ebook img

Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History Part 11. Passeriformes: Parulidae, Drepanididae, Vireonidae, Icteridae, Fringillinae, Carduelinae, Estrildidae, And Viduinae PDF

2013·1.3 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History Part 11. Passeriformes: Parulidae, Drepanididae, Vireonidae, Icteridae, Fringillinae, Carduelinae, Estrildidae, And Viduinae

Scientific Publications of the American Museum of Natural History L E American Museum Novitates C TYPE SPECIMENS OF BIRDS IN THE AMERICAN R Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History O MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History Y : A Publications Committee M 11. PASSERIFORMES: PARULIDAE, DREPANIDIDAE, Robert S. Voss, Chair N H VIREONIDAE, ICTERIDAE, FRINGILLINAE, Board of Editors T Jin Meng, Paleontology Y CARDUELINAE, ESTRILDIDAE, AND VIDUINAE P Lorenzo Prendini, Invertebrate Zoology E S Robert S. Voss, Vertebrate Zoology P E Peter M. Whiteley, Anthropology C I MARY LECROY M Managing Editor E Mary Knight N S O Submission procedures can be found at http://research.amnh.org/scipubs F B I R D S All issues of Novitates and Bulletin are available on the web from , http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace P A R Order printed copies from http://www.amnhshop.com or via standard mail from: T American Museum of Natural History—Scientific Publications 1 1 Central Park West at 79th Street New York, NY 10024 This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (permanence of paper). A M N H B U L L E T I N On the cover: Lithograph by J.G. Keulemans of Loxops 3 8 1 wolstenholmei Rothschild (1900: pl. 65), front and back views of the type and only specimen, named for Henry Palmer’s field assistant, Ted Wolstenholme, who collected it in the mountains of the Wailua district, Oahu, Hawaii. No others 2 0 1 BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY were seen. 3 TYPE SPECIMENS OF BIRDS IN THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY PART 11. PASSERIFORMES: PARULIDAE, DREPANIDIDAE, VIREONIDAE, ICTERIDAE, FRINGILLINAE, CARDUELINAE, ESTRILDIDAE, AND VIDUINAE MARY LECROY DepartmentofVertebrateZoology(Ornithology) American Museum of Natural History BULLETINOFTHEAMERICANMUSEUMOFNATURALHISTORY Number381, 155pp. IssuedSeptember 26,2013 CopyrightEAmericanMuseumofNaturalHistory2013 ISSN0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Parulidae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Drepanididae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Vireonidae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Icteridae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Fringillinae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Carduelinae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Estrildidae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Viduinae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 2 ABSTRACT This 11th part of ‘‘Type specimens of birds in the American Museum of Natural History’’ includestaxainthepasserinefamiliesincludedinvolume14ofPeters’Check-listofbirdsofthe world (Paynter, 1968). The original description of each name has been consulted and the currentlyacceptednameofthetaxonhasbeenlistedwithreferencetorecentpublications.The coordinates and modern names of type localities are given when found and comments on taxonomic history are provided. In this part, 352 names are treated; for 20 of these, name- bearing typesare notin AMNHorwerenotfound. This part of the type list, as well as all previous parts, are searchable and available for downloadfrom theAMNH Library website(http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/). INTRODUCTION The Rothschild Collection has been housed at the American Museum of Natural This11thpartof‘‘Typespecimensofbirds History since its purchase in 1932. In the in the American Museum of Natural Histo- older literature, specimens in that collection ry’’ deals with taxa covered in volume 14 of were said to be housed in the ‘‘Tring Peters’ Check-list of birds of the world Museum.’’ThebirdcollectionoftheNatural (Paynter, 1968). As did earlier parts (Green- History Museum (formerly the British Mu- way, 1973, 1978, 1987; LeCroy and Sloss, seum (Natural History), BMNH, London) is 2000; and LeCroy, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, now housed at Tring on the former Roth- 2011, 2012), this part follows the order of schild estate, and this is a source of possible Peters’Check-listseries,whichisthebasisfor confusion. I have avoided the use of ‘‘Tring the arrangement of the AMNH collection. Museum’’ in relation to AMNH specimens Since the publication of this series, DNA from the Rothschild Collection. studiesofthephylogenyofbirdshavegreatly Most of the types from the Rothschild altered our understanding of avian relation- Collectionthatarecoveredinthispartofthe ships, about which there is as yet no type list were listed by Hartert (1918, 1919a, consensus of opinion. Some of these studies 1920, 1928). In these lists he was attempting have been referred to in the following pages. to ‘‘fix’’ the types, as the Rothschild Collec- Dickinson(2003)istheauthorityformostof tion was never cataloged. I have accepted the currently accepted names for taxa cov- his nomination of ‘‘types’’ as designation of ered herein, but a number of recent regional lectotypesincaseswhereoriginaldescriptions works, as well as families that have been implied syntypes, as has been done in all of coveredinHandbookofthebirdsoftheworld the previous parts of the AMNH type list. (del Hoyo et al., 2010, 2011) are referred to. Rothschild purchased the G.M. Mathews The format for this part follows that for collectionofbirds,andHarterthadonlybegun the previous ones. The citation of the name to list the Mathews types separately when and of the type locality is first given exactly the collection came to AMNH. None of the as it appeared in the original description. In families in this part of the type list had been the text portion for each taxon, the name of covered. When Mathews published his 1912 thetypelocality has been updated when that listofAustralianbirds,hedidsoundertheeye has changed, with the older name given in ofHartert,andhiscatalognumberformostof parentheses, and coordinates in degrees and his types was given. Later, after he began his mintues are given when found. AMNH own publication ‘‘Austral Avian Record,’’ he numbers for specimens in the type series of becamelessandlesslikelytodefinitelyidentify eachnamearegiveninboldfacetypethefirst his intended type specimen, especially as he time they are mentioned. If the catalog rushed to publish the later volumes of ‘‘The number of a specimen is followed by ‘‘bis,’’ birds of Australia.’’ In some cases I have it has been inserted into the catalog between designated lectotypes for Mathews’ names two specimens that had been cataloged when he has indicated his choice by attaching previously. histypelabelorwriting‘‘Type’’onhislabel. 3 4 BULLETIN OFTHEAMERICAN MUSEUM OFNATURALHISTORY NO.381 I have designated the following lectotypes MNHN Muse´um National d’Histoire in part 11: Fringilla spodiogenys koenigi, Naturelle, Paris, France Spinus citrinelloides kikuyensis, Pytelia melba MZB Museum Zoologicum Bogor- mosambica, Pyrenestes ostrinus rothschildi, iense, Cibinong, Java, Indonesia Munia bichenovii bandi, Poephila acuticauda NMV National Museum of Victoria, nea, Alisteranus cinctus vinotinctus, Poephila Melbourne, Australia gouldiae kempi, and Munia subcastanea. PNG Papua New Guinea Types that might be expected to be in RMCA Royal Museum for Central AMNH, but were either not found or were Africa, Tervuren, Belgium found to be elsewhere are listed in brackets. RMNH Nationaal Centrum Voor Biodi- Paratypesfortaxaforwhichtheprimarytype versiteit Naturalis (formerly or types are not in AMNH are usually not Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke listed. The reader is referred to earlier parts Historie), Leiden, the Nether- of this type list by LeCroy and Sloss (2000), lands and LeCroy (2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2011, SAMA SouthAustralianMuseum,Ade- 2012) for expanded explanation of the laide, South Australia introductory material. SMF Forschungsinstitut und Natur- The following acronyms are used in the museumSenckenberg,Frankfurt text: am Main, Germany UMMZ Museum of Zoology, University AM Australian Museum, Sydney, of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Australia USBGN United States Board on Geo- AMNH American Museum of Natural graphicNames,Washington,DC History, New York, NY USNM National Museum of Natural ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences, History, Washington, DC Philadelphia, PA YPM Yale Peabody Museum, Yale AOU AmericanOrnithologists’Union, University, New Haven, CT Washington, D.C. ZFMK Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut BIM Brooklyn Institute of Arts and und Museum A. Koenig, Bonn, Sciences (now Brooklyn Muse- Germany um), Brooklyn, NY ZMB Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Zen- BMNH Natural History Museum, for- tralinstitut der Humboldt-Uni- merly British Museum (Natural versita¨t, Institut fu¨r Systema- History), Tring, UK tische Zoologie, Berlin CP Coleccion Phelps, Caracas, Ven- ZMO ZoologiskMuseum,Oslo,Norway ezuela (formerlyChristianiaMuseum) FMNH FieldMuseumofNaturalHisto- ZSM Zoologische Staatssammlung, ry, Chicago, IL Munich, Germany ICZN International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature IES Instituto de Ecologia y Sistema´- PARULIDAE tica, Havana, Cuba MCZ Museumof Comparative Zoolo- The recent comprehensive phylogenetic gy, Harvard University, Cam- analysis of the core species of Parulidae by bridge, MA Lovette et al. (2010: 753–770) has resulted in MIZ Museum and Institute of Zoolo- a new understanding of relationships within gy, Polish Academy of Sciences, the family. While the order here is that of Warsaw, Poland Lowery and Monroe (1968), reference is MMNH James Bell Ford Museum of made to the results of the Lovette et al. Natural History (formerly Min- study. While the genus Parula is no longer nesota Museum of Natural His- recognizedbyLovetteetal.,thefamilyname tory), University of Minnesota, Parulidae is retained (ICZN, 1999: 46, Art. Minneapolis, MN 40.1). 2013 LECROY:AMNH TYPE SPECIMENSOFBIRDS 5 Helminthophaga Lawrencii Herrick 207–211). Lovette et al. (2010: 764) found that their studies were consistent with this, Helminthophaga Lawrencii Herrick, 1875: 220, pl. butthata‘‘marginallypreferablealternative’’ 15(onthebankofthePassaic,nearChatham). would be to reinstate the genus Oreothlypis Now considered a hybrid between Vermivora cyanoptera and V. chrysoptera. See Hellmayr, and include within it in addition to the six 1935: 336; Gill, 1980; Olson and Reveal, 2009; species included by Sangster in Leiothlypis, Curson, 2010b: 675, 739; and Lovette et al., the two species gutturalis and superciliosa 2010: 764. now included in Parula. HOLOTYPE: AMNH 325755, unsexed Vermivora superciliosa parva Miller [adult male], collected on the Passaic River, and Griscom near Chatham, 40.44N, 74.23W (Times atlas), New Jersey, in May 1874, by D.B. Vermivora superciliosa parva Miller and Griscom, Dickinson. 1925:7(nearJinotega(alt.3500ft),Nicaragua). COMMENTS: Herrick had the single spec- Now Oreothlypis superciliosa parva (Miller and imen, which he apparently returned to Griscom, 1925). See Hellmayr, 1935: 347; Dickinson. The holotype was presented to Mart´ınez-Sa´nchez and Will, 2010: 85; Curson, 2010b:742; and Lovette etal., 2010:764. AMNHbyEdnaDickinsonon11July1941. Lawrence’s Warbler has long been con- HOLOTYPE: AMNH 144485, adult male, sidered a hybrid between the Blue-winged collected 3 mi southeast of Jinotega, 13.05N, Warbler and the Golden-winged Warbler. 85.59W(Timesatlas),3500ft,Nicaragua,on6 Until recently the Latin name of the former April1917,byWaldronDeW.Miller(no.345). has been cited as Vermivora pinus (Linnaeus, COMMENTS: The AMNH number of the 1766) (American Ornithologists’ Union, holotype and only specimen was cited in the 1998: 533; Dickinson, 2003: 759). Olson and original description. Reveal (2009) readdressed this name, find- ing that Wilson had restricted Linnaeus’ Compsothlypis pitiayumi nana Griscom name pinus to the Pine Warbler and had provided the name Sylvia solitaria for the Compsothlypis pitiayumi nana Griscom, 1927b: Blue-winged Warbler. Because that name is 8 (Cape Garachine´, easternPanama). Now Setophaga pitiayumi nana (Griscom, 1927). preoccupied,OlsonandReveal(2009)provided See Hellmayr, 1935: 352; Curson 2010b: 743; Vermivoracyanopteraasareplacementname. and Lovette etal., 2010:765. Vermivora browni Griscom HOLOTYPE: AMNH 257148, adult female, collected at Point Garachine´, 08.07N, Vermivora browni Griscom, 1923: 4 (Miquihuana, 78.37W (Times atlas), eastern Panama, on 5 Tamaulipas,Mexico). Now Leiothlypis crissalis (Salvin and Godman, March 1927, by Paul Covel (no. 249). 1889). See Hellmayr, 1935: 344, American COMMENTS: A single specimen was col- Ornithologists’ Union, 1998: 536–537; Curson, lected and the AMNH number of the 2010b:741;and Lovette etal., 2010:764. holotypewascitedintheoriginaldescription. Griscom (1927b: 1–2) considered this trip HOLOTYPE: AMNH 174885, adult male, an ‘‘ornithological reconnaissance’’ and re- collected at Miquihuana, 23.35N, 99.46W counted areas visited with the following (Times atlas), Tamaulipas, Mexico, on 15 personnel: Ludlow Griscom, Maunsell S. June 1922, by W.W. Brown. From the Crosby, Mrs. Griscom, Rex R. Benson, and Leonard C. Sanford Collection. Paul F. Covel (taxidermist). COMMENTS: Griscom had the single spec- SeeLovetteetal.(2010:765)foruseofthe imen and gave the AMNH number for it in the original description. generic name Setophaga. Based on mitochondrial DNA studies and Compsothlypis pitiayumi roraimae Chapman song, the genus Leiothlypis has been pro- posed to include the following species of Compsothlypis pitiayumi roraimae Chapman, Vermivora:peregrina,celata,ruficapilla,criss- 1929a: 4 (Arabupu, alt. 4200 ft, Roraima, alis, virginiae, and luciae (Sangster, 2008: Venezuela). 6 BULLETIN OFTHEAMERICAN MUSEUM OFNATURALHISTORY NO.381 Now Setophaga pitiayumi roraimae (Chapman, Oyacachi, AMNH 176217, 176218, 180647, 1929).SeeHellmayr,1935:355;Curson,2010b: threemales,JanuaryandAugust1923,Olalla 743; and Lovetteetal., 2010: 765). and Sons. HOLOTYPE: AMNH 237071, adult male, collected at Arabopo´ (5 Arabupu), 4200 ft, Dendroica petechia flaviceps Chapman 05.06N, 60.44W (Paynter, 1982), 13 km Dendroica petechia flaviceps Chapman, 1892: 310 southeast of Mount Roraima, Bol´ıvar, Ven- (RumCay, Bahamas). ezuela, on 7 January 1928, by T. Donald Now Setophaga petechia flaviceps (Chapman, Carter (no. 1250) on the Lee Garnett Day 1892). See Hellmayr, 1935: 371; Lowery and Expedition. Monroe, 1968: 16; Browning, 1994: 38, 42; COMMENTS: Chapman cited the AMNH Curson, 2010b: 745–746; and Lovette et al., number of the holotype in the original 2010:765. description and listed two specimens exam- HOLOTYPE: AMNH 39848 (USNM no. ined. Unfortunately, the sex symbols were 108076), adult male, collected on Rum Cay, reversed; only two specimens were collected, Bahamas,on4March1886,bynaturalistson the male holotype and a female from Paulo. the Fish Commission steamship Albatross. The paratype is: AMNH 237070, female, Presented by the Smithsonian Institution. Paulo, 11 km southeast of Mount Roraima, COMMENTS: Chapman cited the AMNH 29 October 1927, by Carter (no. 468). Chap- numberof theholotype andsaid thathe had man (1931) discussed and compared the examined 21 adult males from Rum Cay, upper zonal birdlife of mounts Roraima NewProvidence,Conception,Wattling,Eleu- and Duida and gave an itinerary for the thera, and Cat islands, all from the Albatross Day Expedition with photographs of the expedition. None of the paratypes are in localities where roraimae was collected. AMNH. A female specimen from Rum Cay cametoAMNHviatheLawrenceCollection Compsothlypis pitiayumi alarum Chapman but was not cataloged until 1902, long after CompsothlypispitiayumialarumChapman,1924:2 thedescription of flaviceps. (Chaupe,6100ft,eastofHuancabamba,north- SeeLovetteetal.(2010:765)fortheuseof ernPeru). Setophaga instead of Dendroica. Now Setophaga pitiayumi alarum (Chapman, 1924). See Hellmayr, 1935: 355–356; Zimmer, Dendroeca (sic) capitalis Lawrence 1949: 2–3; Curson, 2010b: 743; and Lovette etal., 2010:765. Dendroeca (sic) capitalis Lawrence, 1868: 359 (Barbadoes). HOLOTYPE: AMNH 181604, adult male, NowSetophagapetechiapetechia(Linnaeus,1766). collected at Chaupe, 6100 ft, ca. 05.10S, See Hellmayr, 1935: 376; Browning, 1994: 40– 79.10W (Stephens and Traylor, 1983), Caja- 42; Curson,2010b: 745–746;andLovetteetal., marca, northern Peru, on 17 February 1923, 2010:765. by Harry Watkins (no. 7017). COMMENTS: The AMNH number of the SYNTYPES: AMNH 39858, adult male, holotypewasgivenintheoriginaldescription AMNH 39867, adult female, collected on and 15 specimens were listed in addition to Barbados(5Barbadoes)Island,WestIndies, the holotype. Paratypes are: Peru, Chaupe, by A.H. Alexander. From the Lawrence AMNH 181599–181603, four females, one Collection. male, January–February 1923, by Watkins; COMMENTS: Lawrence described both Huarandosa, AMNH 182203, 182204, one male and female but did not say how many female,onesex?,September1923,byWatkins. specimens he had, only saying that the Ecuador, Zamora, AMNH 167932–167934, types were in his collection and collected by twofemales,onejuvenile,November–Decem- Alexander. The above two syntypes are the ber 1920, by Cherrie; Sabanilla, AMNH only Barbados specimens that came to 167931, female, November 1920, by Cherrie; AMNH with the Lawrence Collection and Lower Sumaco, AMNH 183556, male, De- both were marked ‘‘Type’’ by Lawrence. He cember 1923, by Olalla and Sons; below also included a specimen in USNM brought 2013 LECROY:AMNH TYPE SPECIMENSOFBIRDS 7 in alcohol from Barbados by Prof. Gill and the paratypes are: Mount Rusilla, AMNH mentioned by Baird (1864–1866: 202). 166325, male, AMNH 166326, female, col- lectedinFebruaryandMarch1917,byBeck. Dendroica petechia oraria Parkes and Dickerman Leucopeza Bishopi Lawrence Dendroica petechia oraria Parkes and Dickerman, Leucopeza Bishopi Lawrence, 1878: 150 (151 in 1967:87(2milessouthofBuenaVista(5about separate) (St.Vincent). 9 miles north of Tlacotalpan), Veracruz, Mex- Now Setophaga bishopi (Lawrence, 1878). See ico). Hellmayr, 1935: 414; Raffaele et al., 1998: Now Setophagapetechiaoraria(Parkesand Dick- 406–407; Curson, 2010b: 761; and Lovette erman, 1967). See Lowery and Monroe, 1968: etal., 2010:765. 19;Browning,1994:43,47;Curson,2010b:745– 746;and Lovette etal., 2010:765. SYNTYPES:AMNH40016,female,AMNH 40017, juvenile male, collected in the crater HOLOTYPE: AMNH 817690 (MMNH of Soufrie`re, 13.21N, 61.11W (Times atlas), 14594), adult male, collected 2 mi south of St. Vincent Island, West Indies, on 1 and 2 Buena Vista, about 9 mi north of Tlacotal- November 1877, respectively, by F.A. Ober pan,18.38N,95.40W(Timesatlas),Veracruz, (nos. 426 and 428, respectively). From the Mexico, on 16 November 1958, by Robert George N. Lawrence Collection. W. Dickerman (no. 9067). COMMENTS: In the original description, COMMENTS: The MMNH number of the Lawrence discussed the four specimens col- holotypewascitedintheoriginaldescription lected byOberandnotedthatthetypes were and the specimen was exchanged to AMNH inUSNM.Deignan(1961:541),indiscussing inOctober1986.ParkesandDickermancon- this species, noted that two of the four sulted many collections and said that speci- syntypes,both marked‘‘Type’’byLawrence, mens of oraria they examined were from the wereinUSNM,butUSNM74100and74101 following localities: near Lomas del Real, ‘‘have vanished from the collection without Tampico, Laguna Tamiahua, Boca del R´ıo, trace.’’AMNH40016bearsthenumber74100, near Tlacotalpan, and Sa´nchez Magallanes. andAMNH40017thenumber74101without The following five paratyes of oraria are in anyindicationthattheyareUSNMnumbers. AMNH: Tampico, AMNH 85253–85256, Neitherof these specimens ismarked‘‘Type’’ three males, one female, collected on 25 May by Lawrence, but because he did not distin- 1888, from the Sennett Collection; 9 mi east- guish in the original description as to which northeastofTlacotalpan,AMNH781744,male, specimens he considered his types and the 7 April1962, by Dickerman. above specimens had been cataloged at USNM, these two specimens must also be Dendroica pinus chrysoleuca Griscom considered syntypes of bishopi. They had not DendroicapinuschrysoleucaGriscom,1923:5(Mt. previouslybeenincludedwithtypespecimens Tina,Santo Domingo). at AMNH. NowSetophagapinuschrysoleuca(Griscom,1923). The tip of the upper mandible of AMNH SeeHellmayr,1935:407;Keithetal.,2003:192; 40016 is broken off. Curson, 2010b: 755; and Lovette et al., 2010: The species bishopi had formerly been 765. included in the monotypic genus Catharo- HOLOTYPE: AMNH 166327, adult male, peza, butseeLovette et al. (2010:765) for its collected on Loma Tina (5 Mount Tina), inclusion in the genus Setophaga. 18.46N, 70.42W (Keith et al., 2003: 238), Dominican Republic (5 Santo Domingo), Geothlypis trichas coloradonicola Oberholser Hispaniola Island, West Indies, on 10 Janu- GeothlypistrichascoloradonicolaOberholser,1948: ary 1917, by Rollo H. Beck on the Brewster- 3 (Las Vegas, NewMexico). Sanford Expedition (no. 6915). NowGeothlypistrichasoccidentalisBrewster,1883. COMMENTS: The AMNH number of the See Lowery and Monroe, 1968: 40; Guzy and holotype was cited in the original descrip- Ritchison, 1999; Curson, 2010b: 771; and Lov- tion. Griscom had two additional specimens; etteetal., 2010:764–765. 8 BULLETIN OFTHEAMERICAN MUSEUM OFNATURALHISTORY NO.381 HOLOTYPE: AMNH 384387, adult male, (1995), Dickerman and Parkes (1997: 229), collected at Las Vegas, 35.36N, 105.15W and Curson (2010b: 769) retained the genus (Timesatlas),NewMexico,on27May1915, Oporornis. Dickerman and Parkes (1997: byArthurSmith.FromtheJonathanDwight 229) considered intermedia a synonym of O. Collection (no. 43071). t. tolmiei while Curson (2010b: 769) equated COMMENTS: The AMNH number of the it with O. t. monticola. The recent studies of holotype was given by Oberholser in the Lovette et al. (2010: 764–765) recommended originaldescription.Hedidnotlistparatypes. that Oporornis be merged into Geothlypis. Okanagan Centre, British Columbia, is at Geothlypis speciosa limnatis Dickerman 50.02N, 119.23W (Times atlas). Geothlypis speciosa limnatis Dickerman, 1970: 95 (LagoYuriria, Stateof Guanajuato, Me´xico). Teretistris fornsi Gundlach Now Geothlypis speciosa limnatis Dickerman, 1970. See Dickinson, 2003: 764; Curson, TeretistrisfornsiGundlach,1858:274(easternpart 2010b: 773; and Lovetteetal., 2010: 764–765. ofthe island [Cuba]). Now Teretistris fornsi fornsi Gundlach, 1858. See HOLOTYPE: AMNH 788641, adult (?) Hellmayr,1935:424;Garrido,2000;Dickinson, male, collected at Lago Yuriria, 20.12N, 2003:764; andCurson, 2010b: 777. 101.10W(Times atlas), Guanajuato,Mexico, on 9 December 1963, by R.W. Dickerman SYNTYPE: AMNH 40019, adult male, collected on eastern Cuba, in 1857, by J. (no. 11756). Gundlach. From the George N. Lawrence COMMENTS: Dickerman cited the AMNH Collection. number of the holotype in the original description and noted that he had examined COMMENTS: In the original description, Gundlach did not indicate how many spec- 31 specimens of limnatis. Only one of the paratypes is in AMNH: AMNH 788642, imens he had, only saying that plumage did adult male, collected at Lago Yuriria, on 9 not vary with age or sex. In the short article December 1963, by Dickerman. following Gundlach’s, Lawrence (1858: 275– 277) noted that Gundlach had sent him Oporornis tolmiei intermedia Phillips specimens of the birds described in the preceeding pages. Although not specifically Oporornis tolmiei intermedia Phillips, 1947: 299 mentioned, the above specimen probably (Okanagan, British Columbia). came into Lawrence’s hand at this time. Now Geothlypis tolmiei monticola (Phillips, 1947). The AMNH label on this syntype bears a See Lowery and Monroe, 1968: 48; Pitocchelli, 1995; Dickerman and Parkes, 1997: 229; Cur- note by L.L. S[hort] indicating that it might son, 2010b: 769; and Lovette et al., 2010: 764– bea holotype orsyntype offornsi, butithad 765. lain unnoticed in the AMNH collection until it was recognized by Garrido (2000: 89). The HOLOTYPE: AMNH 384003, adult male, other syntype was in Gundlach’s private collected at Okanagan, British Columbia, collection and subsequently deposited in the Canada, on 23 June 1906, by Allan Brooks. IES, Havana (RomanandGarrido,2000: 2). From the Jonathan Dwight Collection Because he thought further study was re- (no. 16985). quired, Curson (2010b: 777) did not recog- COMMENTS: Phillips cited the AMNH nizeT.f.turquinensisGarrido,2000,andthus number of the holotype in the original treated T. fornsi as monotypic. description. Because Phillips visited many collections while studying Oporornis tolmiei and did not indicate the number of speci- Cardellina rubrifrons bella Griscom mens he examined, it has been impossible to Cardellina rubrifrons bella Griscom, 1930: 2 determine paratypes. (Chichicastenango, Guatemala). LoweryandMonroe(1968:48)placedthis Now Cardellina rubrifrons (Giraud, 1841). See species in the large genus Geothlypis and Hellmayr, 1935: 456; Lowery and Monroe, considered intermedia a synonym of the 1968: 51; Curson, 2010b: 779; and Lovette nominatesubspecies,G. t.tolmiei; Pitocchelli etal., 2010:765. 2013 LECROY:AMNH TYPE SPECIMENSOFBIRDS 9 HOLOTYPE: AMNH 397111, adult male NowMyioborus miniatus pallidiventris(Chapman, (sexed as female on original label), collected 1899). See Hellmayr, 1935: 463; Zimmer, 1949: at Chichicastenango, Guatemala, on 27 Jan- 10–14; Curson, 2010b: 781; and Lovette et al., uary 1925, by A.W. Anthony (no. 1345). 2010:765. From the Johathan Dwight Collection (no. 60472). HOLOTYPE: AMNH 70341, sex?, collected atQuebradaSeca,Venezuela,on9December COMMENTS: Griscom gave the Dwight 1898, by F.W. Urich (no. 50). Collection number of the holotype in the originaldescriptionandexaminedonefemale COMMENTS: Chapman cited the AMNH number of the holotype in the original and two male specimens. The female para- description and noted that Urich had sent type is AMNH 397112 (Dwight no. 60473), five specimens. The four paratypes are: Los female, collected at Chichicastenango, on 17 Palmales,AMNH70339,70340,female,male, February 1925, by Anthony (no. 1485). The 5 December; El Guacharo, AMNH 70342, male paratype is MCZ 146669, collected at Chichicastenango, on 17 February 1925, by sex?, 14 December; Montana del Guacharo, A.W.Anthony(no.1486),DwightCollection AMNH 70343, female, 28 November, all no. 60474 (J. Trimble, personal commun.). collected by Urich in 1898. AMNH 70340 and70343 were exchangedto USNM. Myioborus miniatus sanctaemartae QuebradaSecaisnowknownasVillarroel, J.T. Zimmer 10.18N, 63.57W (Paynter, 1982) Myioborus miniatus sanctaemartae J.T. Zimmer, Myioborus miniatus subsimilis J.T. Zimmer 1949: 11(LasNubes,SantaMarta,Colombia). Now Myioborus miniatussanctaemartae J.T. Zim- Myioborus miniatus subsimilis J.T. Zimmer, 1949: mer, 1949. See Lowery and Monroe, 1968: 55; 13(Alamor,Peru´; altitude4450feet). Curson,2010b:78;andLovetteetal.,2010:765. Now Myioborus miniatus subsimilis J.T. Zimmer, 1949.SeeLoweryandMonroe,1968:55;Pe´rez- HOLOTYPE: AMNH 70525, adult sex?, Ema´n, 2005; Curson, 2010b: 781; and Lovette collected at Las Nubes, 4500 ft, ca. 11.10N, etal., 2010:765. 73.56W (Paynter, 1997), Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia, on 10 HOLOTYPE: AMNH 172201, adult male, December 1898, by Grace H. Hull. Gift of collected at Alamor, 4500 ft, 04.02S, 80.02W Morris K. Jesup. (Paynter,1993),Loja,Ecuador,on22August COMMENTS: Zimmer gave the AMNH 1921, by George K Cherrie (no. 23651) and number of the holotype in the original Geoffrey Gill. description and listed the specimens he COMMENTS: Zimmer cited the AMNH examined. The paratypes are: Las Nubes, number of the holotype in the original AMNH 70521–70524, 70526, five specimens description.Helisted 47paratypes: Ecuador, sex? (in addition to the type), November– Guachanama´, AMNH 167968, male; Punta December1898;L´ıbano,AMNH72325,sex?, Santa Ana, AMNH 167979, sex?; Zaruma, 2 May 1899; Valparaiso, AMNH 72326– AMNH 130198–130203, two males, four 72328, one male, one female, and one sex?, sex?; San Bartolo, AMNH 172208–172212, 18–23 March 1899. All but one of the para- five males; Celica, AMNH 167973–167976, types was collected by G.H. Hull. one male, three females; El Chiral, AMNH On the original label, printed with Mrs. 167969–167971, two males, one female?; H.H. Smith’s name, ‘‘Smith’’ has been Coco´, AMNH 173509–173511, one male, marked out and G.H.H. substituted. Grace two females. Ecuador (not Peru), Alamor, H. Hull was Mrs. Smith’s niece (Todd and AMNH 152507–152509, 167972, 172202– Carriker, 1922: 36), not Mr. H.H. Hull as 172207, five males, four females, one sex?; listed by Allen (1900: 122). Cebollal, AMNH 172213, male; La Puente, AMNH 172214, male. Peru, Palambla, Setophaga verticalis pallidiventris Chapman AMNH 175568–175573, one male, three Setophaga verticalis pallidiventris Chapman, 1899: females, two sex?; Seques, AMNH 236100– 153(QuebradaSeca,Venezuela). 236105, three males, two females, one sex?.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.