PRECIPITATION HUMIDITY, [aaa
STATES
VE
AND
STATIONS x W9y
S
<
AVMEARXAIGMAEUV MMEI RNAIGMEEUX MHT IRGEH MEEX TREMEA VERAGDEENF PORARORMMT AULRW EETiE NO KTALLY, GINR 2IEN4.A -THEOUSRT, NPCOTR. MAL PNCOTR. MAL AVMEARXAIGMEAU VMME IRNAIGMEUAA9 0BMN OD BA32NE DL OW3 x2) I50N CH
WICHITA nm> ~ on be Oo §D© E NF\POR ARORMMT AULR Eo o co oINf,SD7 eEOcST1IA NLC, E > a oO 0
JACKSON wo 3]o w @ o te a TIoN=Of.f S JT,O© BaIA 6=nLN 1,C E &SJ1o afIfn N CE oo o 5
LEXINGTON nN @ n @ Ww uo 2BSDw I efc N1C E w wo NI Oo 3
LOUISVILLE w LS) w re} © ~ ny ~ fo)@ 2
PADUCAH wo w o cNwmoO wo W Q o nma Qo@ 2
BATON ROUGE w N > © o S 2
LAKE CHARLES 2 ® 1
NEW ORLEANS Q- n 2
SHREVEPORT 0
CARIBOU 4
PORTLAND 3
BALTIMORE 3
BOSTON 3
WORCESTER 4
ALPENA Dt>enaDnaan Katrnawansdd 2
GRAND RAPIDS 1
HOUGHTON LAKE 2
LANSING 2
MUSKEGON 1
TRAVERSE CITY 5
DULUTH 0
INT'L FALLS 1
MINNEAPOLIS 0
ROCHESTER NWSYWWOWN2wNWR wEWAHNWAWWNWEWAOANNAAGANYO NGOON 0
ST. CLOUD =|BW|WSFNAfB NC“ H NNNDW NNNNN 0
JACKSON o=RO~Oo aRteO ADR2FANABSHN 1
MERIDIAN 3
TUPELO 3
COLUMBIA 0
KANSAS CITY 1
SAINT LOUIS 1
SPRINGFIELD 1
BILLINGS 0
BUTTE 3
GLASGOW 2
GREAT FALLS 1
HAVRE 2
KALISPELL 4
MISSOULA 3
GRAND ISLAND 0
LINCOLN 0
NORFOLK 0
NORTH PLATTE 0
OMAHA 0
SCOTTSBLUFF 0
VALENTINE 0
ELY 0
LAS VEGAS 0
RENO 1
WINNEMUCCA 2
CONCORD 3
NEWARK 4
ALBUQUERQUE 1
ALBANY 3
BINGHAMTON 4
BUFFALO 5
ROCHESTER 3
SYRACUSE 4
ASHEVILLE 2
CHARLOTTE 2
GREENSBORO 2
HATTERAS 2
RALEIGH 2
WILMINGTON OD@&®GO N CONOCONC 2
BISMARCK 1
DICKINSON NNHn > N 1
FARGO 0
GRAND FORKS 0
JAMESTOWN 0
WILLISTON 1
AKRON-CANTON 3
CINCINNATI 3
CLEVELAND 3
COLUMBUS 3
DAYTON 3
MANSFIELD SooOOOCOOOCCOooOKK8eOoOOOOOCCoOCCOOoOCOCCCCOOOCOOOoCcO 8 e N eOCCCOOCOCCOCOoOCCoO O O eooOOCoOCCS a MONeO o DN MaAQ3 AaN MSOOMRoR AEo AoMcAooMcAoAoNoKcWoAoMoDnOwCwnAwAsNnHsPnKwRxHcAoMoAoNo~EoNwN~BoDcAoOcNoNoAoDocNoNeAoNoDeAoAeHcHoEcAooNeEoNoAoAeBoMeDoWoWeNeAoeAeMeAnMrAeAoAeHeAeHeSeeAoAeAoDoAoAeHoLoAeAoNnNr2 +qo0oeo+oqo9oo°°9
Based 0n1971-2000 normais *** Not Available
Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin January 15, 2002
Weather Data for the Week Ending January 12, 2002
TEMPERATURE °F PRECIPITATION aPERCeENT TEMLPe.t e°eFr nPeREC]IP
STATES
AND
STATIONS
AVMEARXAIGMAEUV MMEI RNAIGMEEUX MHT IRGEH MEEX LTORWE MEA VERAGDEENF PORARORMMTA ULRW EEITE NOK TLYA L,D ENFPORARORMMT AULR E PNCOTR. MAL NPCOTSJ1R. aI MnN ACLE AVMEARXAIGMEAU VMMEI RNAIGMEUAA9 0MBN DO VE BA32NE DL OIW.N0 1CMO HOR REI. N50C H
TOLEDO > w&° o N LS) 2 a i) “Ni fe)a o [22N
YOUNGSTOWN w N nN ~“ No=N ~ o
OKLAHOMA CITY or N“N w oO =N N 1&SD IeNcC E TINoOcOfo. f N,JTQ3 aABB n LS1,I NCE Naoaoo aono =o wNo=n n
TULSA o a w oo ~~ TIyNNOh. SDT,=e eIA cLrN1,Ce E a x
ASTORIA a) o w N aa=o
BURNS w N a oSoOn rooaw.
EUGENE n b w © 1.64 oO+ oo a
MEDFORD n be Ww wo ooo oo 75 © a Q fo2)
PENDLETON onr a) Ww 0.11 IO0S2IN G§ 280n0G2 0 8+0R -E02HA o8TuEr8S 8T 8
PORTLAND 2.48
SALEM non- oan 2.22 ©o NoO.OO ooa@N oN
ALLENTOWN WW>w W 0.92
ERIE 0.75
MIDDLETOWN py==© o o 1.11 @oO NWo O ®aO o&On n
PHILADELPHIA WF>w®© W&@ WN 1.36
PITTSBURGH p o Ooan0.n50 annn @ oO a
WILKES-BARRE w @ 1.13
WILLIAMSPORT 0.94 o©O a on ao@On o
PROVIDENCE >> wo NNO 0.88
BEAUFORT for)D S) 1.03
CHARLESTON 1.28
COLUMBIA 1.05
GREENVILLE 0.76
ABERDEEN 0.00
HURON 0.00
RAPID CITY N= oNo oc-0+.0-3 AO0N ©o&0O aoo£ Ow aooSOSNFennSNwD mLo O o a =nOgoa-nwaNm a
SIOUX FALLS @ 0.00 @ nN om iS)
BRISTOL c> 0.25 eaa lo©O NOOAN AONMNDOOAANNAM DFSFAGAAMAWOCSOCNOCONOCOHWwWUABDYN
CHATTANOOGA 0.35 |@e eoceoceoeooadooeoooeceoeoeooeoooeaedqcoco.o.cCco
KNOXVILLE 0.38
MEMPHIS 0.46
NASHVILLE 0.46
ABILENE 0.00
AMARILLO 0.01
AUSTIN 0.00
BEAUMONT 0.37
BROWNSVILLE @=WOW|w9 NDAY RN0. 01 eo©OaO iaxD) AomNnFoNwoDeAwNdeOdOaWn
CORPUS CHRISTI 0.00
DEL RIO 0.00
EL PASO 0.00
FORT WORTH 0.00
GALVESTON 0.74
HOUSTON 7 Z é 0.01
LUBBOCK 6: 2 8 0.00
MIDLAND 0.00
SAN ANGELO 0.00
SAN ANTONIO 0.00
VICTORIA 0.02
WACO 0.00
WICHITA FALLS 0.00
SALT LAKE CITY 0.03 OAANNwMN WWMOBNANDNARBADNOOBRWANNRD
BURLINGTON 0.17 © DS)
LYNCHBURG 0.64
NORFOLK 1.04
RICHMOND 1.36
ROANOKE 0.30
WASH/DULLES 0.27
OLYMPIA 4.03 ON=@No MWNNnNN®Ow N
QUILLAYUTE NNNoY DNu WER5.6O1 AWNWONWEWWAEW o o
SEATTLE-TACOMA 2.67
SPOKANE 0.64
YAKIMA oWw o 0.16
BECKLEY : K 0.59
CHARLESTON E : 5 : 1.53
ELKINS 2 0.97
HUNTINGTON x , 0.86
EAU CLAIRE C 0.00
GREEN BAY : c 0.05
LA CROSSE 5 5 0.00
MADISON 0.00
MILWAUKEE 2 ‘ ; 0.00
CASPER 0.00
CHEYENNE 38 0.03
LANDER 3 y 0.01 e&© WO@Oo- oNr®On *rOonNrnvt uovnwtm aaneosvoveoedas
SHERIDAN ; 5 0.00 @ eocooo o ooMooAoNoSoOCoNeHcMAHOCOCCODOOOCOoNN2OONHOOOOOCCOBBeCCOOBOOKCOBcCOODC oO A eCOOBHCONCCOMOOOCNNONORCARoo A ROMCOHOEAOOcOCADc A o HHCoMeAOA o C ANeoAOOeANoWeADeOMEc oAEeWaUoBMaWoNaOWoAo$aDoBOcAoNeAFcoNkcFNoeDWoHNceFFcDoBeAWcNeAHeNcWeABecTOeDNecOFeNUecNDeTeTcACoNeOeODcCeOoWcHEoReHcANeNeOoOCeeDDcTOeeDNcWTedFDnHcOdEAeWeN ADWHHAYO WWWAREWOHRTONNNNWEFWEWAFAADHLWANNOOFSN
Based 0n1971-2000 normals *** Not Available
NOTE: These data are preliminary and subject to change. In the past, precipitation totals from a number of stations were incomplete.