ebook img

Variation of Pitcher Morphology within Nepenthes vieillardii Hook. f. (Nepenthaceae) in New Caledonia PDF

2004·2.1 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Variation of Pitcher Morphology within Nepenthes vieillardii Hook. f. (Nepenthaceae) in New Caledonia

TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosciee tySociety ffoorPrl anPtlant SSyystsetmaetmicastics ISSN1346-7565 ActaPhytotax.Geobot,55(3):181-197(2004) Variation PitcherMorphology Nepenthes of within vieiUardii Hook. fi(NepenthaceianeNe)w Caledonia KAORUKO KUR-ATAi JAFFRE2 HIROAKISETOGUCHIi and ,TANGUY 'Graduate SZrhoo olfHLtm aandn Environmental Studies ,K)Jo tUhoive,isiC B1<l,oto606-8501 JZ{pan; ? Researeh lnstitutefo rDevetopment, BP A5, IVbutnea, ?Vlew Cdtedonia, Fhance, [Ihxonomy of Nbpenthes has been exc]usively based on pitche mrorphology that well characterizes the carnivore. In order to understand the morphological divers iantdy to rc-cxamine taxonomical diagno- sis ofthe Nepenthe staxa in New Caledonia t,he pitche mrorphology was carcfUlly studicd based on 221 individuaflrsem localities islandF.orthis inves- matured upper pitcher soM24 seven ofthe purpose, we tigated size ofpitchcrs and oftheir lids n,umber and densit yofnectar glands on lids n,umber and den- sity of digesti gvleand sin pitcher asnd ratio of digestiv zconc vs. waxy zene in pitcher sT.hese mor- phologica fleatur evsaried widely betwee nthe populatio ntshough they are mostly stable within an indi- vidual plant .Statisti canaallyses did not segregate any populatio annd supported the taxonomical treat- ment to unite several taxa int oan insula erndemic, 7Vlepenthe vsieillaJxlii Hook. f in New Caledonia. The number ofdigestive gland sand area ofdigestive zone in pitcher varied greatly between populations sug- gestin gthat some ecolegical factor dso affect the morphological diversi toyfpitchers. Key words: carnivorous plant sd,igesti vgelands m,orphology, nectar glands ?,Vepenthe Nse,w Caledonia, pitcher Nepenthes t,he sole genus ofthe famil yNepentha- shows a wide range in it smorphological diversity ceae comprises about 90 species ofperennial herbs (e.g M.a,cfarlane 1908, Kurata 1976, Komiya 1994, distribute din Madagascar, Seychelles ,northern Phillip s& Lamb 1996, Clarke 1997, Jebb & Cheek India ,Indo-China peninsula ,Malesia ,northern 1997) .Therefbre t,axonomical confusions have Austral ianad New Caledoni a(Kura 2t0ae2) ,These been caused in the current classification of plant scould expand thei rdistribut biyo nadjusting to AJkipenthes. soils with poor nutrients owing te an accomplished New Ca]edonia, a continental islan dthat orig- insectbsy insec- inatedfromGondwana,is latge special evolution ofcapturing an covered with a ser- tivorou sleaf called a "pitcher". Taxa ofNepenthes pentin earea, The ultramafic soil derive dfrom the have been mainly classified based on the charac- serpentine or gabbro is well characterized by very teristi cofspitcher morphology, On the other hand, few nutrients fbr plant growth and hypeFmagnesium dimorphism of the upper funne lpitcher and the content and the IVepe nthes plant is well adapted to lower janin pgitche rhas been well recognized even the edaphic conditions. Concernin gthe species in within an individual p]ant (e.g .Cl,arke 1997). New Caledonia n,ine taxa including six endemic Intraspeci fvairciation of pitche mrorphoLogy also species have been describe dmainly based on the NII-Electronic Library Service TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosciee tySociety ffoorr PPllanatnt SSyystsetmaetmicastics 182 APG V]1.55 morphology of the pitcher (Hooke r1873, Dubard tine area with poor nutrient. The populatio nexsam- 1906 ,Macfarlane 1908, Guillaumin 1911, Moore ined in the presen tstucly were chosen ftom near]y I921, Danser 1928, Guillaumin 1953, 1964, Jebb & entire area of distributi roannge of the species, Cheek 1997). These taxa of Nepenthes in New moreover, fiv eofthe seven population esxamined Caledoni haave been describ ebdased on small num- were locate din the southern part ofthe islan d(Fig. ber of specimens, and i tis uncertain whereabouts in 1 and Table 1-A) where the serpentine soil is wide- the plan tbody the pitcher wsere collected. ly distribute (dORSTOM 1983), Population ofGR Moreover, Jebb & Cheek ( ] 997) integrat ealdl is devclope don gabbro and the remainders on ser- taxa reported from New Caledoni aas, a synonym of pentmc. ?Vbpenth evsieillardii Hook, fl without any expla- Prior to the analysis between the populations, nations. Further examination ofthe morphological morphological variation ofpitcher within an indi- diversit aymong New Caledonian Nqpenthes is vidual was examined. Plant sof Albpenthes vieil- needed to clarify the morpholegical diversi tquyan- laJdi iusually have several matured pitchers and titatively and to verify the classification of the we could collect many pitchers ,enough fbr statis- specles. tica lanalysis at CR GR, MK among the seyen pop- As contribution to a critical cxamination of ulations and additionai RA and BL CTab l1e-B). the taxonomic prob]ems of IVepenthes in New 14 - 28 pitcher wsere sampled from each individual Caledoni aw,e clarified in thi sstudy the variation of in the fiv ecollection sites. pitche rmorphology in Nepenthes vieillaFdii sensu Fer analysis on the inter-populati voarniaatlion latoinNew Caledoniaby quantitativ aenalyses on of pitcher morphology, we collected a matured the size of the pitche rand it slid ,the number and upper pitche rfrom each individual ,and eight to densit yof the ncctar glands and digesti vgelands, 28 matured pitcher wsere sampled from each local- and the ratio ofthe digesti vzoene and waxy zone in ity .In total, 119 pitcher swere used fbr the mea- the pitcher .Classificati oofn Ncw Caledonian surements ([la b1l-Ae). Since remova] ofpitchers IVbpenthe ghas been discuss ebdy comparison among was expected to seriously damage thc individual, the collection sites ,The nomenclature tentatively pitcher swere collectcd from large individual swith fo11ow sthat ofJebb & Cheek (1997). many pitcher sT,he collected pitcher wsere fixed with FAA (50% ethanol: acetic acid: fbrmali n= Materials and Methods 90: 5:5). S t u d"vPla ntssites and materials iWeasurements ef Nepenthes vieillardii grow in maquis veg- Seven morphological characters were measured etation (Broo k1s987) develope don ultrabasic soil (Fi g2.)i sizc of lid (maximum and minimum diam- o.riginating from serpentine rock or gabbro. The eter of lid )l,engt hand width ofpitcher and height of plant susually develo psmall populations isolated digestiv egland zone were measured using a scale; from each other. NOpenthes in New Ca]edonia usu- the number and densit yof nectar glands on the lid ally grown in sunny place lik ethat ofopened slepe, and digesti vgeland sin the pitche rwere ¢eunted riverbank or edge ofthe fbres tT.he plant is creep- under a stereoscopic microscope (Olympu SsZ4045, er ef several meters in length a,nd develop sleafi Olympus Co., Ltd.) .We did not use characteristics pitcher son the top ofshoot while withering lower such as color, shape and presence or absence of leafpitche rsTh.erefbre the plant sfi'equent lhyave the fring efbr this analysis because the pitchers several matured upper funne lpitcher sin sexpen- showed larg evariations even within onc plan t(Fig, NII-Electronic Library Service TThheJea paJnae,pseanese SSooccieityety ffoorr PPllanatnSyts teSmaytsictsematics Deeember2004 KURATA et aL: Variatio nofpitclter morpholegy within N. vieittasdii 183 "ts 'O KO COL DE PRONY GORO(GR) ILE DES PINS (cp) (IP) FiG. 1. Map showing the location osfnine collection sitcs of Aiepenthes vieiUardii in New Caledonia. TABLE 1. Col]ectio nsitcs and samples ofNepenthes in New Caledonia, A. Inter-populationak,aria otfipiotncher morphology. Code forst u dy ' Altitud e(m)Soil typeNumber of sitcLocalitv pitcher esxaminedHabitat IPGRCPMKIRlBeKdNeKsPPins 30 Serpentine IO28152821W9e8triverbank GoroCol 803204202G2a0b8b3r0o81S0erpentine Open slope d e P r on v' Open slope Mont Koghi Serpentine ShtvbEdge RiviereBleue Scrpentine ofthc forest Kuniambu Serpentine Open slope Kopeto Serpentine Edge ofthe forest B, Variati oofnpitcher morphoLogy within onc plant. Sample No,Loca[ity Code fbrstudv typeNumbcr of site pitchers examinedHabitat 'Soil 12345 Mont Koghi MKBLGRcpRASerpentine 2814152520 ShnibOpen R{viere Blanche Serpcntinc slope GoroCol GabbroSerpentine Open slope de Prony Opcn slope Radier Serpentine Open slape NII-Electronic Library Service TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosciee tySociety ffoorPrl anPtlSyastnetma tSicysstematics 184 APG Vbl.55 A H <S. e e B . e ee c ' ' D - G ee !ee <l e iliS) e F eeeeee paee FiG ,2, Measuremcnt ofpitchers and lid sof Akzpenthe vsieittardl'i A, Length ofmaximum djannet eorf Lid B., Length ofminimurn diam- eter of lid C,. Ik)tu nlumbcr of nectar glands .D. Length ofpitcher. E. Width at the widest part ofpitcher. F, Height efdigestive gland zone ofpitcher. G.. Number of digesti vgclands per unit area. 3). Thc area of the lid swas calculated from the Guillaumin includin gtheir type specimens were rnaximum and minimum diarnete arnd, the density examined fbr measurcment of their pitche rmor- ofthe ncctar gland swas estimated. The densit oyf pholegy. The available specimens were the four of digesti vgelands pcr square was calculated from the nine taxa describe dfrom New Caledonia, 26 the area of the leafpiec ceut-off by the leafpunch. pitcher sfrom 12 sheets ofN vieillanlii, 15 pitchers Specimcns ofAJepenthes vieillantii, N, vieil- from six sheets of N vieillardii var. dqplanchei, laFdi ivar. deplanche iDubard, Nl vieillardii var. fiv epitche rfsrom one sheet ofAL vieiliaptiii var. min- montrottzierii Dubard and N. vieillantii var. minima ima and 13 pitcher fsrom three sheets of ?V lvieil- NII-Electronic Library Service TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosclee tySociety ffoorPrl anPtlSyastnetma tSlcysstematics Deeember2004 KURATA et al, : Variatio ont' pitche rmorpho]ogy within Ah,ieiUcuthi 185 ee ':-rtrv,,ll・Il iffme swee ・・,/,/,/tvt'/・t;/1, //mmbt' ,l/ilm lll,i,・ill, S'ii$imai・me.. -ew Ill#,:/・ ts,iil# uet ' i,lajtt・/--vma/ llllll,,}e,/・i 'ts "ll:ll,I /lva,,l,ll, fs -.ul,i,!,tW .'m.a.k./.',wi' "w hiva;lvafi '1'i,Sll:g・i'ii;・iili,/{.., .wn:.t,-:im FiG .3, Gross rnorphoiogy ofpitchcrs ofIL'(7]enthe,s vieillantii Thc color and the shape erthe pitche rvar- ied ameng p!ant sT,he arrows indicat tehe boundaty between thc cligcstiye gland zone and waxy zone. a, b and d were from RB, and e was fror nMK. f: indicate funge. NII-Electronic Library Service TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosciee tySociety ffoorr PPllanatnt SSyystsetmaetmicastics 186 APG Xlo15.5 tardi ivar. montrouzierii were examined for the given in Table 2-B. Length and width ofpitcher on rnorphology. List ef specimens examined were list-plants from KP are large rthan these from other ed in appendix, localiti e(smea n13.5 cm in lengt hand 4.4 cm in width in KP). On the other hand, pitche irn plants Statisticalanalysis from GR., MK and KN were relatively smal]er; Statisti acnaallyses were performe dusing the mean width ofthe GR specimens (2, c3m) was almost half value for the characters of each individua lT.he of specimens from KR data were subjected to analysis ofvariance (one-way ANOVA) with the Tukey' shonestl ysignificant dif 2) Nectar gtancls ference test (Tukey H'SsD) using SPSS ver. 1O,O J Number of nectar gland son the lid of plants from fbr Windows (SPS S2000). KP was markedly higher than those from other localiti(e1s45.1 lid)l;essthan glands on one-third of Results gland swere distribut eond the lid of specimens fromGR (Tabl2e-B), PZiriati oonfpitch meorrphotogy within one indi- Thc area of the li dwas calculated from the vidual and between individuats lengths of the maximum and minimum diameters, The seven morphological characters were measured and the densit yof the nectar gland on the lid at for 1 02 pitcher sfrom fiv eindividua lansd, the mean each cellection site was also estimated. Intrapop- value and standard error of the measurement of ulational variation and comparison among the pop- each plant were presente idn 1labl e2-A, The stan- ulatiens in the densit yof the nectar gland on the 1id dard errors for each measurement in individual are presente din Fig. 6. The value showed a varia- were lower than the value ameng the individual tion range of 17.4 (KN) - 7,7 n,/cm2 (RB) i,ndicat- (Fi g4.), The mean va]ue is remarkably differenting grea tvariability, from each jndividu aNle.ctar gland densit yranged The relation between the area of the lid and the from 6,6 (sampl 4e) to 24.3 nos,lcm2 (samp l1)e and number ofnectar glands is given in Fig, 7, A cor- was remarkably high in sample 1 among the five relation was recognized between these two factors individua lsO.n the other hand, ratio ofdigestive (Correla tcoiefofincient - O.5271 ,p < O.OO1) .The gland zone f length ofpitcher was O.59 in sample 2, number ofnectar gland swas changed in propouion indicatin gthe highes tvalue among the fiv eindi- to the area ofthe lid .However, the densit yofthe viduals exarnined (Fi g5),, The significant difibrencenectar gland sis an unstable character on account of was detecte bdetween all individu pallant sexcluding the iarg evariatjon within a population. the densit oyfthe digestiv egland (p < O,O 1, Tukey's The distribut iofon nectar glands is shown in HSD, Table 3-B), Fig .8-a .The nectar gland sof?Vlepenthes vieillardii were sparsely distribute tdhroughout the entire lid. lhteripopulationalvariation D Size ofti adndpitcher sy Digestive glancts' The variation ofthe area oflids is shown in [Ribl e2- The densit oyfthe digesti vgelands t,he tota 1number B, The area oflids in KP was significantly ditTerentof digesti vgelands and the ratio of the digestive from that in other population sT.he mean value is gland zone are also shown in [labl 2e-B, large r(mea n14.4 cm2) than twice ofthose in GR, The yariation range in the densit yof digcs- CP and MK (mea n5,6 - 6.6 cm2). tive gland son a pitche rwas 442.0 g]and sper cm2 in Variation sin the size of the pit¢her are also IP to 733,7 glands in GR (Fi g9,) .No significant dif NII-Electronic Library Service TThhee  JJaapapnaesneese  SSooocieityety  ffoorr  PPllanatnt  SSyystsetmaetmioastics . ’ December 2004 KURATA  et al,;Variatio nofpitcher  morphology  withinAN  vieilla,dii 87   O 一 一 一   O    =oNo 〇.mO.e .OO.〇.    口ONo NO.一〇.NO,伺O.NO.凶O.cO「.   O O O O O   O O O O O目O O も唄出影o 回順燭跼>u邑D 刊り寸O.ひり〇刑.O寸制O.判〔}寸〇.判Q寸OQ. ち驀畄o 眉嘱で>騨o翰勹 判卜寸O.嗣m寸O.制トの〇.燈爿寸O.¶m寸O .劇e寸Oう.判⊃邑Oσ. . 脳‘一トO旨O【=一⇒広鳴〇 勹[羇国層の=訂ロ>のobDDo         (ε.mひトN蹌一〇〇N剥一O〇..ひOO寸刊個℃りo寸一D勹o,,寸NゆO寸刊O℃トリoo.,Om卜り1めひO一制O冂O.,一〇卜[寸刑崎い◎卜NoN., 』』[』ド一O」 [口,=邸〇 て[刺噺℃磆⊆邸栃bり〉o⇔oo          (ε.寸個d唄n刊卜一〇D囚NgN.,箇卜〇一邑 N寸Nゆひ一料..〇邑軌Q嶋 判一寸りO卜[o..寸mや一噴 嗣Oo軌尸ゆ一Q5..q卜一トひ州嗣一ゆトじN9り.,a ひO姶mひ一寸門制寸尠軌一5,.O寸卜e寸n刊一一めN寸5O., 起一州‘で←日』邸⇔oo弱o邸                    脳掴〔【Oの自りh つ【蜩回唱撰の弓鳴bΦ〉0⇔Do      (伺丶)【口り=.剛寸O寸劇寸軌D卜Q,.一NOい邑卜例O判..卜鳩卜伺凶一ひ寸剥..ぴ【ひN判のNひO,.O囚鴫寸刊OO邑トQ.、    」坊←∩[Oら口  ℃一唱唄℃臼口応惇o>のoワbΩo      (囚丶)目Qq.嶋ααN判ON寸寸..マ一嶋寸判卜m卜m..り1一ゆm一O刑[6..mN寸[寸O劇嶋N..0一寸爿ひOい0OQ..ひり釧ひ爿[ひつ9..0 ゆOひト劇OOα脇.. oo     一 一 =』唱oりu」oo口         セ蕚窪タ 号且お    言∀。寸OO劇ぴ一,.3OO料O因σ..一O嗣ひ一,.D0り個制60,.卜O○刊寸N.. 鰍‘芍喟彡o  調潔」ooq    )倉。 卜囚O刑O笆..O一O劇mN..m剛O判りN,.吟OO判卜国..O一Om料mo..mOひN嗣..りmO劇寸寸,. 偶   縞   一 』一りの」〇Q』邸Qコo          焔』闘O筋口o   当乞H。    曾)。 N一O判O℃,,QO嗣9O0cN..ひめO爿つ卜D..のNO制一O一..い囚O 一ひ刊.. も蕊畠=   渥旦』・    ()口δ 吟QO 岡一刊[Q..q寸Oeひ劇う,.頃O劇吟〇一..〇N〔)判斡ひ..寸ぴ○刑ON一..e笛O刊嶋D5う、.寸一一制い怖【..   罵   2epo   ワ 一‘舶〇臼o田o」     ←ヨg⊆ , 』岩(日O訥の‘O ℃[切←口訂bお9自o0    (門丶)自Q悶.一d一爿m寸N..〇卜ODO[刑o..Q⇔O爿m寸一oo..ひNO判¢O..O寸O刊卜ひ.. 一幽、劬〇〇臼. 哨易←∩[o(口Q ℃鬥←9仁緡5」OQり霞0    〔囚丶)[口O自.O卜O刊び卜り.,αぴO判Nひ、.ひO凶寸一刊[..頃m[ひ寸[制.,D卜O制卜卜O,,国Dq爿寸卜[o..斡一い刑DO【o.. o 口o o ℃噂⇒←一≧N」「」」o」鳴口肥り¢聞黠〇』」』イ腎.. 們‘7圏‘』眉隔←口タ氤⇔oF一〇p【」Du瓢o鍜po 脳』【』ド唱=嘱<O」 雰冖コ望邸尸OO邸O」   唱一§   (N)Q悶邸φo自巳Qり灯Q          (ε.嶋寸N判燈寸卜り[O四笛判,...寸脇国判寸ゆ凶O囚O判鴇m....Oいり刑卜O姶卜【O嗣℃ρ「覧.,,,寸一口鬥寸判嶋軌eO判O卜5...,Oり口判酌的寸一m)〔刊O寸..,. 』属隔覃喟【岩【冖g」oo自oeお〉邸自o邸詔畠3qo 璃』円]卩℃「【脳イ一O』O∈欝口に〇O鐔0」、  で一   (6)9一1口邸凶」邸りo員∈oり         〔ε,δQ刊Oいりm一一刑め卜O....寸Nの料OQ寸口寸Oゆ刑りO,..,卜O=刑ひひo一QO刊OOco..,.寸ON【制寸°ひ邑寸ONO刊う,...O刊NいO℃卜OひH...,O °OO噂ひ判り卜甑【刑ゆ卜N勹じn.,,,りOO【一江刑瞬Nひ一劇寸寸【.... o oqI     顰τ〉司邸,五。日紹  OZ. 一ぐtlr ら 寸 い 【一』〇⊆.軍一一=OQO   帽oしe 暗 ら 難 Sk < ゜つ 醗 〇 り 一 NNI工I工-EElleoetcrotniroonic  LLiibrbarryary  Service TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosciee tySociety ffoorPrl anPtlSyastnetma tSicysstematics 188 APG Xio15.5 N'-' U=oNo>'pe1noenv-Foo'pNct E xutivv30252015105 [os O,5 a Ltu Pum [YF o M,e c[ooa 1(MK) (B2L3 ) (GR ) (4CP) 5(RA) ( 1MK ) (B2L ) (3GR ) (C4P ) (R5A) (SCamopllle enucmbt esriitoen) S(aCmopllle enucmbterionsite) Fi( }4.. Mcan and standard crror ofdensity ofnectar glands col- FiG. 5. Mcan and standard error of ratio ofdigestive gland zone lecte dfrom fiy eindividual plants. co]]ectcd from fiy eindividua pllants. TABLE 3.Significa ndtifferenc ocfmorphological characters in one plant using Tukey' HsSD test, (*p<O, 0**5p<,O.O1) A.Density ofncctar gland Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 12345 o.ooo**o.ooo**o.ooo**o.ooo** O.11IO.O16*O.945 o.ooo**O.O08rk* O.064 B.Density ofdigestive gland SampleNo. 1 2 3 4 5 .]2345 O.054o.ooo**O.355O.87S O.39SO,762O.389 O,O15*O.O03*s O.942 C, Total number of digestiv egland Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 12345 O,O06**o,ooo**o.ooo-*o.ooo** O.Oooe*o.ooo**o.ooo**O.ooos*o.ooo**O.041* D. Ratie ofdigestive zone SarnpleNo, 1 2 3 4 5 12345 o.ooo**O.074O.O12*O.435 o,ooo**o.ooo**o,ooo**1.000O,O02**o.ooo** NII-Electronic Library Service TThhee JJaapapnaesneSeosciee tySociety ffoorPrl anPtlSyastnetma tSicysstematics December 2004 KURAT/A et al.: Vtariati oonfpitcher morpholegy within N.L,ieittasdii 189 and the maximum width of a pitcher (Correlation ouAE 25 Ux coeMcient =- O.7446 ,p < O.OOI). Therefbre we dNL2Y0v used lengt hof pitche rfbr representing the size of cre 15 pitcher in furthe srtudy. On the other hand, corre- a latio nwas not recognized between the size of the L PaUs 10 pitcher and the density of digestiv eglands oc-p 5 (Correla tcoieorancient - -O.214, p < O,05 ,Fig. o 11). M't c[ooa IP GR CP MK RB KN KP The shape of the piteher was assumed to be a Collectio snite column for estimating the total number ofdigestive gland sin a pitche rbased on the maximum irv'idth of F i G ,6 , M ea n a nd s ta nd ar d e rr or of d en s itvt of nectar g-lands col- lecte adt seven localities. the pitche rt,he heigh tof the digesti vgeland zone and the densit yofthe digesti vgeland ,The total number ofdigestive gland son the pitche orfplants from KP was significantly highe rthan those from 250Adve other localiti e(smea n40,231. 1glands on pitcher); 2oog-en more than twice ofthose at IR GR, CR MK and KN (mea n16,398. 6- 22,861. 7glandslcm 2a)s shown in 150ds82 Table 2-B. The variation and comparison amQng populatio nisn the nurnber of digesti vgeland son the pitche arre presente idn Fig .12 .The tota lnumber of loovotsD digestiv egland sshowed a relatively strong corre- 50E=z latio nwith the area ofthe digesti zvoene (correlation coeMcient - O,7763 ,p < O.OOI ,Fig, l3), oo On the other hand, no significant difference 10 20 30 was observed in the ratio of the digestive gland zone (digest ziovneeftotal length ofpitcher) among Area of lid s(cm2) the collection sites except at CP and MK (Fi g1.4, [labl e4-D), The maximum mean value was O.47 at FIG. 7. Diagram showing corrclation between the area of' lid sand the number ofnectar glands ofthe pitche rat cach locality.IP, and the minimum was O.37 at CP. The mean Correlatio nindex = O.527 1, value of the ratio of the digesti vgleand zene was O.5 or les s{n all the sites, i twas clarified as character- istic osf Aiepenthes vieiUaidii that the digestive fercnce was recognizedi in the densit yofthe diges- gland zone was distributc bdclow the lower halfof tive gland sdetecte adt each collection site, howev- the lengt hofthe pitche rH,owever, thc distribution er, significant difference wsere fbund between in JP (dept ho)f the digesti vgeland zone varied among and GR, GR and MK (lbke HyS'D, p < O.O1, Tbble each pitchcr (Fig 8.-b). 4-B) .To examine the relation between the size of the pitche rand the densit yof the digestiv geland ,the Measttrement oj'Hlerba srpieucimmen correlation between lengt hand the maximum width 59 pitcher sfrom fbur taxa of New Caledonian of the pitcher was examined (Fi g1,O), A relatively Nbpenthe swere exarnined based on thc hcrbarium strong correlation was recognized between length specimens includin tgheirtypes ,Averagc and stan- NII-Electronic Library Service TThheJea paJnaespeSaoncieestyefo rSPloacntiSyestteym atficosr Plant Systematics 190 APG 5,bl, 55 F[c・,.8 .Distribution ofnectar glands on lids collected at KP. The neetar glands of ALepenthe svieillardii were sparsely distribuie dthroughout the entire lid ,b, Longitudinal sections ofpitehers in KP The distributio nofthe digestive gland zone was variable in cach pitche rT.he arro", shows the boundary between the digestive g]and zone and the waxy zone. NII-Electronic Library Service

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.