ebook img

Untitled - Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer PDF

157 Pages·2006·7.97 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Untitled - Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer

32B Natural Resource Damages Brian D. Israel, Esq. Arnold & Porter LLP 555 12th Street, N. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 942.6546 brian israel (g) aporter.com This chapter addresses the ability of the government to recover damages at sites where natural resources have been injured or destroyed due to the release of hazardous substances or oil, among other things. Sections 32B.01 through 328.04 damages (NRD) law discuss the basics of natural resource including the context of an NRD claim, the principal statutes authorizing NRD recoveries, the key regulations promulgated by the federal government and the main statutory defenses. Section 32B.05 provides a discussion of the difficult evidentiary issues related to NRD claims including the government's bur- den to prove injury, baseline, causation, and damages. Section 32B.O6 addresses some of the considerations at a trial of NRD claims. Section 32B.07 provides an overview of one of the most controversial aspects of NRD, namely, the methodologies for calculating damages. Section 32B.08 addresses the recent in- crease in prosecution of groundwater NRD claims. Finally, Section 32B.09 discusses the advantages, disadvantages and mechanics of cooperating with the government in an NRD matter. Many NRD assessments are now handled through a coopera- .. The author gratefully acknowledges the invaluable assistance of Chris Anderson, Esq., Sandhya Gupta, Esq., and Leigh Logan of the Environmental Practice Group of Arnold & Porter LLP. 32B- (ReI. 39.7/200(, l'ub.793) WASTES 32B. tive process that involves both the government and the poten- tially responsible party (PRP). Part C of this chapter (consisting of Sections 328.10 and 32.Bll) provides two model cooperative agreements between a PRP and a government trustee. NRD claims may be brought by both the federal government as well as state governments. Part D of this chapter (Section 32B.12) provides a comprehensive, state-by-state guide of the current NRD program in each state. This 50-state guide discusses the nature of each state s NRD program, an overview of major matters where applicable, and contact information. SYNOPSIS PART A: LEGAL BACKGROUND ~ 32B. Natural Resource Damages: The Basics (1) Introduction to Natural Resource DamaKes (2) NRD in Context: The Life Cycle of a Contaminated Site (3) NRD Litigation in a Nutshell (a) Hazardous Waste and Other Superfund Sites (b) Spills and Other Discrete Events (c) Regulatory Challenges ~ 328. Overview of the NRD Statutes (11 The Principal NRD Statutes (a) The Superfund Statute IbJ The Oil Pollution Act (c) The Clean Water Act (dl Other Federal Laws lei State Statutory Authority (2) Who Is a Trustee? (a) The Main Federal Trustees (b) States, Tribes, Territories and Cities (c) StandinK to Assert an NRD Claim ~ 328.03 The Key Federal Regulations, Their Troubled History and Why They Matter III CERCLA Regulations - The Statutory Mandate (2) Round One - The 1980s (3) Round Two - The 1990s (4) The Type A Regulations - A Closer Look (5) The Type B Regulations - A Closer Look (6) The Oil Pollution Act Regulations (a) History or the OPA Regulations rb1 Framework or the OPA Regulations lei Main Difference Between the CERCLA and OPA Regulations (ReI. 39-712006 Pub,793) 32B. NATURAL RESOURCES DAMAGES (7) Round Three - What's Next for NRD Regulations ~ 328.04 Principal Statutory Defenses (11 Statute of Limitations la) The NRD Statute of Limitations Under CERCLA Ii) General (non-NPL) Limitations Period Iii I Limitations Period for NPL and Scheduled Remedial Sites (bl The NRD Statute of Limitations Under OPA (2) Wholly Before December 11, 1980 (3) Federally Permitted Release (4) Irretrievable Commitment of Resources (5) Double Recovery (61 Determination of Amounts ~ 32B. Principal Evidentiary Issues (1) Injury Injuries (a) Per Se I b) Adverse Biological Changes I c) Defined Injuries (d) Injury and Issues of Proof (2) The Relationship Between Baseline and Causation (3) Baseline - A Closer Look (4) Causation - Which Standard Applies? (5) Damages ~ 32B. Trial Considerations (1) Right to a Jury (2) The Rebuttable Presumption (3) Scope and Standard of Review PART B: PROCEDURAL GUIDE ~ 328.07 How to Value Nature 11) Calculating Restoration or Replacement Costs (2) Compensation for Interim Lost Uses (a) Recreational Losses Ib) Economic Losses (c) Cultural Losses (d) Aesthetic Losses (3) Calculating Compensatory Damages fa) Appraisal Method (b) Production Cost Method (c) Averting Expenditures Method (d) Hedonic Pricing Method (e) Stated Preference Approaches (i) Contingent Valuation Studies (ReI,39-712006 Pub,793) (g) WASTES 32B. (ii) Conjoint or Attribute-Based Studies (4) Equivalency Offset Approaches ~ 328. Groundwater - The Next Frontier (1) The Unique Features of a Groundwater NRD Claim (2) The Seminal Groundwater Case: New Mexico v. General Electric (3) Calculating Groundwater Damages (4) The New Jersey Initiative (5) Strategic Issues Related to Groundwater NRD Claims ~ 32B. NRD Defense Strategies: Litigation Versus Cooperation 111 The Litigation Advantage (a) PuttinK the Trustees to Their Proof' Ib) Attacking Assessment Bias Icl Developing Caselaw on Legal Defenses Id) Postponing Liabilities lei Avoiding Liabilities 121 The Cooperation Advantage la I Trusting the Trusting Trustee (bJ Impacting the Scope and Type of the NRD Assessments (c) Proactive Restoration Idl Integration of Restoration and Remediation (e) Information Sharing (t) Avoiding Litigation Reducing Transaction Costs 131 Mechanics for Cooperation (a) Trustee Cooperative Assessment Programs (b) Cooperative Agreements (i) Statements of Principle (ii) Funding Arrangements (iii) Tolling and Standstill Provisions (iv) Termination Provisions (v) Information Sharing lvi) Reservation of'Rights (c) Avoiding Cooperation Pitfalls PART C: . FORMS !i 32B. Cooperative Assessment Project Initiation Agreement ~ 328. Cooperative Injury Assessment Agreement PART D: REFERENCE GUIDE - NRD IN THE STATES ~ 32B. A State-by.State Guide to NRD Programs in All SO States (1) Alabama la) Overview (b) Contact Information (Rei, 39-7/2006 Pub.793) 32B- NATURAl. RESOURCES DAMAGES (2) Alaska (a) Overview (h) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (3) Arizona La) Overview (b) Contact Information (4) Arkansas (5) California (a) Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (6) Colorado (a) Overview (hI Major matters (c) Contact Information (7) Connecticut (a) Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (8) Delaware (a) Overview (b) .Major Matters (c) Contact Information (9) Florida La) Overview (b) .Major Matters Ic) Contact Information (to) Georgia (a) Overview Ib I Major Matters Ic) Contact Information (11) Hawaii (a) Overview IbJ Contact Information (12) Idaho laJ Overview (b) .Major Matters Icl Contact Information (13) Illinois (a) Overview (b) Major Matters (ReI 39-712006 Pub.793) WASTES 32B~ (c) Contact Information fl41 Indiana (a) Overview (bl Major Matters lei Contact Information 1151 Iowa laJ Overview Ibl Major Matters (c) Contact Information Kansas 1161 laJ Overview (h) Contact Information (171 Kentucky rat Overview IbJ Contact Information (18) Louisiana rat Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact 119) Maine (a) Overview fb) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (201 Maryland (al Overview (h) Major Matters (c) Contact Information 1211 Massachusetts la! Overview (b I Major Matters I C 1 Contact Information Michigan 1221 fa) Overview (b) Major Matters fc) Contact Information f231 Minnesota (a) Overview (h) Contact Information f24) Mississippi la) Overview Ibl Major Matters IcJ Contact Information (ReI. 39-7/2006 PlIb.793) 32B- NATURAL RnSOI.lRCES DAMAGES (25) Missouri Overview La) (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information Montana 126) lal Overview (h) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (27) Nebraska (a) Overview (b) Contact Information (28) Nevada fal Overview (b) Contact Information (29) New Hampshire fa) Overview (b) Contact Information (30) New Jersey (a) Overview (b) .Major Matters (e) Contact Information (31) New Mexico (a) Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information New York 1321 (a) Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information 133) North Carolina (a) Overview (h) Contact Information (34) North Dakota (35) Ohio lal Overview Ib) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (361 Oklahoma (a) Overview (b) Major Matters fc) Contact Information 137) Oregon (Re!, 39-7/2006 Pub,7'J3) WASTES 32B. lal Overview Ibl Contact Information (38) Pennsylvania (a) Overview (h) Major Matters (cl Contact Information (39) Rhode Island (a) Overview Ibl Major Matters (c) Contact Information 140) South Carolina fa) Overview Ib) Major Matters (c) Contact Information 141) South Dakota fal Overview fbl Contact Information 1421 Tennessee la! Overview Ibl Contact Information 1431 Texas lal Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information f441 Utah (a) Overview (b) Major Matters (c) Contact Information (451 Vermont lal Overview Ib) Contact Information (46) Virginia (a) Overview (b) Major Matters fc) Contact Information (47) Washington la1 Overview (h) Major Matters (c1 Contact Information West Virginia 1481 lal Overview (bl Major Matters (ReI. 39-7/2006 Pub,793) 32B- NATURAL RESOURCES DAMAGES (e) Contact Information (49) Wisconsin la) Overview (b) Contact Information Wyoming 150) (a) Overview (b) Contact Information (Re!,39-7/2006 Pub,7'!3)

Description:
a Nutshell. There are three major types of NRD litigation: hazardous waste sites, spills, and regulatory challenges. (a) Hazardous Waste and Other Superfund Sites . National Marine Sanctuaries Act trustees' legal costs were " reasonable assessment costs:' The new rule also provides examples of.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.