‘Unlearning’ hegemony: An exploration of the applicability of Alain Badiou’s theory of the event to informal learning through an examination of the life histories of South African social movement activists By Anne Harley Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of KwaZulu-Natal 2012 Abstract This thesis argues that it is both necessary and possible to change the world. Changing the world requires engaging with, to try to understand it from the basis of lived reality, and then acting. Our ability to do this is, however, affected by hegemony, which attempts to convince us that the way things are is either normal and natural and the only possible way they could be, or that it is impossible to change them. Nevertheless, there is always resistance to this, and I suggest that we might learn something useful by examining how this happens. The thesis thus explores Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, and its applicability to our current world; and also considers resistance to this. I argue that the nature of capitalism has shifted, and discuss how this shift has impacted on hegemony, identifying three current interlocking hegemonic ideologies. I consider current resistance to this hegemony, including the role of social movements. Much resistance, and many social movements, I argued, cannot properly be called counter-hegemonic in that, although it/they may critique the dominant economic system, it/they remain trapped within hegemonic logic. However, it is clear that there is existing truly counter-hegemonic resistance, including some social movements, and I argue that Abahlali baseMjondolo is one such counter-hegemonic movement. Thus it is possible that those who join/align themselves with this movement might be considered to have ‘unlearned’ hegemony and be useful subjects for this study. I thus consider the life stories of seven people who have aligned themselves to this movement, in order to determine whether they have indeed ‘unlearned’ hegemony, and if so, how. I discuss relevant and appropriate theory for examining this phenomenon, including experiential learning, transformative learning and Freirean emancipatory learning. I argue that whilst these theories of learning are helpful, they cannot entirely account for unlearning. I then turn to the theory of the event of Alain Badiou as a possible complementary or alternative way into thinking about unlearning. I apply both the learning theories and Badiou’s theory of the event to the stories, all of which show strong evidence of unlearning,, and consider how useful the theories are in understanding this. I conclude that all of the theories help to some extent in understanding the unlearning in stories. There are, however, fundamental differences between the learning theories on the one hand and Badiou’s theory on the other. I construct a model showing that the basis of the difference between the adult learning theories and Badiou’s theory of the event rests on the locus of the trigger for transformation. I argue that Badiou’s theory provides a very useful additional perspective to adult learning theory; but that it cannot be considered to have replaced existing theories in understanding how people learn informally to think and act in counter-hegemonic ways. Acknowledgements Firstly, to the people who agreed to be part of this study, because, obviously, it could not have been done without you. Thank you for sharing your stories with me. I found them, and you, truly inspiring. Secondly, to the writers who have inspired me so much with their unswerving commitment to a better world, and who have so profoundly impacted on my thinking, as will be apparent in this thesis; too many to mention, but in particular Alain Badiou, Frantz Fanon, Griff Foley, Paulo Freire, John Holloway, Michael Neocosmos, Richard Pithouse and Jacques Rancière. Then, to my colleague and supervisor, Peter Rule, who kept me going through the years with sage advice and excellent suggestions for improvement. Any continuing weaknesses are really my fault alone. Finally, this thesis is dedicated to my partner in everything, Mark Butler, for ongoing challenging conversation, unswerving commitment to what is right and good, and much happiness over 20 years; and to our children, Hannah and Adam, whose Freirean technique of always asking ‘why?’ has spurred me on to greater coherence and clarity of argument in all things. This could not have been done without you. Table of contents Chapter 1: Introduction and rationale ........................................... 1 1.1. Change is necessary ............................................... 1 1.2. Change is possible ................................................ 4 1.3. So how do we change the world? ..................................... 6 1.3.1. By trying to understand it ................................... 6 1.3.2. By thinking something new .................................. 7 1.3.3 By acting ................................................. 8 1.4 Therefore, this thesis ............................................... 9 Chapter 2: Research methodology ............................................. 14 2.1 Introduction ..................................................... 14 2.2 Research paradigms ............................................... 15 2.3 Research method ................................................. 22 2.3.1 The narrative or life history method ........................... 24 2.4 Using the life history method ........................................ 31 2.4.1. Data collection ........................................... 32 2.4.2 Analysis ................................................ 35 2.4.2.1 Thematic analysis (37); 2.4.2.2 Event analysis (39) 2.5 Validity and trustworthiness ........................................ 42 2.5.1 Memory ................................................. 42 2.5.2 Bias .................................................... 43 2.5.3 Trustworthiness ........................................... 44 2.5.3.1 Triangulation (45); 2.5.3.2 Reflexive subjectivity (46); 2.5.3.3 Face validity (48); 2.5.3.4 Catalytic validity (49) 2.6 Ethical issues .................................................... 49 2.6.1 Informed consent ......................................... 51 2.6.2 Harm and risk ............................................ 52 2.6.3 Honesty and trust ......................................... 53 2.6.4 Privacy, confidentiality and anonymity ........................ 54 2.6.5 Intervention and advocacy .................................. 55 2.7 Conclusion ...................................................... 56 Chapter 3: Hegemony ...................................................... 57 3.1 Introduction ..................................................... 57 3.2 The concept of hegemony and Antonio Gramsci ........................ 57 3.3 Marx ........................................................... 60 3.4 Gramsci ........................................................ 70 3.4.1 Gramsci’s conception of the State and civil society ............... 71 3.4.2 Gramsci’s conception of ideology and consciousness ............. 75 3.4.3 Gramsci’s conception of hegemony ........................... 76 3.4.4 The role of intellectuals .................................... 82 3.5 Conclusion ..................................................... 85 Chapter 4: Hegemony in the current context ..................................... 86 4.1 Introduction ..................................................... 86 4.2 Changes in the economic base ...................................... 87 4.2.1 Economic crisis ........................................... 88 4.2.2 Colonialism .............................................. 90 4.2.3 Decolonisation and developmentalism ......................... 92 4.2.4 Neoliberalism ............................................ 96 4.2.4.1 Globalization (98) 4.3 Changes in the superstructure under neoliberalism ...................... 100 4.3.1 The role of the state ...................................... 103 4.3.1.1 Force (107); 4.3.1.2 Hegemony (108) 4.3.2. The role of civil society ................................... 108 4.3.3 South Africa ............................................ 113 4.4 Ideology and consciousness ........................................ 116 4.4.1 Neoliberalism as ideology ................................. 119 4.4.2 Liberal democracy ....................................... 122 4.4.3 Postmodernism .......................................... 125 4.4.4 Defeat ................................................. 129 4.5 Conclusion ..................................................... 130 Chapter 5: Resistance ...................................................... 132 5.1 Introduction .................................................... 132 5.2 Gramsci on resistance ............................................ 132 5.3 Resistance since Gramsci ......................................... 133 5.3.1 Possibility versus defeat ................................... 133 5.3.2 Resistance to whom? ..................................... 137 5.3.2.1 ‘With’ the state (137); 5.3.2.2 ‘Within’ the state (139); 5.3.2.3 Outside/ ‘without’ the state (141) 5.3.3 Resistance how? ......................................... 147 5.3.4 Resistance by whom? ..................................... 152 5.3.4.1 The working class (152); 5.3.4.2 The multitude (156); 5.3.4.3 “The party” (157); 5.3.4.4 The role of intellectuals (159); 5.3.4.5 The ‘new’ social movements (163) 5.4 Conclusion ..................................................... 164 Chapter 6: Social Movements ............................................... 165 6.1 Introduction .................................................... 165 6.2 Debates about what social movements are ............................ 165 6.3 Social movement theory .......................................... 167 6.3.1 Opportunities/constraints within which social movements may/may not develop ................................... 167 6.3.2 How social movement participants themselves define their movements ....................................... 169 6.3.3 Networks, structures, and other resources needed to mobilize supporters ..................................... 174 6.3.4. ‘Bridging’ theory ........................................ 175 6.3.5 The Marxist analysis of social movements ..................... 176 6.3.6 Critiques of social movement theory ......................... 177 6.4 The city and the slum ............................................. 181 6.5 Social Movements in South Africa .................................. 186 6.6 Conclusion ..................................................... 191 Chapter 7: Abahlali baseMjondolo ........................................... 193 7.1 Introduction .................................................... 193 7.2 History of Abahlali .............................................. 193 7.3 Academic discussion on the movement .............................. 196 7.4. Abahlali as a counter-hegemonic movement .......................... 198 7.4.1 Anti-capitalist (i.e. counter neoliberalism as ideology) ........... 198 7.4.2 Within/without state, but not with (i.e. counter liberal democracy as ideology) .................. 201 7.4.3 An alternative politics (i.e. counter postmodern ideology) ........ 206 7.4.4 A politics of praxis ....................................... 212 7.5 Conclusion ..................................................... 215 Chapter 8: Unlearning hegemony ............................................ 216 8.1 Introduction .................................................... 216 8.2 Learning hegemony .............................................. 217 8.2.1 Formal education as hegemonic ............................. 217 8.2.2. Counter-hegemonic formal education ........................ 222 8.2.3. Non-formal education as hegemonic ......................... 223 8.2.4. Counter-hegemonic non-formal education .................... 226 8.2.5. Informal education and learning ............................ 227 8.3. Unlearning hegemony ............................................ 237 8.4 Experiential learning ............................................. 238 8.4.1 Kolb’s theory ........................................... 240 8.4.2 Critique of Kolb’s theory .................................. 242 8.4.3 Further development of the theory ........................... 243 8.5 Transformative Learning .......................................... 255 8.5.1 Mezirow’s theory ........................................ 255 8.5.2.1 Meaning Perspectives and Meaning Perspectives (256); 8.5.2.3 Reflection (257); 8.5.2.4. Action (259) 8.5.2 Critique of Mezirow’s theory ............................... 260 8.5.2.1 The process of perspective transformation (262); 8.5.2.2 Critical reflection versus emotional response in perspective transformation (264); 8.5.2.3 The relationship between transformative learning and social change (264); 8.5.2.4 The role of the educator 8.5.3 Further development of the theory ..................... 267 8.6 Emancipatory education .......................................... 267 8.6.1 Freire’s theory ........................................... 269 8.6.1.1. Humanization and dehumanization (270); 8.6.1.2. Conscientization (271); 8.6.1.3. Praxis (274) 8.6.2 Critique of Freire’s theory ................................. 279 8.6.2.1. Universal categories and dichotomies (282); 8.6.2.2 Antidialogue, manipulation and authoritarianism (283) 8.6.3 Further development of the theory ........................... 284 8.7 What can we learn from these learning theories? ....................... 286 8.8 Conclusion ..................................................... 288 Chapter 9: Alain Badiou’s theory of the event .................................. 292 9.1 Introduction .................................................... 293 9.2 Alain Badiou ................................................... 293 9.3 Philosophy ..................................................... 293 9.3.1 Badiou’s ontology ........................................ 296 9.3.1.1 Set theory (297); 9.3.1.2 The ‘situation’ (set) (299) 9.3.2 The ‘event’ ............................................. 300 9.3.3 ‘Fidelity’ .............................................. 306 9.4 Badiou’s epistemology ........................................... 308 9.4.1 Knowledge and Truth ..................................... 310 9.4.2 Agency and the subject .................................... 310 9.5 Badiou’s politics ................................................ 314 9.5.1 The current state of the situation/The role of the State ............ 316 9.5.2 Current hegemony ........................................ 316 9.5.2.1 Neoliberal capitalism (318); 9.5.2.2 Liberal democracy (318); 9.5.2.3 Postmodernism (319) 9.5.3 Praxis/ So, what is to be done? .............................. 320 9.6 Critique ....................................................... 322 9.7 Badiou’s relevance to this study .................................... 326 9.7.1 Badiou and hegemony ..................................... 329 9.7.2 Badiou and adult learning theory ............................ 329 9.7.2.1 The nature of consciousness and the role of hegemony (331); 9.7.2.2 ‘Unlearning’ hegemony (332) 9.8 Conclusion ..................................................... 333 Chapter 10: Life stories .................................................... 336 10.1 Introduction ................................................... 337 10.2 Andrew Collins ................................................ 337 10.3 Lindela Figlan ................................................. 340 10.4 Zodwa Nsibande ............................................... 360 10.5 David Ntseng .................................................. 365 10.6 Mazwi Nzimande ............................................... 369 10.7 Richard Pithouse ............................................... 379 10.8 S’bu Zikode ................................................... 389 Chapter 11: Analysis and discussion .......................................... 404 11.1 Introduction ................................................... 416 11.2 Approach to data analysis ........................................ 416 11.3 Why have the activists considered in this study joined/aligned themselves with Abahlali baseMjondolo? .................... 416 11.4 Have these activists ‘unlearned’ the hegemony of our current context, and if so, how? ........................................ 419 11.4.1 Learning hegemony ..................................... 424 11.4.1.1 Family and friends (425); 11.4.1.2 Church (425); 11.4.1.3 Media and culture (425); 11.4.1.4 Schooling (428) 11.4.2 ‘Unlearning’ hegemony .................................. 429 11.4.2.1 ‘Unlearning’ party politics/liberal democracy and developmentalism (435); 11.4.2.2 ‘Unlearning’ difference, especially race and class (436) 11.5 To what extent was their ‘unlearning’ of hegemony informal, and how did this happen? ................................ 445 11.5.1 Experiential learning ..................................... 450 11.5.2 Transformative learning .................................. 451 11.5.3 Emancipatory learning ................................... 452 11.6 What does Badiou’s theory of event-fidelity-truth contribute to understanding this process? ............................... 454 11.6.1 Hegemony, consciousness, and the state of the situation ........ 458 11.6.2 Shifting consciousness versus fidelity to the event ............. 466 11.6.3 Unlearning and change ................................... 467 11.7 Conclusion .................................................... 470 Chapter 12: Conclusion .................................................... 472 12.1 Introduction ................................................... 473 12.2 Overview of argument ........................................... 473 12.3 Reflection on my findings ........................................ 473 12.4 Reflection on life history methodology .............................. 475 12.5 Possible areas for further investigation .............................. 477 12.6 “The importance of staying angry” ................................. 478 Appendix 1: List of interviews .............................................. 479 Appendix 2: Interview schedule ............................................. 480 Appendix 3: Examples of analysis ............................................ 481 References .............................................................. 482 List of Tables Table 1: Categorisation of research paradigms ................................... 15 Table 2: Characterisations of research paradigms ................................. 16 Table 3: A typology of struggle vis-a-vis the state ............................... 137 Table 4: Livingstone’s categorisation of education ........................ ....... 230 Table 5: Eraut’s typology of informal learning .................................. 233 Table 6: Badiou’s main works ............................................... 297 Table 7: Badiou’s terminology ...... ........................................ 300 Table 8: Research participants ............................................... 338 Table 9: The situation ..................................................... 460 List of Illustrations Figure 1: Marx’s base-superstructure model Figure 2: Kolb’s model of experiential learning Figure 3: Boud, Keogh and Walker’s model of experiential learning Figure 4: Jarvis’ model of experiential learning Figure 5: Jarvis’ revised model of experiential learning Figure 6: Marsick and Watkins’ model of informal or incidental learning Figure 7: A comparison between adult learning theories and Badiou’s theory of the event
Description: