PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 96(4), 1994, pp. 599-606 VACCINIDIPLOSIS, A NEW GENUS FOR CECIDOMYIA VACCINII OSTEN SACKEN (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) Raymond J. Gagne and Jerry A. Payne (RJG) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, % U.S. National Museum NHB 168, Washington, D.C. 20560; (JAP) Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1 1 1 Dunbar Road, Byron, Georgia 31008. Abstract.—TheadultandpupalstagesofCecidomyiavacciniiOstenSackenaredescribed for the first time and the larva is redescribed. Vaccinidiplosis Gagne, a new genus in the supertribeCecidomyiidi, isexpressly erectedfor C. vaccinii. ('accinidiplosis vacciniiforms a scallop-shaped leafgall on deerberry, Vaccinium stamineum (Ericaceae). Past records ofthis gall midge on other hosts are discussed. Key Words: Gall midge, Nearctic, deerberry, Vaccinium, Ericaceae Osten Sacken (1862) named Cecidomyia and form cocoons. Adults emerge the fol- vaccinii fora larva from leafgalls on a Vac- lowing spring. cinium from Washington, D.C. His full We have found the galls only on deer- description ofthe larvaconsisted of "a red- berr>', \'accinium stamineum L., in Georgia dish larva." Osten Sacken's description of and Maryland, never on other blueberries the gall was more diagnostic, which has orhuckleberries. Gallshavebeen foundalso madeitpossibletoassociatehisspecieswith on r. stamineum from Pennsylvania (J. aparticulargallon ]'acciniiin}(¥\g. 1). Galls Plakidas, personal communication, speci- are usually green and scallop-shaped with a mens in the National Museum of Natural serratedistal margin. Galls mayturn orange History), North Carolina (Beutenmiiller to red in the fall or after leaves are picked. 1907), and Massachusetts (Stebbins 1910). They are attached to the main veins on the Osten Sacken's original gall specimens, col- under surface ofleaves, which makes them lected in Washington, D.C. and preserved inconspicuous from above. Galls may be intheNational MuseumofNaturalHistory, found from July to October along the At- were probably also from deerberry. He re- lantic United States from Massachusetts to ported the host as ""Vaccinium (or Gaylus- Georgia. Each gall contains one to several sacia?)." but the under surface ofhis galled larvae. Larvae remain in the first instar for leaves do not have the glandular surface of most ofthe summer, usually until late Au- a Gaylussacia. The leaves otherwise agree gust, whengrowth proceedsquicklythrough in shape with those of I'. stamineum. Proc- the second instar to the mature third and ter (1946) listed a "blueberry leaf gall" as last instar. When larvae become fully de- common on Vaccinium sp. on Mount De- velopedinautumn,thegallssplitlengthwise sert Island, Maine. Thegall wasnot specified into two equal halves. The larvae then drop furtherand I'. stamineumisnotknown from to the ground, burrow under the surface. Maine(VanderKJoet 1988), so it ispossible 600 PROCEEDINGSOFTHE ENTOMOLOGICALSOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Fig. 1. Leafofdeerbern'. I'. stamineum. showinggallsofI'. vacciniiattachedtotheveinsonabaxialsurface. that a gall similar to that ofC. vaccinii oc- liissacia. Possibly Felt never collected the curs on another I'accinium in Maine. species and misapplied a scientific name to We cannot corroborate literature records someone else's common name. Leonard's ofC vaccina from Gayliissacia (huckleber- (1928)listoftheinsectsofNewYork, where ry), because we have seen no leaf galls on Feltdid mostofhisown collecting, doesnot plants ofthat genus. It is possible also that include C. vaccinii. Incidentally, Felt(1918) such records are due to the misapplication cited Beutenmiiller (1907) for the dangle- of the common name "huckleberry." The berrv' or Gaylussacia record, but Beuten- common name "huckleberry" is correctly miiller's paper refers only to V. stamineum applied only species of Gayliissacia. How- as the host. Gagne (1989) listed C. vaccinii ever, Johnson (1899) recorded C. vaccinii from r. stamineum, ]'accinium spp., and from New Jersey "on leaves of the huck- possiblyGaylussacia. buttheserecordswere leberry', \'acciniiim sp.." and Felt (1918, based on the literature. Lacking hard evi- 1940) reported the species from "dangle- dence to the contrary, C. vaccinii is defi- berry, Gayliissacia frondosa" Britton and nitely known only from I', stamineum. Brown (1913)listed squaw-huckleberryand The genus Cecidomyia was once used as dangleberry among common names ofPo- anartificial category to which wereassigned lycodium (now Vaccinium) stamineum. so somespeciesthatcould notbeplacedinany Johnson's record, at least, could have re- known genus. Many of these, for example ferred to V. stamineum. The Felt Collection C. vaccinii, wereknownonly from thelarval hasno representatives ofgalls or specimens stage. Cecidomyiaisnowrestricted toa nat- from this kindofgall on Vacciniumor Gay- ural group of species that feed on resin of VOLUME 96. NUMBER 4 601 conifers (Gagne 1978), leaving in uncertain es not regularly aligned; circumfilar loops generic placement many species that are short, some emerging from a base in three known only from larvae and cannot be strands instead ofthe more usual two found placedinanyknowngenus. InGagne(1989), in othergenera; setulae sparse, present only forexample, thisspecieswastreatedas'T^'- on basal nodes offlagellomeres. cidomyia" vaccmii. The adults we have ob- Thorax: Scutum with 2 lateraland 2 dor- tained can still not be placed in any genus socentral rows ofsparse setae and no scales. known to us, so a new genus is erected for Mesanepisternum naked. Mesepimeron this species. The new genus belongs to the with 2-5 setae. Wing (Fig. 5); Rs curved supertribe Cecidomyiidi because ofthe bi- apically tojoin C posterior to wing apex; C nodal, tricircumfilar male antennae, but unbroken at juncture with R5; Rs moder- cannot be placed in any named tribe. ately strong but evanescent before joining Sc. situatedapproximatelyhalfwaybetween Methods M arculus and apex of Sc; base of weakly We followed the growth ofthis species in curved; Cu forked. First tarsomere without Georgiabypickinggallsperiodicallyforone spur. Tarsal claws(Fig. 6) untoothed, curved season. Galls were sent live to Washington beyond midlength; empodia slightly longer for examination. Samples were stored in than claws. 70% ethanol. Some larvae and resulting Female abdomen (Figs. 7, 8): First adults were mounted for microscopic study through sixth tergites entire, rectangular, in Canada balsam, using the method out- with single row of uninterrupted posterior lined in Gagne (1989). In the descriptions setae, each with basal pair oftrichoid sen- that follow, anatomical terminology ofthe silla,occasionallywith 2-3 lateral setae,and adult stage follows usage in McAlpine et al. no scales. Seventh tergite with double row (1981) and that of the larval stage follows ofposterior setae and otherwise as for pre- that in Gagne (1989). The new genus is to cedingtergites. Eighth tergite slightly small- be attributed to Gagne. er than seventh, the posterior row ofsetae not extending as far laterally. Ovipositor Vaccinidiplosis Gagne, New Genus short, slightly protrusible, distal halfabout \d\x\\.—Head(¥ig. 2): Eyes separated at as long as seventh tergite; cerci (Fig. 8) sep- vertex; facets circular, closely adjacent. Oc- arate, elongate-ovoid, bilaterally flattened, ciput without dorsal protuberance. Frons each with 4 or 5 thickened, sensory setae at with 5-11 setae per side. Labella hemi- apex and covered elsewhere with short se- spherical, each with 6-8 lateral setae and tae. Hypoproct short, bilobed. rounded at apex. Palpus with 3 to 4 seg- Male abdomen: First through seventh ments. Antenna with first and second fla- tergites entire, rectangular, each with basal gellomeres not connate. Female flagello- pair oftrichoid sensilla, single, mesally in- meres (Fig. 3) cylindrical with short necks, terruptedposteriorrowofsetae,andnooth- each with 3 circumfila. the basal one dis- er setae or scales. Eighth tergite short, scle- crete, the distal two connected on one side rotized only anteriorly, with only anterior of node; circumfila with short loops, their pair oftrichoid sensilla. Genitalia (Figs. 9. bases irregularly placed; setulae sparse, oc- 10): cerci (a) elongate, each tapering to con- cumngmainlyatbaseofflagellomeres. Male vex apex, with several posterior and lateral flagellomeres (Fig. 4) binodal. intemodes setae; hypoproct (b) elongate, bilobed, en- and necks less than halfas longaspreceding largedventrallynearapex toflankaedeagus, node; each basal node with one circumfil- resulting lobes covered with short setulae um, each distal node with two that are con- and setae; aedeagus (c) cylindrical, as long nected on one side ofnode; circumfilar bas- ashypoproct;gonocoxiterobust, withshort. Figs. 2-10. I'acanidiplosis mccinii. 2, Head (frontal view, antennal flagella removed). 3, Female third fla- gellomere. 4. Male third flagellomere. 5, Wing(scale = 0.5 mm). 6, Foretarsal clawand empodium. 7. Female postabdomen, seventh segment to end (lateral). 8, Detail of female postabdomen (lateral). 9. Male genitalia (dorsal, showing only left gonopod); a = cerci, b = hypoproct, c = aedeagus. 10, Same (ventral, only base of gonopods shown). Figs. 11-18. ('accimdiplosisvaccinii. 11. Pupalhead,onlybaseofantennaeshown(ventral). 12. Firstinstar, headand first thoracicsegment(ventral). 13, First instar, eighthand terminalabdominal segments(dorsal). 14, First instar, (dorsal, scale = 0.25 mm). 15, Second instarhead (dorsal). 16, Third instarspatula and associated papillae, with enlargement ofone groupofthree lateral papillae (ventral). 17, Third instar(dorsal, scale line = 0.75 mm). 18, Third instareighth and terminal abdominal segments, with detail ofterminal papillae (dorsal). 604 PROCEEDINGSOFTHE ENTOMOLOGICALSOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ventromesal lobe; gonostylus short, broad- Remarks.—Thisgenusdiffersfrom other estnearbase,taperingtoapicaltooth,setose genera of the supertribe Cecidomyiidi in and setulose throughout. the following combination of characters: Pupa (Fig. 1 1).—Exuviae hyaline. Anten- theeyesareseparatedat the vertex; the first nal horns not prominent, slightly pointed and second antennal flagellomeres are not and pigmented anteroventrally. Cephalic connate; the two distal circumfila ofeach pair of setae short. Prothoracic spiracle male flagellomereareconnected, andthree, elongate. Abdominalsegmentswithoutdor- aswellasthe usual two, circumfilarstrands sal spines, uniformly covered with short emanate from a single circumfilar base; fe- setulae. male flagellomereseach havethreecircum- Larva.—F//5/ instar (F'\gs. 12-14): Body fila; the presence of most of Rs and the ovoid. Spiracles present only on prothorax curved base of M; the reduced setation of and eighth abdominal segment. Antennae the adult abdomen; the short female post- about three times as long as wide. Integu- abdomen and unmodified eighth tergite; ment mostly smoothexcept forfinespicules and the female cerci with 4-5 sensory setae on ventral crawling pads and last segment. posteriorly. Papillar pattern basic for Cecidomyiidi This genus shares some characters with (Gagne 1989); papillae with short setae, ter- Blaesodiplosis spp. that form complex galls minal papillae similar to dorsal papillae in on Amelanchier and Crataegus (Rosaceae) size. (Gagne 1973). Characters in common are Second instar: Body elongate ovoid. the separated eyes, the wing venation and Head as in Fig. 15, antennae twice as long the presence ofthree circumfila on each of aswide. Spiracles present on prothorax and the female flagellomeres. These similarities eight abdominal segments. Spatula absent. may indicate an affinity between the two Integument mainly smooth with fine spic- genera, but the male and female genitalia ules on ventral crawling pads. Papillar pat- arequitedifierent: in Blaesodiplosisthe male tern as for first instar. hypoproct is very small relative to the large Thirdinstar(Figs. 16-18): Bodyelongate aedeagus, thegonocoxite is unlobed (see Fig. ovoid. Antennae less than twice as long as 6 in Gagne 1973), and the female cerci are wide. Spatula robust, bilobedanteriorlywith covered apically and ventrally with many strong anterior and posterior lateral projec- short, blunt sensory setae. tions. Integument minutely spiny-rugose. In the key to Nearctic genera ofCecido- Papillar pattern basic for Cecidomyiidi myiidae in Gagne (1981), I'accinidiptosis (Gagne 1989); papillae with short setae, ter- will key to couplet 135. It is readily sepa- minal papillae similar to dorsal papillae in rated from both genera, Caryomyia and size; at least two pairs ofterminal papillae Contarima (in part), that terminate at that situated on conical projections ofthe integ- couplet. In those two genera eyesjoin at the ument. vertex and antennal flagellomeres are sim- Type species.—Cff/V/o/m'/a vaccinii Os- ilarto most Cecidomyiidae, with each male ten Sacken. circumfilum discrete and the female cir- Etymology.— \'accinidiplosis combines cumfila made up oftwo horizontal strands Vacciniuni. the host ofthe genus, and "dip- connected by 2 vertical strands. In Vaccin- losis." The suffix is commonly used in ge- idiplosistheeyesareseparatedat the vertex, neric names ofthe supertribe Cecidomyiidi the male flagellomeres have interconnected andmeans"double," referringtothebinod- circumfila, and female flagellomeres each al male flagellomeres. The name is femi- have three circumfila, the distal two inter- nine. connected. VOLUME 96. NUMBER 4 605 Vaccinidiplosis vacclnii first and 3 third instars, 27-VIII-1993, (Osten Sacken) Beltsville, R. J. Gagne. PENNSYLVANIA: vaccina Osten Sacken 1862: 196 (Cecido- 3 third instars, 29-IX-1985, and 2 92, myia). NEW COMBINATION. Syn- emerged 5-V-1986 from larvae collected types: 2larvae,whicharelost,and 2 leaves X-1985, Pittsburgh, J. Plakidas; <3, 2 22, "C emerged 18 to 24-III-1993 from larvae col- wciitnhiugamlls(,orlabGealylleudssacivaa)c.cinWiaisOh.iSn.g,tIo'nac,- lectedX-1992, Little RochesterCreek, 7 km D.C.,"anddepositedin theNational Mu- S Ingomar, J—. Plakidas. seum of Natural History, Washington, Remarks. Felt (1915) considered Osten Sacken's Cecidomyia vaccinii as having no D.C. standing in zoological nomenclature and gaylussaciiVeW. 1918: \16(Dasyneura{s\c\)), unjustified new name for vaccinii Osten confused it with Cecidomyia vaccinii Smith (now Dasineura oxycoccana [Johnson]), a Sacken; Felt 1925: 55 (Cecidomyia); Felt 1940: 300 (Dasyneura (sic!)). species that feeds in blueberry and cran- berry buds. Felt (1918) effectively renamed Adult.—Coloration: Wing covered with Osten Sacken's species as Dasyneura (sic) fuscous scales, veins C and R5 brown; tho- gaylussacii Felt and attributed it to the typ- rax black to brown; legs covered with short, ical gall on \'acciniiim. but ascribed ""Ce- brownscales;abdomenreddishbrown. Wing cidomyia(vacciniiO.S)" toa purportedgen- length, 3.3 mm in male(n = 1), 3.1-3.5 mm erally similar gall on Gaylussacia frondosa. (n = 5) in females. Head as in Fig. 2; an- Felt (1925) formally renamed Osten Sack- tennal flagellomeres as in Figs. 3, 4; wing as en's C. vaccinii as Cecidomyia gaylussacii. in Fig. 5; female postabdomen as in Figs. 7, stating that the gall might be the work ofa 8; male genitalia as in Figs. 9, 10. Dasineura. Felt 1940 listed Dasyneura (sic) Pupa.—Pupal head as in Fig. 1 1. gaylussacii Felt for the gall of Vaccinium Larva (Figs. 12-18).—Body transparent spp. but still used Cecidomyia vaccinii Os- to white in first instar. white in second and ten Sacken for the gall ofGaylussaciafron- early third instar, the third instar turning dosa. As argued in our introduction, there reddish as it matures. Head capsule black is no hard evidence that l\ vaccinii occurs in first instar, brown in second and third. on Gaylussacia. — Distribution, (from north to south) Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington, D.C, North Car- Acknowledgments olina, Georgia. Specimensof I'. vacciniiexamined, all on We are grateful to several individuals for slides in National Museum ofNatural His- their help with his paper: J. Plakidas of tory, Washington. D.C, all from Vaccinium Pittsburgh, PA for his gift ofthe male and stamineuni.—GEORGIA: 4 second and 7 other specimens of V. vaccinii; P. Malikul third instars, 27-IX-1991, Brooks property, for preparing the microscopic slides; S. 8 km E Fort Valley, Peach Co., J. A Payne; Grupp for inking the illustrations; and Da- 3 firstinstars, 4-VII-1991,8 first instars, 19- vid Headrick, Riverside, California, Paul VII-1991, 7 first instars, 28-VII-1991, 13 Lyrene, University ofFlorida, Gainesville, first instars and 1 second instar, 20-VIII- W. Nijveldt, Wagenigen, The Netherlands, 1991, 5 second instars, 3-IX-1991, and 6 Allen Norrbom, Washington, D.C. Alma pupal exuviae and 6 22, emerged 23 to 25- Solis, Washington, D.C, and Karl Valley, IV-1992 from larvae collected X-1991, Harrisburg,PA, fortheircommentsondrafts Peach Co., J. A. Payne. MARYLAND: 2 ofthe manuscript. 606 PROCEEDINGSOFTHE ENTOMOLOGICALSOCIETY OFWASHINGTON Literature Cited . 1989. ThePlant-FeedingGallMidgesofNorth America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New Beutenmiiller, W. 1907. Newspeciesofgall-produc- York, xiii + 355 pp. and 4 pis. ingCecidomyiidae. BulletinoftheAmerican Mu- Johnson,C.W. 1899. OrderDiptera. //iSmith,J. B. seum ofNatural Hislor>' 23: 385^00. pis. XIII- InsectsofNewJersey. SupplementtotheTwenty- XVII. SeventhAnnual Reportofthe State Board ofAg- Britten, N. L. and A. Brown. 1913. An Illustrated riculture. Trenton, NewJersey. 755 pp. Floraofthe Northern United States, Canada and Leonard,M.D. 1928. ListoftheinsectsofNewYork the British Possessions. Second Edition. Vol. 2. with a list ofthe spiders and certain other allied CharlesScribner'sSons, New York, iv -I- 735 pp. groups. New York (Cornell) Agricultural Experi- Felt,E. P. 1915. AstudyofgallmidgesII.NewYork ment Station Memoir(1926) 101: 1-1121. State Museum Bulletin 175: 79-213, pis. 1-15. McAlpine, J. F., B. V. Peterson, G. E. Shewell, H. J. . 1918. Key to American insect galls. New Teskey, J. R. Vockeroth, and D. M. Wood, eds. York State Museum Bulletin 200: 5-310, pis. 5- 1981. Manual ofNearctic Diptera, Vol. 1. Re- 16. search Branch, Agriculture Canada, Monograph . 1925. Keytogallmidges(aresumeofStudies 27. vi + 674 pp. I-VII,Itonididae). NewYorkStateMuseum Bul- OstenSacken,C.R. 1862. V.OntheNorthAmerican letin 257: 3-239, pis. 1-8. Cecidomyidae, pp. 173-205, 2 pis. In Loew, H. . 1940. Plant Galls and Gall Makers. Com- MonographsoftheDipteraofNorthAmenca. Part Gagnset,ocRk.PJ.ubl1i9s7h3i.ngACog.e,neIrtihcacsay,noNpYsi.svoifit+he3Ne6a4rcptpi.c tI.ioSnmsi6t.hsonian Institution Miscellaneous Collec- Cecidomyiidi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Annals Procter, W. 1946. Biological survey of the Mount oftheEntomologicalSocietyofAmerica66: 857- Desert Region Incorporated. Part VII. WistarIn- 889. stitute, Philadelphia. 566 pp. . 1978. Asystematicanalysisofthepinepitch Stebbins,F.A, 1910. InsectgallsofSpringfield,Mas- midges Cecidomyia spp. (Diptera: Cecidomyi- sachusetts, and vicinity. Springfield Museum of idae). USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1575: 1-18. Natural History Bulletin 2: 1-139. . 1981. Cecidomyiidae, pp, 257-292. In Vander Kloet, S. P. 1988. The genus Vacciniu/n in McAlpine,J. F., B. V. Peterson,G. E. Shewell, H. North America. Research Branch, Agriculture J.Teskey,J. R.Vockeroth,andD. M.Wood,eds.. Canada, Publication 1828. 201 pp. Manual of Nearctic Diptera, Vol. 1. Research Branch,AgricultureCanada, Monograph27.vi + 674 pp.