USE OF THE STAFF AID AUXILIARY FUNCTIONS IS THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY by Thomas H. Bart i Is on Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ^ ? 1960 Z % A jV's ! v UMI Number: DP70266 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP70266 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProUuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 AemxajsocmsEms this manuscript would not ho complete without the author * s grateful acIoiowXedgemerrfc of the material assistance ho has received from many sources in the course of this study. To the numerous busy officials of th© Buroau of 'Animal industry v&o so generously took time from, crowded schedules for th© iatorvievm and discussions upon which much of the study is based and who later critically reviewed various portions of th© manu script the author extends his heartfelt thanks, These officials include Ivlr. K* A# Butler , Assistant Chief of Bureau in charge of Administrations Dr. A, R* IE Her, Assistant Chief of Bureau in charge of Food Inspections Dr. Hugh 0* X&Fhoe, Assistant Chief of Bureau in- charge of Research; St*. William A. DeTaughn^ Head, Robert B« Harris, Assistant Head, and &r, falasadge W* Little, in charge, 5rjploymeat Section, of the Personnel Divisions Dr, W. A* Clmstoad, Hoad, Budget and Fiscal Division, Miss Isabel Allen, in charge, Estimates and Allotments Scot!on, and Ur* John Tierney,' in charge, Fund Accounting Section of this Division! tit* L. E. Bar rover. Head, Administrative Services Division and It*. H* A. Carlson, Assistant Head of this Division! and 13% William J. Efebs, Administrative Officer for th© Animal Husbandry Division in charge of that unit*® business office. ?&£!© these experts have assisted ma terially in preventing th© occurrence of stisstatements of fact in th© final preparation of this study, for those -which may inadvertently have crept into this manuscript th© author alone is responsible. It should be stated, also, that the analyses, interpretation®, and conclusion® presented are the full responsibility of the author and are not to be interpreted as reflecting ©ithor th© official views of the Bureau of Animal Industry or of any of its key officials vdio have had any connection mdth this study* The author is particularly indebted to Dr* Joseph II* Kay* Hoad of the Department of Government and Politics * University of Maryland* undor -whose helpful and kindly guidance this study lias been conducted. Dr. Ray’s thoroughness in offering pertinent criticisms and highly useful suggestions for th® improvement and aor® precise handling of this material and his as sistance in helping solve th® problems encountered are deeply appreciated. TABLE OF C0MTMTS Page I THE* FROBLSli.. ............ ......... .......... 1 Application of Public Administration Principles .... 4 Importance of the Staff and Auxiliary Functions........... 5 Application to the Bureau of Animal Industry.............. 7 Purpose and Scope of This Study. ....... 9 II HISTORY AHD FOBCTXOHS OF THE BIXBSMT OF AMIMAL INDUSTRY. .... 14 Early History and Development. .... 14 Bureau Established to 15cet Specific Heeds................ • 15 Present Functions and Responsibilities of the Bureau..... 21 Dork of the Bureau is Widely Scattered...... 24 III ADillMISTRAITVS AMD FUNCTIONAL ORGAIJXZATIOH ...... 25 Office of the Chief of Bureau. .... 26 IJeat Inspection Division. ....... 52 Virus-Serum Control Division.............................. 34 Tuberculosis Eradication Division. .......... 37 Inspection and Quarantine Division. .... 38 Interstate Inspection Division* ........... 41 Animal Foods Inspoction Division. .......... 42 The Pathological Division. ...... 44 The Zoological Division. ....... 46 Th© Anisia! Hus ban dry Division. •• 47 Iloxican-Unitod States Commission for Eradication, of Foot-and-IIouth Disease • • * 50 The Information Divi si on* ..... 51 Th© Auxiliary Divisions...... 52 Some Observations on Bureau Organisation and Functions.... 52 Pag® IY THE STAFF FONCTIOH......... 54 Th© Role of th© Chief of Bureau*....„,..... 54 The Staff Function. ............. *....*. 59 Organization of th© Staff Function. ..... 85 Operation of th© Staff Function in th© Bureau.....•••««••. 67 Planning and Policy Formulation in th© Bureau 71 Th© Staff Function of Coordination. *...... 75 The Function of Advice and Counsel. ..... 78 Bureau Is© of the Staff Function Broadly Effective.•••*•*. 79 Y THE PK&SOHHEL FOlCTIOl,....... 85 A Glance at the Past. .... ............................ 84 Present Organization and Functions............ 85 Comparison of Pact and Present Personnel Operations....... 92 Flow of Personnel Material to Lin© Divisions....*.*....... 96 Relationship with Department Personnel and Civil Service Commission. .... 98 Special Services to Operating Programs........ 100 Personnel Division Program Developments.........»....... 102 Some Problem Areas......... 105 Some Intemal Problems of th© Personnel Division.......... 108 Importance in Bureau Administration* ..... Ill YI THE BUDGETARY F01CTIOH...... 112 Brief History of the Bureau Budget Function. ....... 116 Current Bureau Budget Organization .... 118 Budgetary Procedure in th© Bureau .... 122 Importance of This Function in Bureau Administration...... 129 Special Budgetary Problems ........ 131 Pag© Federal Budgetary Process Bader Review* ....... ... 134 Bureau Budgetary Problem A r e a s . 137 m i IBB FISCAL AG&XSKtmi OTCTIGff........... 143 a© Audit and Fiscal Control Section. ...... 144 Th© Fund Accounting Section. ....... 146 Background of the Fiscal Function in the Bureau.•»•*....«• 149 Baportanc© to Bureau Administration* .... ISO Governmental Accounting Always a Serious Problem. ..... 131 Bureau Problem Areas in the 'Fiscal Function. .... IBS Fiscal Procedures in Constant Process of Evolution*....... 139 rut THIS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FUNCTIONS .... 160 History of Those Functions in the Bureau.................. 161 Functions and Duties of th© Division. .......... 164 Work of the Contracting and Leasing Section....... 167 The Property end Space Management S e c t i o n . 169 Work of th© Management Procedures Section. ...... 171 Punotioois of the Records Management Section. .... 172 Operation of These Functions in. th© Bureau. ..... 175 Importance of These Function# in Bureau Administration. •.. 177 These Function# Governed by Minute Buies and Regulations.. 176 Special Problems Must Be Handled Effectively* ..... 181 Other Problem Areas in This Field.... ....... 183 m eklati^shifs... .... ise A Difficult Area of Adminlstration• ........... 186 Msaas of Improvement in This Area of Administration. 190 Th© Place of Field Work in th© Bureau*.................... 194 Working Relationships with Field Activities. ...... 196 tit •••••*..............*........................ gfloisfliomo mc? mmmn * Oft .........»di:q8tzot:^t©H es©*a J© #jm|Dgi o^I sot •**•***••* *e£p$*m$wt©s P I ® j o tWfqejEji &m% SOt Pt®M O^ owrnqM^BVY pro® ©©trappy fisa-pni®®!, ?Ot **♦• ••sno-p'veq^ pf©M «w j$*i ©h ooputog m^mi^sfirpijpv tOt .♦ •*•• PI ©M WS* strop pat ©h Toospg ptm ^.0%Tig O0t ♦ * • *mmjq.'Q%s Wt®M «W|«prt*S fomrosjro# *a*i CHAPTER I HIE PROBLEM Tho past IT years have witnessed a rapid and extensive growth. In the number, sisse, functions and spheres of Influence of governmental agencies, particularly at the Federal level# This development has inten sified many of the problems of effective public administration, such as those involved in organising, coordinating, and administering organisa tions of substantial sis© in a manner that will most efficiently and ec onomically accomplish the end purposes for mich they were established. In recent years, such problems have occupied alike the increased atten tion of alert administrators and that of serious students of public ad ministration in an effort to improve acbsini strut ion in this important area and make it more precise and effective in the public interest* Prominent in this situation 2ms boon the problem of making most ef fective us© of the staff and auxiliary functions* such as those concerned with th© personnel, budget, fiscal, and administrative services areas of' administration* That such staff and auxiliary functions, Y&ten properly administered and used, can materially increase tho effectiveness of an or ganisation lias boon well established, particularly in recent year®* That such functions con also present serious and disabling administrative prob lems and pitfalls, if not soundly coordinated with the needs, purposes, and functional operations of the organisation, 3ms become equally apparent# Administration can perhaps best be defined as a system of working to gether to get things don©. In such definition lios th© key to tho proper and most effective use of the staff and auxiliary functions. Careful and well thought out organization is -vital to any activity, whether private or public, and is imperative, of course, in the successful admimi strati on and op oration of the largo governmental agencies which w© have today. One of the most characteristic and significant aspects of modem government is tho development in recont years of a sharpened specialisa tion of function and assignment* Such specialisation is continuing to broaden and deepen, partly as a- normal growth of administrative need and experience and partly as a result of the increased availability of nor© specialised education and training in tho various aspects of public ad ministration# Xhus, in practice, a personnel mtm today nay bo not merely a broad expert in all phases of tho personnel fields he is more likely to be a specialist in employee relations or classification or recruitment* A budget man is more likely to bo a specialist in budget justification or budget control % the property i.m a specialist in procurement or prop erty records or space control or one of the other specializations which have been developed in this field* Such sharply defined specialization can be a two-edgod sword to an administrator* It affords him an excellent opportunity for clearly delin eating the areas of responsibility end action in the units of his organi sation* This can work for an increased mass production of one results and for more efficient production* It develops special talents among his em ployees, enables than to work on specialised assignments which they m y profor, and thus can bo a potent influence on morale* it also affords an excellent opportunity for identifying end correcting problem areas in the organization* On the other hand, unloss carefully handled, such special ization can develop an exaggerated opinion of the importance of a specific function* It can build up the foe ling that the function is of most im-