UNBEARABLE AFFECT 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb ii 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2200 PPMM 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb iiii 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2211 PPMM UNBEARABLE AFFECT A Guide to the Psychotherapy of Psychosis Second Edition David A.S. Garfield 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb iiiiii 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2211 PPMM 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb iivv 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2211 PPMM CONTENTS PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xiii SECTION I: AFFECT DIAGNOSIS 1 CHAPTER ONE Introduction: The focal point 3 CHAPTER TWO Forms of introduction: The chief complaint 15 CHAPTER THREE Psychotic themes in the precipitating event 31 CHAPTER FOUR Affect and primary process in psychosis 45 CHAPTER FIVE Vitality affects and the self in psychosis 59 v 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb vv 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2211 PPMM vi CONTENTS SECTION II: AFFECT THERAPEUTICS 75 CHAPTER SIX Countertransference: The transmission of affect 77 CHAPTER SEVEN The forms and transformations of affect 95 CHAPTER EIGHT Shame, pride, and paranoid psychoses 111 CHAPETR NINE Emotion and self-esteem in psychosis 131 CHAPTER TEN Bearing unbearable affect 147 SECTION III: A LIFE’S WORK: STAYING OUT OF PSYCHOSIS 163 CHAPTER ELEVEN Putting emotion in perspective 165 CHAPTER TWELEVE Staying out of psychosis 183 REFERENCES 199 INDEX 209 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb vvii 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2222 PPMM PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION Over twelve years have gone by since the publication of the first edition of “Unbearable Affect” and it is heartening to see the worlds of psychiatry, neurology, psychology and psychoanalysis embrace the primacy of affect in human mental life (Abend and Nersessian, 1989; Spezzano, 1993; Kantrowitz, 1997; Lane and Nadel, 2000; Damasio 2000; Diener et al, 2007). When affect is used as a guide to psycho- therapeutic work with patients in psychosis, the ordinary can emerge out of the extraordinary. Amidst the bizarre, seemingly alien, and often unintelligible communications of psychotic patients, the natural human element of emotion provides the means to guide both doctor and patient to safer waters. By seeking out, harnessing, and rechan- neling affect, the storms of psychosis can be successfully navigated. Affect is the most fundamental element and background field of the mind and brain of humankind. Like the physical elements of gravity, wind, and lightning, emotion has force and direction. As the great 19th-century Swiss psychiatrist Eugene Bleuler (Jung, 1907/1976) stated, “Thus, affectivity, much more than reflection, is the driving force behind all our actions and omissions.” The neurobiologists know, that the limbic system, also called the “primitive brain,” is the home of affectivity. Psychologists, too, torn between the other basic vii 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb vviiii 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2222 PPMM viii PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION ingredients of the psyche, such as thinking and volition, have given the nod to the primacy of affect. Bleuler (1906) stated it clearly when he declared, “Affectivity is the basis of life.” What happens when emotion becomes unbearable? We see par- allels in the natural world–gravity and wind turn beautiful waters into hurricanes. Lightning strikes quickly destroy humans, homes and forests alike. Little that is ordinary is left in the wake of natural disaster. So too, in psychotic patients, delusions, hallucinations, and incoherence are sometimes all that can be seen. The human being inside is left ravaged and little remains intact. We are also aware that the most basic natural elements, when in turmoil, are not always explosive–at times they implode. The heat from the earth’s core combined with the powerful pull of gravity shifts the earth’s underlying mantle; massive faults crack open to swallow up our usual existence. So too, when human events build up and become too much to bear, emotion may implode, resulting in the negativism, the autism, and the paralysis of psychosis. The method in madness To attend to affect-to find it, make it tolerable, and place it back in its indigenous context is the goal of those who work with psychosis. This is the map first laid down by the late Dr. Elvin Semrad, a clini- cian teacher-scholar at Harvard’s Boston Psychopathic Hospital/ The Massachusetts Mental Health Center. Semrad stood on the shoulders of Bleuler and Jung in his emphasis on affect as the orga- nizing principle in psychosis. No doubt, Semrad would have agreed completely with the words of the European psychiatrist, Godferaux (Jung, 1907/1976): “Below the cold and rational laws of association of ideas, there are others which conform more to the profound needs of life. This is the logic of feeling.” The affect approach to psychosis is a psychoan- alytic approach. And yet, those who work with psychosis know that any successful approach must also be psychosynthetic. Does conflict bring about psychosis or do defects? With emotion as the guide to healing psychotic patients, clinicians can see how internal emotional strength makes bearing unbearable affect possible. Conversely, by diminishing the affective intensity of conflict, the patient’s internal condition is less twisted out of shape. 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb vviiiiii 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2222 PPMM PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION ix Neuropsychiatry and psychopharmacology have made great strides in the management of psychosis. Research in phenomeno- logical neuropsychiatry has resulted in brilliant discoveries con- cerning the neurological components of psychopathology. Research on mirror neurons in empathy (Gallese and Goldman, 1998), the cerebellar contributions to thought disorder (Taylor, 1991), the role of language centres (Cleghorn et al, 1992) in hallucination, and cortical-subcortical circuits (Cummings, 1985) in delusion, all make the phenomena of psychosis better understood in their brain basis. Psychopharmacology too, has made major advances in quieting the storms of psychosis. Newer antipsychotic medications, novel uses of anticonvulsants, and electroconvulsive therapy can rapidly diminish psychotic symptoms. Yet, neurobiology and psychopharmacology are like ocean sonog- raphy and better fiberglass boats. They give precise indications of the terrain and they provide better equipment for the hurricane- force winds. But they do not show you a way out; they do not chart the course! Semrad’s map out of psychosis focuses on finding the affect in the psychosis, bringing it into the patient’s body and, finally, putting it into words in the context of the life history of the patient. His blue- print is crucial but incomplete. Semrad begins with acknowledgment- the finding of affect, locating it in the delusional, hallucinatory, or neologistic elements of psychosis-and having the patient “own” the affect. This is a good start. Semrad’s second step, “bearing affect” is a complex affair. It requires more than bringing the unbearable affect in psychosis into the patient’s body. Added into Semrad’s plan is the idea that a special kind of relationship with the analyst is required. The revolutionary contributions of Heinz Kohut (1971) to the under- standing of narcissism and the coherence of the self are the missing ingredients in this regard. Here the analyst is not only the co-pilot, but also, at times, serves as the patient’s own missing eyes, ears, and hands. The therapist becomes, in some respects, a living part of the patient’s experience. Finally, Semrad’s design calls for putting that which was unbear- able affect into a new perspective. As affect is better tolerated in the body, it can now be tied to the rational mind. Still, a better emotional understanding of his or her history is not enough for the patient. Remobilization, revitalization, and further development of the 66000055TTSS--GGAARRFFIIEELLDD--BBooookk 11..iinnddbb iixx 55//1111//0099 88::4433::2222 PPMM
Description: