OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity Editedby MATTHEW BAERMAN, DUNSTAN BROWN, AND GREVILLE G. CORBETT 1 OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi 3 GreatClarendonStreet,Oxford,ox26dp, UnitedKingdom OxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford. ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship, andeducationbypublishingworldwide.Oxfordisaregisteredtrademarkof OxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountries ©editorialmatterandorganizationMatthewBaerman,DunstanBrown,and GrevilleG.Corbett2015 ©thechapterstheirseveralauthors2015 Themoralrightsoftheauthorshavebeenasserted FirstEditionpublishedin2015 Impression:1 Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedin aretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthe priorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermitted bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics rightsorganization.Enquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeofthe aboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,atthe addressabove Youmustnotcirculatethisworkinanyotherform andyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirer PublishedintheUnitedStatesofAmericabyOxfordUniversityPress 198MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY10016,UnitedStatesofAmerica BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData Dataavailable LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2014947260 ISBN 978–0–19–872376–9 Printedandboundby CPIGroup(UK)Ltd,Croydon,cr04yy LinkstothirdpartywebsitesareprovidedbyOxfordingoodfaithand forinformationonly.Oxforddisclaimsanyresponsibilityforthematerials containedinanythirdpartywebsitereferencedinthiswork. OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi Contents ListofFiguresandTables vii ListofAbbreviations xi ListofContributors xiii PartI. WhatisMorphologicalComplexity? Understandingandmeasuringmorphologicalcomplexity:Anintroduction MatthewBaerman,DunstanBrown,andGrevilleG.Corbett Dimensionsofmorphologicalcomplexity StephenR.Anderson PartII. UnderstandingComplexity Rhizomorphomes,meromorphomes,andmetamorphomes ErichR.Round Morphologicalopacity:RulesofreferralinKanumverbs MarkDonohue MorphologicalcomplexityàlaOneida Jean-PierreKoenigandKarinMichelson Gender–numbermarkinginArchi:Smalliscomplex MarinaChumakinaandGrevilleG.Corbett PartIII. MeasuringComplexity Contrastingmodesofrepresentationforinflectionalsystems:Some implicationsforcomputingmorphologicalcomplexity GregoryStumpandRaphaelA.Finkel Computationalcomplexityofabstractivemorphology VitoPirrelli,MarcelloFerro,andClaudiaMarzi Patternsofsyncretismandparadigmcomplexity:ThecaseofOldand MiddleIndicdeclension PaoloMilizia OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi vi Contents LearningandthecomplexityofØ-marking SebastianBankandJochenTrommer References LanguagesIndex NamesIndex SubjectIndex OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi List of Figures and Tables Figures Figure3.1 Kayardildclausestructureandattachmentoffeatures 31 Figure3.2 Featureswhichpercolateontowordω 34 Figure5.1 Ahierarchyofnom-index 80 Figure5.2 Ahierarchyofpersonvalues 80 Figure5.3 Ahierarchyofgendervalues 80 Figure5.4 Ahierarchyofnumbervalues 80 Figure6.1 Typesofsimpledynamicverbsaccordingtothephonological shapeoftheirperfectivestem(total142) 112 Figure8.1 One-to-oneandone-to-manyrelationsin one-node-per-variableandmany-nodes-per-variableneural networks 146 Figure8.2 Atwo-levelfinitestatetransducerfortheItalianirregularform vengono‘theycome’ 150 Figure8.3 OutlinearchitectureofaTSOMandatwo-dimensional20×20 TSOM 152 Figure8.4 Topologicalpropagationoflong-termpotentiationand long-termdepressionoftemporalre-entrantconnectionsover twosuccessivetimesteps;andword-graphrepresentationof Germanpastparticiples 154 Figure8.5 Topologicaldispersionofsymbolsontemporaland spatio-temporalmaps,plottedbytheirpositionininputwords 157 Figure8.6 Alignmentplotsofthefindenparadigmonatemporal(left) andaspatio-temporal(right)map 158 Figure8.7 (Topological)dispersionvaluesacrossactivationpatterns triggeredbyselectedinflectionalendingsontemporaland spatio-temporalmapsforItalianandGermanknownword forms,andonunknownwordforms 159 Figure8.8 BMUactivationchainsforvediamo-vedete-crediamoona 20×20map(left)andtheirword-graphrepresentation(right) 160 Figure8.9 Correlationcoefficientsbetweenalignmentscoresandrecall scoresfornovelwords,plottedbyletterpositionsrelativetothe stem-endingboundary 161 OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi viii ListofFiguresandTables Figure8.10 Stemdispersionover<PREF-X,X >pairsinItalianand Germanverbforms.Dispersionvaluesaregivenasafractionof 100overthemap’sdiagonal 163 Figure9.1 Agraphrepresentingtherelativefrequenciesof morphosyntacticpropertycombinationsinOldIndicadjectival paradigms 172 Tables Table3.1 Morphometypesandtheirmodeofcategorization 29 Table3.2 Inflectionalfeaturesandtheirpotentialvalues 32 Table3.3 Featuresforwhichlexicalstemscaninflect 37 Table3.4 Inflectionalfeaturesandtheirmorphomicexponents 51 Table3.5 Phonologicalexponentsofmorphomes 51 Table4.1 Inflectionforampl‘laughat’withdifferentsubjects,objects, andtenses 56 Table4.2 FreepronounsinKanum,absolutive,andergativeforms 56 Table4.3 Kanumverbalinflection 57 Table4.4 Inflectionformakr‘roast’withdifferentsubjects,objects,and tenses 61 Table4.5 Opacityandtransparencyinpronominalsystems 62 Table4.6 Tensedistinctionsportmanteauwithagreementaffixes 62 Table4.7 Pronominaldistinctionsintheidealizedagreementaffixes 63 Table4.8 Takeoversintheobjectprefixesfortwoverbs 63 Table4.9 Referralsintheobjectprefixes 64 Table4.10 Referralsintenseaffixes 64 Table4.11 Referralsinthesubjectsuffixes 64 Table5.1 Oneidaprenominalprefixes(C-stemallomorphs) 73 Table5.2 Thenineteenpossiblecategoriesofsemanticindices 79 Table5.3 Numberofmorphsineachstemclassfromwhichallother fifty-sevenformscanbededuced 88 Table5.4 Numberandpercentageofstemsofeachclassintwelvetexts 89 Table6.1 AgreeinglexicalitemsintheArchidictionary 95 Table6.2 SyncretismpatternA 98 Table6.3 SyncretismpatternB 98 Table6.4 Archiprefixes 98 Table6.5 Archiinfixes,SetI 98 OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi ListofFiguresandTables ix Table6.6 Archiinfixes,SetII 99 Table6.7 Archisuffixes 99 Table6.8 Partialparadigmoffirstandsecondpersonpronouns 102 Table6.9 Verbsofsimilarphonology,butdifferentpatternsofrealizing agreement 111 Table7.1 Orthographicformsoftheverbsin(1) 121 Table7.2 Hearer-orientedplatfortheverbsin(1) 122 Table7.3 Speaker-orientedplatfortheverbsin(1) 123 Table7.4 Morphologicalindicesemployedinthespeaker-orientedplat 124 Table7.5 Twohypotheticalplats 125 Table7.6 PlatrepresentingahypotheticalsystemofICs 127 Table7.7 Inflectionclasses,exponences,anddistillationsinthetwoplats 128 Table7.8 4-MPSentropy(×100)ofthefourdistillationsinTable7.7 129 Table7.9 Distinctexponencesineachofthefourdistillations 129 Table7.10 TraditionalprincipalpartsoffiveLatinverbs 130 Table7.11 Optimaldynamicprincipal-partsetsofthreeverbs(H-Oplat) 131 Table7.12 Dynamicprincipal-partsetsinthetwoplats 132 Table7.13 Dynamicprincipal-partnumbersinthetwoplats 132 Table7.14 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforcastintheH-Oplat 133 Table7.15 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforcast(S-Oplat) 133 Table7.16 Numberofviableoptimaldynamicprincipal-partsets 134 Table7.17 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforpass(H-Oplat) 134 Table7.18 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforpass(S-Oplat) 135 Table7.19 Densityofviabledynamicprincipal-partsetsamongall candidatesetshavingthesamenumberofmembers 135 Table7.20 ICpredictabilityoftwelveverbsintheH-OandS-Oplats 137 Table7.21 CellpredictabilitymeasuresforthirteenverbsintheH-Oand S-Oplats 138 Table7.22 Predictivenessofaverb’scells,averagedacrossverbs 139 Table7.23 Predictivenessofaverb’spast-tensecellintheH-OandS-Oplats 139 Table9.1 Relativefrequenciesofinflectionalvaluesonthebasisof Lanman(1880) 171 Table9.2 OldIndic-a-/-a¯-adjectivedeclensionandrelativefrequencies ofthesetsofinflectionalvaluearraysassociatedwiththe differentexponents 173
Description: