ebook img

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ABDUL KHALIF CALHOUN ... PDF

44 Pages·2010·0.25 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ABDUL KHALIF CALHOUN ...

CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ABDUL KHALIF CALHOUN, CIVIL NO. 09-683 (MJD/JSM) Plaintiff, v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA “PRAIRIE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,” TIMOTHY WENGLER, MRS. SEIDL, MR. KOOSMAN, MAYER, MAUS, RIELAND, and ASMUSSEN, Defendants. JANIE S. MAYERON, United States Magistrate Judge The above matter comes before the undersigned upon defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 27]; plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 50]; plaintiff’s Motion for Response to Defendants’ Summary Judgment [Docket No. 61]; and Motion for Telephonic Appearance [Docket No. 69]. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation by the District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1(c). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Abdul Khalif Calhoun (“Calhoun”) was convicted of first-degree robbery and burglary, second-degree assault, and drug possession. See Affidavit of Kathleen D. McMahon (“McMahon Aff.”), Ex. A. Calhoun was confined at the Prairie Correctional Facility (“PCF”) at all times relevant to this action. PCF is owned by defendant Corrections Corporation of America (“CCA”). See Defendants’ Memorandum CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 44 in Support of Summary Judgment (“Defs.’ Mem.”) at p. 2. CCA is under contract to house inmates for the State of Washington Department of Corrections (“WDOC”). See McMahon Aff., Ex. B (Contact between PCF and the WDOC). Calhoun had been transferred from the prison in Washington to PCF. See Defs.’ Mem. at p. 2. Calhoun has since been transferred to Coyote Ridge Correctional Center in the State of Washington. See Docket No. 55. The gravamen of Calhoun’s suit is that based on certain policies regarding the ordering and purchasing of books from approved and non-approved vendors, PCF and the individual named defendants repeatedly denied Calhoun’s requests to obtain certain books from a vendor that was not on PCF’s approved list of vendors. Calhoun claimed that this denial violated his rights under the First Amendment of the Constitution as evidenced by CCA’s own policies, the Western Interstate Corrections Compact applicable to Washington inmates (RCW § 72.70.010), the contract between WDOC and CCA, and WDOC Policies 450.100 and 590.500. Defendants disagreed with Calhoun’s contention, maintaining that they had no obligation to adhere to the policies and contract governing Washington prisoners, and their refusal to permit Calhoun to buy the books he wanted was based on facility policies that were reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. A. Policies, Statute and Contract at Issue 1. CCA and PCF Policies The relevant portions of the policies at issue are as follows: CCA Corporate and Facility Policy No. 16-1 (“CCA Policy 16-1”) provides: 2 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 3 of 44 16-1.1 PURPOSE: To establish procedures whereby restrictions of inmate/resident mail, if necessary, can take place. 16-1.2 AUTHORITY: Turner v. Safely, 107 S.Ct. 2254 (1987); Thornburgh v. Abbott, 109 S.Ct. 1874 (1989); Corporate and Facility Policy. * * * 16-1.4 POLICY: There will be no limitation as to the number of letters an inmate/resident may send or receive or on the length, language, content or source of the mail, except where there is clear and convincing evidence to justify the limitations for reasons of public safety or facility order and security. All publications such as books and periodicals must be received from a publisher unless deemed to constitute a tangible threat to the security of the institution. However, at some facilities the contracting agency requires publications to be sent from a vendor. * * * 16-1.5-D LIMITS ON AMOUNT OF CORRESPONDENCE 2. A limit may not be imposed on the amount of correspondence an inmate/resident is allowed to send or receive except where reasonable belief exists to justify the limitations for reasons of public safety or facility order and security. * * * 16-1.5-H. PUBLICATIONS 1. Books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed matter may only be mailed to an inmate/resident from a publisher or a vendor/book club. At some facilities the contracting agency allows the books and publications to be sent from a vendor. 3 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 4 of 44 2. Books, magazines, newspapers and other printed matter may be approved for inmates/residents unless deemed to constitute an immediate and tangible threat to the security or order of the facility or to inmate/resident rehabilitation by meeting one or more of the following criteria: a. The material contains instructions for the manufacturing of explosives, weapons, drugs or drug paraphernalia or alcoholic beverages; b. The material advocates violence within the facility; c. The material is of a type which has demonstrably caused violence or other serious disruption of facility security or order within the facility or similar facilities; d. The material advocates racial, religious, or national hatred in such a way so as to create a serious danger of violence in the facility; e. The material is of a nature which encourages deviate sexual behavior which is criminal and/or in violation of facility rules or detrimental to rehabilitation; and/or f. The publications was [sic] not sent from a publisher. * * * 16-1.5-J. PACKAGES 1. Each Warden/Administrator may make available to the inmate/resident population a list of items which may be received in packages. 2. Any person may purchase and send such approved items to any inmate/resident. However, at some facilities the contracting agency allows the package to only be sent from a vendor. AT THIS FACILITY, THE ITEMS WHICH MAY BE RECEIVED IN PACKAGES ARE AS FOLLOWS: Inmates are allowed to receive packages only from approved vendors at this facility. 4 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 5 of 44 THE NUMBER OF PACKAGES WHICH MAY BE RECEIVED ARE AS FOLLOWS: Inmates may receive packages once in each quarter as scheduled. 3. All incoming packages will be inspected for contraband. Any incoming package which is privileged correspondence will be treated according to the procedures for privileged mail. AT THIS FACILITY, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES RELATING TO PACKAGES ARE AS FOLLOWS: Inmates may receive packages once each quarter from approved vendors ONLY. A limit of not more than one package each, from a maximum of two vendors, may be ordered at the time of the order. A specific schedule for the receipt of packages per quarter is as follows: January, April, July, & October - PCF number ends in 1, 2, or 3. February, May, August. & November - PCF number ends in 4, 5, or 6. March, June, September, & December - PCF number ends in 7, 8. 9, or 0. Packages will contain only those items allowed in Policy 9-102,1 Inmate Property. Quantities may not exceed the totals allowed. If an order would exceed the allowed totals, the excess property must be disposed of - as provided by Policy - prior to issuance of the incoming property. 1 The Court was not provided with a copy of CCA Policy 9-102. 5 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 6 of 44 See Affidavit of Assistant Warden Barbara Seidl Schreier in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Schreier Aff.”), Ex. 1; Pl.’s Ex. Z (emphasis in original).2 PCF also issued a Memorandum on May 12, 2008 (“PCF Memorandum”) to all PCF inmates, entitled “Package/Property Orders, Clothing Exchange.” Schreier Aff., Ex. 2. The relevant portion of this Memorandum stated: • All property/package orders must originate (money and request/order form – unless specifically stated otherwise) from this facility. • Case managers must sign off on all money order requests regarding approved purchases. • Any item/package that arrives at Prairie Correctional Facility, not having come from an approved vendor (free or not) or not having prior authorization will not be allowed. This includes packages/orders/money not originating from PCF. • If you cannot find an item (book/tape) from an approved vendor, you may request to your Unit Manager, approval from another reputable/verifiable vendor. Package Orders: The following vendors are approved for general package orders. Catalogues are available in the library for viewing. * * * Edward R. Hamilton, Bookseller Falls Village, CT 06031-5000 2 In Calhoun’s briefs, he cited to his own exhibits, however, he did not attach the exhibits to the various affidavits he filed with the Court in response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment and in support of his own motion for summary judgment. This Court has determined that the exhibits referenced in Calhoun’s briefs were attached to his verified Complaint [Docket No. 2] as Docket No. 4. Therefore, the Court’s citation to “Pl.’s Ex.” refers to plaintiff’s exhibits included in Docket No. 4. 6 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 7 of 44 * * * Educational Items. All items not listed on the Cell Property list3 or sought from a non-approved vendor must have the Educational Counselor’s/Principal’s prior approval, including correspondence courses. Id. 2. Western Interstate Corrections Compact The State of Washington has adopted the Western Interstate Corrections Compact. See RCW 72.70 et seq. The provisions of this Act bearing on this Court’s analysis can be found in RCW § 72.70.010, Article IV, entitled “Procedures and Rights.” (e) All inmates who may be confined in an institution pursuant to the provisions of this compact shall be treated in a reasonable and humane manner and shall be cared for and treated equally with such similar inmates of the receiving state as may be confined in the same institution. The fact of confinement in a receiving state shall not deprive any inmate so confined of any legal rights which said inmate would have had if confined in an appropriate institution of the sending state. * * * (h) Any inmate confined pursuant to the terms of this compact shall have any and all rights to participate in and derive any benefits or incur or be relieved of any obligations or have such obligations modified or his status changed on account of any action or proceeding in which he could have participated if confined in any appropriate institution of the sending state located within such state. 3. Contract Between WDOC and CCA Pursuant to RCW § 72.70.010, CCA and WDOC entered into a contract that contained the following relevant provisions: 3 The Cell Property list was not provided to the Court by the parties. 7 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 8 of 44 4.01 General Duties and Liquidated Damages. The management of WDOC offenders in the Facility shall be consistent with the management of other offenders at the Facility and in accordance with the Operating Requirements.4 * * * 4.01.2 CCA will exercise authority to ensure that the daily operation of the Facility is in compliance with the provisions of this Contract. Subject to the provisions of this Contract, CCA shall provide WDOC Offenders care and treatment, including the furnishing of subsistence and routine and emergency medical care, provide for their physical needs, make available work, training and treatment programs, retain them in safe, supervised custody, maintain proper discipline and control, make certain that sentences and orders of the committing court are faithfully executed, provide reasonable access to the courts, and otherwise comply with applicable law. * * * Section 4.13 Access to Courts. CCA will provide opportunity for meaningful access to federal and Washington State legal materials at the Facility in accordance with security and operating needs. * * * Section 9.12 Compliance with Applicable Laws. CCA shall, at all times during the performance of its obligations of this Contract, strictly adhere to all applicable federal laws and regulations, * * * Section 9.18 No Third Party Benefit. This Contract shall benefit and burden the parties hereto in accordance with its terms and conditions and is not intended, and shall not be deemed or construed, to confer any rights, powers, benefits or privileges on any person or entity other than the parties to 4 The contract defined “Operating Requirements” as: “applicable federal, state, and local law and court orders; constitutional minimum standards; WDOC regulations made applicable to CCA and this Contract. If there exists a difference between any of these, the higher standard shall be followed as determined by the WDOC.” 8 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 9 of 44 this Contract. This Contract is not intended to create any rights, liberty interests, or entitlements in favor of any WDOC Offender. The Contract is intended only to set forth the contractual rights and responsibilities of the Contract parties. WDOC Offenders shall have only those entitlements created by Federal or Washington constitutions) statutes, regulations or case law. McMahon Aff., Ex. B. 4. WDOC Policies 450.100 and 590.500 WDOC Policy 450.100, entitled “Mail for Offenders,” allows inmates in stand- alone facilities to “receive a reasonable number of new or used books from a publisher or approved vendor,” and states that inmates “may receive a reasonable number of new books sent directly from the publisher provided they meet the requirements of this policy and facility requirements regarding property retention.” WDOC Policy 450.100, Section VIII.A.5 However, inmates cannot receive publications “outlined in the document entitled “Unauthorized Mail” attached to WDOC Policy 450.100. See WDOC Policy 450.100, Section VIII.B. The attachment entitled “Unauthorized Mail” sets out 35 different categories of mail that offenders are not be allowed to receive for any reason. WDOC 450.100 Attachment 1.6 Categories 26 and 27 provide: 26. Publications (i.e., reproduced handwritten, typed/printed, or pictorial materials including books, periodicals, newspapers, magazines, and pamphlets) and catalogs (i.e., a publication predominantly or substantially focused on offering items for sale) not mailed directly from the publisher/retailer. Clippings of newspaper and magazine 5 WDOC Policy 450.100 was located at: http://www.doc.wa.gov/policies/ default.aspx?show=4000. 6 WDOC Policy 450.100 Attachment 1 was located at: http://www.doc. wa.gov/policies/default.aspx?show=4000. 9 CASE 0:09-cv-00683-MJD-JSM Document 75 Filed 07/16/10 Page 10 of 44 articles not mailed directly from the publisher/retailer are permitted in quantities identified above. 27. Mail containing items that were not ordered, paid for, and approved in advance through facility designated channels. WDOC Policy 590.500 addresses legal access for offenders.7 Generally, this policy requires that all inmates be given the opportunity to research and prepare legal matters related to their sentence and confinement and actions related to their civil rights. Offenders are allowed to purchase and retain personal legal reference books and materials from authorized sources, subject to property limitations. In addition, inmates are permitted access to a law library that includes relevant and up-to-date constitutional, statutory, and case materials, applicable rules and practice treatises. B. Plaintiff’s Requests for Books and Defendants’ Denial of These Requests On July 2, 2008, Calhoun submitted an Inmate Letter to defendant Chief of Unit Managers Koosman (“Koosman”) asking for permission to obtain for his pending appeal the book “Redemption Manual 4th ed.” from an alternative vendor, which PCF’s approved vendors did not carry. McMahon Aff., Ex. C; Pl’s Ex. B. Calhoun was told that he needed to go through defendant Unit Manager Mayer (”Mayer”) for his request. Id. The same day, Calhoun sent another Inmate Letter to Assistant Warden Barbara Seidl Schreier (“Schreier”) requesting approval to obtain a “self help” educational research manual case titled the “Redemption Manual 4th ed.” from a company in Oregon and offering to provide the book list information and information regarding the book seller so that staff could substantiate his request. McMahon Aff., Ex. D; Pl.’s Ex. 7 WDOC Policy 590.500 was located at: http://www.doc. wa.gov/policies/default.aspx?show=500. 10

Description:
Edward R. Hamilton, Bookseller. Falls Village, CT 06031-5000. 2. In Calhoun's briefs, he cited to his own exhibits, however, he did not attach the.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.