TULANE LAW SCHOOL The Tulane-Siena Institute for International Law, Cultural Heritage & the Arts Siena, Italy SUMMER, 2015 BEYOND THE LAW: THE ETHICS OF COLLECTORS AND COLLECTIONS Professor Holly Flora Assistant Professor – Tulane Law School WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS The Copyright Law of 1976 (United States Code, Title 17) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction [including that made by electronic transmission of reserve material] for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. Beyond the Law: The Ethics of Collectors and Collections Instructor: Holly Flora, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Art History, Tulane University, [email protected] Course Description This course will explore the ever-changing ethical and legal issues surrounding the acquisition of art by museums and collectors. What duty does a museum have to ensure that it is not acquiring stolen property? When must property that is discovered to be stolen be returned to its rightful owner – and what if that owner cannot be found? Is it ethical for a private collector to purchase a masterpiece, and deny the public access to it? Taking advantage of resources in Siena itself, the course will look at how and why art (in particular Italian works by seminal figures in Sienese painting such as Duccio) was and is acquired by museums and collectors in Italy and abroad. As a complement to the Core Course, this course will focus on ethics and professional practices of collecting in museums today, but we will refer to the recent agreements and laws in the U.S. and abroad, many of which are available for your review on this website: http://culturalheritage.state.gov/. Course Goals and Objectives 1. Students will be able to identify the various stakeholders in historical and contemporary practices of art collecting and assess their values and interests in issues such as the acquisition, treatment, ownership, and display of works of art and antiquities. 2. Students will be able to formulate and articulate educated opinions on current controversies in art collecting through critical study and analysis of contemporary and past professional codes of ethics in the field. 3. Students should be able to assess and evaluate contemporary issues of ethics and law in the context of the modern professional practice of museums. Assessment and Grading 1. Attendance and active class participation demonstrating that you have read the material and can apply the readings is MANDATORY. Students are expected to have completed the assigned readings prior to class. 2. Final exam (100%) Course Structure and Schedule: Part 1 (June 1): Collecting Ethics and Legal Issues Today: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and the J. Paul Getty Museum and their Battles for Italian Antiquities Themes: • History of Collections of Antiquities: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Getty Villa • The Met’s “Hot Pot” and Italian Repatriation • The Getty Case of Marion True • Responses of Museums: Current Acquisitions Policies at the Getty and Met Readings: Elisabetta Polvoledo, “Ancient Vase Comes Home to a Hero’s Welcome,” The New York Times, January 19, 2008. Hugh Eakin, “Treasure Hunt,” The New Yorker, December 17, 2007. Jane Morris, “Looting or Liberation?” reviews of The Medici Conspiracy and Rescuing the Past, The Guardian, August 26, 2006. Marion True, “Neither Condemned nor Vindicated,” The Art Newspaper, January 2011. The Metropolitan Museum of Art-Republic of Italy Agreement of February 21, 2006. International Journal of Cultural Property v. 13 no. 4 (2006) p. 427-34. The J. Paul Getty Museum Policy for Acquisitions—Approved by the Board of Trustees on October 23, 2006. International Journal of Cultural Property Volume 13, Issue 4, November 2006, pp 423-425. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Policy for Acquisitions and Collections Management, updated November 2008. Randy Kennedy, “Collecting Antiquities, Cautiously, at the Getty,” The New York Times, June 26, 2007 Derek Fincham, “Transnational Forfeiture of the 'Getty' Bronze” (August 22, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2238204 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238204 Rachel Donadio, “Repatriated Works Back in Their Countries of Origin,” The New York Times, April 17, 2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/20/arts/design/repatriated-works-back-in-their-countries-of- origin.html J. Paul Getty Museum Press Release: “Getty Returns Byzantine Manuscript to Greece,” http://news.getty.edu/press-materials/press-releases/byzantine-manu-to-greece.htm Part 2 (June 3): Who Owns Culture? The Case of the Elgin Marbles Themes: • Issues of Title versus Ethics: 19th century archaeology and “looting” • Art, Nationalism, and Identity Readings: In-class short film: “Treasure Wars: Parthenon Marbles Battle” National Geographic Films, 2008. American Association of Museums, Standards Regarding Archaeological Material and Ancient Art, revised July 2008. American Association of Art Museum Directors, Standards Regarding Archaeological Material and Ancient Art, revised 2013. “The British Museum,” Chapter 9 in Sharon Waxman, Loot: The Battle Over the Stolen Treasures of the Ancient World (New York: Times Books, 2008), pp. 209-232. “A Greek Tragedy,” Chapter 10 in Sharon Waxman, Loot: The Battle Over the Stolen Treasures of the Ancient World (New York: Times Books, 2008), pp. 233-251. Michael Kimmelman, “Elgin Marble Arguments in a New Light,” The New York Times, June 24, 2009. Michael Kimmelman, “Who Draws the Borders of Culture?” The New York Times, May 5, 2010. Bernard Fricscher, “Museums Should Dig In,” The New York Times, December 22, 2010. Martin Bailey, “Turkey Renews Claim for Long Lost Head,” The Art Newspaper, May 2, 2014. http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Turkey-renews-claim-for-longlost-head/3258. Hugh Eakin, “The Great Giveback,” The New York Times, January 26, 2013. “The Conflict in Ukraine Spreads to its Museums,” The Economist, April 19, 2014 http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21601043-conflict-ukraine-spreads-its-museums-history-lessons Part 3 (June 4): Collecting Ethics Past and Present, Museums and Early Italian Renaissance Paintings Themes and case studies: • Codes of Ethics for Museums, Dealers, and Collectors • Duccio’s Maestà: its history, removal and dispersal • American and British collecting of early Italian paintings in the 18th and 19th centuries: ethical issues of the past and how they have changed today • Acquisition of Duccio’s “Stroganoff” or “Stoclet” Madonna by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005 • Acquisition of Cimabue’s Virgin and Child Enthroned by the National Gallery of Art, London (2000) Readings: Peter Marks, "The Ethics of Art Dealing," International Journal of Cultural Property 7 (1998), pp. 116–127. American Association of Museums, Code of Ethics for Museums (2000). ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums—As approved by the 21st General Assembly of ICOM in Seoul, Republic of Korea, 8 October 2004, International Journal of Cultural Property, Volume 13, Issue 04, November 2006, pp 393-408 Shelby White, "A Collector’s Odyssey," International Journal of Cultural Property 7 (1998): 170–176. James Ede, "Ethics, the Antiquities Trade, and Archaeology," International Journal of Cultural Property 7 (1998): 128-131. Carl Strehlke, “Carpentry and Connoisseurship: The Disassembly of Altarpieces and the Rise in Interest in Early Italian Art,” in Rediscovering Fra Angelico: A Fragmentary History, ed. Clay Dean (Yale University Art Gallery, 2001), pp. 41-58. Calvin Tomkins, “The Missing Madonna: The Story of the Met’s Most Expensive Acquisition,” The New Yorker, July 11, 2005. Nicholas Fox Weber, “Found in a Country House: A `Curator’s Dream,” The New York Times, March 4, 2001. Dillian Gordon, “The Virgin and Child by Cimabue at the National Gallery,” Apollo 157 (2003), pp. 32-36. Tom Mashberg, “No Quick Answers in Fights Over Art,” The New York Times, July 1, 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/02/arts/design/museums-property-claims-are-not-simply-about- evidence.html?src=rec&recp=10&mabReward=RI:2 Final Exam: You will be asked to write essays in response to hypothetical situations addressing ethical and legal issues faced by museums. Open book. List of Useful Websites http://www.archaeological.org Official site of the Archaeological Institute of America (AIA), the professional organization of classical archaeologists. http://www.saa.org/ Official site of the Society for American Archaeology, the professional organization of archaeologists who study the material record of the American past. http://www.sha.org/ Official site of the Society for Historical Archaeology, the professional organization of archaeologists who work on cultures dating after ca. 1400 CE. http://www.rpanet.org Site of the Register of Professional Archaeologists, which is “focused solely on the promotion and maintenance of professional standards in archaeology.” http://www.aamd.org/ Official site of the Association of Art Museum Directors, an organization formed by large-scale art museums in North America. http://www.savingantiquities.org/ Official site of Saving Antiquities for Everyone (SAFE), a non-profit organization founded in the wake of the National Museum of Iraq looting of 2003. http://www.international.icomos.org/home.htm Official site of the International Council on Museums and Sites, an NGO concerned with preserving sites of cultural heritage. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/ The World Heritage List, created by UNESCO to denote sites of particular cultural or natural significance. http://whc.unesco.org/en/158/ The World Heritage in Danger list is designed to draw attention to World Heritage sites that are in danger of being destroyed. http://exchanges.state.gov/culprop/committee.html Site of the President’s Cultural Property Advisory Committee The New York Times January 19, 2008 Ancient Vase Comes Home to a Hero’s Welcome By ELISABETTA POVOLEDO ROME — As the restless crowd applauded, and flashbulbs popped, the Euphronios krater, at the heart of a three-decade tug of war between the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and the Italian government, received a hero’s welcome here on Friday. When the krater, a 2,500-year-old vase, first appeared at the Met in 1972, seemingly out of nowhere, it was hailed as the acquisition of a lifetime. But the Italian government, suspecting that it had been plundered from Italian soil, soon began pressing the museum for information on its provenance. This week the krater was finally packed up and shipped to Rome, one of 21 treasures turned over by the Met under the terms of a pathbreaking 2006 accord. As workers whipped a white sheet off the bowl in a ceremony at the state attorney’s office, Italy’s culture minister, Francesco Rutelli, began reciting a passage from Homer’s “Iliad” illustrated on the vase’s main panel. The Lycian champion Sarpedon perishes from the wounds he has received in the Trojan war; the twin winged gods Hypnos (Sleep) and Thanatos (Death) bear him home. The event was held at the attorney’s office to underscore the persistence of the Italian lawyers who have lobbied for the return of antiquities from American museums, dealers and private collectors over the last three years. “In these gloomy days, it gives me great pleasure to celebrate something positive,” said Italy’s attorney general, Oscar Fiumara. (The Italian news media has been feasting on grim news this week: the justice minister resigned; protests prompted the pope to cancel an appearance at Rome’s main university; and Naples is submerged in trash.) In the last two years Italy has also struck deals with museums in Los Angeles, Boston and Princeton, N.J., and with the private collector Shelby White, a New York philanthropist who this week transferred title to 10 antiquities. Negotiations are under way with other institutions in the United States, Europe and the Far East, Mr. Rutelli said on Friday. But in the minds of Italians, the Euphronios krater holds a special place, symbolizing the war against clandestine tomb-robbing and illicit trafficking of the nation’s cultural patrimony. So the general mood was victorious. “The Italian state has won,” said Rocco Buttiglione, the former culture minister who initiated the talks with the Met just over two years ago and took part in the ceremony. “This is a success story.” The vessel is to go on view on Saturday at the Quirinale, or presidential palace, where 68 other artifacts recovered from museums through similar accords are grouped in an exhibition titled “Nostoi: Recovered Masterpieces.” (Nostoi is ancient Greek for homecoming.) 1 Fewer than 30 vases by Euphronios, one of the greatest artists of ancient Greece, are known to have survived. The krater returned by the Met dates from around 515 B.C. and is considered one of his finest achievements. Italian archaeologists have traced most of the existing Euphronios vases to Cerveteri, known as Caere in Etruscan times, an area of steep slopes and raised tomb chambers. Caere was also “a privileged market for red-figure production, and Euphronios in particular,” said Maria Antonietta Rizzo, an archaeologist whose research on Euphronios persuaded the J. Paul Getty Museum in Los Angeles to return a rare kylix, or drinking cup, by that artist in 1999. That piece is signed by Euphronios as the potter, and by his protégé Onesimos as the painter. Italian court records based on a state investigation say the Met krater was dug up in the Greppe Sant’Angelo area, near Cerveteri, in December 1971 by a gang of tomb robbers. After that, the records say, it passed through the hands of a convicted Italian antiquities dealer and then was sold to the Met by the American dealer Robert Hecht, who is on trial in Rome on charges of conspiring to traffic in looted antiquities. He denies the charges. If a memoir seized by law enforcement officials during a 2001 raid on Mr. Hecht’s Paris apartment is to be believed, the krater arrived in style in New York in 1972, in its own first-class seat on a TWA flight from Zurich. (Mr. Hecht now discounts that memoir as fiction.) It returned to Italy on Thursday in somewhat more modest circumstances: a blue box in the cargo hold labeled “Handle With Care.” A few hours after Friday’s ceremony, the krater was transported to the state television network, RAI, and paraded on an evening broadcast, with the culture minister and a news anchor sitting proudly nearby. “Euphronios could never have imagined that one day he’d find himself featured” on the 8 o’clock news, Mr. Rutelli said on live television. “We are proud to be at the forefront of the battle to fight looted antiquities.” 2 TREASURE HUNT. By: Eakin, Hugh, New Yorker, 0028792X, 12/17/2007, Vol. 83, Issue 40 A REPORTER AT LARGE One afternoon in April, 1998, Marion True, the curator of antiquities at the J. Paul Getty Museum, in Los Angeles, took a flight from Athens to Rome. When she got off the plane, a carabinieri officer was waiting for her. "He actually picked me up before passport control, just to show how important I was," she recalls. The officer drove her to the Raphael Hotel, near Piazza Navona; in her room, she found a giant bouquet from General Roberto Conforti, then the head of the carabinieri's cultural-heritage-protection force. Conforti had invited her to address an international police conference that he was hosting, on the circulation of stolen art. "This was his courting phase," True told me. Now retired, General Conforti - often called simply Il Generale - is renowned in the international circle of beat cops, private detectives, insurance executives, customs agents, and state prosecutors involved in the recovery of stolen art. In the nineteen-nineties, he built up his squad into the largest of its kind in the world; he also set out to combat what he considered the most intractable problem in art crime. "It wasn't Picassos, and it wasn't Caravaggios," Conforti, who wears a mustache and speaks in a gravelly basso profundo, said when I met him in Rome, this fall. "It was antiquities." Freshly looted artifacts have no documented history, he pointed out, and criminal organizations were putting them on the international market with impunity; quality pieces could sell for seven or even eight figures. In 1995, True had persuaded the Getty to adopt ethical standards requiring objects proposed for acquisition to have been documented and written about by scholars, and Conforti hoped to enlist her in his efforts to retrieve improperly obtained Italian antiquities from the Getty and other American museums. "We thought the Getty was ready to work with us," Conforti said. At the time, True was a frequent participant in Italian archeology conferences, where she talked about the "brutally direct evidence" of looting and about her efforts to change the Getty's image as the "most aggressively acquiring institution in the world." (The endowment of the J. Paul Getty Trust is $6.4 billion.) Paola Pelagatti, who is one of Italy's leading classical archeologists, says of True, "She made a big impression. She was extremely conscientious - direct in that strong American way." True, who is fair and has striking blue eyes, was also known for her elegant New England manners and her classic wardrobe. "She was very Waspish, very Bostonian," Mario Bondioli-Osio, an Italian diplomat who in the nineties ran a government commission on art recovery, says. "She kind of fit the Italian ideal of elegance, of the well-turned-out lady," says John Papadopoulos, a professor of archeology at U.C.L.A. and a former associate curator at the Getty, who travelled with her to Italy on several occasions. At Conforti's conference, True addressed a group that included representatives of Scotland Yard, Interpol, the U.S. Customs Service, and the Gendarmerie Nationale. "Among the things I talked about was a big cult statue, the Aphrodite," True says. Depicting a Greek goddess clad in billowing drapery, the statue was seven and a half feet tall and had been, as True said in her presentation, "one of the museum's most controversial acquisitions" when it was bought by the Getty from a London dealer, in 1988, for eighteen million dollars. A rare surviving example of late-fifth-century- B.C. sculpture, it had been created in an unusual manner: the covered body was limestone; the exposed head, arms, and feet were white marble. Its provenance was unknown, but reports had 3 circulated in the American and the Italian press that it had been excavated recently at Morgantina, a frequently looted site in central Sicily. "Despite the best efforts of the press, no evidence has come forward to this day to substantiate its suggested provenance of Morgantina," True said at the conference. "However, the statue does represent an important document in the history of monumental sculpture." She continued, "It is most certainly a product of a workshop in the western Greek colonies. For this reason, the museum has agreed to work with Italian colleagues on a complete technical study of the statue." In an effort to determine the Aphrodite's origin, True had sent limestone samples to geologists in Palermo. (The samples matched limestone found in Sicily, but the geologists could not identify a specific site.) In her presentation, True also mentioned several objects that the Getty had voluntarily repatriated after the museum determined that they had been stolen or illegally exported. Her lecture was applauded. "She spoke well," Conforti recalls. Today, True, who is fifty-nine, is best known as the target of a sprawling carabinieri investigation of American museums and the illegal antiquities market. In April, 2005, she was indicted in Rome, charged with conspiracy to traffic in tens of millions of dollars' worth of looted Greek vases, Etruscan bronzes, terracottas, and other objects. True allegedly obtained these artifacts through an international network run by the American antiquities dealer Robert E. Hecht, Jr., who is a co- defendant in her case, and by an Italian dealer named Giacomo Medici, who was convicted of trafficking in 2004, and who was described in his sentencing documents as perpetrating "one of the greatest thefts against the Italian state ever recorded." According to the prosecution, the conspiracy involved top dealers and private collectors in London and New York, along with art restorers in Zurich, middlemen in Geneva, and tomb robbers and smugglers in Italy. True denies any wrongdoing. "Marion True had a double nature," Paolo Giorgio Ferri, the state prosecutor in the Italian case, says. "Not Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, but very similar." Weeks before the trial began, in the fall of 2005, True lost her job at the Getty, after she disclosed that she had taken a loan from Lawrence Fleischman, a well-known antiquities collector based in New York, to help pay for a vacation home on the Greek island of Paros; she obtained the loan just days after Fleischman's collection, which he had amassed with his wife, Barbara, was acquired by the museum, in a deal worth sixty million dollars. In March and April, 2006, Greek police conducted a series of raids on the Paros house, and confiscated ancient stone objects and architectural fragments that they found on the premises. True was subsequently indicted in Athens on charges of trafficking three Greek antiquities owned by the Getty, including a fourth-century-B.C. gold wreath; the Getty has returned all three to Greece. At the center of these investigations is the Aphrodite, which, like True, has been transformed from pristine goddess to corrupting siren - a symbol of the cupidity and lawlessness of American museums in the face of exquisite loot. Italian officials have presented the story of the cult statue - its passage from Switzerland to London and then Los Angeles, the exorbitant price the Getty paid for it, and the persistent rumors that it was looted from Morgantina - as typical of the Getty's corrupt practices during True's tenure. And although the Getty's administration recently entered a détente with the Italian government, the criminal trial of True and Hecht continues, and True could face a maximum prison term of twenty years if the conspiracy charges are upheld. (Hecht, who also maintains his innocence, is eighty-eight, and cannot be sentenced to jail, under Italian law, because of his age.) 4
Description: