Typification of Dr. Tomitaro Makino's Botanical Names (2)

2005·0.17 MB·English

by  Nobuyuki Tanaka

植物研究雑誌
.JJpn. Bot.
80:340-342(2005)
Typification of Dr. Tomitaro Makino's Botanical Names (2)
Nobuyuki TANAKA
The Kochi Prefectural Makino Botanical Garden，42 00-6，Go daisan，Ko chi，78 1-8125 JAPAN
E-mail: [email protected]
加 町
(Received on May 30，2 005)
As ap art of as eries of studies on the typification of botanical names published by
Tomitaro Makino，p roposals for the lectotypification and the verification of other type
materials for taxa in the Balsaminaceae，B oraginaceae and Buddlejaceae are presented
here. (Continued from 1. Jpn. Bot. 80: 22-26，2 005)
Key words: Balsaminaceae，Bo raginaceae，Bu ddlejaceae，To mitaro M紘ino，type.
As a p tof ongoing research into the in the Balsaminaceae，n amely，I mpatiens
訂
typification of Tomitaro Makino's botanical hypophylla Makino. The type material of this
names，th is paper is presented as the second species has been well verified by Akiyama
in a series of reports proposing the lecto- (1989). One of the original syntypes，M aki-
typification，or otherwise providing verifica- no' ss pecimen collected at Mt. Fukaba in
tion of the status of potential type material， August 1907，w as not found. Two syntypes
for taxa in the Balsaminaceae，B oraginaceae at MAKc ited above as MAK 151134 and
and Buddlejaceae. MAK 151135 can also be seen on the
Makino Herbarium website (Makino
BALSAMINACEAE Herbarium 1999).
Impatiens hypophylla Makino in Bot.
Mag. Tokyo 25: 153 (1911). BORAGINACEAE
Lectotype (Nakai 1939): Prov. Yamato， Eritrichium nipponicum Makino in Bot.
Tonomine，O ct. 9，1 908，N ikai 1801 (TI; Mag. Tokyo 17: 51 (1903).
TNS-isolectotype). Paratype: Prov. Tosa， Lectotype (designated here): Prov.
Okunanokawa，A ug. 30，1 905，O da 581 and Shinano: Mt. Togakushi，J uly 12，1 884，R .
582 as MAK 151135 (MAK); Prov. Higo， Yatabe & 1. Matsumura s. n. (TI).
M .tFukaba，S ept. 23，1 906，M . Kodzuma Doubtful material: M .tTogakushi，A ug.
s. n. as MAK 61606 (MAK); Aso-gori， ?1903，T. Yagi s. n. as MAK4 0915 (MAK).
Nakamidzu-mura，S ept. 30，1 906，M . Kodz- Japanese name: Miyama-murasaki.
uma s. n. as MAK 61610，6 1611，6 1612 The specimen which Makino cited in the
(MAK); Prov. Awa，A ug. 23，1 908，N ikai original protologue， Yatabe and Matsu-
1800 (TI; isosyntype in TNS); Prov. Awa， mura's collection from Mt. Togakushi，w as
Aug. 1909，T. Makino s. n. as MAK1 51134 found at TI. Although the label on the sheet
(MAK). does not be thecollector' sn ame，it s date
紅
Japanese name: Hagakure-tsurifune and locality are identical with Makino's cita-
(Makino 1911). tion，a nd the label is annotated “Eritrichium
M北ino(1911) described only one taxon nipponicum Makino (sp. nov.)"，w ith the
一340-ー
December 2005 Journal of Japanese Botany Vol. 80 No. 6 341
words “Myosotis Sp." crossed out， in MAK4 0928 can also be seen on the Makino
Makino's own handwriting. Also mo中ho- Herbarium website (Makino Herbarium
logical features of the specimen agree well 1999).
with those given in the original description. This taxon is currently accepted as
The specimen is therefore considered to be a Hackelia deflexa (Wahlenb.) Opz.
type for Eritrichium nipponicum Makino.
The other original syntype，th e specimen that BUDDLEJACEAE
ぺ
Makino cited as“T. Yagi Aug. 1901 has Buddleja venenifera Makino in Bot.
not thus far been found. At MAKt here is a Mag. Tokyo 24: 56 (1910).
Yagi specimen collected from the same 10- Lectotype (de signated here): Prov.
cality in 1903，t hough the date is recorded as Osumi; Isl. Yakushima，M iyanoura，S ep ，.t
“?1903". The reason why someone recorded 1909，T . Makino s. n. (TI; MAK96455-
this date as“?1903" is not clear. There is a isolectotype). Paratype: Isl. Nakano-shima，
possibility that this date was 1901 in truth， unknown date，S . Tashiro s. n. as MAK
but in the absence of any evidence to con- 96451 (MAK).
firm this either way，th e specimen should be Japanese name: Urajiro-fudziutsugi
treated as doubtful. For all these reasons，it is (Makino 1910).
appropriate that the Yatabe and Matsumura There ethree sheets of the Yakushima
紅
specimen should be selected as the lectotype. collection distributed between MAKa nd TI.
The material at TI is composed of two sheets
Echinospermum matsudairae Makino in (one is the upper ptof the plant with flow-
征
Bot. Mag. Tokyo 17: 52 (1903)， ut ers and another is the lower part with stem
“matsudlαirαi". and leaves only). A. 1. M. Leeuwenberg an-
，
Lectotype (designated here): Prov. notated the MAKs pecimen (MAK96455) as
Shinano: Mt. Togakushi，J uly 12，1 884，R . the holotype in 1976，th ough this specimen is
Yatabe & J. Matsumura s. n. (TI). actually one of the syntypes. The other MAK
Paratype: Prov. Shinano: Mt. Togakushi， specimen，M AK9 6451，is likely the Tashiro
Aug，1 893，Hi toshi Matsudaira s. n. as MAK specimen which Makino cites in his original
40928 (MAK). publication. However，th e specimen does not
Japanese name: Iwa-murasaki. have ac ollection date on it，a nd it is probable
The specimen selected as the lectotype that Makino did not provide the date for
here was originally identified as Myosotis Tashiro's collection because it is lacking
intermedia Link. on Makino's label. Above from the specimen.
this is written “Lappula matsudairai Makino (1910) initially described this
Makino" and below it“Echinospermum taxon as an ew species but later changed its
Matsudairai Makino sp. nov人 bothin status to B. curviflora Hook. & Arm. var.
Makino's writing. The other specimen，th at [s] venen俳ra(Makino) Makino (Makino
at MAK，al so bears Makino' so riginal label 1911). Yamazaki (1965) transferred this va-
with the transcription “Echinospermum riety to form status under B. curviflora
Matsudairai Makino sp. nov.". The TI speci- Hook. & Arm. This taxon is currently ac-
men has flowers and the MAKs pecimen has cepted as B. curviflora Hook. & Arm. f.
fruits. Matsudaira's specimen at MAKw as venerifera (Makino) T. Yamaz.
identified by Kitagawa in 1965 and has been
annotated as the lectotype by someone on the Ia m grateful to the curators of MAK，T I
sheet，t hough it has never been published as and TNS for permission to study their collec-
such. The syntype at乱1AKcited above as tions during my visits. Iw ish to thank Mr.
342 植物研究雑誌第80巻第6号 平成17年12月
Stephan Gale of the Makino Botanical Herbarium， Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Garden for reviewing the English manu- Published on the Internet~ http://www.makino.
shizen.metro-u.ac.jp/ database.htm [accessed 25
scnpt.
May 2005~ 10:30 GMT].
Makino T. 1911. Observation on the Flora of Jap an.
References Bot. Mag. Tokyo 25(293): 156.
Akiyama S. 1989. A taxonomic no臼 onImpatiens Nakai T. 1939. Notulae ad plantas asiae orientalis (IX).
hypophylla Makino and 1. microphylla Nakai J. Jpn. Bot. 15(9): 523-541.
(Balsaminaceae). Mem. Natn. Sci. Mus.，T okyo Yamazaki T. 1965. OnB uddl々jacurviflora. J. Jpn. Bot.
(30): 43-56. 40(6): 160.
Makino Herbarium. 1999. Type Specimens of Makino
田中伸幸:牧野富太郎博士発表学名のタイプ検討
(2)
この一連の研究では，牧野博士が発表した学名 る検討があるので，主としてタイプ標本をMAK
のタイプ標本を分類群ごとに整理し，必要があれ の標本番号とともに記すだけにした.ムラサキ科，
ば再検討しようとするものである.本稿ではツリ フジウツギ科についてはMAK，TIに潜在するタ
フネソウ科，ムラサキ科，フジウツギ、科を扱った. イプ関連標本を整理し，レクトタイプ指定を含め
ツリフネソウ手ヰについてはAkiyama(19 89 )によ て再検討を行った(高知県立牧野植物園)