Table Of Content

INDEX VOLUME5 5 2002 2002] INDEX LEADING ARTICLES—AUTHOR INDEX BAINBRIDGE, STEPHENM .: Why A Board? Group Decisionmian kCoirpnorgat e Governance | BERMAN, MITCHELI Conditions Doctrine: A Second Look at “The Greater Includes the Lesser” ...... 693 MANN, RONALD J.: Credit Cards and Debit Cards in the UniStattes eandd Ja pan 1005 SHERRY, SUZANNA: HASTE MAKES WASTE: Congress and the Common Law in Cybe rspace — . qeseaderscansunneesonitecseeteny . 309 VERS, ANITA & STEIN, MICHAEL ASHLEY: An Equality Paradigm for Preventing Genetic Discrimination , eedbaveubinieeun sukeneews N, MICHAEL ASHLEY & SILVERS, ANITA: An Equality Paradigm for Preventing renetic Discriminattc LEADING ARTICLES—TITLE INDEX AN EQUALITY PARADIGM FOR PREV + GENETIC DISCRIMINATION: Silvers, Anita & Stein, Mic OMMERCIAL SPI { AND THE UNCONSTIT OOK AT “THE GREATER I UDES THE LESSER Berman, Mitchell , CREDIT CARDS AND DEBIT CARDS IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN: Mann, Ronald J HASTE MAKES WASTE: CONGRESS AND THE COMMON LAW IN CYBERSPACI Sherry, Suzanna Libis amusements eta WHY A BOARD? GROUP DECISIONMAKING IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: Bainbridge, StephenM ESSAYS “IRST AMENDMENT LIMITS ON COPYRIGHT: Baker, C. Edwin....... , ):T ORT IN THE MODERN LEGAL ACADEMY: John C. P. Goldberg. SYMPOSIUM: HE DELAWARE MYTH: Harvey R. Mille fake cea NS Se : RPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM AND REEMERGENCE FROM BANKRUPTCY: PUTTIN( HE STRUCTUR E BACK IN RESTRUCTURING: Charles M. Elson, Paul M. Helms, James R. Mon pais ae YRATE OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTIONO F BANKRUPTCY LAW: ESSONS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM: John Armour, Brian R. Cheffins, & A. Skeel, J1 ‘ ; SE ae PETER ED 1699* ’R FIVE) EASY LESSONS FROM ENRON: Douglas G. Baird & Robert K. Rasmussen TITTTTITT TTT 1787* DELAWARE IS NOT A STATE”: ARE WE WITNESSING JURISDICTIONAL COMPETI- TION IN BANKRUPTCY?: Marcus Cole 1845* THE LAW OF LAST RESORT: Barry E. Adler = 1661* MANGERS’ FIDUCIARY DUTY UPON THE FIRM’S INSOLVENCY: ACCOUNTING FOR PERFOR- MANCE CREDITORS: Alon Chaver & Jessie M. F 1813” WHY ARE DELAWARE AND NEW YORK BANKRUPT‘ Lynn M. LoPucki & Joseph W. Doherty 1933” INDEX NOTES—AUTHOR INDEX ASHLEY, GREGORY M.: Theology in the Jury Room: Religious Discussion as “Extraneous Material”i n the Course of Capital Punishment Deliberations DEBARBA, KIRSTEN: Maintaining the Adversarial System: The Practice of A Jurors to Question Witness During Trial GRAYBILL, ELIZABETH SUSAN: Assisting Minors Seeking Abo rtions Proceedings: A Guardian ad Litem Is No Substitute for an Attorne INGLE, MEGHAN PAULK: Law on the Rocks: The Intoxication De fenses Are Beir Eighty-Sixed KLEIN, DORA W.: Trial Rights and Psychotropic Drug : The Case # Administering Involuntary Medications to a Defen hoi During MONCUS, JAMES Roy III: The Marriage of the False Claims Act Information Act: Parasitic Potential of Positive Synergy MOTHERSHEAD, KYLE F.: How the “Equal Opportunity” Sexual Haras Discriminates on the Basis of Gender Under Title VII MoyEs, ANNE-MARIE: Assessing the Risk of Executing the Innocent: A Cass Allowing Access to Physical Evidence for Posthumous DNA Test OVERMAN, TODD R.: Shame on You: Campaign Finance Reforn RIDE i vanicora vo veka eatavatanecs sik Giacean ncaeeuneveaimaakes Keng PariE L, SEWALI K.: Immunizing Internet Service Prot fleer s from Internet Defamation Claims: Hou ier Should Courts Go? REINSMITH, LAINA ROSE: Proving and Employer's Intent: Disparate Discrimination and the Stray Remarks Doctrine «A fter Reeves PUG FPO sn ick sn ssecsnsccckacoeoncansohuseoidaces SCHARMAN, CHRISTOPHER A.: Not Without My Father: Posthumously Conceived Child... SIPOS, CtH ARL ES C. : The¢ Disappearing Settle ment: : The Cont) ractual SMITH, JUSTIN H: tne aes for Warrant: Reinventing the Fou rth . Search Warrant Requirement Through Electronic Procedures WOLFE, JOSHUA ANDREW: A Search for the Best IDEA: Balancing the Provisions of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act ZEEMER, SHAY ELLEN: FMLA Notice Requirements and the Che Maintaining a Hard-Fought Balance...............:00:00++ NOTES—TITLE INDEX HE INNOCENT: A CASE FOR ALLOW TO) PHY SICALL EV IDENCE FOR POSTHUMOUS DNA TESTING: Ann-Marie | ASSISTING MINORS SEEKING ABORTIONS IN JUDICIAL BYPASS PROCEEDIN‘ A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR AN ATTORNEY: Elizat ION occ chcasuuisaaeduc tase tuaciesb oencdes caacubncesakoanisiasetorsnteaeans THE DISAPPEARING SETTLEMENT: THE CONTRACTUAL L REG! ULATION OF SMITH & WESSON FIREARMS: Charles C. Sipos .. : FMLA NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AND THE CHEVRON TEST: MAINTAININ( BALANCE: Shay Ellen Zeemer HOW THE “EQUAL OPPORTUNITY” SEXUAL HARASSER DISCER IMI OF GENDER UNDER TITLE VII: Kyle F. Mothershead ...... IMMUNIZING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM THIRD- PARTY INTERNET DEFA) CLAIMS: HOW FAR SHOULD CouRTS GO?: Sewali K. Patel LAW ON THE ROCKS: THE INTOXICATION DEFENSES ARE BEIN‘ Meghan Paulk Ingle “i MAINTAINING THE ADVERSARIAL SYSTEM: THE PRACTICE OF ALLOWIN( QUESTION WITNESSES DURING TRIAL: Kirsten DeBarba 2002] INDEX [THE MARRIAGE O} THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND THE FREEDOMO F INFORMATION ACT PARASITIC POTENTIAL OI POSITIVE SYNERGY?: JAMES RAY MONCUS II1....... 1549 NoT WITHOUT MY FATHER: THE LEGAL STATUS OF 'HE POSTHUMOUSLY CONCEIVED CHILD: Christopher A. Scharman 1001 PRESS ONE FOR WARRANT: REINVENNTIITINN G F WARRANT REQUIREMENT THROUGH ELECTRONI( PROCEDURES: Justin H. Smith PROVING AN EMPLOYER'S ID TENT: DISPARAT! TREATMENT DISCRIMINATION AND STRAY REMARKS DOCTRINE AFTER RI EVES V. SANDERSON PLUMBING a e Reinsmith ARCH FOR THI BEST IDEA: BALANCI( I CONFLICTING PROVISIONOSF THI ALS WITH DISABII ITIES EDUC ACT: Joshua Andrew Wolfe REFORM THROU H SOCIAL NORMS: Todd R SSION AS “EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL’ BERATIONS: Gregory M. Ashley AGAINST ADMINISTERING RING TRIAl L: Dora W. Klein 2002] INDEX 2002 INDEX DIGEST Page references followed by an aster- isk (*) are to Leading Articles, Essays, Prefaces, Symposiums, and Book Re- views; those followed by a dagger (+) are to Notes; those accompanied by two daggers (++) are to the Special Project. BANKRUPTCY BANKRUPTCY, JUST FOR THE RICH? AN ANALYSIS OF POPULAR FEE ARRANGE MENTS FOR PRE-PETITION LEGAL FEES AND A CALL TO AMEND CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION CASES AND THE DELAWARE MYTH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM AND REEMERGENCE FROM BANKRUPTCY PUTTING THE STRUCTURE BACK IN RESTRUCTURING CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE EVOLUTIONO F BANKRUPTCY LAW: LESSONS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM CORPORAT }i FOUR (OR FIVE) EASY LESSONS FROM tA STATE”: ARE WI RISDICTIONAL COMPET NKRUPTCY? AST RESORT ARY DUTY UPON THE FIR\ ACCOUNTING FOR PERFOR \ND NEW YORK BANKRUPTCY REORGANIZATIONS I CIVIL RIGHTS AN EQUALITY PARADIGM FOR PREVENTIN¢ DISCRIMINATION “EQUAL OPPORTUNITY “ HARASSER MINATES ON THE BASISO F GENDI TLE VII “HE MESSENGER: THE MISUSI ATE IMPACT THEORY TO NGE HIGH-STAKES YNAL THEORY COMPARATIVE LAW ( ORE DIT CARDS AND DEBIT CARDS IN THI UNITED STATES AND JAPAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ASSISTING MINORS SEEKING ABORTIONS IN JUDICIAL BYPASS PROCEEDINGS: A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IS NO SUBSTITUTI FOR AN ATTORNEY 2002] INDEX ING THE MESSENGER: THE MISUSE GOVERNMENT & LEGISLATION OF DISPARATE IMPACT THEORY TO FMLA NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AND THE CHALLENGE HIGH-STAKES CHEVRON TEST: MAINTAINING A HARD- EDUCATIONAL THEORY FOUGHT BALANCE a sicaeeaeee ‘ HASTE MAKES WASTE: CONGRESS AND THE ELECTION LAW COMMON LAW IN CYBERSPACE SHAME ON YOU: CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM THROUGH SOCIAL NORMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HASTE MAKES WASTE: CONGRESS AND THI EMPLOYMENT COMMON LAW IN CYBERSPACE. AN EQUALITY PARADIGM FOR PREVENTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND NON GENETIC DISCRIMINATION LEGAL SANCTIONS IN FINANCING FMLA NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AND THI TRANSACTIONS... CHEVRON TEST: MAINTAINING A HARD- FOUGHT BALANCE JURISPRUDENCE HOW THE “E \L OPPORTUNITY “* HARASSER HASTE MAKES WASTE: CONGRESS AND THE DISCRIMINATES ON THE BASIS OF GENDER COMMON LAW IN CYBERSPACE UNDER TITLE VII UNLOVED: TORT IN THE MODERN LEGAL <CEIVED DISABII TII ES, SOCIAL COGNITION, ACADEMY YD “INNOCENT MISTAKES VING AN EMPLOYER'S INTEN DISPARATE TECHNOLOGY/INTERNET \TMENT DISCRIMINATION AN D THE HASTE MAKES WASTE: CONGRESS AND THE REMARKS DOCTRINE AI TER REEVES COMMON LAW IN CYBERSPACE SANDERSON PI MBING PRODUCTS IMMUNIZING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM THIRD-PARTY INTERNET DEFAMA- EVIDENCE TION CLAIMS: HOW FAR SHOULD CourRTS NG THE RISK OF Ext! Go? ¢ ALI TORT DNA TEST IMMUNIZING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM THIRD-PARTY INTERNET DEFAMA- FAMILY LAW TION CLAIMS: HOW FAR SHOL LD COURTS Not WITHOUT My FA Go? TUINnLy )VED: TORT IN THE MODERN | ACADEMY 4 GIOUS IONS AS “E) ,ANEOUS MATERIAL I nok ( I ( AT i P NISHMENT \T TIONS\ FEDERAL COURTS \ NG I ERAL PROS! ETHICS FINANCE . CARDS AND Dt UNITED STATES FIRST AMENDMENT i TABLE CHOICE AD Y CHALLENG! ) FOR REGULATIOD MENT RELIGION TIONAL CONDITIONS DOCTR SECOND LOOK AT “THE GRE HE LESSER *IRST AMENDMENT LIMITSO N iH