ebook img

Turkey 2013 combined: phase 1 + phase 2 PDF

126 Pages·2013·1.385 MB·English
by  OECD
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Turkey 2013 combined: phase 1 + phase 2

Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE for Tax Purposes OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES PEER REVIEWS, COMBINED: PHASE 1 + PHASE 2 TURKEY Peer Review Report The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by 120 jurisdictions, which participate in the Global Forum on an Combined: Phase 1 + Phase 2 equal footing. The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily refl ected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004. The TURKEY standards have also been incorporated into the UN Model Tax Convention. The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fi duciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard. All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identifi ed by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases. Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for Pe e the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of r R that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 and ev ie Phase 2 – reviews. The Global Forum has also put in place a process for supplementary w reports to follow-up on recommendations, as well as for the ongoing monitoring of Re p jurisdictions following the conclusion of a review. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions o r to effectively implement the international standards of transparency and exchange of t C o information for tax purposes. m b All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent ine d agreed Global Forum reports. P h a For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of s e Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please refer to 1 + www.oecd.org/tax/transparency and www.eoi-tax.org. P h a s e Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264192041-en. 2 T This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and UR statistical databases. KE Y Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org for more information. ISBN 978-92-64-19203-4 -:HSTCQE=V^WUXY: 23 2013 10 1 P Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Turkey 2013 COMBINED: PHASE 1 + PHASE 2 March 2013 (reflecting the legal and regulatory framework as at January 2013) This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of the governments of its membercountriesorthoseoftheGlobalForumonTransparencyandExchange ofInformationforTaxPurposes. Thisdocumentandanymapincludedhereinarewithoutprejudicetothestatus oforsovereigntyoveranyterritory,tothedelimitationofinternationalfrontiers andboundariesandtothenameofanyterritory,cityorarea. Pleasecitethispublicationas: OECD(2013),GlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTaxPurposesPeer Reviews:Turkey2013:Combined:Phase1+Phase2,OECDPublishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264192041-en ISBN978-92-64-19203-4(print) ISBN978-92-64-19204-1(PDF) Series:GlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTaxPurposesPeerReviews ISSN2219-4681(print) ISSN2219-469X(online) CorrigendatoOECDpublicationsmaybefoundonlineat:www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. ©OECD2013 Youcancopy,downloadorprintOECDcontentforyourownuse,andyoucanincludeexcerptsfromOECD publications,databasesandmultimediaproductsinyourowndocuments,presentations,blogs,websitesand teachingmaterials,providedthatsuitableacknowledgementofOECDassourceandcopyrightownerisgiven. Allrequestsforpublicorcommercialuseandtranslationrightsshouldbesubmittedtorights@oecd.org. Requestsforpermissiontophotocopyportionsofthismaterialforpublicorcommercialuseshallbeaddressed directlytotheCopyrightClearanceCenter(CCC)[email protected]çaisd’exploitationdu droitdecopie(CFC)[email protected]. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Table of Contents About the Global Forum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Information and methodology used for the peer review of Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Overview of Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Recent developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Compliance with the Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 A. Availability of Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 A.1. Ownership and identity information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 A.2 Accounting records. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 A.3. Banking information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 B. Access to Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 B.1. Competent Authority’s ability to obtain and provide information. . . . . . . . 71 B.2. Notification requirements and rights and safeguards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 C. Exchanging Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 C.1. Exchange of information mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 C.2. Exchange of information mechanisms with all relevant partners . . . . . . . . 94 C.3. Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 C.4. Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 C.5. Timeliness of responses to requests for information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 PEER REVIEW REPORT – COMBINED PHASE1 AND PHASE 2 REPORT – TURKEY © OECD 2013 4 – TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Determinations and Factors UnderlyingRecommendations. . . 107 Annex1: Jurisdiction’s Response to the Review Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 Annex2: List of All Exchange-of-Information Mechanisms Signed . . . . . . . 114 Annex3: List Of All Laws, Regulations andOtherMaterialConsulted. . . . 119 Annex4: People Interviewed During On-Site Visit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 PEER REVIEW REPORT – COMBINED PHASE1 AND PHASE 2 REPORT – TURKEY © OECD 2013 5 ABOUT THE GLOBAL FORUM – About the Global Forum The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 100 jurisdic- tions, which participate in the Global Forum on an equal footing. The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily reflected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004. The standards have also been incorporated into the UN Model Tax Convention. The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all fore- seeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard. All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is under- taken in two phases. Phase1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase1 and Phase2 – reviews. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards of transpar- ency and exchange of information for tax purposes. All review reports are published once adopted by the Global Forum. For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please refer to www.oecd.org/tax/transparency and www.eoi-tax.org. PEER REVIEW REPORT – COMBINED PHASE1 AND PHASE 2 REPORT – TURKEY © OECD 2013 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Executive Summary 1. This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information in Turkey as well as the practi- cal implementation of that framework. The international standard which is set out in the Global Forum’s Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency and Exchange of Information, is concerned with the availability of relevant information within a jurisdiction, the compe- tent authority’s ability to gain timely access to that information, and in turn, whether that information can be effectively exchanged with its exchange of information (EOI) partners. 2. Geographically, Turkey forms a natural bridge between the conti- nents of Asia, Africa and Europe. This unique geographical position gives it easy access to strategically important trade areas. Its location and economic relations with various countries is reflected in an extensive network of 82 double taxation treaties and five tax information exchange agreements, which provide for international exchange of information for tax purposes in line with the international standard. In addition, Turkey has also signed the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. 3. Turkey allows for the formation of companies, partnerships, founda- tions, associations and cooperatives. Turkey’s legal and regulatory framework ensures that information on the owners of these entities and arrangements is available to its competent authority. Sufficient mechanisms are in place that allow identification of the owners of bearer shares issued by publicly held joint stock companies whose shares are traded on the stock exchange. However, availability of information on the owners of bearer shares issued by other joint stock companies is not ensured resulting into determination of the Element A.1 as “not in place”. 4. Turkey’s tax and commercial legislation contain provisions ensuring the maintenance of accounting information to the standard by all relevant entities for at least five years. Underlying documents must also be maintained. The combination of the Banking Law and the AML/CFT legislation ensures that all records pertaining to accounts as well as to related financial and trans- actional information is required to be kept by banks operating in Turkey. PEER REVIEW REPORT – COMBINED PHASE1 AND PHASE 2 REPORT – TURKEY © OECD 2013 8 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5. The tax administration and tax inspectors are empowered to obtain information from taxpayers and third parties including banks, however, the legislative basis on which they obtain information for EOI purposes should be clarified in Turkish laws. Tax inspectors can also use compulsory powers to enforce compliance in case of non-cooperation. In practice, the competent authority generally obtains information through tax inspectors, who normally conduct tax audits to gather information. 6. Tax inspectors should give greater priority to their EOI work. They have a high workload and historically have not generally provided informa- tion to the competent authority before the completion of the tax audit which may take six to 12 months. In most cases, this process of gathering infor- mation results in delays and the issue of delayed receipt or non-receipt of information was identified as a problem in the peer input of partner countries. Since 2011, the tax inspectors are required to complete investigations for the purposes of exchange of information in six months and this reduction in time limit is likely to reduce delays in providing information. This should be monitored by Turkey. 7. Turkish tax authorities are authorised to seek information from bar- risters and solicitors about the names of their client and information relating to their fees and expenses but information that reveal facts and particulars which have been entrusted to them or which they have learnt through their duties cannot be obtained. The protection afforded to professional privilege is very broad and is not consistent with the international standard. 8. During the three year review period ending December 2011, Turkey has received 518 requests for information from 37 different jurisdictions. Turkey has provided the requested information substantially or partially in 260 cases. Information in 11% of the cases was provided within 90 days. In about 41% of the cases information was provided after one year. The compe- tent authority has recently begun to systematically provide status updates to exchange of information partners when requests are not responded to within 90 days. 9. Notwithstanding the need to strengthen various areas of Turkey’s system relating to exchange of information, Turkey’s peers indicated that Turkey is a very important and valued partner exchanging a significant amount of information in tax matters. A follow-up report on the steps under- taken by Turkey to answer the recommendations made in this report should be provided to the Peer Review Group within six months of the adoption of this report. PEER REVIEW REPORT – COMBINED PHASE1 AND PHASE 2 REPORT – TURKEY © OECD 2013

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.