ebook img

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA PDF

57 Pages·2017·0.26 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA

Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 57 PageID# 11438 UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE EASTERNDISTRICT OFVIRGINIA ALEXANDRIADIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ) ABDULLAH AL SHIMARI et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CaseNo.1:08-cv-827(LMB/JFA) v. ) ) CACI PREMIERTECHNOLOGY, ) PUBLICVERSION INC. ) ) Defendant ) ) PLAINTIFFS’MEMORANDUMINOPPOSITIONTO DEFENDANT CACI PREMIERTECHNOLOGY’S MOTIONTO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’THIRDAMENDEDCOMPLAINT 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 2 of 57 PageID# 11439 TABLE OFCONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 STATEMENT OFFACTS............................................................................................................3 A. SevereMistreatment ofSalahAl Ejaili at AbuGhraib............................................3 B. SevereMistreatment of Asa’dAl-Zuba’e at Abu Ghraib........................................7 C. SevereMistreatment ofSuhail Al Shimari at AbuGhraib....................................12 I. SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OFTORTURE,CIDT ANDWARCRIMES RENDERS DISMISSAL UNDERTHE POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE INAPPROPRIATE.......................................................................................16 A. CACIFundamentallyMisunderstands orMisrepresents theTorture,CIDT andWarCrimes Norms.........................................................................................16 1. TortureandCIDTMust BeAssessedBasedonCumulativeEffect, Not TacticbyTactic...................................................................................17 2. Torture Includes BothSeverePhysical andMental Harm........................19 3. CACISeeks toRedefine TorturebyAdvancinga Discredited Standardfor“Severe”PainorSuffering....................................................20 4. CACIMistates theDefinitionofCIDT.....................................................22 5. TortureandCIDTofDetainees AreWarCrimes......................................23 B. TheEvidenceShows EachPlaintiffSufferedTorture,CIDTandWar Crimes or,at aMinimum,aReasonableJurorCouldso Find...............................24 C. BecauseDefendant’s Conduct Was Unlawful,There Is NoPolitical Question.................................................................................................................29 II. PLAINTIFFS’THOROUGH ALLEGATIONS STATE APLAUSIBLE CLAIMTHAT CACI ENGAGEDINACONSPIRACYORAIDED AND ABETTEDTORTURE,CIDT ANDWARCRIMES.....................................................30 A. CACI’s PriorAttempts toDismiss Plaintiffs’ConspiracyClaims........................31 B. TheTAC States ValidClaims ofCACI’s ConspiracyLiability............................32 1. TheTAC AdequatelyAlleges anUnlawful Agreement............................33 2. TheTAC AdequatelyAlleges CACI’s Intentional Participationin theConspiracy...........................................................................................34 i 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 3 of 57 PageID# 11440 TABLE OFCONTENTS Page 3. TheTAC AdequatelyAlleges that theConspiracyHarmed Plaintiffs.....................................................................................................36 4. TheTAC AdequatelyAlleges CACI’s Corporate Liability......................37 C. CACI’s MotiontoDismiss theAidingandAbettingClaims Also Fails...............40 III. CACI’S PREEMPTIONDEFENSE IS UNAVAILING.................................................41 A. Rule12(g)Waiver..................................................................................................41 B. Plaintiffs’Federal ATS Claims Cannot Be“Preempted”......................................41 1. PreemptionOnlyApplies toState LawClaims.........................................41 2. CPAOrder17Does Not BarPlaintiffs’ ATS Claims................................44 3. TVPADoes Not DisplacetheATS...........................................................44 IV. CACI HAS NO DERIVATIVE IMMUNITY..................................................................45 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................45 ii 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 4 of 57 PageID# 11441 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES Page(s) TABLE OFAUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Abebe-Jira v.Negewo, 72F.3d844(11thCir.1996).............................................................................................18,28 Ahmedv.Keisler, 504F.3d1183(9thCir.2007).................................................................................................21 Al Shimari v.CACIPremier Tech.,Inc., 657F.Supp.2d700(E.D.Va.2009),appeal dismissedfor lackof jurisdiction,679F.3d205(4thCir.2012)...............................................................................41 Al Shimari v.CACIPremier Tech.,Inc., 758F.3d516(4thCir.2014).........................................................................................1,24,43 Al Shimari v.CACIPremier Tech.,Inc., 840F.3d147(4thCir.2016)...........................................................................................passim Al Shimari v.CACIPremier Tech.,Inc., No.15-1831(4thCir.Sept.28,2015).....................................................................................18 Al-Quraishi v.Nakhla, 728F.Supp.2d702(D. Md. 2010)...................................................................................23,45 Al-Saher v.INS, 268F.3d1143(9thCir.2001)...........................................................................................18,28 InreAmerican HondaMotor Co., 958F.Supp.1045(D.Md.1997)............................................................................................40 InreAppleiPhoneAntitrust Litig., 846F.3d313(9thCir.2017)...................................................................................................41 Ashcroft v.Iqbal, 556U.S.662(2009)...........................................................................................................32,34 Aydinv.Turkey, No.57/1996/676/866(E.Ct.H.R.Judgment ofSept.25,1997)...............................................28 Aziz v.Alcolac, 658F.3d388(4thCir.2011)...................................................................................................40 iii 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 5 of 57 PageID# 11442 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Boylev.UnitedTechnologies Corp., 487U.S.500(1988).................................................................................................................42 Brownv.Gilner, No.1:10-cv-00980,2012 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 138662(E.D.Va.Sept.25,2012).....................36 Cabellov.Fernandez-Larios, 402F.3d1148(11thCir. 2005)...............................................................................................33 Cai LuanChenv.Ashcroft, 381F.3d221(3dCir.2004).....................................................................................................21 Campbell-EwaldCo.vGomez, 136S.Ct.663(2016)...............................................................................................................45 InreChiquitaBrands Int'l,Inc.AlienTort Statute&S'holder DerivativeLitig., 792F.Supp.2d1301(S.D.Fla.2011)....................................................................................36 Commercial Business Sys. v.BellsouthServs., 453S.E.2d261(Va.1995).................................................................................................38,39 Daliberti v.Republicof Iraq, 97F.Supp.2d38(D.D.C.2000).............................................................................................28 Dayv.DBCapital Group,LLC, No.DKC 10-1658,2011 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 25303 (D.Md. Mar.11,2011)...........................39 Djondav.UnitedStates AG, 514F.3d1168(11thCir. 2008)...............................................................................................21 Doev.DrummondCo.,Inc., 2010WL9450019(N.D. Ala.Apr.30,2010).........................................................................23 El-Masri v.Former YugoslavRepublicof Macedonia, E.Ct.H.R,Judgment,Dec.13,2002.........................................................................................23 Goodmanv.PraxAir, Inc., 494F.3d458(4thCir.2007)...................................................................................................43 Halberstamv. Welch, 705F.2d472(D.C.Cir. 1983).................................................................................................36 Hamdanv.Rumsfeld, 548U.S.557(2006).................................................................................................................23 Heckenlaiblev.Va.PeninsulaReg'l Jail Auth., 491F.Supp.2d544(E.D.Va.2007)......................................................................................38 iv 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 6 of 57 PageID# 11443 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Hill v.LockheedMartin Logistics Mgmt., 354F.2d277(4th Cir.2004) ...................................................................................................39 Kadić v. Karadžić, 70F.3d232(2dCir.1995).......................................................................................................45 Kazemzadehv.UnitedStates AG, 577F.3d1341(11thCir. 2009)...............................................................................................21 InreKBR,Inc.,BurnPit Litig., 744F.3d326(4thCir.2014).............................................................................................42,43 Kiobel v.Royal DutchPetroleumCo., 133S.Ct.1659(2013).......................................................................................................32,42 Larsonv.Domestic &ForeignCommerceCorp., 337U.S.682(1949).................................................................................................................45 LorenDataCorp. v.GXS,Inc., No.11-2062,2012U.S.App. LEXIS 26471(4th Cir.Dec.26,2012)....................................35 McGeev.Arkel Int'l,LLC, 671F.3d539(5thCir.2012)...................................................................................................44 Mehinovicv. Vuckovic, 198F.Supp.2d1322(N.D.Ga.2002)....................................................................................29 NorfolkSouthern RyCo.v.Cityof Alexandria, 608F.3d150(4thCir.2010)...................................................................................................41 Oki Semiconductor Co.v. Wells FargoBank,N.A., 298F.3d768(9thCir.2002)...................................................................................................39 Padillav.Yoo, 678F.3d748(9th Cir.2012) ...................................................................................................21 ThePaqueteHabana, 175U.S.677(1900).................................................................................................................42 Pricev.Socialist People’s LibyanArabJamahiriya, 274F.Supp.2d20(D.D.C.2003)...........................................................................................21 Pricev.Socialist People’s LibyanArabJamahiriya, 384F.Supp.2d120(D.D.C.2005).........................................................................................21 Pricev.Socialist People’s LibyanArabJamahirya, 294F.3d82(D.C.Cir.2002).............................................................................................20,21 v 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 7 of 57 PageID# 11444 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Prosecutor v.Furundžija, No. IT-95-17/1-T, Trial Chamber,Dec.10,1998...................................................................28 Prosecutor v.Krnojelac, CaseNo. IT-97-25-T,Trial Judgment,Mar.15,2002.......................................................18,28 Prosecutor v.Kunarac, CaseNo. IT-96-23-A,Appeal Judgment,June12,2002.........................................................19 Prosecutor v.Kvocka., No. IT-98-30/1-T, Trial Judgment,Nov.2,2001....................................................................18 Robertson v.SeaPines Real EstateCos., 679F.3d278(4thCir.2012)...................................................................................................32 Salehv.TitanCorp., 580F.3d1,16(D.C.Cir. 2009) ..............................................................................3,42,43,44 S.AppalachianMt.Stewards v.PennVa.OperatingCo.LLC, No.2:12CV00020,2013U.S.Dist. LEXIS 457(W.D.Va.Jan.3,2013)...............................34 Smithv.Integral ConsultingServ., No.14-cv-3094,2015U.S.Dist.LEXIS 102376(D.Md. July27,2015)........................40,41 Sosa v.Alvarez-Machain, 542U.S.692(2004).....................................................................................................42,43,44 Starr v.SonyBMGMusicEntm't, 592F.3d314(2dCir.2010)...............................................................................................35,36 Stithv.Thorne, 488F.Supp.2d534(E.D.Va.2007)......................................................................................39 Surettev.IslamicRepublicof Iran, 231F.Supp.2d260(D.D.C.2002)...................................................................................18,29 Tatev.Smith, No.1:14-cv-125,2016U.S.Dist.LEXIS 112102(M.D.N.C.Aug.23,2016).......................41 Tysons Toyotav.GlobeLifeIns. Co., Nos. 93-1359,93-1443, 93-1444,1994U.S.App. LEXIS 36692 (4thCir.Dec. 29,1994)............................................................................................................................33,34 Ungar v.IslamicRepublicof Iran, 211F.Supp.2d91(D.D.C.2002)...........................................................................................37 vi 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 8 of 57 PageID# 11445 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) UnitedStates v.Oliver, No.12-4047,No.12-4052,2013U.S.App. LEXIS 4741(4thCir.Mar.8, 2013)........................................................................................................................................36 UnitedStates v.Stevens, 909F.2d431(11thCir.1990).................................................................................................39 Wag MoreDogs, LLC v.Cozart, 680F.3d359(4thCir.2012)...................................................................................................35 InreXeServs. AlienTort Litig., 665F.Supp.2d569(E.D.Va.2009)......................................................................................23 Xuncaxv.Gramajo, 886F.Supp.162(D.Mass.1995).....................................................................................18,19 Yearsleyv. W.A.Ross Const.Co., 309U.S.18(1940)...................................................................................................................45 Yousuf v.Smantar, 2012U.S.Dist. LEXIS 122403(E.D.Va.2012)......................................................................18 Statutes 18U.S.C.§2340......................................................................................................................19,22 18U.S.C.§§2340A.......................................................................................................................22 18U.S.C.§2441(d)(2)(D).............................................................................................................22 2002WarCrimes Act, 18U.S.C.§2441(d)(1)(A)...........................................................19,22,23 Federal Tort Claims Act.....................................................................................................42,43,44 ForeignClaims Act,10 U.S.C.§2734..........................................................................................44 TortureVictim ProtectionAct,28U.S.C.§1350.............................................3,19,20,23,44,45 OtherAuthorities Adam Liptak,Legal Scholars CriticizeMemos onTorture, NYTimes, June25,2004........................................................................................................22 Conclusions andRecommendations of theCommitteeAgainst Torture-Israel, 18thSess.,U.N.Doc.A/52/44(Sept.10,1997)................................................................18,26 vii 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 9 of 57 PageID# 11446 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) ConventionAgainst Torture,Art.1(1)(enteredintoforceJune26,1987).............................19,23 CordulaDroege,“’InTruththe Leitmotiv’: TheProhibitionofTortureand Other Forms of Ill-Treatment in International Humanitarian Law,” 867Int’l Rev.of theRed Cross 515(Sept.2007)..............................................................17-18 CPAOrder17............................................................................................................................3,44 David Lubanand HenryShue,Mental Torture:ACritiqueof Erasures inU.S. Law,100Geo. L.J.823(2012)................................................................................................20 Dep’t ofJustice,Officeofthe Legal Counsel,Memorandum of Law forAlberto R.Gonzales, Counsel tothePresident Re; Standards ofConduct for Interrogationunder18U.S.C.§§2340-2340A,Aug.1,2002.................................................22 Dep’t ofJustice,OfficeofProfessional Responsibility, Investigationintothe Officeof Legal Counsel MemorandaConcerningIssues RelatingtotheCIA’s UseofEnhanced InterrogationTechniques onSuspectedTerrorists, July29, 2009..........................................................................................................................................22 Fed.R.Civ.P.12(g)(2)............................................................................................................40,41 H.R.Rep.No.102-367(1991)......................................................................................................45 H.R.Res. 627,108thCong.(2004)..................................................................................................1 HernánReyes, “TheWorst Scars AreintheMind: Psychological Torture,” 867Int’l Rev.of theRed Cross 591(Sept.2007)....................................................................20 InterpretativeGuidanceontheNotionofDirect ParticipationinHostilitiesunder International Humanitarian Law,Nils Melzer, ICRC,May2009...........................................23 JaneMayer, WhoKilledGul Rahman?,NewYorker,Mar.31,2010...........................................27 Natural Disasters andSevere Weather:Hypothermia,Ctrs. forDiseaseControl & Prevention,https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/winter/staysafe/hypothermia.html (last visitedAug.17,2017)......................................................................................................27 Nigel Rodley,TheTreatment ofPrisoners Under International Law(3ded. 2009).....................19 Report onSituationofDetainees at Guantánamo Bay,62ndSess.,U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2006/120,¶¶51-52(Feb.27,2006)............................................................................23 Report oftheSpecial RapporteurontheQuestionofTorture,ManfredNowak, Civil andPolitical Rights,IncludingtheQuestions of TortureandDetention, U.N.Doc.E.CN.4/2006/6 (Dec.23,2005)...............................................................................24 viii 9966432v.1 Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 639 Filed 08/18/17 Page 10 of 57 PageID# 11447 TABLE OFAUTHORITIES (continued) Page(s) Restatement (Second)of Torts §876.............................................................................................40 Sheri Fink,Settlement ReachedinC.I.A.TortureCase, NYTimes, Aug.17,2017........................................................................................................27 S.Rep.No.102-249(1991)...........................................................................................................45 Trial ofTanakaChuici,11 LRTWC 62(AustralianMilitaryCourt,Rabaul, July 12,1946),excerptedin60 International LawStudies, Documents onPrisoners ofWar344(1979)....................................................................................................................28 U.N.Report onSituationofDetainees at GuantánamoBay,62ndSess.,U.N.Doc. E/CN.4/2006/120(Feb.27,2006)............................................................................................23 U.N.Special Rapporteur onTortureand OtherCruel InhumanorDegrading Treatment orPunishment,Manfred Nowak,StudyonthePhenomenonof Torture,Cruel, Inhuman orDegradingTreatment orPunishment intheWorld, IncludinganAssessment ofConditions ofDetention, U.N.Doc.A/HRC/13/39/Add.5(Feb.5,2010)........................................................................19 U.S.DEP’TOFARMY,FIELDMANUAL34-52,INTELLIGENCEINTERROGATION (Sept.28,1992) .................................................................................................................26,27 WhiteHouse,Press Release,President Bush Meets withAl Arabiya Television (May5,2004).............................................................................................................................1 WorldWeather InformationService—Baghdad,availableat http://worldweather.wmo.int/en/city.html?cityId=1464(last visitedAugust 17, 2017)..........................................................................................................................................6 ix 9966432v.1

Description:
DEFENDANT CACI PREMIER TECHNOLOGY'S MOTION TO Courts assessing torture or CIDT are obligated to consider an individual's treatment.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.